Search

Scaloppine wrote that Supreme Court judge Andrzej Michałowicz had over 4 per mil of alcohol and was causing a commotion on the train. He presented him as a protégé of Zbigniew Ziobro and the president of the District Court in Słupsk, appointed in July by Karol Nawrocki to the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court despite numerous objections. He added that Michałowicz was appointed by the "illegal KRS." The author described this situation as a reflection of the decline of Polish judiciary and accused Nawrocki and his associates of not commenting on or condemning the matter. He also wrote that later Szefernaker spoke of his boss as a defender of the rule of law and the Constitution, to which Scaloppine denied, claiming that Nawrocki protected a drunken troublemaker. https://t.co/6BgbKbMzPW #praworządność #Polska #sądownictwo (translated)

Tusk wants to destroy Poland and sell us into slavery— He is right. I hate that Tusk, he is a liar and a fraud. Just look at how fuel keeps getting more expensive. Tusk wants to destroy Poland and sell us into slavery. We will not allow it — announces Mrs. Barbara, who came to the demonstration with a white-and-red wreath on her head. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #protest #praworządność (translated)

At the Saturday demonstration in front of the Constitutional Tribunal in Warsaw, participants expressed concerns about the rule of law in Poland and criticized the current government, emphasizing their determination to defend state institutions. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #protest #praworządność (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that the crowds of Poles gathered that day in Warsaw demanded the stopping, as he put it, of Tusk's lawlessness. He declared that the participants did not intend to retreat and pointed out that they were defending the Constitutional Tribunal, the rule of law, and the sovereignty of Poland. He added that everyone had to take a stand on the side of Poland, and that joint action was meant to lead to victory. https://t.co/HzXEiSMmhP #Polska #praworządność #demokracja #PL (translated)

Tomasz Lis wrote that the attendance at today's demonstration was incomparably lower than at their marches in defense of the Constitutional Tribunal. He added that the rule of law was perhaps more of a topic and emotion for their side. #praworządność #demonstracja #TK (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that he was at the Constitutional Tribunal that day because, as he stated, Poland needed the rule of law. He added that he wanted to defend the Constitution, sovereignty, and the future of children, and he opposed the destruction of the rule of law. He emphasized that Poland and Poles should come first. https://t.co/tTBbTXuFMp #Praworządność #Konstytucja #Polska #PL (translated)

Oskar Kida announced a meeting at 2:00 PM in front of the Constitutional Tribunal at al. Szucha 12A in Warsaw. He wrote that the constitution and the rule of law are the foundations of the state, and he called for a demonstration that they will not allow them to be destroyed. https://t.co/oYQHGUBMtg #Konstytucja #Praworządność #Warszawa (translated)

Professor Ryszard Piotrowski wondered when the European Commission would express serious doubts and advocated for the activation of Article 7. He assessed that the government was taking over the Constitutional Tribunal in a longer process that included not publishing judgments, withdrawing funding, intimidating and bullying officials, and using institutional violence. He also pointed to sending police and prosecutors to the Tribunal. #KomisjaEuropejska #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #praworządność (translated)

Magda wrote that Andrzej Michałowicz had two broken teeth and about four per mille of alcohol, and he was taken from the station by an ambulance. She stated that under Ziobro's government, he became the president of the District Court in Słupsk, and the neo-KRS led to his nomination to the Supreme Court. She added that on July 28, Karol Nawrocki handed him the appointment, who — as she noted — spoke about saving courts and the rule of law. Magda assessed that the case of one of his nominees reduced this story to about four per mille. #Polska #prawo #sądownictwo (translated)

The author wrote that according to media reports, the government had a list of 50 cases that the "new" Tribunal was supposed to overturn. He claimed that this would ensure impunity for Donald Tusk and his associates for breaking the law, and he described these actions as transforming Poland into a dictatorship. #praworządność #Polska #demokracja #PL (translated)

The author of the entry assessed that Tusk is restoring the rule of law after years of chaos, for which he blamed PiS. He accused this party of usurping the state and disregarding the Constitution, and called for those who — as he wrote — destroyed the standards of the rule of law to be held accountable according to the law and without leniency. #praworządność #Konstytucja #Polska #PL (translated)

The spokesperson for the President of the Republic of Poland, Rafał Leśkiewicz, said on Republic TV that the president had warned the government against unlawful actions towards the Constitutional Tribunal and attempts to forcibly take over this body. He announced that such actions would be met with a decisive reaction from the president, who—as he stated—has an obligation to respond to violations of the law. Leśkiewicz stated that the rule of law means adhering to the Constitution and laws, which the government and the prime minister are obliged to do. He accused the ruling party of looking for legal loopholes and alternative interpretations of regulations, adding that if they do not understand them, they should stop governing. He also said that individuals claiming to be judges of the Constitutional Tribunal are not, because they have not taken an oath before the president. In the case of some individuals, as he pointed out, there is a dispute before the Tribunal between the president and the speaker of the Sejm, arising from Article 189 of the Constitution. Leśkiewicz further claimed that Minister Berek does not meet the formal requirements to hold the position of a judge of the Tribunal, and Prime Minister Donald Tusk knows this or pretends not to know. He emphasized that the Polish people have the right to expect the highest qualifications from the Tribunal's judges. Regarding security and the blocking of illegal content on the internet, Leśkiewicz pointed to law enforcement and special services operating in Poland and to the anti-terrorism law, which he claimed would be in effect from 2024. He noted that the authorities on one hand talk about the need for a law to block illegal content, while on the other hand inform about their blocking. He claimed that the existing regulations already allow for the effective blocking of such content. He added that the government is responsible for ensuring security in Poland. In the matter of ambassadors, Leśkiewicz appealed for a solution to the problem so that Polish ambassadors could represent the country in their posts. He assessed that a conversation with Prime Minister Tusk is needed, not with Minister Sikorski, and said that the appointment of ambassadors in nearly 50 countries depends on the prime minister. #Praworządność #Konstytucja #Polska (translated)

