Search

Piia Metsähonkala referred to the SDP's strict immigration policy and said that Nasima Razmyar had stated in her Instagram post on the same day that tightening family reunification and abandoning teaching children their mother tongue were forms of racism. #sdp https://t.co/thSHZGAVlg #maahanmuutto #rasismi #politiikka (translated)

Jesse Rauhamo claimed that Nasima had accumulated her wealth through funds related to reception centers and had started to appeal to racism once the funding had run out. He also wrote that Nasima had received everything from Finns and the Finnish state, and accused her of ingratitude. https://t.co/l7zwmwGt4E #rasismi #Suomi #kiittämättömyys (translated)

Pasi Majuri wrote that, in his opinion, the politician appealed to racism to gain publicity from the media he portrays as leftist when he had no other means. He used derogatory leftist-related terms regarding the politician and the media. https://t.co/Qpu2h8luxJ #rasismi #politiikka #media (translated)

According to the author, the National Coalition Party did not accept racism or the unequal treatment of people based on their background. He said that Finland should be an equal country where people are assessed based on their own actions. #rasismi #yhdenvertaisuus #Suomi #FI (translated)

Alpo Rusi wrote that former Prime Minister Lipponen, in an interview published by Ilta-Sanomat on October 16, 2026, was most concerned about racism, but still not about Russia, even though Rusi stated that Finland's security was also at risk. https://t.co/v2YNqC4Jh2 #rasismi #Suomi #turvallisuus (translated)

Petra Nyqvist wondered whether the previously expressed division by the Finns Party that led to the party's split into the "nasty" and "blue" factions had also spread to the National Coalition Party. According to her, there seemed to be an attempt to oust cultured bourgeois values from the party. Nyqvist questioned what the point would be in having two right-wing parties that are both "nasty," which would share core ideas of opposing immigration and attitudes towards racism. She doubted whether there would be enough anti-foreigner voters for two large parties, which she described as being empty in content. #politiikka #maahanmuutto #rasismi (translated)

The author believed that reporting on the large proportion of foreign students in Finnish vocational schools was not racism. He considered the situation a sign of the incorrect and harmful immigration policy that had been practiced for years. #maahanmuutto #opiskelu #Suomi #FI (translated)

The Listener podcast wrote that talking about racism had lost its meaning in their opinion because too many things were called racism. They argued that preventing queue jumping or the lack of free bus rides were not racism, and blamed the left and the liberal elite for the inflation of the concept of the discussion. According to the author, racism no longer meant anything in 2026. #rasismi #yhteiskunta #politiikka (translated)

Miia Autero wondered whether it was racist to question the student distribution in vocational schools and the absence of Jeret and Janina from the group. She wrote that not everything could be considered racist and stated that nearly all of the names were of foreign origin. Autero asked whether there would still be any Huttus in vocational schools in 20 years. #rasismi #Suomi #monimuotoisuus (translated)

Elina Hiltunen wrote that the Finns Party should justify its immigration concerns more clearly and calmly, and rely on facts. According to her, many Finns perceived the party's anti-immigration stance as racism, even though, in her opinion, the party should communicate that it defends the whole of Finland instead of immigrants. Hiltunen argued that a free and equal Finnish society would cease to exist if immigration, particularly from Muslim countries, continued as it is. Hiltunen estimated that the party's swearing, provocation, and the communication style she described as “rude” might drive away educated supporters. She also urged so-called “hidden supporters,” especially members of the National Coalition Party, to either join the Finns Party or strive to change their own party's line. According to Hiltunen, the party should not only seek support from those who already agree with them but also help Finns understand the basis of their politics. #maahanmuutto #keskustelu #Suomi (translated)

Mika Treuthardt wrote that he would continue the discussion because he was blocked. He criticized a person who, according to him, after years of warnings, was horrified that the discussion had gone too far. Treuthardt asked if it had not been warned before that avoiding issues would increase racism and distrust. He also criticized the portrayal of the situation's resolver as a heroic journalist and how the journalists praised each other. Treuthardt called the actions stigmatizing, hypocritical, and hindsight. #rasismi #journalismi #yhteiskunta (translated)

