Search

On November 6, the first law implementing the DSA will come into effect, allowing complaints against online platforms such as Meta, TikTok, Google, and Allegro, which will introduce new opportunities for Polish users to enforce their rights. #DSA #prawo #usługicyfrowe (translated)

From November 6, 2026, a law implementing the DSA will come into force in Poland, allowing users to file complaints against platforms such as Meta, TikTok, Google, or Allegro, but it does not ensure automatic unblocking of accounts or restoration of content. #DSA #UsługiCyfrowe #Skargi (translated)

Jan Molski pointed out that Gawkowski's announcement may have been overlooked among current events. As he wrote, Gawkowski stated that if the president does not sign the DSA, he will be responsible for future tragedies, and the government has a plan B that allows circumventing the lack of a signature. https://t.co/kSDAXN12z0 #Polska #Polityka #DSA (translated)

The author questioned whether the Chancellery of the President was conducting foreign policy in the interest of Poland or focusing on building the image of Karol Nawrocki and his relations with Donald Trump. Referring to the American military base in Poland, he wrote that its construction alone does not guarantee security. He cited events in the Middle East over the past six months, during which — he claimed — American installations were among the first targets of attacks, and some of them were damaged or destroyed. He emphasized that he did not question the significance of the presence of U.S. troops in Poland, but demanded specific information regarding guarantees concerning troop numbers, armament, missile defense, and the durability of this presence. He added that talks have been ongoing since 2018 and that up to now, mainly meetings, invitations, and declarations have been heard. The author also asked what Poland would do in the event of diverging interests with Washington and criticized the reliance of a nearly 38-million-strong country's security on personal relations with the President of the United States. In response to the accusation of many months of passivity by the Ministry of National Defense (MON), he recalled that the EDCA agreement was signed in 2020 and that the development of American military infrastructure and command presence in Poland had been ongoing for years. He demanded the specification of concrete neglects by the ministry and questioned attributing merits for long-term defense cooperation to Nawrocki. He also wrote that, in his opinion, Nawrocki's political activity amounted to promoting boxing. Referring to discussions about ambassadors, the author opposed the claim that Prime Minister Donald Tusk should conduct them instead of Minister Radosław Sikorski. He cited Article 146 of the Constitution, which — as he pointed out — entrusts the conduct of foreign policy to the Council of Ministers, and Article 133, paragraph 3, which obliges the president to cooperate with the prime minister and the relevant minister. He also criticized the presentation of DSA regulations as a censorship tool. He demanded the indication of a provision that would prohibit citizens from expressing opinions and wrote that the dispute over the proportionality of mechanisms for removing illegal content does not justify such a description of the regulations. Finally, he accused Przydacz of using the concept of sovereignty for political purposes in statements about its transfer to Brussels. #polityka #bezpieczeństwo #suwerenność (translated)

The author of the entry criticized Bogucki's statement, who — as he wrote — demanded the urgent adoption of regulations implementing the DSA and announced that Nawrocki would sign them on the first day, despite having previously vetoed such a law. The author demanded specific solutions to be indicated and an explanation of how they would differ from those questioned by the president. He assessed that shortening the vacatio legis would not resolve the fundamental dispute over the content of the regulations and the permissible mechanisms for interfering with civil rights. He also accused Bogucki of exploiting the safety of children in criticizing the government, while remaining silent about the president's responsibility for the veto. He called on him to present specific legal proposals instead of lecturing the prime minister about responsibility for the state. #Polityka #PrawaObywatelskie #DSA (translated)

Max Hübner wrote that Włodzimierz Gawkowski undermined Donald Tusk's narrative regarding Karol Nawrocki and the DSA law by informing about the immediate blocking of accounts glorifying the criminal. Hübner accused the politicians of claiming for several days that they could not respond immediately because of the president. https://t.co/1YYwdrSYcf #polityka #fakeNews #DSA (translated)

Markus Frohnmaier wrote that the foreign trips of his faction served to maintain German jobs, secure exports, and create prosperity. He explained that 30 percent of the cars in Baden-Württemberg went to the USA. That is why he represents Germany's interests there as well. #AfD https://t.co/DSaHr5Dlt7 #Wirtschaft #Export #Deutschland (translated)

Jan Molski wrote that according to the MP from Poznań, fascism means "verbal attack." He insultingly assessed the MP and stated that even President Jaśkowiak could not tolerate her. He also claimed that the actions related to the DSA were intended to silence the opposition on the internet and called for resistance. https://t.co/NnrP2Hse1J #wolnośćsłowa #opozycja #DSA (translated)

