Search

The District Court for Warsaw-Śródmieście refused the temporary arrest of Piotr W., stating that although the evidence suggests his involvement, there are no grounds for applying the most severe preventive measure, among other reasons due to his previous clean record. #Prawo #TymczasowyAreszt #Warszawa (translated)

Women in Poland struggle with a lack of support and appropriate diagnosis during menopause, despite the fact that midwives can play a key role in their healthcare, offering a holistic approach and education about this natural stage of life. #menopauza #zdrowiekobiety #położne (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk accused Joanna Makosa of portraying Piotr as an attacker using a knife, although — as he wrote — such an attack has not been confirmed. He urged her to reveal the wires she claimed to rely on and demanded clarification on whether there was a lack of accuracy or a conscious spreading of false information. He deemed that uncritically basing a serious accusation on a single source indicated a lack of journalistic skill. Kusznieruk wrote that depicting Piotr as a "knife-wielder" could expose him and his family to hostility. He emphasized that threats against anyone were unacceptable, but they did not absolve one from responsibility for their own words. He demanded a clear correction on TVP and public apologies, assessing that attributing it to a mistake was insufficient. He also criticized the funding of public television with taxpayers' money and noted that Piotr and his family were likely not laughing. #dziennikarstwo #media #społeczeństwo (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk described the court's decision to deny the arrest of Piotr after the protest as a disgrace for the prosecution. He stated that, in his opinion, the lack of high probability of committing a crime meant that the prosecution had not demonstrated the basic premise for applying the arrest. He claimed that Piotr had spent over 50 hours deprived of freedom, and the police conducted a brutal intervention and a request for arrest was submitted without convincing evidence. He noted that the denial of arrest does not mean acquittal, but he considered it a serious signal for the prosecution. He called for the accountability of the police officers and their superiors. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #prokuratura (translated)

Bartosz Lewandowski called the situation a disgrace for the National Prosecutor's Office. He wrote that the lack of a high probability of committing an offense meant that the court had already at this stage determined that the crime had not been demonstrated even to a degree justifying the application of preventive measures. #Polska #prawo #sprawiedliwość (translated)

Magdalena Prządka-Leszczyńska informed that the court did not grant the prosecutor's motion for the temporary detention of Piotr W. and agreed with the defense's position. She wrote that the man returned home after more than 50 hours. The author described that on Friday morning on Marszałkowska Street in Warsaw, Piotr W. was waiting for a green light at the pedestrian crossing, after which he was subdued by police officers. According to her account, he lost consciousness and was transported by ambulance on a stretcher, always in handcuffs, even during transport and while at the emergency room. Prządka-Leszczyńska wrote that the prosecutor demanded the application of temporary detention, and she, Magda Majkowska, and Bartosz Malewski from Ordo Iuris argued in court that there were no grounds for depriving Piotr W. of his freedom before the verdict. She added that the court agreed with them. She thanked the MPs who — as she wrote — supported Piotr W. from the very first hours, as well as journalists for showing the full recording. Among the people and editorial offices mentioned were Dorota Arciszewska, Marek Jakubiak, Telewizja Republika, wPolsce.pl, and Polsat News. #sprawiedliwość #Polska #prawo (translated)

Bartosz Malewski informed that the court did not grant the prosecution's request for a month of temporary detention for Piotr. According to Malewski, the prosecutor justified the request with concerns that Piotr might hide and an assessment that there is a high probability of him committing further crimes. Malewski wrote that together with lawyers Magda Prządka and Magda Majkowska, he convinced the court that there were no grounds for imposing detention. He claimed that it was not sufficiently substantiated that Piotr had committed the alleged acts and that Friday's events should be treated as an incident requiring thorough explanation. According to Malewski, Piotr has a permanent place of residence, is socially engaged, and is a firefighter in the volunteer fire department, so there is no real risk that he would hide. He added that after the defenders reached him, Piotr, feeling safer, started limited cooperation with the authorities. Malewski also emphasized that the lack of cooperation is Piotr's right and should not be a basis for preventive measures. Malewski also assessed that the forecast for further criminal activity had no rational basis. He wrote that Piotr had not been convicted and that his behavior on Friday was not aimed at committing the alleged acts, which, in Malewski's view, undermined the legal qualification adopted by the prosecution. He informed that the court did not apply other preventive measures, such as police supervision, and that Piotr would respond to the charges at liberty. He added that assistance was provided as part of a procedural intervention by Ordo Iuris. #wolność #sprawiedliwość #prawo (translated)

