Search

What I think. I believe it is necessary to make some clarifications regarding the many things that are being said these days about the actions of the technical consultant appointed by the then Public Prosecutor of Vigevano. When a public prosecutor entrusts an assessment to their own technical consultant and the assessment is carried out in the manner provided for in Article 360 of the Criminal Procedure Code - that is, involving the defenders of the accused and any appointed consultants - that consultant has a legal obligation to make available to the same Public Prosecutor, and obviously to the other parties, all the material related to their work. The obligation of the consultant to submit all documentation is accompanied by the prosecutor's duty to include everything in their file so that the parties can, if they wish, use that material in a future trial. In this case, the lack of knowledge of every operation related to the assignment has ultimately created a procedural flaw (or perhaps it would be better to define it as a “virus”) that has then spread in the subsequent phases of the proceeding. Just to give a concrete example, the experts that the Judge of the abbreviated trial had appointed for an ad hoc expertise on this aspect (DNA on the pedals) did not have knowledge of the negative replies. This process continued until we reached the latest ruling of the Supreme Court, which considered that it was undisputed that there was highly cellular genetic material belonging to the victim on the pedals of the "Umberto Dei" bicycle. By denying the judges of the merits (the GUP of Vigevano and the Courts of Assize of Appeal in Milan) knowledge of the objectively hidden elements (in the sense of "not present"), it ultimately undermined, in my humble opinion, the entire validation process of the evidence, rendering it in fact illegitimate. I am firmly convinced that the Public Prosecutor's Office of Pavia is necessarily committed to the faithful reconstruction of what happened and any related responsibilities. Last note. If at the time of the appeal presented by Stasi's defense to the European Court of Human Rights it had been possible to report this enormous violation of the right to defense that was unknown at the time, the outcome of the appeal would have been completely different. (translated)

#Garlasco #news I finally managed to hear all the recordings released today. "The castle" is exactly that. I have always said that 2017 was a consequence of 2007. The links were clear, especially on one side. Barbaini advises the Poggi family to ask Tizzoni to intervene against Napoleon, and she always asks Venditti to archive Sempio in 2017. Tizzoni tells us about his connections with Barbaini in his book, where he boasts about having managed to have Alberto Stasi convicted. Over the years, Tizzoni shows a strange involvement and attachment to the case, taking attitudes more typical of one side than their legal representative. Tizzoni, a lawyer with very high connections in politics and the judiciary, just to name a few: La Russa, Ligresti, and Berlusconi, takes on the case of a "very important" bicycle accident involving Chiara Poggi’s grandmother, the only (I assume) interlocutor, given the lack of relations between the grandmother and the mother. Let's return to the present, there's lawyer Lovati. The one of dreams, of the hitman. The one who has strange connections even with certain "YouTubers" (Dr. Stevens/Sindoca). The lawyer who accepts cash, "under the table", capable of obtaining a still-secret consultancy, the Linarello, strangely released from the Milan prosecutor's office of our first protagonist, Barbaini. Lovati, advised by Tizzoni, "friends" since their internship days, decides to give the mandate to Garofano, "head" of the Ris in 2007 who, along with Marino, plays with a boy's life. Attributing a trace of blood on the pedals that never existed. A "mistake", unfortunately still cannot be classified as a crime that will forever change Alberto Stasi's life, trapped for the interests of others. The point is, were the Ris hunting for successes after the blunders in Perugia and Cogne, or is there a complicit direction of a corrupt system? (translated)

At #Ore14 with @salvosottile, we deepened the issue of DNA on the pedals of #Stasi's bike and the discovery of the two negative tests from the Ris, excluded from the case for nineteen years and not delivered to either the prosecutor or the defense, which negate the existence of DNA on the pedals. #Garlasco (translated)

No. There is nothing to discuss. There is nothing to ascertain. If there are two opposing scientific results, particularly one positive and two negative, that element cannot be used as evidence against the suspect or the accused. This is due to the principle that a conviction must be issued beyond a reasonable doubt, for the presumption of innocence, for the "favor rei." Because we live in a rule of law state. The DNA of Chiara Poggi on the pedals of Alberto Stasi's bicycle was one of the seven pieces of evidence that led to his conviction. Judicially and humanly. In the ruling of the Court of Appeal in 2014, it is clearly stated that according to the RIS interviewed during the first-degree trial in 2009, that DNA was significant, highly cellular, and compatible with blood substance. In fact, it was so significant that white blood cells could be seen with the naked eye. And that the tests conducted in 2009 yielded negative results regarding the blood presumably because two years had passed. All this was reported. But they forgot to mention that the day after the positive result, two additional tests (which were incomprehensible given the clear result of the first test) had yielded negative results. And when the experts appointed by the first-degree judge asked for all the laboratory results related to the pedals, they only provided the positive one. I want to believe that I live in a place where those who hold great responsibilities take on the consequences of their actions or omissions. I am not interested if, according to the law, the consequences will not be criminal because they have become statute-barred in their illegality. I care that those responsibilities be clarified and made known to everyone. To everyone. And I am sure that will happen. #garlasco (translated)

