Search

Biazita Gomes stated that if Flávio Bolsonaro changed the entire Supreme Court and abolished the guarantees for homosexuals—which, according to her, only existed due to the court's decisions—those who voted for and defended these people would be responsible. She questioned whether these individuals were aware of their own choices and stated that they should bear the consequences. #Política #DireitosHumanos #Cidadania (translated)

JH Fonseca criticized the Supreme Federal Court, stating that the Court was reversing several partial decisions. He said that the court should not act according to the law only under political pressure and advocated for impartial justice. He also accused judges of corruption. #Justiça #STF #Corrupção (translated)

"defeat of the strategy of various Spanish public powers that prevented and delayed the application of the amnesty for strictly political reasons" In a statement from Belgium transmitted by Spanish media, Puigdemont considered that the decisions of the Spanish justice this Tuesday are the "defeat of the strategy of various Spanish public powers that prevented and delayed the application of the amnesty for strictly political reasons." #Puigdemont #Amnistia #Catalunha (translated)

"We came to tell the judge that we will comply with the Constitution and the law. That we do not have a spirit of vendetta [revenge]. On the contrary. That we want to rebuild the country, we want to normalize the relationship between the powers." Rogério Marinho made this statement after a meeting with the president of the Brazilian Supreme Court, Edson Fachin, on which occasion he said they discussed “the excesses” of some judges with “monocratic decisions.” #Eleições2026 #STF #PartidoLiberal (translated)

Cristiano Ronaldo stated, in a statement published on October 6, 2026, that he decided to leave the Portuguese national team camp after the coach, according to him, did not uphold an agreement regarding his participation in a match in Norway. He said he agreed to play for 30 minutes, went to warm up at halftime, but never got to enter. He also apologized for not greeting the fans after the match. Ronaldo recounted that, after the 2026 World Cup, he prepared a farewell letter and that the president of the Portuguese Football Federation (FPF) asked him to consider continuing. He said he supported the choice of the current coach, and that the coach proposed he play the first and last game, with rotations, and not travel to Norway and Denmark. Ronaldo stated that he refused to stay in Portugal and that the coach agreed. According to the player, the coach initially maintained the plan agreed upon in a conversation at his house, along with Simão Coutinho, the sports director of Al Nassr. Ronaldo said that he agreed to be substituted in a game in Alvalade without protesting and passed the captain's armband to Bruno Fernandes. Regarding the match in Norway, he said he expected to play again only at the Dragão but accepted the offer to come in for 30 minutes. Ronaldo said that, 48 hours later, he arranged with the coach for him to explain at a press conference that the plan had been his initiative and that he had made a mistake by having him warm up without using him. He added that, at the coach's request, a document was prepared with Simão Coutinho and Tiago Craveiro, validated by him and submitted to the coach. According to Ronaldo, the notes acknowledged that he accepted the plan and was loyal and professional but did not include an apology. The player stated that this was the second time the coach had failed to keep his word and that he decided to leave the camp because he felt trust was broken. He said that, on the morning of the conference, the president of the FPF and the coach assured him that his place on the team was still secure. Ronaldo took full responsibility for leaving the camp, apologized to his teammates and the Portuguese fans, and declared that the FPF should evaluate and punish the act, without mitigation, also considering his role as captain. Ronaldo added that there could be one or more farewell matches, but he associated the national team with competition. He said that after serving any suspension that might be imposed on him, he would be available to play and fight for victories if he was physically well and playing for the club. He also recalled that he stayed in a camp after learning of his father's death, until finishing the next game. #CristianoRonaldo #SeleçãoPortuguesa #Futebol (translated)

Eli Vieira wrote that ministers of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) would have threatened senators with investigations and decisions in anonymous messages. He stated that if the ministers were deliberately withholding cases against the senators, that could constitute malfeasance. Vieira described the crime as delaying or omitting a duty, or acting against an express provision of the law, with personal intent, and said that the penalty provided for in Article 319 of the Brazilian Penal Code was imprisonment for three months to a year and a fine. #STF #Direito #Política (translated)

