Search

The author of the post, We will see each other tomorrow - Shmoo, reminded that Konrad Wernicki claimed the day before that migrants in Paris caused more destruction than Russians in Kyiv, and described it as a fact, not an opinion. As he wrote, seven hours later, after reading 600 comments, Wernicki called his statement an obvious hyperbole and stated that he was amused by the outrage of those commenting on him. The author assessed this change of position as a "reverse ride." #migranci #Paryż #Kijów (translated)

Today in the Military World stated that the presidential debate the previous day did not address defense but extensively discussed public security. The author considered Flávio Bolsonaro's strategy of classifying CV and PCC as narcoterrorist organizations to be correct. According to him, the groups dominated territories, kidnapped and killed, imposed drug trafficking laws, and forced millions of people to live under fear and armed threats. The author stated that this constituted terrorism and supported Flávio Bolsonaro's proposal to combat the groups. #SegurançaPública #Terrorismo #PolíticaBrasil (translated)

The author of the entry accused TVP Info in liquidation of depicting Mr. Piotr as a knifeman, which – as he wrote – destroyed his life and fueled hostility towards the opposition. He stated that the station was hiding behind a mistake by PAP and asked why it had not published an equally loud correction and apology. He informed that in his complaint to KRRiT he demanded the highest legally permissible penalty. https://t.co/MwbBwg9VeC #prawda #media #opinia (translated)

DataFut assessed that the debate was poor, with little discussion about Brazil and proposals and candidates who, according to him, avoided answering the questions. He said that the meeting was reduced to two hours of mutual attacks and that almost no undecided voter would have chosen whom to vote for that day. The author stated that he considered this result expected and hoped that the Globo debate would be a little better. #debate #Brasil #política (translated)

Javier Tebas wrote that the events of October 18 confirmed his earlier accusations against Real Madrid. He recalled that on October 16 he named the journalist from "El Debate," Tomás González-Martín, as the spokesperson for the club's management narrative. On the same day, Real responded with a statement in which, as reported by Tebas, they distanced themselves from the opinions of journalists outside the club. Tebas claimed that he asked Real to deny the comparison to Negreira that the journalist allegedly attributed to club sources, as well as allegations that La Liga was harming the club regarding the scheduling of matches. He also demanded the publication of all of Real’s requests for changes to the schedule and information on how many of them were considered. According to Tebas, on October 18, Real Madrid TV attacked him again, and a section of fans coordinated and supervised by the club displayed a banner with the slogan "Tebas and Negreira." He asked whether the club would also present this as an opinion unrelated to Real. He also accused the management of inciting hostility among fans toward specific individuals; he cited an earlier warning that the club had set Real fans against him and prevented him from moving freely on the street. Tebas accused the management of manipulating the message and spreading false information. He also referred to Real's publication from October 17 about "international media": he stated that the materials from Reuters, BBC, and "L’Équipe," repeated by the club, indicated that it was Real who requested them, and presenting the press reports as support for the club was manipulation. He added that his questions about sources, accusations, and the schedule had remained unanswered since October 16. #RealMadrid #LaLiga #Tebas (translated)

"In my opinion, we failed to make it 4-1. We had countless opportunities to score. We sought with aggression, we never stayed calm with the 3-1. What I would like to emphasize is that, in the moment of defeat, I am exactly the same person and I defend my players until the end. In terms of attitude, they gave everything they had to give. They did what I asked of them. We had a bit of bad luck, with several moments that could have been different in set pieces, in the cards. It was a meeting of emotions, as it could not be otherwise," remarked Reinaldo Ventura after the defeat against France in extra time after Portugal had been leading by two goals seven minutes before the end of the match. #HóqueiemPatins #Mundial2026 #Portugal (translated)

The author r00t🇪🇺 accused Bogucki of selective representation of the Constitutional Tribunal's ruling from December 3, 2015, in case K 34/15. He pointed out that Article 194, paragraph 1 of the Constitution entrusts the Sejm with the election of judges of the Tribunal, while the obligation to take an oath before the President results from the law. He referred to points 8.5.1, 8.5.3, and 8.6 of the justification. As he wrote, the Tribunal considered the oath to be an element added by the legislator to the constitutional procedure, and its acceptance by the President was regarded as an obligation. He added that the Tribunal questioned the interpretation of provisions that would not foresee the immediate taking of an oath. The author assessed that the President does not approve the choice made by the Sejm and cannot, based on statutory competence, co-decide on the composition of the Tribunal. He accused Bogucki of omitting parts of the ruling and using it to provoke opposition to the government and to present its actions as an attack on the constitutional order. Referring to Karol Nawrocki, the author reminded that Article 126, paragraph 1 of the Constitution defines the President of the Republic of Poland as the highest representative of the state and the guarantor of continuity of power, while paragraph 3 indicates that he performs his tasks on the principles specified in the Constitution and laws. He wrote that using the authority of the Constitution to justify a political position does not correspond to those obligations. #Konstytucja #Prawo #Polityka (translated)

