Search

The author of the entry claimed that a Supreme Court judge, appointed by the neo-KRS and appointed during the presidency of Karol Nawrocki, started a commotion on a train while having 4.3 grams of alcohol in his blood. According to the author, he was detained in Słupsk. He added that he was not surprised by this, as he believed the case involved people from the same environment. https://t.co/b4pLaz00yj https://t.co/dWrDHjahK6 #SądNajwyższy #Polska #neoKRS #PL (translated)

The author criticized a Supreme Court judge appointed by the KRS, which he described as "neoKRS" set up by PiS, and appointed by Nawrocki. He wrote that such individuals were promoted and introduced to the highest level of the judiciary within the framework of reforms, calling it a manifestation of degeneration and pathology. #SądNajwyższy #Polska #Reformy #PL (translated)

MaxTVNews Poland claimed that a Supreme Court justice nominated by President Nawrocki had been heavily intoxicated when he fell on a train platform in Słupsk and lost two teeth. The account said police were investigating a possible Russian connection, asking whether Stolichnaya or Belvedere was involved, and questioned the justice’s identity. https://t.co/4G4W4eTR4w #Polska #SądNajwyższy #Polityka #US #PL #RU

Supreme Court judge Andrzej Michałowicz was taken to the hospital after police intervention at the train station in Słupsk, where, according to the media, he had over four per mille of alcohol in his blood and was causing a disturbance on the train, prompting the National Council of the Judiciary to announce an investigation into the matter regarding disciplinary responsibility. #pijanySędzia #KrajowaRadaSądownictwa #sądNajwyższy (translated)

Justice Minister Waldemar Żurek emphasized the need to thoroughly clarify the incident at the station in Słupsk, in which a Supreme Court judge was involved, pointing out the unacceptable behavior and doubts concerning the process of judicial nominations. #Żurek #SądNajwyższy #alkohol (translated)

Kamil Zaradkiewicz wrote that the regime's services took specific actions aimed at paralyzing the work of the Supreme Court. He claimed that the next steps would be similar to those concerning the Constitutional Tribunal and would include an attempt to remove judges from office. He added that the takeover of the Constitutional Tribunal was also an element of the attack plan on the Supreme Court, independent of the regime. #Polska #SądNajwyższy #NiezależnośćSądów (translated)

Dariusz Mazur wrote that a three-member panel of judges, whom he referred to as neojudges, excluded 35 judges from adjudicating on the resolution planned for November. According to him, it was meant to serve the "legalization" of nominees from the neo-KRS, and the majority of those excluded were legal judges remaining in the Supreme Court. Mazur accused that the panel was to rule on its own case, while simultaneously excluding properly appointed judges. He assessed that after the healing of the Constitutional Tribunal, it should be time for the Supreme Court. He claimed that the participation of neojudges in adjudicating panels deprives the Supreme Court of the characteristics of an independent and impartial court as understood by the Constitution and the ECHR. #SądNajwyższy #praworządność #NeoSędziowie (translated)

It is about excluding those who have a different opinion than the others. Yet the others also present their opinion in a series of rulings. Those judges who do not fit the position that is to be adopted in the resolution have been excluded. The institution of exclusion has been used instrumentally to achieve the desired effect – comments Supreme Court judge Michał Laskowski, who has also been excluded from considering this case. #SądNajwyższy #neoSędziowie #Prawo (translated)

The Supreme Court in Poland has faced a challenge regarding the status of so-called ne judges, as 35 judges have been excluded from considering a key case, which raises controversy and accusations of manipulation from judges who question the legality of their appointment. #SądNajwyższy #neoSędziowie #Prawo (translated)

The author of the entry referred to the comparison made by Professor Grabowska, who likened the selection of a Constitutional Tribunal judge to the admission of a person without a high school diploma to university. He asked why similar procedural requirements are not applied to the election of President Karol Nawrocki. He recalled that Article 129(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland indicates the Supreme Court as the body determining the validity of the presidential election. However, he noted that the resolution in this matter was adopted by the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs, the status of which as a court established by law — as he wrote — has been questioned in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. He added that the National Electoral Commission pointed out irregularities requiring judicial assessment and the need for the case to be heard by a panel whose independence would not be in doubt. The author emphasized that he does not prejudge the invalidity of Nawrocki's election. He also reminded that taking the oath provided for in Article 130 of the Constitution does not by itself remove any potential defects in the earlier electoral procedure. He asked whether constitutional requirements are applied selectively, depending on the political support for a given person. #KonstytucjaRP #SądNajwyższy #Polityka (translated)

The number of legal questions directed to the Supreme Court in Poland has dropped by nearly 57 percent over the last decade, which is a result of the loss of authority of this institution and the conflict over the status of neojudges. #SądNajwyższy #prawo #neosiędziowie (translated)

In the Supreme Court, under the leadership of acting Chief Justice Zbigniew Kapiński, a legal absurdity is being prepared. The head of the Ministry of Justice, Waldemar Żurek, assessed on Tuesday that a "trial of legal absurdity" is being prepared in the Supreme Court. #SądNajwyższy #praworządność #neosiędziowie (translated)

Minister Waldemar Żurek criticized the attempt to convene a full bench of the Supreme Court by the First President Zbigniew Kapiński, describing it as "an attempt at legal absurdity" and stressing that only legitimate judges can constitute a court. #SądNajwyższy #praworządność #neosiędziowie (translated)