Search

Today, Viktor Orbán laughed while commenting on the armed rebellion and the forceful change of constitutional order. In a post published online, Prime Minister Péter Magyar accused Orbán of trivializing the issue of state security and directly cited provisions of Hungarian criminal law. #Orbán #Magyar #Węgry (translated)

Waldemar criticized the statements about the constitutional crisis and the possibility of the state being taken over by Czarzasty. He argued that the constitution provides that in case the president is unable to act, his duties are performed by the Marshal of the Sejm, and reminded that Nawrocki had previously expressed a similar position. According to Waldemar, Berek and the others took an oath because the president refused, and the Venice Commission allowed for other solutions when the president blocks actions. The author pointed out that the opponents of this decision used offensive terms and referred to the "strength of the nation." Przydacz, as Waldemar reported, raised the alarm that the Constitutional Tribunal might soon declare Nawrocki unfit to perform his duties. Waldemar assessed that the critics reacted with panic because they were losing control over the Tribunal, which they had treated as their property for years. He added that it was not Czarzasty who abdicated or was lost, but his opponents who had weakened the Tribunal for years and were now screaming about succession and the use of force. He appealed for them to apply the constitution regardless of whether its provisions suited them. #Konstytucja #Polska #Prawo (translated)

Zbigniew Bogucki wrote that the dispute regarding the Constitutional Tribunal concerned, in his opinion, fundamental principles of law and the Constitution, and not the defense of specific individuals or parties. He claimed that the government wanted to forcibly introduce to the Tribunal individuals who had not taken an oath before the President of the Republic of Poland, but had taken it in the Sejm before the Marshal of the Sejm, under the protection of the Marshal's Guard and on political indication. Bogucki assessed that such actions violated fundamental principles of law and the Constitution. He also accused that the ruling of the Constitutional Tribunal from December 2015, case no. K 34/15, was not being respected. As he wrote, this ruling indicated that the oath before the President of the Republic of Poland is not a trivial matter nor merely a formal ceremony. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Prawo #Konstytucja (translated)

The connoisseur of the Soviet Union urged Poland not to repeat the mistakes of France in the 1960s and not to bring in migrants from culturally different countries as cheap labor. He suggested prioritizing Poles and filling staffing shortages with Ukrainians and Belarusians. He also called for not voting for Braun. https://t.co/XEmLLYljg1 #migracja #Polska #praca (translated)

Prem evaluated the recording from the body camera and pointed out nine violations that, in his opinion, were committed by the intervening individuals. He claimed that one of the police officers only provided their rank, without a name, and that the officers did not explain the actual reason for the identification. Referring to Article 15 of the Police Act was, as he wrote, insufficient to justify this action. According to Prem, there were also no legal or factual grounds for the identification, which he considered unlawful. The author also accused the police officers of violating the principle of least intrusive action as per Article 15(6) of the Police Act. He considered a mocking comment directed at the man and an approach within 45 cm to be a manifestation of psychological pressure and a violation of dignity. He also wrote that the order to move to another location had no legal basis. Prem asserted that the officers used physical force without prior calls to comply with the law and warnings required by Article 34 of the Act of May 24, 2013, on measures of direct coercion and firearms. He listed possible consequences: violation of personal inviolability under Article 217 of the Penal Code and potential abuse of power or failure to fulfill duties under Article 231 § 1 of the Penal Code, which carries a penalty of up to 3 years of imprisonment. He regarded the most significant issue to be the man's escape from the grip. According to Prem, if the grip was unlawful, the citizen would not, in principle, have committed an offense under Article 222 or Article 224 of the Penal Code, and self-defense against the unlawful action of a public officer would not be punishable. #policja #prawo #uczciwość (translated)

The services in action described an incident in which witnesses suspected that the driver of a Porsche was drunk and tried to stop him. According to the author, the driver assaulted several people, including an elderly woman, whom he hit several times, and with one of the blows — an elbow to the head — he knocked her onto the hood of the car. Another witness was said to have been hit while the driver was fleeing the scene. The author cited a statement from the spokesperson for the Warsaw II District Police Headquarters, who reported that the case is being pursued upon a private accusation, and the police had not received a notification. The services in action claimed that in this situation, a notification from the victim is not required, and the police and prosecutors should initiate proceedings. They referred to Article 217a § 1 of the Penal Code and appealed to the police and prosecutors to take action. #Bezpieczeństwo #Prawo #Policja (translated)