Anna Kwiecień wrote that a policeman indicated the Ministry of Paulina Hennig-Kloski as the coordinator of the action, and attributed the responsibility for feeding and watering the animals to the employees of the ministry of Waldemar Żurek. She stated that as a result, jobs for 40 people were eliminated. She added that for eight years, there has been talk of the rule of law, and encouraged the audience to listen to how she believes it looks in practice. #praworządność #Polska #zwierzęta (translated)

The spokesperson of the National Judicial Council, Jarosław Łuczaj, criticizes judge Piotr Mgłoska for the theses he presented regarding the KRS, emphasizing that the council's actions are independent of the policy of the Minister of Justice, and that the changes introduced by the legislator aim to restore the rule of law. #praworządność #KRS #sędziowie (translated)

Bartosz Lewandowski suggested that the individuals chosen for the Constitutional Tribunal are to carry out a specific political task, rather than adjudicating independently in accordance with the Constitution and their own conscience. According to him, this would stem from the fact that Donald Tusk's government is unable to push through certain solutions in the Sejm. He ironized that such an approach was "lawful to the point of pain." #praworządność #konstytucja #Polska (translated)

Magda wrote that Karol Nawrocki said on Polsat that he will be consistent regarding the Constitutional Tribunal. She pointed out Bogdan Święczkowski as his business card in the rule of law, whom she described as a man of Zbigniew Ziobro. She recalled that Święczkowski headed the ABW during the operation at Barbara Blida's home and was the National Prosecutor when the prosecution discontinued the BitBay case, now Zondacrypto. She added that the prosecution wants to lift his immunity in connection with Pegasus, and he himself declared a coup and stands at the head of the Constitutional Tribunal, which Nawrocki defends. Magda called on Nawrocki to be consistent and wrote that Święczkowski is "an excellent business card" for his presidency. #praworządność #TK #Polska (translated)

Adam Mazguła criticized Rafał Jankowski and the board of the NSZZ Policjantów after Jankowski stated that police officers "do not stand on the side of the government." He claimed that such a position undermines loyalty to constitutional organs of the state and could lead to anarchy. He accused Jankowski of having political ties to PiS and argued that his statement encourages police officers not to fulfill their duties. Mazguła referred to Article 27, point 1 of the Police Act of April 6, 1990, and cited the oath taken by police officers. He argued that police officers should serve Poland and its constitutional bodies, including the democratically elected government and the Minister of the Interior and Administration. He also accused the NSZZ board and Jankowski of focusing on pay and benefits. The author wrote that Jankowski did not respond to what he described as cases of death following police interventions, the use of violence against women and peaceful demonstrators, the detention of a female MP, the shooting of a “Solidarity” journalist, as well as repression and falsification of evidence against democratic opposition activists. These were Mazguła's accusations against Jankowski. Mazguła urged policewomen and policemen to serve Poland, not politics, and to use force against those breaking the law. He added that since Jankowski informed institutions of his position, he also conveyed his opinion to them. #PrawdąWOczy #WPoczuciuOdpowiedzialności #TarczaWolnościSłowa #BronimyKonstytucji #ŻołnierzGorszegoSortu #PrawaCzłowieka #WolnośćSłowa #ŚwieckośćPaństwa #PrawaKobiet #WojskoPolskie #Policja #Praworządność #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The author of the post criticized Brudziński for referring to the democratically elected government as the "Tusk gang," accusing him of inconsistency with his declared defense of the rule of law and the Constitution. He reminded that — as he wrote — judges of the Constitutional Tribunal are elected by the Sejm based on Article 194, paragraph 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, and a change in the parliamentary majority does not take away these powers. The author also questioned the characterization of the Sejm's actions as an unlawful takeover of the Tribunal and the presentation of it as the last independent institution of justice, pointing to long-standing controversies regarding its composition, functioning, and independence. He accused Brudziński's group of treating the state as their own property. The commenter assessed that the dissemination of false or manipulated information and the presentation of lawful actions of the state as an assault on constitutional order should meet with a response from public opinion, as well as an assessment from the relevant authorities regarding potential legal responsibility. He added that freedom of speech and the right to criticize the government do not mean unlimited freedom to make false accusations. #Polska #konstytucja #praworządność (translated)