Search

Andrew Sousa stated that Caixa had loaned 400 million and had already received more than 600 million. According to him, the bank would still keep all the financial operations of the club, the naming rights of the stadium, and the possibility of opening a branch on-site, in addition to being able to cover any undue charges investigated by the Public Prosecutor's Office. Sousa said that, in this scenario, the bank would not incur any losses. #Futebol #Finanças #Caixa (translated)

Julio Schneider stated that a report by Andreza Matais from Metrópoles reported that the lobbyist Roberta Luchsinger allegedly used a photo of Fábio Luís Lula da Silva, known as Lulinha, with President Lula, taken during an official trip to Europe in April 2023, to impress businessman Leo Slezynger from Unigel. According to Schneider, Luchsinger presented Lulinha as her partner and was hired to mediate Unigel's interests with Petrobras and BNDES. He added that, according to investigations by the Federal Police mentioned in the report, she received at least R$ 1.26 million between 2023 and 2024. Schneider also wrote that Unigel signed a contract with Petrobras in December 2023, which was later annulled after the TCU pointed out a high risk of loss. Messages released by the report suggested that Luchsinger requested permission to share the photo and suggested that Slezynger invite Lulinha to join the board of an investment fund. He said that the report raised questions about the use of familial relationships with the president to influence business with public companies and classified the case as a criminal organization. #Lula #Lulinha #Corrupção (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the President of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), Minister Luis Felipe Salomão, did not grant, on Thursday (15), the request from Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. to suspend the decision that authorized Vasco x Boca Juniors at Maracanã on October 20 at 9:30 PM for the semifinal of the Copa Sul-Americana. According to the report, Salomão considered that the concessionaire, constituted by Flamengo and Fluminense, did not have the legitimacy to appeal to this legal instrument, as it is a private company and does not act as a delegate of public service. The minister also understood that the choice of the stadium did not constitute a primary public interest that would justify the exceptional request. The publication stated that Fla-Flu Serviços had claimed risks related to the meeting of the fans, the operation of the stadium, the pitch, and the need for a minimum interval of 72 hours between matches. According to the report, Salomão concluded that the company did not prove a serious threat to public order, security, or the economy. He also pointed out that the transfer of the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo alleviated some of the concerns. Furthermore, according to Attention, Vasco fans!, the minister considered that potential damage to the pitch would not constitute serious harm to public assets nor justify the suspension. The publication added that he evaluated that the request could not substitute for a judicial appeal and that any questioning regarding the actions of judges from the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro should follow the appropriate appeal channels. The decision maintained the authorization for the match at Maracanã without suspension by the STJ. The publication described the outcome as a procedural victory for Vasco but noted that it did not end all possibilities for judicial contestation. It also informed that the decision concerning Safety Suspension No. 3,678/RJ was signed at 12:49 PM on October 15, 2026. #Vasco #BocaJuniors #Maracanã (translated)

The management of SATA stated that the disclosure of competing companies for the privatization of Azores Airlines could lead to losses and decided to postpone this disclosure to December 9, when the consortia will be committed to the acquisition. #Privatizações #AzoresAirlines #SATA (translated)

SATA stated that disclosing the competitors for the privatization of Azores Airlines could result in losses, choosing to keep them confidential until December 9, the date when the binding proposals will be presented and the consortia will be committed to acquiring the company. #Aviação #Privatização #Açores (translated)

Alberto Gonçalves discusses the privatization of TAP and argues that the sale of nearly half of the company to Lufthansa reduces the financial loss from the previous bailout and criticizes the nostalgia surrounding the need for a state airline. #TAP #Privatização #PedroNunoSantos (translated)

The Judicial Police and the Tax Authority conducted more than 50 searches at banks, companies, and residences, including Banco Carregosa and the Angolan Investment Bank, as part of an investigation into a tax fraud scheme that may have caused losses of millions of euros to the State. #FraudeFiscal #PolíciaJudiciária #Impostos (translated)

The president of Vasco, Pedrinho, commented again on the controversy regarding the use of Maracanã. He said he requested to play at the stadium because he could not perform at São Januário and that he had asked the Consortium for the location in advance. According to Pedrinho, Bap, president of Flamengo, often claimed not to recognize the contract, even though it had been signed by Flamengo and Fluminense. Pedrinho stated that he learned the Consortium had once again gone to court and cited a report from Conmebol that, according to him, could lead Brazil's match to Paraguay. He classified this possibility as a cowardice against Vasco and the competition. The official said that the discussion had ceased to be technical and had turned into a power struggle, although he claimed to have never had a direct conflict with Bap. Should the game be moved to Paraguay, Pedrinho stated that he would strongly position himself before Conmebol on behalf of Vasco and that he would reassess the meaning of the Copa Sudamericana. He spoke to ESPN Brazil and SportsCenter BR. https://t.co/nSA2gNaXC4 #Vasco #Flamengo #Maracanã (translated)