The author wrote that the Sejm's choice of a person for the Constitutional Tribunal, whom he believes does not meet the criteria, showed that such a choice is possible. He stated that force rules in Poland, and he called the belief in the validity of the constitution and law a fiction. #Polska #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Prawo #PL (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk wrote that the revealed recordings raised questions about the reason for the police check on the man who was, as he suggested, connected to the protest. According to his reconstruction, the officers followed the man for several dozen meters, demanded his personal information without providing a specific reason for the check, and then incapacitated him inside the building. Kusznieruk noted that the man pushed the officers away and fled inside, but he believed that this did not explain the earlier decision to conduct a check. The author claimed that the man lost consciousness during the intervention, and the knife found with him was not presented as having been used. He also questioned the proportionality of the force used and whether the man deliberately attacked the policewoman when the window broke. Furthermore, he described that several hours later, the detained man was informed that he could meet with lawyer Magdalena Leszczyńska if he provided his details. According to Kusznieruk, the man did not know the lawyer and did not want to see her, while the police considered this a refusal to contact a defense attorney. Kusznieruk also criticized the statement by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who — as he wrote — linked the matter to President Nawrocki. He asked whether the police acted on the orders of superiors, collected data on demonstration participants, and previously observed the man. He directed questions to the Polish Police and the Ministry of Interior and Administration regarding who ordered the identification of Piotr and on what basis. He warned that if the identification of protesters occurred without legal grounds, it could mean using the state apparatus to control citizens. #Polska #Policja #protesty (translated)

The commentator referenced a statement by Błażej Poboży, who asked politicians associated with Donald Tusk if they needed reminding of the meaning of the slogan recorded as eight stars. Poboży also claimed that no political force in Poland since 1989 has placed such vulgarity on their banners. The commentator called these words the perfect summary of the level of politics of the current government. #Polityka #Tusk #Rząd (translated)

Katarzyna Pełczyńska wrote that the message from the Kremlin, claiming that Ukraine's capitulation will bring peace, has been echoed by Donald Trump for over a week, and for months by European supporters of Putin, including AfD, Marine Le Pen, and Grzegorz Braun. She urged not to be swayed by this narrative and asserted that Russian domination does not bring peace, and that "Russkij mir" means tyranny and war. #Putin #Ukraina #propaganda (translated)

The author wrote that the use of brutal force against people who have served their homeland their whole lives was an injustice and an attempt to intimidate the nation. He called for the signing of an appeal to the President in defense of the Constitutional Tribunal. https://t.co/RGCkmXzWt0 #bezprawie #obrona #Wolność #PL (translated)

It is a political force that, according to polls, has the support of some Poles, therefore it should be considered present in Polish politics. Meanwhile, President Karol Nawrocki, in a recent interview with "Rzeczpospolita," spoke about Braun's party, stating that it is a party that "has its representation in parliament" and that "it is a political force that, according to polls, has the support of some Poles, therefore it should be treated as present in Polish politics." #GrzegorzBraun #KonfederacjaKoronyPolskiej #polityka (translated)

Jack Strong wrote that during the times of communism, the opposition was defended by Jan Olszewski, Władysław Siła-Nowicki, Jacek Taylor, Piotr Andrzejewski, Maciej Bednarkiewicz, and Jolanta Zabarnik-Nowakowska. He added that today Poland has individuals who work for its benefit and emphasized the importance of their work. #Polska #Historia #Opozycja (translated)

The task assigned to the Russian armed forces is not only to drive the enemy out of our territory but also to establish a security zone in the adjacent area. This task is being effectively implemented. Putin emphasized that the created zone will not be the subject of any possible peace talks with Ukraine. #wojnaWUkrainie #WładimirPutin #strefaPrzygraniczna (translated)

Jack Strong wrote that Prime Minister Beata Szydło will lead the Polish delegation in the ECR. He assessed that her return to the political top league could be a turning point for Law and Justice. He pointed out her strengths, including the ability to unite different environments and factions within the party, as well as her experience, sense of justice, loyalty, and ability to seek compromise. #Polska #Polityka #PrawoISprawiedliwość (translated)