Marcin Edo wrote that the President of Poland, Karol Nawrocki, participated in the funeral ceremonies of 49 victims of the communist regime. He described Włodzimierz Czarzasty, the current Marshal of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, as a representative of that regime and called the entire situation unbelievable. https://t.co/JZobNuIuRx #Polska #historia #pamięć (translated)
Zbigniew Bogucki criticized Marshal Czarzasty, assessing that he should not speak about Yalta, Polish freedom, or the military. He wrote that Czarzasty joined the PZPR in 1983, during or shortly after the martial law, and that his environment had enslaved Poland for decades. He added that Czarzasty participated in this system when — as Bogucki claimed — others stopped participating in it. #Polska #Wolność #Historia (translated)
Krzysztof Sałek from the KO Stalowa Wola wrote that Donald Trump and then Pete Hegseth mocked the participation and sacrifice of Polish soldiers in Afghanistan. He claimed that in both cases, Prime Minister DT, the Marshal, and the politicians of K15X stood in defense of the honor of the fallen, while Nawrocki, the Confederation, and PiS remained silent. He called the situation pathetic. https://t.co/sB41iesBDr #Polska #Żołnierze #Polityka (translated)
Piotr Kusznieruk wrote that the obligation to adhere to binding international law does not mean the possibility of creating new powers for state authorities based on opinions from international institutions. He pointed out that Article 9 of the Constitution mandates compliance with such law, while Articles 87 and 91 specify the sources of universally applicable law and the status of ratified international agreements. He highlighted that the Venice Commission is an advisory body of the Council of Europe, and its opinions are neither treaties, judicial decisions, nor an independent source of state powers. Kusznieruk emphasized that binding rulings from international courts have a different status than non-binding opinions from advisory bodies. He also questioned whether international obligations in themselves authorize the Speaker of the Sejm to replace the President in the procedure for the oath of judges of the Constitutional Tribunal and demanded the identification of a provision that would establish such a competence. He added that referring to common values of legal orders does not provide a legal basis for granting powers, and Article 7 of the Constitution still applies. In his view, the argumentation did not clarify on what basis the Speaker of the Sejm could replace the President of Poland. He stressed that the competence must exist before the authority can exercise it, and the Constitution defines the limits of power. #prawo #Konstytucja #międzynarodowe (translated)
Waldemar wrote that before the meeting of the Sejm, Marshal Włodzimierz Czarzasty directed three appeals to President Karol Nawrocki. The first concerned the remarks of U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, who — as the author of the entry reported — downplayed the involvement of NATO allies in the fighting in Afghanistan. Czarzasty reminded that 44 Poles died there and accused Nawrocki of lacking a decisive reaction and defending the dignity of Polish soldiers. The second appeal related to the planned meeting of Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin, and Xi Jinping regarding Ukraine, without the participation of Kyiv and the EU. Czarzasty reportedly called such a scenario a scandal and urged the president to take a stance. The third appeal was directed to Nawrocki and the PiS circles regarding possible agreements with Russia. According to Waldemar, Czarzasty urged them not to be afraid and not to subordinate themselves to Trump. The author of the entry concluded with a declaration that he likes Czarzasty. #Polska #NATO #Wojna (translated)
Marshal Czarzasty criticized the idea of organizing a "second Yalta" with the participation of Putin, Trump, and Xi Jinping, considering it a scandalous omission of Ukraine and the European Union and calling for condemnation of actions supporting Putin's regime. #Putin #Trump #Ukraina (translated)
Jacek Fogiel wrote that Marshal Czarzasty was advocating for the memory of Polish soldiers, while the president did not protest and was unable to defend their dignity. He criticized Nawrocki, claiming that he was occupied with playing tag and horse riding instead of these matters. https://t.co/35Y0Wa82zV #Polska #Żołnierze #Pamięć (translated)
ADAM wrote that it has only now occurred to him that Father Jerzy Popiełuszko was murdered in 1984, and the current Marshal of the Sejm joined the PZPR in 1983. He added that it is difficult to blame Czarzasty for this, but in his opinion, it shows how much “we have lost our way.” #Historia #Polska #Pamięć (translated)
Zbigniew Bogucki wrote that President Karol Nawrocki assessed that Włodzimierz Czarzasty could neither disregard nor offend him. According to the words of Nawrocki cited by Bogucki, the Speaker of the Sejm had minimal social support, and his position was a result of political pragmatism and the decisions of Prime Minister Donald Tusk. The president also described him as Tusk's deputy in the Sejm. #Polityka #Sejm #DonaldTusk (translated)
Piotr Kusznieruk wrote that the president also exercises executive power, according to Article 10 of the Constitution, and the Sejm controls the government based on Article 95. Referring to Włodzimierz Czarzasty, he stated that his statement demonstrated a misunderstanding of the constitutional roles of state bodies, and he assessed that the Speaker of the Sejm should know the Constitution before he starts explaining it. #Konstytucja #Polska #Prawo (translated)
