Search

Mikkel Bjørn wrote that the Social Democrats had promised not to grant new citizenships without assurance that the applicants were not criminals or opposed to Denmark and democracy. He claimed that the party was now breaking that promise because several thousand would receive citizenship without the promised screening, including many from the Middle East and Africa. According to Bjørn, the largest single group in the proposed legislation was the temporary Syrian refugees, whom the Social Democrats had promised to send home. #politikk #Danmark #statsborgerskab (translated)

Anders Hesselbom wrote to Morgan Johansson and Hans E. Lundblad that the Swedish National Property Board was governed by the Social Democratic Director General Max Elger. He also agreed that the state should not regulate rents and claimed that it always ended the same way. #politik #hyresreglering #Sverige (translated)

Klaus Riskær Pedersen criticized the former and current government for the handling of the CPR register. He wrote that systematic data collection could have taken place without being stopped by the security systems and called it a political scandal that required immediate accountability. Pedersen claimed that the problems were due to Minister of Interior and Housing Christian Rabjerg Madsen awarding the operation of the CPR system to the American company DXC Technology in 2022. He also criticized former Minister Kaare Dybvad Bek, stating that the tender in 2021 was carried out under the GPA agreement, which allowed American companies to bid. According to Pedersen, the agreement allowed for the exclusion of foreign bidders on grounds of security and vital national interests, and he believed that the CPR register, which he described as critical infrastructure, should not have been entrusted to a foreign company. He placed the responsibility for the lack of control systems on the Agency for Digitization and believed that the government's leadership bore political accountability for the appointments. He wrote that Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen had not made the decision herself but had appointed a political leadership that he considered lacking in professionalism and experience. He also claimed that the government had been so preoccupied with the war in Europe by the end of 2022 that it had not concerned itself with the CPR system. Furthermore, Pedersen criticized that the Parliament, in his opinion, would choose Henrik Frandsen from the Moderates as chairman, even though Frandsen had only served in Parliament for four years. He described Frandsen as unworthy of the position and accused him of serious moral shortcomings. Pedersen wrote that all Danish citizens must remain vigilant until those responsible figured out whether new CPR numbers were necessary, suggesting that Russia would be to blame. He alleged that businesses' access to the register had been shut down, causing chaos, and that the lack of identity verification could make it difficult for public institutions to hire educators. He compared the situation to previous problems in the police's data systems. #Inkompetence #Politik #Danmark (translated)

Morten Messerschmidt wrote that the Social Democrats had destroyed the immigration policy. He claimed that the government had decided to grant citizenship to 2,055 individuals without screening, and that a significant proportion came from the Middle East and Africa. According to Messerschmidt, the Social Democrats had lost the internal power struggle over immigration policy, so the Radical Left, the Socialist People’s Party, and the Moderates now determined the policy in the area of citizenship. He believed that one could not conduct a strict immigration policy while simultaneously accepting a practice that, in his view, could grant citizenship to Islamists without screening. Messerschmidt wrote that the Social Democrats had lost control over immigration policy and that the Danish People's Party and he himself were ready to take over if Mette Frederiksen no longer wanted or could pursue the policy she had promised. He said he would make Denmark the safest country in the world. #udlændingepolitik #Danmark #socialdemokratiet (translated)

Eva Gregersen wrote that the government, according to her information, would reintroduce a bill on Danish citizenship for 2,055 applicants and their 1,039 children without first screening them for anti-democratic views. She believed that the Social Democrats were thus yielding to the value-political left. In a column in Berlingske in February, Gregersen had predicted that at least 600 people with the same ideological standpoint as an applicant, whom Stoklund had allegedly rejected the year before due to their values, would obtain citizenship. She also referred to Wilkes' study for Jyllands-Posten from 2024, which according to her showed that 54 percent of Muslims living in Denmark believed that the dictates of the Koran should be followed fully. Gregersen pointed out that Mette Frederiksen had stated from the podium of the Folketing that it was incompatible with Danish society to take the words of the Koran at face value. Gregersen agreed with that assessment and called it national self-harm to continue granting citizenship to so many people, whom she believed could be expected to follow the dictates of the Koran. #udlændingepolitik #danskpolitik #statsborgerskab (translated)

