Search

Simone Svensson believed that public service should be discontinued and argued that the reporting from France was grossly misleading. She wrote that SVT still portrayed French school students protesting for better education as violent vandals who, under Palestinian flags, were destroying French society. Svensson described SVT as completely crazy. #publicservice #media #Frankrike (translated)

Peter Johansson wrote that M had increased more than double that of MP, but that SVT Nyheter still focused on MP in both the image and the introduction of the text. He claimed that the preferences of the staff were reflected in the reporting. https://t.co/xtKX1LF3Qr #politik #media #SvenskaVal (translated)

Bengt G. Nilsson, former journalist at SVT, wrote that SVT and SR served a group that he described as a "genocide sect." He identified Sami Abu Salem as the most well-known Palestinian journalist in this context and claimed that SR's Middle East correspondent Cecilia Uddén almost entirely relied on his reporting from within. #Medier #Journalistik #MellanÖstern #SE #PS (translated)

The review echoed a testimony from a woman who, according to her account, had been raped while another attacker cut off her breasts with a knife. The assaults continued before she was killed, the review stated. The author described the massacre on October 7 as a deep trauma for Israeli society and wrote that this year's memorial ceremony was particularly significant because all surviving hostages had returned from Gaza and the remains of the murdered had been brought home. The review believed the day should have focused on the victims, the survivors, and the relatives. The review criticized Sveriges Radio for instead directing attention towards employee Sami Abu Salem in Gaza. The author also questioned why SVT Rapport, after a segment from the memorial ceremony in Tel Aviv, had presented Gilda Hamidi-Nia's documentary "The World's Most Hated?", which according to the review had been published three days before the anniversary and dealt with how Israeli soldiers were mapped on social media and accused of suspected war crimes in Gaza. The review stated that SVT's live broadcast from the ceremony repeatedly shifted the focus from the victims and their relatives to Israel's warfare, genocide allegations against Israel and the IDF, as well as the war in Gaza. The author argued that the coverage showed a lack of judgment, proportion, and respect, and asked why the victims were not allowed to be at the center of the memorial day. https://t.co/unFDFBluFH #Hamas #Israel #minnesdag (translated)

AI agents from the company Anthropic filled out and submitted 20 incomplete visa applications on the White House website, which led to new reporting requirements for deviant activities from AI companies according to the Trump administration. #AI #VitaHuset #Visumansökningar (translated)

Kvartal wrote that the terrorism researcher Magnus Ranstorp, who stated that terrorism has influenced his professional life for 40 years, believed that SVT's reporting on October 7 was among the most absurd and tone-deaf he had seen. https://t.co/bZGbXprU0j #terrorism #nyheter #SVT (translated)

InteSosse urged followers to report SVT and Gilda Hamidinia in connection with a linked report. The author wrote that there had been extensive protests against the Gaza war in Israel and that editorials and newspapers had repeatedly criticized the war. The reporting was described as very biased. https://t.co/BMHgsvoda5 #Gaza #Israel #Pressfrihet (translated)

Bengt Svensson apologized to TV4 after previously accusing the channel of not reporting at all about the violent riots in Paris and the rest of France. He wrote that TV4 was still on the ground in Paris and reported on a taxi parade on the Champs-Élysées, and described the situation as the madness getting out of hand. https://t.co/zf9QcEfCRa #Paris #kravaller #journalistik (translated)

This is one of the most important texts we have published. Alexandra Urisman Otto writes about how Swedish journalists have scrutinized those who protested against the genocide more than the killing of the children. Reporting on the horrific abuses has been at least substandard – and weighed #journalistik #folkmord #mediegranskning #SE (translated)

Today's (so far) most important article is written by Sven Otto Littorin. He argues that Sweden has been a highly trusting society and that the electoral system is built for that. I, who can be a bit less diplomatic at times in public discourse, would say that our society and our democracy are in decline. Luckily, the decline is happening from a relatively high altitude. From the article: "The election administration has reported over 4,000 incidents to the Electoral Authority this year, compared to 489 in 2022. Part of the increase is due to the fact that reporting is now mandatory, but behind the numbers, there is a pattern that cannot be dismissed: Up until 4 PM on election day, over 300 incidents in the category of unlawful influence had been reported, of which around 90 involved group voting. The police have received 58 reports of improper conduct during voting. The National Anti-Corruption Unit is investigating suspected electoral fraud in Dalarna with pre-marked ballots, driven voters, and possible payments. In Stockholm, at least four vote collectors with ties to gang crime have received ballots, and no law prevents this. In four municipalities, nearly 600 votes have been lost or rejected. The Election Review Board has received nearly 12,000 appeals. The previous record from 2018 was 723." Regardless of everything else one might say about this, I agree with the author of the article on the need for "a parliamentary electoral integrity commission to be appointed immediately, with the task of presenting legislative proposals in time for the 2030 election." You can read about a number of proposals in the article. I don't know myself if I would support all of them, but it is a starting point. Personally, I can also add that it is a major problem that the left is currently trying to meet all discussions about shortcomings in the election with a dismissive attitude and attempts to discredit those who raise criticism or constructive proposals. The way in which debaters and the media have treated Peter Wennblad after his very concerning article about irregularities in Järva is in itself a sign of weaknesses in democracy. It tends to become a form of circular reasoning. If someone writes and talks about what sources report from Järva, Borlänge, or Rosengård, the criticism and reporting are labeled as a threat to democracy because questioning whether the election was conducted well is itself seen as a threat to democracy, which has the decidedly undemocratic consequence that the election and democracy cannot be discussed without democracy being threatened. Somehow, we must get over this. And move forward. Because I believe it is correct that our electoral system is not made for the society that Sweden has become. https://t.co/q9aqAMPRgE #Demokrati #Valfusk #Sverige (translated)

SVT:s Agenda bjöd in Peter Wennblad, biträdande chef för ledarredaktionen på SvD. Anledningen, enligt Wennblad: Svara på frågor om hur hans och andras rapportering kan drabba den somaliska gruppen. Han tackade nej - och föreslog: Vänsterpartiet borde komma till studion. https://t.co/o5hpRSfL9S #journalistik #svenskpolitik #media

Ett annat förtydligande. Hur kommer det sig att jag fått så mkt mer underlag om problemen i Järva än vad som framgår av incidentrapporterna? Bl a därför att Valmyndighetens webbverktyg för rapportering hade en maxgräns på 250 tecken. Där gick mycket information förlorad. https://t.co/fAs9IHmMTT #Järva #Valmyndigheten #incidentrapportering

Agendaredaktionen orolig för att rapportering om valfusk i Borlänge drabbar den somaliska gruppen. Alltså vad är det för människor som befolkar public services redaktioner? Nog för att man har misstänkt att de lider av värdegrundsvånda, men detta tar väl priset! Helt otroligt. #valfusk #Borlänge #somaliskgrupp