Filip Zator wrote that the KO MP Kierzek-Koperska described a verbal attack on another person as fascism. He added that, in his opinion, the authorities want to combat this understood fascism through the DSA law, which — he claimed — the MP herself admitted. He called on the president to veto the law and warned that otherwise reality would resemble "Orwell IRL." #faszyzm #wolnośćsłowa #DSA (translated)

The Connoisseur of the Soviet Union wrote that people confused concepts, and the law was intended solely to quickly block content that was violent, pornographic, and illegal. According to him, it aimed to limit the arbitrariness of social media and implement the EU's DSA regulation. The author described it as very good and useful. #prawo #media #DSA (translated)

Marcel Crok suspected that Tijs was referring to him with the term 'climate deniers' because he claimed to be about the only dissenting voice during an external expert day in March 2025. He called the term derogatory and pointed out that CDA leader Henri Bontenbal had also used it regularly, according to him. Crok invited Tijs to a lecture by Clintel given by Roger Pielke Jr. the following Sunday in Driebergen. He referred to an article by Pielke about a campaign against climate scientists with dissenting views. According to Crok, Australian activists, including a cartoonist, with the support of influential American climate scientists, created blacklists. Among those listed were Pielke, his father, and Judith Curry, according to him. Crok wrote that their academic careers were thereby hindered and called the issue concerning for Members of Parliament. Regarding his own participation in the Citizen's Assembly, Crok stated that the selection of citizens went well and that his discussions with KNMI director Maarten van Aalst were respectful. However, in hindsight, he claimed that the organization published an incorrect fact-check. He said he should have filed a forty-page complaint before he received any response. Crok argued that the debate about climate, just like the debate about corona which Tijs had previously struggled with as a journalist, was, in his view, being stifled. He spoke of a suffocating atmosphere in the academic world and wrote that no journalist had signed up to attend Pielke's lecture. #klimaat #wetenschap #discussie (translated)

Adam Czarnecki recommended the entry of Niebezpiecznik criticizing the draft act implementing the DSA, which — as he wrote — is bad. According to Czarnecki, the draft stipulated that the President of the Office of Electronic Communications could issue orders to remove or block content. Until now, it was an independent civil court that decided whether a statement violated the law or someone's rights, in proceedings where both parties could defend themselves. Czarnecki claimed that according to the draft, an official could independently assess the legality of content, the proceedings would primarily rely on evidence provided by the complainant, the author of the entry would not have the guarantee of being heard before the block, and the order would be subject to immediate execution. He assessed that an appeal to the administrative court would not solve the problem, as the court would only verify the formal correctness of the office's actions, and the content could disappear from the internet for many months before the case is considered. According to Czarnecki, the draft also included the protection of personal rights. He warned that a councilor, mayor, minister, or company that deemed a critical article or comment offensive could use a fast track to file a request to the office instead of seeking redress in court. He also pointed out that this procedure did not cover the leaks of personal data of ordinary citizens. Czarnecki accused Donald Tusk of exploiting the current attacks in schools to introduce regulations. He referred to Krzysztof Bosak's term, who called it "disgusting exploitation of tragedy." He appealed for improvements to the law instead of its quick enactment. He added that the ABW can already block content of a terrorist nature under EU regulation 2021/784 and a law signed by President Andrzej Duda in 2024. #DSA #Ustawa #WolnośćSłowa (translated)

Łukasz Warzecha pointed out the vote on the part implementing the DSA, which — as he wrote — allowed for easy censorship in administrative procedures. He mentioned that the PiS abstained from voting, and called on the party to leave the political scene. https://t.co/y1w03OYyKh #Polityka #DSA #Cenzura (translated)

The services in action wrote that in the political dispute surrounding the tragedy, the issue of the EU regulation DSA was overlooked. According to the entry, the regulations were in effect from February 17, 2024, and allowed state judicial and administrative authorities to order providers to block content on the internet. The authors appealed to politicians to stop blaming each other and start working for the safety of children. #DSA #BezpieczeństwoDzieci #Polityka (translated)

The author asked whether emotions were to lead again to "enslavement" in the name of security. He indicated that the wide implementation of the DSA could, in his opinion, mean the end of freedom and the transfer of unprecedented censorship tools to the government and the European Commission. He provided an analysis of the DSA and a report on other EU actions. #wolność #DSA #cenzura #EU (translated)