Gustavo Tutinha wrote that Judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto reinstated the injunction that required the Fla-Flu Consortium to make the Maracanã available for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors on October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to Tutinha, the magistrate considered that moving the match could pose public safety risks and disrupt the planning already in place, giving weight to the opinions of the Public Ministry and security agencies. Tutinha stated that the judge rejected the consortium's arguments regarding the preservation of the field, believing that any material damage could be compensated for as loss and damages. He also noted that the judge deemed the sale of 46,014 tickets to be significant and dismissed the claim that Vasco's request had become irrelevant with the end of the CONMEBOL deadline. According to the author, the magistrate recorded that the entity had set the new deadline for selecting the stadium as October 13 at 12 PM, Brasília time. Still according to Tutinha, the decision mandated that the basketball game between Flamengo and Botafogo, scheduled for the Maracanãzinho on the same day, be transferred or rescheduled for a time that did not coincide with the flow of fans. He added that the case would be analyzed by the Special Body of TJRJ in the first in-person session, scheduled for October 19, the eve of the match. #Maracanã #Vasco #SegurançaPública (translated)

Danteskoo said he had been criticizing daily, in OVOV and Expresso, what he called a loss for the consortium for hosting another football match in October, which he considered insignificant. He cited the assessment of a judge that any material losses incurred by the concessionaire could be compensated, while the risks to public safety caused by the change of stadium would be harder to remedy. The author criticized what he considered a lack of common sense in the decisions and mocked that it seemed as if Vasco was practicing another sport or would be doing work on the Maracanã lawn. #Futebol #Vasco #Consórcio (translated)

The Cruzmaltino Podcast reported that the judge Joaquim Domingos de Almeida Neto, from the Special Body of the TJRJ, reinstated the authorization for Vasco to face Boca Juniors at Maracanã on October 20 at 9:30 PM. According to the report, the decision was signed on Tuesday (13th) at 7:11 AM, and determined that Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. would make the stadium available. The podcast stated that the judge reconsidered a previous ruling that had suspended the authorization. Among the reasons, he pointed out that the prior decision was based on an outdated version of the Internal Regulations of the Court, without considering a change approved in September. The rule, according to the report, allowed the president of the Chamber to review urgent requests when the rapporteur was absent. Since the original rapporteur was on vacation and there was a deadline to inform Conmebol about the stadium, the judge recognized the competence of the president of the 23rd Chamber to grant the authorization. The Cruzmaltino Podcast also reported that public safety weighed into the decision. The magistrate reportedly considered favorable technical assessments regarding Maracanã and the potential impacts of a stadium change on policing, access, fan separation, the press, and broadcasting. The document recorded, based on information presented by Vasco, the sale of 46,014 tickets. According to the podcast, the judge assessed that any material damages to the concessionaire could be compensated, while the risks to collective safety would be harder to repair. Regarding Conmebol's deadline, the report stated that the judge rejected the argument that the request had lost its purpose. The decision reportedly noted that the initial communication occurred within the deadline, and that, according to Vasco, the entity granted a new deadline: that same day at noon. The podcast added that Flamengo x Botafogo, scheduled to take place at Maracanãzinho on the same date, should be transferred or rescheduled for a time that did not coincide with the flow of fans from the football match. It also reported that the process would continue in the Special Body, with consideration expected at the first in-person session the day before the match. #Vasco #Maracanã #Justiça (translated)

Attention, Vasco fans! It was reported that the Institute of Cooperation, Human and Social Development (CODHES) presented, on Monday (12), a factual news item to the Public Prosecutor's Office of Rio de Janeiro, requesting urgent measures regarding the denial of use of the Maracanã for Vasco vs. Boca Juniors. The match was scheduled for October 20, for the semifinals of the Copa Sudamericana. According to the publication, the document, signed by the president of the institute, José Roberto da Costa Junior, requested that the responsibilities of the presidents of Flamengo and Fluminense and the administrators of the concessionaire Fla-Flu Serviços S.A. be investigated. CODHES also requested clarifications regarding the powers of the concessionaire and about a possible influence of sports rivalry on the decision. The entity further requested that the Public Prosecutor's Office examine the situation of Judge Suely Lopes Magalhães, who, according to journalistic information cited in the statement, was in the Netherlands when she suspended the authorization for the match. The request included clarifications about the trip, any functional suspension, and the exercise of the magistrate's duties during that period. The publication stated that the document mentioned more than 45,000 tickets sold and requested an assessment of possible losses for fans in terms of travel, accommodations, and transportation. The institute pointed out the possibility of compensation for material damages and potential collective moral damages, if the legal requirements were met, in addition to requesting measures to prevent clashes and risks related to the uncertainty of the stadium. According to Attention, Vasco fans!, CODHES also admitted the possibility of filing a collective lawsuit and resorting to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights if it identified violations attributable to the Brazilian state and if the legal requirements were fulfilled. #Maracanã #CopaSulAmericana #Vasco (translated)

Karina Michelin stated that, on Monday, October 12, Flávio Bolsonaro's electoral program was broadcast without audio on television, while Lula's was transmitted normally afterwards. According to her, Flávio's campaign claimed to have delivered the material with sound and checked the content before the transmission. Michelin recalled that, according to her description, the generation of the national signal was the responsibility of a pool of broadcasters installed at the headquarters of the Superior Electoral Court in Brasília, which distributed the content via satellite. She questioned at what stage the audio might have been lost and who would be responsible, in addition to raising the hypothesis of sabotage. The author said she presented a video comparing the silent transmission with the original version of the program, with audio. She also stated that the incident harmed the fairness of the competition and the right of voters to know Flávio's proposals, which, according to her, had been the target of false news. Michelin requested clarifications, the disclosure of the transmission records, and compensation for the lost time. #Eleições2023 #Brasil #Justiça (translated)