Search

ATTENTION!! It has been 48 hours since the ORGIES of Flávio Bolsonaro with prostitutes were revealed, paid for with CORRUPTION MONEY, and this trash broadcaster has not reported ANYTHING. Absolutely ZERO seconds! In the last 48 hours, Globo: -censored the news of Flávio's orgies -produced a 6-minute segment to defend Flávio and André Mendonça in the Nossa Senhora Aparecida case -censored news that Luciano Huck is Vorcaro's brother -broke its own debate rules to not invite the only candidate who would attack Flávio TOXIC TRASH GLOBO GLOBO CANCER OF BRAZIL (translated)

Trump sent $1 million to fund a campaign against the Supreme Court in Brazil, according to the British newspaper The Guardian. The $1 million subsidy, titled "Combatting Lawfare and Censorship in Brazil," would finance civil society groups, that is, bozos, who attack the Supreme Court with the talk of judicial dictatorship. Jamil Chade published this news recently in ICL. The election is Lula vs. Trump. (translated)

I will take a Spanish example, but it wasn't different here. The media and journalists, in general, hate Israel (due to ignorance, ideological conviction, collective phenomenon; there are various explanations), and almost without exception, all "news" about Israel is biased. Yesterday, that bias was as clear as day. In light of a terrorist attack without a doubt: an Omani, who has been in Dubai for 8 months and is known among colleagues for being "strongly religious," stabs the commander; there are images and videos, and reports from passengers. What was the press's initial reaction? Attempted suicide. The second reaction: "Israel says." How would these "journalists" report on 9/11 if it were today? Journalism is based on rigor; right now, it seems to me that it is in rigor mortis. (translated)

Statement | #RespectBTSPrivacy #BTSenPeru To the media, press, journalists, content creators, and streaming platforms. ARMY, we ask you to retweet and share this statement, as well as tag in the comments any television, print, and streaming media that we may have forgotten to mention. (translated)

It is still necessary to wait for the adjustment for the average vote, but the prevailing thesis is that only objectively false information is prohibited; that is, indicating conduct that was not practiced by Flávio Bolsonaro. For example, it is not possible to state that Flávio Bolsonaro proposed a bill to strip Nossa Senhora Aparecida of the title of patroness of Brazil (this is materially false), but it is permissible to say that Flávio Bolsonaro's allies defend this measure. It is allowed to say that Flávio is close to people who think this way and that sectors of the Catholic Church have expressed concern about this, etc. (this is objectively true), and it is possible to say, for example, that one does not trust Flávio Bolsonaro to protect the status of the patroness of Nossa Senhora Aparecida (this is an opinion, therefore not subject to the Byzantine criterion of truth or falsehood). Tomorrow, with the expected adjustments to the average vote, I will talk more about the subject. But the press needs to be alert because it is reporting incorrectly about the results in certain excerpts and headlines. (translated)

Gentlemen of @Citytv City News We ask you to respect the privacy of BTS. Going to harass them at the hotel is not journalism; it violates their rest after exhausting travels and schedules. We request that you limit coverage to official events only. They are humans, not display dolls. (translated)