The evidence that could implicate #Sempio: there could have been blood on imprint 33. The palm print on the wall of the cellar, compatible in 15 points with Sempio's hand, linked to the trace of the bloodied shoe from Racis's work. In the words of the general's men, superficiality emerges: the data on the bicycle identical to that on the teaspoon and the two negative runs on the pedals that invalidate the DNA of the #Stasi verdict. @ilgiornale #Garlasco PS. See you later at #Ore14 (translated)

Influencers and various criminologists should carefully reread this part of the press release from the Public Prosecutor's Office of Pavia: A consultancy from the experts appointed by the defense of Alberto Stasi, Dr. Ugo Ricci and Pasquale Linarello, regarding the Raw Data delivered to the Public Prosecutor's Office of Pavia by the RIS of Parma on 11/06/2025 in the context of the current proceedings has been acquired. In the Raw Data, these consultants detected the presence of counter-analysis (two electrophoresis runs dated 09/20/2007) of the sample bu_p, the same sample that revealed the presence of the victim's DNA on the pedals of Umberto Dei's bike and led to Stasi's arrest, which were completely negative. According to the consultants, these counter-analyses were suitable to exonerate Alberto Stasi 19 years ago, but they do not exist in the file of the criminal proceedings 2025/2007 R.G.N.R. (Public Prosecutor's Office of Vigevano). In other words, the genetic profile determined just the day before (09/19/2007) from the only available extract obtained from the pedals of the bicycle (evidence bu_p) and attributed by the technical consultant of the P.M. of the time "beyond any reasonable doubt" to the victim, was found to be completely negative the following day (09/20/2007), when the same consultant had conducted new analyses. There is no trace of these two electrophoresis runs from 09/20/2007 and the related completely negative profiles in any document of the proceedings/trial held against Alberto Stasi. (translated)

The omission of the production of negative raw data on the presumed DNA undermines the reconstruction of Frau's fingerprints at the crime scene, given that the alleged contamination of the pedals would have been the result of the killer's walk. Non-existent DNA and blood = invalid also Testi. (translated)

L'avvocata di Alberto Stasi, Giada Bocellari, ha sostenuto che la mancanza di due controanalisi negative sul Dna dei pedali della bicicletta, emerse solo recentemente, avrebbe potuto cambiare l'esito del caso, in cui Stasi ha scontato undici anni di galera. #Giustizia #DNA #AlbertoStasi

#garlasco: “Ma mica l’hanno condannato per i pedali!!1!1!”. No, l’hanno solo arrestato con tanto di folla inferocita e l’indizio viene citato nella sentenza definitiva come uno dei capisaldi della colpevolezza. Andate a raccogliere le barbabietole da zucchero. #giustizia #arresto #sentenza

I pedali senza Dna di Chiara: “Ma i Ris nascosero la prova” Un errore nella registrazione delle tracce sulla bici fu coperto e omesso ai magistrati. “#Stasi poteva essere innocente dal 2007″. Il login “port” sul pc dei carabinieri #Garlasco #veritasottoprocesso @ilgiornale https://t.co/t9Ym0adAiy #Garlasco #giustizia #verità

#Garlasco, quel DNA sui pedali che non c’era è un colpo al cuore della giustizia - IL VIDEO Il caso Garlasco è diventato un'inchiesta nell'inchiesta, dove la verità processuale finisce sotto processo. Alberto #Stasi oggi è un presunto innocente che, secondo la procura, poteva essere già scagionato nel 2007. La sua condanna è stata costruita su una prova inesistente @ilgiornale https://t.co/MUHcDy2bdP #giustizia #verità #Garlasco

Milo: “I Ris si dimenticano di comunicare l’esito negativo sui pedali e i carabinieri cancellano il suo alibi. Sei Alberto Stasi e puoi solo andare in carcere perché non c’è una strada diversa, non ti puoi difendere” MILO SUGLI SCUDI 🔥🔥🔥 #ore11 #garlasco https://t.co/Iw1rp3Uzb1 #Giustizia #AlbertoStasi #Garlasco