Paweł Sokala cited a statement by Marshal Krzysztof Bosak, who assessed that the presence of individuals pursuing a double agenda in the Polish political class undermines the presumption of good intentions. Sokala added that for those remembering the appointment of the leader of the Stop CPK movement as the CPK commissioner, it is difficult to regard comparisons to a circus with a smile. https://t.co/roWdQaBEJg #Polska #Polityka #StopCPK (translated)
Waldemar criticized the statements about the constitutional crisis and the possibility of the state being taken over by Czarzasty. He argued that the constitution provides that in case the president is unable to act, his duties are performed by the Marshal of the Sejm, and reminded that Nawrocki had previously expressed a similar position. According to Waldemar, Berek and the others took an oath because the president refused, and the Venice Commission allowed for other solutions when the president blocks actions. The author pointed out that the opponents of this decision used offensive terms and referred to the "strength of the nation." Przydacz, as Waldemar reported, raised the alarm that the Constitutional Tribunal might soon declare Nawrocki unfit to perform his duties. Waldemar assessed that the critics reacted with panic because they were losing control over the Tribunal, which they had treated as their property for years. He added that it was not Czarzasty who abdicated or was lost, but his opponents who had weakened the Tribunal for years and were now screaming about succession and the use of force. He appealed for them to apply the constitution regardless of whether its provisions suited them. #Konstytucja #Polska #Prawo (translated)
Zbigniew Bogucki wrote that President Karol Nawrocki considered taking an oath before the president a necessary condition for assuming the office of a judge of a common court or the Constitutional Tribunal. According to Bogucki, Nawrocki emphasized that this obligation pertains to the office of the president, not a specific person. Bogucki also conveyed that Nawrocki assessed that individuals taking an oath before the Speaker of the Sejm undermine their qualifications to sit on the Constitutional Tribunal by demonstrating a lack of basic knowledge. He added that the president stated that the Speaker of the Sejm does not have the authority to swear in judges. #Polska #Konstytucja #sędziowie (translated)
Gustaw Jędrejek, the president of the Lublin Agricultural Chamber, reveals that Marshal Jarosław Stawiarski from the Law and Justice party urged him to support the construction of a wind farm, while investor Jacek Wysokiński, who is connected to the marshal through a development agreement, was waiting for him at the office. #wiatraki #inwestycje #Polska (translated)
The Chancellery of the President of the Republic of Poland stated that President Karol Nawrocki recognized that individuals taking an oath as judges of the Constitutional Tribunal before the Marshal of the Sejm undermine their qualifications for this position and demonstrate a lack of fundamental knowledge. Nawrocki stated that the Marshal of the Sejm does not have the competence to accept such an oath. The statement was quoted in connection with an interview for Polsat News and Interia Events. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Sędziowie #Polska (translated)
The Chancellery of the President of the Republic of Poland reported that President Karol Nawrocki described the Speaker of the Sejm, Włodzimierz Czarzasty, as a person with minimal social support, appointed as a result of political pragmatism and the decision of Prime Minister Donald Tusk. He added that Czarzasty was practically Tusk's deputy in the Sejm, which is why he could not offend him. #Polityka #Sejm #DonaldTusk (translated)
The profile "Karol Nawrocki - we support" quoted Karol Nawrocki's statement, who assessed that Marshal Czarzasty had minimal social support and was a result of political pragmatism and a decision by Donald Tusk. He added that as Tusk's deputy, Czarzasty could not offend him. https://t.co/gXJkJqXwUK #polityka #DonaldTusk #KarolNawrocki (translated)
WolnośćTV reported that President Nawrocki said in Polsat News that Włodzimierz Czarzasty, as the Marshal of the Sejm enjoying minimal social support, was a result of political pragmatism. Nawrocki characterized him as the actual deputy of Donald Tusk in the Sejm and stated that Czarzasty could not offend him. https://t.co/4EPG04k0Xc #Polska #Sejm #Polityka (translated)
Scorpion referred to Nawrocki's comments about Czarzasty. He wrote that Nawrocki described the Marshal as a person enjoying minimal social support and as a result of political pragmatism, as well as a decision by Donald Tusk and in practice his deputy. Nawrocki was said to have added that Czarzasty could not offend him. Scorpion praised Nawrocki for the calm and cultured "sweeping" of Czarzasty, using an insulting term referring to communism against him. https://t.co/GCMUbMrM3D #Polityka #Czarzasty #Tusk (translated)
Chrzanik cited a statement from Karol Nawrocki, who described Marshal Czarzasty as a result of political pragmatism and a decision and deputy of Donald Tusk. Nawrocki stated that for this reason Czarzasty could not have insulted him. https://t.co/pPcIpwlq11 #Polityka #Czarzasty #DonaldTusk (translated)