Mikkel Bjørn wrote that the government and the Social Democrats would reintroduce a bill on citizenship for over 3,000 individuals, even though the party had previously promised not to present it. He stated that over 70 percent of the applicants were from non-Western countries, including MENAPT, and that nearly 40 percent were from MENAPT. According to Bjørn, the largest single group was Syrian refugees, whom he described as temporary. Bjørn pointed out that the Social Democrats had previously referred to the reception of Syrian refugees as temporary, and wrote that Syrians who marched on the motorways in 2015 now constituted the largest group in the bill ten years later. He also claimed that the party had promised to introduce a new model designed to prevent Islamists, anti-democrats, and terror sympathizers from obtaining citizenship, as well as a new system to investigate applicants’ criminal records. According to Bjørn, the bill would be presented without screening, and he questioned whether the plans for criminal investigations had been abandoned. He wrote that Islamists, anti-democrats, criminals, and individuals with limited Danish skills could thus obtain citizenship. He called it a failure and criticized the Social Democrats for entering into government with the Radicals. #danskpolitik #flygtninge #statsborgerskab (translated)

Mikkel Bjørn wrote that the government apparently intended to reintroduce L98 on the granting of citizenship without screening, even though, according to him, it had claimed the opposite. He also wrote that Islamists and anti-democrats could soon again receive citizenship, despite the fact that the Social Democrats had promised the opposite according to him. #statsborgerskab #politiksdk #danmark (translated)

Christian Peterson wrote that ETC, with the support of the law firm DLA Piper, had tried to delay the release of its share register. He stated that left-wing activists had invested 5,590,000 kronor in the group and that among the owners was Skiftet, which he described as a social democratic troll factory. According to Peterson, a prominent social democrat had personally invested 510,000 kronor. Peterson claimed that the business's profit margin was based on state media support and that the group had received more than 405 million kronor since 2005. He also recounted social democrat Jan Emanuel's comment that the stock was something one could brag about at an expensive lobster dinner in Söder. https://t.co/7EsDPgjlr9 #politik #mediestöd #vänsteraktivism (translated)

Christian Peterson stated that he only received ETC's share registers after threatening to file a lawsuit. He wrote that Skiftet, which he described as a social democratic troll factory, and a wealthy migration activist together had invested 570,000 kronor. https://t.co/v5fPkPBKU5 #politik #Sverige #aktier (translated)

Today, the Parliament showed its ugliest side. Before the election, Pelle Dragsted promised that his first political proposal would be to reinstate Great Prayer Day. An hour ago, when we voted on the Danish People's Party's proposal to reinstate Great Prayer Day now and not in 2030, the Unity List voted against it. Before the election, Pia Olsen Dyhr promised the students that she would not cut their student grants. Now she and the Socialist Party are cutting the student grants to finance the government's budget. Before the election, Mette Frederiksen promised that the punishment should fit the crime. Nevertheless, the Social Democrats voted against it when we voted an hour ago on the Danish People's Party's proposal that murderers like Elias Shegow, who stoned a 13-year-old girl, should not receive a reduced sentence. And do you know what the worst part is? That these arrogant politicians probably don't even feel the slightest shame over their blatant lies and voter deception. Just think... They stand on nationwide TV and promise the Danish people one thing. And when the election is over, they go right down to the Parliament and vote the exact opposite, hoping that the Danes won't notice it. They should be ashamed. #politik #valg #fagforening (translated)

För en månad sedan hade vi en moderatledd borgerlig regering med ordning och reda och en tydlig riktning för Sverige. Idag har vi ett socialdemokratiskt lett politiskt kaos utan vare sig styrfart, riktning, mening eller mål. Man blir trött, det blir man. #politiken #Sverige #regering