#garlasco: secondo varie fonti, la persona che materialmente svolse il test relativo al DNA sui pedali della bicicletta è Giorgio Portera. L’uomo, oltre ad essere opinionista in TV, fu curiosamente anche il consulente dei #gambirasio nel processo a #massimobossetti. https://t.co/Hion5J31Wc #garlasco #giustizia #DNA

Oggi, ancor più di ieri, la scoperta di luglio di @LuigiGrimaldi19 sull’Estathé acquista ancora più valore. Per mesi Luigi è stato aspramente criticato e deriso per tutto ciò che ha sempre sostenuto sul caso #Garlasco. Perché l’Estathé acquista ancora più valore ? Ve lo spiego. Ripercorriamo le date e intrecciamo i dati. Sappiamo che il 20 settembre arrivano due controanalisi negative. Nonostante ciò, questo dato non viene riportato alla PM Muscio. Così, il 24 settembre, Stasi viene fermato. Qualcuno pensa forse di averla fatta franca, ma non basta: il 28 settembre la giudice Pravon revoca il fermo per insussistenza di prove e rimette Alberto in libertà. Passano cinque giorni e arriviamo al 3 ottobre, giorno dell’ennesimo sopralluogo nella casa dei Poggi, al quale partecipa anche il generale Garofano. Il 3 ottobre è la prima volta in cui viene fotografata la spazzatura e, nella fotografia, si vede l’Estathé. Estathé che, però, scomparirà nella fotografia del successivo sopralluogo, quello del 5 dicembre 2007. Questo fatto viene messo nero su bianco dai consulenti Avato e Fabbri, i quali chiesero di SIGILLARE E REPERTARE il sacchetto della spazzatura. Richiesta che, però, non venne fatta. Infine arriviamo al 16 aprile 2008, quando, magicamente, nel sacchetto ricompare il famoso brick, accompagnato dalla domanda, pronunciata in sottofondo: «C’è l’Estathé?», proprio prima del repertamento generale. Ecco, se questa spazzatura è stata analizzata solo oggi, nel 2025, è perché, con la “denuncia” di Avato e Fabbri, si sarebbero potute scoprire sin da subito le anomalie relative a quei repertamenti. Anomalie che sembrano seguire un filo conduttore comune: INCASTRARE IN OGNI MODO ALBERTO. Prima con un interrogatorio di sette ore e mezza, per farlo crollare (13 agosto); poi con la cancellazione dell’alibi (14 agosto); quindi con l’impronta 33 (17 agosto e 5 settembre); poi con il sangue sui pedali (19, 20 e 24 settembre); infine con la spazzatura (3 ottobre 2007, 5 dicembre 2007 e 16 aprile 2008). E tralascio i CAPELLI NON REPERTATI (ictu oculi), la pedopornografia, le cartelle militari e tutto il resto. Voglio fare un invito a tutti: non chiamiamole più COINCIDENZE, non chiamiamole più SCIATTERIE, non chiamiamole più ANOMALIE, perché così finiremmo per giustificare cose che NON DEVONO essere giustificate. Da ieri possiamo chiamarle tranquillamente, perché ne abbiamo la conferma: DOLI. DEPISTAGGI. Tutto questo per incastrare un ragazzo di 24 anni. C’erano quasi riusciti. Ma PADRE TEMPO OPERA IN SILENZIO e, nel momento giusto, ha fatto sì che degli UOMINI DI BUONA VOLONTÀ, spinti da un senso profondo di verità e giustizia, facessero ciò che per vent’anni non era mai stato fatto. Il Cinghio. #Garlasco #Giustizia #Verità #Cinghio

Il caso Garlasco si arricchisce di nuovi indizi contro Andrea Sempio, con prove come l'impronta identificabile sul muro e la compatibilità della scarpa con il suo piede, mentre le analisi sul Dna rinvenuto sui pedali della bici di Alberto Stasi risultano ora totalmente negative, alimentando i dubbi sulle condanne passate. #CasoGarlasco #OmicidioChiaraPoggi #IndaginiSempio

L'ex generale Garofano e alcuni ufficiali sono stati sentiti in Procura riguardo all'ipotesi di depistaggio dei Ris nel caso dell'omicidio di Chiara Poggi, poiché si sostiene che il Dna della vittima non fosse presente sui pedali della bici di Alberto Stasi e che le prove siano state occultate. #Garlasco #ChiaraPoggi #Depistaggio