Fried stated that a TSE minister appointed by Lula interfered in the only debate that, according to him, could have prevented criticisms of the president, leading to the cancellation of the event. He also said that another minister of the court, appointed by Lula on the same occasion, annulled the candidacy of a former prosecutor who had accused Lula of corruption. According to Fried, both decisions were made unilaterally: the first on the day of the debate, and the second on the eve of the election, at times that, in his view, prevented them from being reversed. He mocked the idea that this group was saving democracy and compared the cases to graffiti on a statue with lipstick, which, he wrote, almost toppled the political system. He added that democracy would remain in power "for better or for worse." #Democracia #Eleições2024 #Justiça (translated)

UpdateCharts reported that NandaTsunami stated she would vote for Lula and Erika Hilton, with numbers 13 and 5070. According to the publication, she advocated for political participation to continue beyond the electoral period, with collective organization, oversight of those elected, and involvement in the communities. NandaTsunami also argued that a lack of hope for change could reduce public participation and favor the continuation of power in the hands of privileged groups. #Política #VotoConsciente #ParticipaçãoCidadã (translated)

David Ágape stated that electoral disputes have begun to be taken to ministers of the Supreme Federal Court through old processes, without a new drawing, which, according to him, emasculated the Superior Electoral Court (TSE). He compared the situation to the election of 2022, when Alexandre de Moraes presided over the TSE and was part of the STF, and said that, for many, decisions against Jair Bolsonaro and his supporters were decisive for Lula's victory. According to Ágape, Gilmar Mendes granted a preliminary injunction to include Renan Santos in a Globo debate, although he acknowledged that the topic did not fit within a complaint about Deltan Dallagnol. He stated that subsequent requests regarding electoral disputes in Bahia and Paraná were also presented in this complaint. Ágape added that the PT requested Flávio Dino, within an ADPF regarding mining, an investigation into alleged foreign interference in favor of Flávio Bolsonaro; in another complaint related to Dallagnol, Dino suspended an order from the TSE. Flávio Bolsonaro's campaign, he said, appealed to Luiz Fux to challenge the intervention, in a process that was already addressing the removal of content on the internet. Ágape concluded that Edson Fachin tried to organize the situation, but it was too late. https://t.co/tRVnTKz9aT #STF #TSE #Eleições2022 (translated)

Julio Schneider stated that Gilmar Mendes, from the Supreme Court, overturned on Saturday decisions from the TRE-PR that had granted the right of reply to Sergio Moro against advertisements from Sandro Alex. According to Schneider, Moro lost the right of reply and the removed pieces could be shown again. Schneider also used a derogatory term to refer to Mendes. https://t.co/0hoHopuHAD #STF #Justiça #Eleições2022 (translated)

The author stated that an exiled Venezuelan lawyer and experts expressed concern about monocratic decisions and the politicization of higher courts. She also compared the court's interferences to the profile of Venezuela. https://t.co/udGsYwnzUk #Justiça #DireitosHumanos #Venezuela (translated)