DRAMA I FOLKETINGET: THOMAS SKRIVER FORSVINDER? På et møde i Folketinget går Socialdemokratiets Thomas Skriver til frontalangreb på Dansk Folkeparti. Han kalder mig og Dansk Folkeparti en “SKAMPLET”, fordi vi viser et billede af Beate, der blev dræbt af en udvisningsdømt kriminel. Straks herefter forsvinder Thomas Skriver ud af mødet. Han undgår dermed at blive konfronteret med, at Dansk Folkeparti selvfølgelig har fået tilladelse til at bruge billedet. Beates død er den sørgelige konsekvens af Socialdemokratiets insisteren på, at udvisningsdømte kriminelle skal have ret til at vandre frit rundt i Danmark. Har man tid til at kalde andre en “skamplet” på demokratiet, bør man også blive og høre svaret - og måske sætte sig ind i sagerne, før man slynger om sig med anklager. Beate og andre ofre for udvisningdømtes kriminalitet fortjener bedre end disse arrogante Socialdemokratiske vredesudbrud. #Folketinget #Socialdemokratiet #DanskFolkeparti

Et godt eksempel på hvordan den etablerede presse dækker for regeringen, Socialdemokratiet og Mette Frederiksen. Her er det @EkstraBladet som laver en forside om at @MadsStrange_ "lyver så vandet driver". Men hvor er den samme forside om Mette Frederiksen? Hun har ikke lavet andet end at lyve, misinformere og vildlede siden hun blev statsminister i 2019. #presse #politiskdækning #MetteFrederiksen

Skadeglädje är inte vackert men gissa vad jag känner. Tyvärr viker väl något av de rödgröna partierna ned sig i sista omgången och så får vi en ytterst svag. socialdemokratisk minoritetsregering igen. Katastrof för Sverige i det världsläget vi befinner oss i. https://t.co/LynS0zmlC3 #Sverige #politik #regering

Jeg kan her til morgen se, at de socialdemokratiske spinkanoner er rettet mod mig! Indledningsvis er Bennys kritik en lille smule ironisk med tanke på, hvorfor han selv mistede sin ministerpost. Men fred være med det. :) EB har ret i flere af deres "afsløringer". Altså, jeg har - dog ubevidst og i god tro - sagt ting, der er forkerte. Og det står jeg 100 % på mål for og vil gerne beklage over! For når man har et stort talerør, skal man også gøre sig umage for, at ens udsagn holder vand. Men lad os lige dvæle lidt ved EB's "afsløring". Deres artikel går flere år tilbage. I den periode har jeg vitterligt skrevet flere tusind opslag på de sociale medier, lavet hundredevis af videoer og deltage i hundredevis af debatter og interviews. SELVFØLGELIG er jeg i den periode på et eller andet tidspunkt kommet til at sige noget, der er forkert! For den her historie ville du vitterligt kunne lave på alle, der i samme grad har deltaget i den offentlige debat. De eneste, der ikke laver fejl, er jo dem, der ikke laver noget. Og lad mig understrege; Jeg synes både, det er 100 % rimeligt og vigtigt, at medierne laver historier på det, hvis jeg eller andre siger noget forkert! For det er et afgørende aspekt af en sund offentlig debat. Men at Benny forsøger at koge suppe på det ved at få det til at lyde som om, at jeg bevidst går og lyver, er jo bare decideret lavt. For medmindre man virkelig prøver at fortolke det her som fanden læser Biblen, ved man jo udmærket godt, at der er tale om ubevidste fejl i god tro. Og dét er ret væsentligt. For alle kan i god tro lave fejl - og medmindre man gør sig umage for at finde hår i suppen, ved folk jo godt, at det er en uvægerlig præmis for at deltage i debatten. Siger man mange ting, vil man på et tidspunkt også sige noget forkert. Men hvordan er det egentlig lige, Socialdemokratiet selv agerer i den offentlige debat? Jeg vil ikke opliste alle eksemplerne - men se gerne @hr_noergaard s fremragende liste nedenfor i kommentarfeltet. Så man man jo vurdere for sig selv, hvem der bidrager til en dårlig politisk kultur. Hæv niveauet, Benny. #offentligdebat #politiskkultur #fejl