Mika Treuthardt pondered whether instead of so-called extremist groups, it could be ordinary people who were frustrated by being treated as second-class citizens accused of racism in their own country, while, according to him, even the most serious crimes of others were aggressively silenced. He blamed traditional media for the situation, describing it as pathetic, biased, and negligent in its duties. #rasismi #media #kansalaisuus (translated)

Kristina Kivinen wrote that the president of Somalia had welcomed Somalis to Somalia. She estimated that dual citizens would integrate there better than in Finland and justified this with religion, Sharia law, and language. According to Kivinen, there would be no racism, True Finns, snow, winter, or dogs in Somalia, but Kela benefits would be lacking. #Somalia #Kansalaisuus #Integraatio (translated)

Joakim Vigelius criticized Helsingin Sanomat for having, in his opinion, turned a year-old incident into a government racism scandal and hinted that the Finns Party was responsible for the reactions on social media. Vigelius believed that the criticism directed at the villa accommodations for asylum seekers was warranted and appropriate and was not related to racism. https://t.co/elG6wTZBtj #keskustelu #politiikka #rasismi (translated)

Keijo Kaarisade wrote that sharia law divided opinions in Finland and that, in his view, civilized bourgeois should not quarrel about it with each other, especially before elections. He raised racism, human rights, and achieving carbon neutrality by 2035 as greater challenges. https://t.co/CQnA7E8cZe #Suomi #Ihmisoikeudet #Rasismi (translated)

Mika Merano wrote that he had observed that some people who consider themselves conscious held the view that opposing Islam was racism. He questioned this interpretation and wondered why a Finn who converted to Islam but still viewed it and its teachings as harmful to Western modern democracies would, in his view, be considered a racist towards another Finn. Merano stated that he did not understand the logic of this reasoning. #rasismi #islam #demokratia (translated)

The author believed that this was not about individual silliness, but a long list indicated to him that racism had been toyed with throughout the entire term. He said that nothing real had been done about the issue. https://t.co/b2ouwo85hW #rasismi #oikeudet #politiikka #FI (translated)

Yaron Nadbornik criticized Heikki Hiilamo's column published in Yleisradio, stating that it presented a one-sided image connecting the actions of Israel's leadership, Finnish Christian groups, and Minister Antti Häkkänen's visit to the structures of oppression. Nadbornik argued that the column's treatment of Israel and Zionism made Jews collectively responsible and expanded the criticism to also include Israel's supporters and Jews in general. According to Nadbornik, Hiilamo's text divided the parties into white and Christian oppressors and non-white and Muslim victims. He said this framing overlooked the Jewish roots, history, and vulnerability in the Middle East, as well as the fact that millions of people from various backgrounds lived in Israel. He also believed that the framework wrongly fit the conflict into a narrative of Western colonialism and racism and presented Israel as a refuge for a people without another homeland. Nadbornik wrote that the prejudices against Jews were based on their otherness. He noted that studies had shown that Jews living in the diaspora were unjustly held accountable for the actions of the state of Israel. He argued that Hiilamo's rhetoric, which connected Christian groups and ministerial visits with the suffering in Gaza, reinforced this framework. Nadbornik recalled the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023, describing it as a massacre involving rapes, mutilations, and the abduction of civilians, including babies, festival-goers, and the elderly, into Israel. He called it the largest single act of violence against Jews since the Holocaust. According to Nadbornik, Hiilamo overlooked the fact that Hamas and Hezbollah openly sought the destruction of Israel in connection with Israel's military actions. He believed that framing the terror attack merely as a security threat or comparing it to Russia's invasion of Ukraine ignored the rights of Israeli citizens to exist and be protected. https://t.co/PFvBFdaoiQ #Israel #Juutalaiset #Rasismi (translated)