Polls indicate that Lula da Silva and Flávio Bolsonaro are likely to advance to the second round of the presidential elections in Brazil, although the absence of electoral debates and judicial decisions are creating uncertainties in the campaign. #Eleições2026 #Brasil #Democracia (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha wrote that Vasco filed an appeal on Friday (02) at the TJRJ against the decision of the 2nd Civil Court that did not analyze its urgent request to use Maracanã against Boca Juniors and suspended the process for 20 days, after a statement from Fla-Flu Serviços in 48 hours. According to Tutinha, Vasco argued that it needs to indicate the stadium to CONMEBOL by 10/05 for the match on 10/20 at 21:30, and that the suspension could make a subsequent decision pointless. The club requested that Judge Rose Marie Pimentel Martins, from the 5th Chamber of Public Law, grant the request directly for Maracanã to be made available. As an alternative, it requested the end of the suspension and that the first-instance judge analyze the preliminary injunction without waiting for the appeal related to the popular action. Tutinha reported that Vasco also contested the technical criteria used to deny the stadium and claimed a contradiction in the concessionaire's position on the Memorandum of Understanding signed by Vasco, Flamengo, and Fluminense. The club stated that the restrictions should be applied in a non-discriminatory manner and cited ten official matches held at Maracanã in May 2026, nine of them between the 9th and 30th, including games on consecutive days: Fluminense x Bolívar on 05/19, and Flamengo x Estudiantes on 05/20; Flamengo x Cusco on 05/26, and Fluminense x Deportivo La Guaira on 05/27. According to Tutinha, Vasco also mentioned the indication of Maracanã by PMERJ as the most suitable option for security planning. Among the requests, it included non-discriminatory commercial and operational conditions, a maximum ticket load according to the authorized capacity, and a daily fine of R$ 1 million in case of non-compliance. #Vasco #Maracanã #Futebol (translated)

Mario Frias stated that, during his time at the Ministry of Culture, he faced criticism and attacks for decisions whose background, according to him, was unknown to those who judged him. He said he preferred to maintain his convictions rather than seek acceptance or preserve his own image, and that he could not live with the shame of having acted against what he believed in. He added that positions and power were temporary, while the awareness of one's own choices remained. #Coragem #Integridade #Convicções (translated)

The Attorney General's Office stated that António Costa cannot consult the case of the Influencer Operation, as he is not a formal party, while the Minister of Justice argues that legal proceedings should not drag on indefinitely and should have quicker decisions. #OperaçãoInfluencer #MinistérioPúblico #Justiça (translated)

The profile SPACE LIBERDADE stated that Flávio Dino defended the legitimacy of court decisions during the elections and cited as precedents the case of Bush v. Gore in the United States in 2000 and Silvio Santos' candidacy in 1989. https://t.co/PF1dSaYSLy #Eleições2022 #Justiça #FlávioDino (translated)

Kriska Carvalho praised Flávio Dino and stated that bringing Justice into play to resolve controversies was part of the separation of powers. As examples, she cited the 2000 presidential election in the United States: according to her, legal disputes lasted a month and ended with a 5-4 decision from the Supreme Court in the Bush vs. Gore case. Carvalho said that Al Gore won the popular vote but lost in the Electoral College after a difference of 0.009% of the votes in Florida and the judicial interruption of the recount. She added that the episode did not cause an institutional crisis, the end of the Supreme Court, or the impeachment of its judges. Carvalho also mentioned the 1989 Brazilian presidential election, whose outcome, according to her, was heavily influenced by a judicial decision regarding Silvio Santos's candidacy, made less than a week before the voting. She defended the legitimacy of the decisions made by Ministers Kassio and Gilmar and Minister Estela regarding debate rules, although she acknowledged that there was room to disagree with their content. She stated that Kassio determined Zema's participation on Globo, that Gilmar guaranteed Renan Santos's presence, and that Estela decided on the existence of an empty chair on the stage. She said that the country should not return to the period before 1930, when, in her description, there was no Electoral Justice and the law of the strongest prevailed. Finally, she questioned why, according to her, Estela's decision was more attacked than those of the two ministers. #Justiça #Eleições #Democracia (translated)

The Football Planet reported that a judge suspended Vasco's process to play in Maracanã against Boca Juniors. According to the publication, the decision occurred because a Vasco fan opened another action regarding the same match. The fan's request for immediate release of the stadium was denied, and the appeal presented to the Court of Justice had not yet been judged. The judge suspended the club's action until the fan's process is defined to avoid contradictory decisions. The publication cited ge as the source. #Vasco #Maracanã #BocaJuniors (translated)