The Operational Command of the Armed Forces has reported that services continued the search and verification of information regarding the nighttime incident that may have involved a violation of Polish airspace. In the operations, soldiers from the Territorial Defense Forces participated, as well as a military helicopter; actions were carried out in cooperation with the Police and Military Gendarmerie. The Command emphasized that the actions were of a preventive nature and aimed at clarifying the circumstances of the incident. As reported, various scenarios were being considered, including meteorological anomalies and smuggling or provocative actions, but none of them were confirmed. The Command also stated that it did not have grounds to confirm the authenticity of the reports appearing or their connection with the conducted activities. It did not rule out that some publications might have served for information manipulation or disinformation. The Command called for calm, prudence, and the use of official, reliable sources, warning against the dissemination of unverified information and speculation. In the event of finding objects that could be remains of an object, it recommended not to approach, touch, or move them, but to notify the services at number 112. It added that it was monitoring the situation and would inform about further confirmed findings. #JointForSecurity #Bezpieczeństwo #Służby #Dezinformacja (translated)

Prem evaluated the recording from the body camera and pointed out nine violations that, in his opinion, were committed by the intervening individuals. He claimed that one of the police officers only provided their rank, without a name, and that the officers did not explain the actual reason for the identification. Referring to Article 15 of the Police Act was, as he wrote, insufficient to justify this action. According to Prem, there were also no legal or factual grounds for the identification, which he considered unlawful. The author also accused the police officers of violating the principle of least intrusive action as per Article 15(6) of the Police Act. He considered a mocking comment directed at the man and an approach within 45 cm to be a manifestation of psychological pressure and a violation of dignity. He also wrote that the order to move to another location had no legal basis. Prem asserted that the officers used physical force without prior calls to comply with the law and warnings required by Article 34 of the Act of May 24, 2013, on measures of direct coercion and firearms. He listed possible consequences: violation of personal inviolability under Article 217 of the Penal Code and potential abuse of power or failure to fulfill duties under Article 231 § 1 of the Penal Code, which carries a penalty of up to 3 years of imprisonment. He regarded the most significant issue to be the man's escape from the grip. According to Prem, if the grip was unlawful, the citizen would not, in principle, have committed an offense under Article 222 or Article 224 of the Penal Code, and self-defense against the unlawful action of a public officer would not be punishable. #policja #prawo #uczciwość (translated)

The author of the entry r00t wrote that the document commented on by Wójcik contradicted his assertion that Maciej Berek did not meet the formal requirements. According to the author, the Chancellery of the Sejm indicated that the application with Berek's candidacy was submitted on time by an eligible entity and contained the required elements, after which it was referred to the Justice and Human Rights Committee. The author added that during the committee meeting, Berek's performance of the legal advisor profession was discussed, and the candidate answered questions. The committee positively assessed his candidacy. r00t accused Wójcik of ignoring the course of the procedure and the documents, which — as he wrote — indicated something contrary to his assertion. #Polska #Prawo #KomisjaSprawiedliwości (translated)

Menopause is not only physical changes but also enormous emotional and psychological challenges that women often are not adequately prepared for, leading to feelings of loneliness and lack of support during this difficult period of life. #Menopauza #ZdrowieKobiet #Emocje (translated)

Judges who were elected by the Sejm, those who were sworn in by the president, and those who were sworn in by the Sejm, both oaths are equally important, should be allowed to work. I can guarantee that there is a plan inside [the Constitutional Tribunal] on how to restore it to the citizens. I am convinced that it will simply happen by the end of the year. Financial issues and the lack of a financial plan are not insignificant— Judges who were elected by the Sejm, those who were sworn in by the president, and those who were sworn in by the Sejm, both oaths are equally important, should be allowed to work. I can guarantee that there is a plan inside [the Constitutional Tribunal] on how to restore it to the citizens. I am convinced that it will simply happen by the end of the year. Financial issues and the lack of a financial plan are not insignificant— said Katarzyna Kotula, a member of the Left and government delegate for equality, reminding that from January 2027, judges will not be receiving salaries. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Polityka #Sędziowie (translated)

The author wrote that the protests began with students who pointed out the lack of teachers, decaying schools, and overcrowded classrooms, and ended in devastation. He assessed the students' demands as clear and just. He added that later labor unions, yellow vests, and hooligans joined in, talking about the cost of living and the deteriorating state of public services. https://t.co/9r0x1bINrG #edukacja #protest #społeczeństwo #PL #FR (translated)

The War Observer recalled a statement from Vance, who reportedly said that he had not met Putin in person but had spoken to him on the phone. According to Vance, Putin was calmer than one might expect, and his image in American media was stereotypical. He described him as reserved and measured in his words. Vance also stated that Putin, in his understanding, cares about Russia's interests and respects the president because he— as Putin believes— takes care of the interests of the American people. The War Observer wrote that he could not comment on this and compared this statement to a situation where a representative of the White House would be enamored with the perpetrators of the Katyn crime. #Putin #media #Polska (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that environmental organizations threatened to sue the owner of the Tefal brand, which was described as a leading French manufacturer of kitchenware. They accused him of failing to take action to remove so-called forever chemicals from products, which, as they pointed out, pose a threat to consumer health. #ekologia #zdrowie #Tefal #FR (translated)