Adam presented as a "unpopular opinion" the proposal to include in the constitution the leading role of the PZPR and the unbreakable alliance of the Polish People's Republic with the Soviet Union, which — as he wrote — was supposed to allow competing with the imperialist USA and fractious China. He added that these could have been Gierek's words from around 1975. https://t.co/4uTlI6E7WF #Polska #historia #polityka (translated)

Cláudia Teixeira stated that five commentators distinguished themselves by thinking for themselves, unlike others who, according to her, repeated an ideological line. She wrote that the five voices questioned and dismantled arguments and had the courage to expose what many tried to hide, adding that this made them uncomfortable and made a difference. #Opinião #LiberdadeDeExpressão #VozesAutênticas (translated)

Mafinha wrote that Roberta Luchsinger, who is under investigation in the INSS case, questioned in an interview with CNN what Lula's son did for a living and suggested that they ask the president about it. According to Mafinha, she also said that if Lula wanted to comment on her life, morals, and conduct, he should start at home. https://t.co/bVUAFKCmob #Lula #Política #INSS (translated)

Vinicios Betiol stated that, in 2022, the Federal Highway Police blocked roads in areas where the electorate was predominantly from the Workers' Party and that, subsequently, the Federal Police concluded that the blockades were criminal and led by Silvinei Vasques. He said that the TSE, under the command of Nunes Marques, whom he called a Bolsonaro supporter, was changing 4,000 electoral sections just before the second round. Betiol stated that he could not accuse the minister of acting like Vasques, but that he did not trust in his impartiality. He advocated for transparency in the electoral process and said he hoped that the Workers' Party would take action in the Supreme Court to prevent the changes and that the Federal Police would investigate whether they aimed to hinder voting for one side of the dispute. #Eleições2022 #Transparência #Justiça (translated)

The author of the post claimed that the police violated procedures by detaining Piotr without grounds and without giving him a reason. He added that the recordings had been hidden for a long time so that the public would not see the officers' neglect or how severely they beat Piotr. #OddajciePiotra https://t.co/pvIWXutYMS #Polska #Policja #Sprawiedliwość #PL (translated)

Rafael Gloves stated that Nikolas had worked very hard in this second round. He said that, despite possible disagreements regarding statements, previous positions, or Nikolas's support, Flávio's election would have received a very significant contribution from his support. In the end, he thanked Nikolas. #Eleição2023 #SegundoTurno #Apoio (translated)

Léo Lins stated that if fascism meant defending that minors who committed rape and murder remained in overcrowded prisons, he would identify with that position and wouldn't care. He also said that if they wanted to turn fascism into something positive, they should do it. #fascismo #opinião #justiça (translated)

Victor Lessa stated that, in a meeting last Wednesday, the CBF acknowledged what he considered biased refereeing and serious errors by Rafael Klein and VAR Daniel Nobre Bins. According to the journalist, the refereeing committee assessed that Pulgar should have been expelled for rough and violent play, and that Alex Sandro committed a penalty on Savarino, although it considered the VAR's decision to respect the on-field call in that incident to be correct. The committee, Lessa added, understood that there was no penalty by Leo Ortiz on Castillo. Lessa said that Fluminense demanded punishment for the referee, but that the CBF had already assigned him for the weekend, as it schedules appointments more than one round in advance. He questioned whether Klein could still be punished afterward. He also stated that he agreed the VAR should not intervene in interpretative plays when the referee had a clear view, but criticized the lack of criteria, saying that those responsible decided when to intervene. In Lessa's opinion, there was a clear foul by Leo Ortiz on Castillo, at least for dangerous play, and the incident should have been called as a foul even outside the area. #CBF #Arbitragem #Futebol (translated)

Xico Graziano stated that he had known Reinaldo Azevedo for about 30 years and described him as an excellent journalist who, according to him, was critical of the Workers' Party and was not left-wing. He said that Azevedo later changed his position and became a strong defender of Lula. Graziano mentioned that he had even thought that this change might have been influenced by money, as some people said, but he did not believe that. He stated that people could change their opinions and ideology, citing his own experience, and that he had tolerated comments and analyses from Azevedo that he considered terrible. Finally, he said that he had been mistaken and accused the journalist of having sold out and debased himself. #Jornalismo #ReinaldoAzevedo #Opinião (translated)