A Russian drone hit a school in Kyiv while there were more than 100 children and 60 teachers inside, and President Zelensky emphasized that such attacks are a deliberate tactic targeting everyday life. (translated)
⚠️The president signed the law that he talked about just 9 days ago: https://t.co/DxOausNBgl (translated)
Sikorski confirms to Olejnik that there will be no fuel at 5.19: - the president expects that the price of gasoline will be 5.19 as Donald Tusk promised during the campaign - let him write a complaint to his patron, who started the war in the Persian Gulf And where can one write a complaint about a deceitful, promise-breaking, and completely unreliable government? Anyone, anything? (translated)
No, Poland lost. Gasoline is going to remain expensive, with the difference being that taxpayers will have another levy to pay. The real causes of this high prices have not been addressed. You are just passing the responsibility and imposing more taxes. That's all you can do. (translated)
"Ukrainian tactical ballistics. FP-7. First combat application. Thank you for the result," writes Zelensky on social media. (translated)
Ukraine has used its tactical ballistic missile FP-7 in combat conditions for the first time, announced President Volodymyr Zelensky, and it is compared to the American missile ATACMS. (translated)
On Sunday we start running. This is what the medal looks like for all finishers of the Slavia Run powered by Hisense. How do you like it? 👀 (translated)
From tomorrow, filling up to full costs a maximum of 260-290 PLN. For a full tank. That's how it will be, right @donaldtusk? (translated)
It's quite sad here. I'm not even writing about it anymore because most of you can't even imagine anything about it and you still have smart remarks. But since my colleague summarized it so nicely here with pictures... Africa in France. This will catch up with all of us over time. (translated)
"I've made a few materials about the deposit system. Every time before such material, I do a little test for myself. [...] In three large stores, I was unable to return the bottle again in the afternoon, after work. Simply. The bottle return machine didn't work in each one." (translated)
"The situation in the Strait of Hormuz is still very tense." Finance and Economy Minister Andrzej Domański also addressed the matter during a press conference for Polish media in the United States on the sidelines of the G20 meeting. (translated)
I understand that you are not an economist, but after all, you have an entire army of "advisors" at your disposal... Because this is no longer information relayed by Moody. This is your RHETORIC. Just like with the debt. "In four years, the government increases debt by a trillion." The thing is, four years have not yet passed 🤷♂️ You are already linking the executed debt with a FUTURE FORECAST and then dividing that amount by the number of residents, announcing that a newborn has "26 thousand zł of debt." How do you come to such absurd conclusions?? I won't say it's not impressive... But public debt is not a personal obligation that is assigned to a child's account. And then there's the Constitutional Tribunal. You sign a law, still consider it unconstitutional, and send it to the Tribunal. The same Tribunal that the ECtHR has found to violate the right to a court set by law in the Xero Flor case, and the Grand Chamber of the CJEU in case C-448/23 stated that it does not meet the requirement of an independent and impartial court due to serious irregularities concerning its composition. And just minutes earlier, you said: "I'm not looking at legal loopholes." The Constitution and the legality of state organs are not "legal loopholes," Mr. Guardian of the Constitution 🤦♂️ And in the end, you say that you don't want "constant political war"... After a speech in which words fall: - blackmail, - the government’s ATM, - the government's financial catastrophe, - the prime minister's political plan and unsubstantiated claims that the government deliberately maintains high fuel prices to profit from them. I won't judge intentions. I assess the content. And the content of the official statement by the person holding the highest office in the state should withstand confrontation with documents 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ Here - in many key areas - it does not withstand. I will no longer dwell on this speech, as I believe it is a waste of time. I'll just say this. I don't know who prepared this text for you. However, I do know that you read it, you delivered it, and you take responsibility for every word. And you repeated nonsense and manipulations that have long circulated in the statements of people from your Chancellery — which I have already corrected multiple times. The worst part is that many of them don't even take long to verify. You just need to open the documents from your own Chancellery. I really don't envy you. It only pains me your slogan: "First Poland, first Poles." Because Poland and Poles should truly come first - even before political interests, party narratives, and the need for another conflict. You cannot appeal to the good of citizens while simultaneously playing with their trust in the state, providing them from the highest office with half-truths, insinuations, and political assessments cloaked as facts. This is not about whether someone likes this government. It's about accountability for words. Especially from this office 🫣 (translated)
Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that the assets of Western companies seized in Russia can be returned under favorable conditions. (translated)
Ukrainian tactical ballistic missile FP-7. First combat use. Thank you for the result. Next: production. Glory to Ukraine! Ukraine has used its tactical ballistic missile FP-7 in combat for the first time, President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Thursday. (translated)
That the former leader of the Council for the Fight Against Hate Speech so lowly mocks the victims of post-war massacres is sensational news. With rare exceptions, the major media have kept silent about it. Because they judged that it would harm the left option. You can stick credibility somewhere. (translated)
President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed the first combat use of the Ukrainian tactical ballistic missile FP-7, thanks to which production is expected, while details about its use and strikes remain undisclosed. (translated)
Mr. Nawrocki, Unfortunately, I listened to this hmmm "message" and checked it against the documents. And, as usual, I have a problem. A big one. Because when you set aside the gestures, the teleprompter, and the political phrases, what remains is a series of facts mixed with half-truths, altered chronology, forecasts presented as certainties, and accusations that are not even confirmed by the documents of your own Office and a mass of other manipulations. Step by step. "The campaign promise of fuel at 5.19." No. Mr. Donald Tusk’s specific statement about 5.19 PLN was made in JUNE 2022. Parliamentary elections were scheduled for August 8, 2023. Only then did the election campaign begin in the sense of the Electoral Code. But it gets much more interesting with your quote... In the message, you connected 5.19 PLN, "one simple decision," and... a VAT reduction 🤦♂️ However, in the original statement about 5.19, Tusk talked about the MARGINS of Orlen and Lotos. And in a later statement about "one decision," he also talked about limiting Orlen's profits. Not about VAT! 🤦♂️ You are manipulating the Prime Minister's statement, and you are using the institution of the Address to the Nation for that... Exactly the same version about VAT was spread by Mr. Bogucki in the morning, but in his case, nothing surprises me anymore. A coincidence? Let’s move on. You claim that your project would cause "an immediate drop in fuel prices of over 2 PLN." Meanwhile, your OWN justification explicitly states that the mechanism DOES NOT START when the law comes into force. First, specific market conditions must occur. Then the Council of Ministers MAY issue a regulation. Only then does the mechanism begin to work. Where is the "immediate" here? Did you read your "own" project? Or are you just repeating this nonsense from Mr. Przydacz? Moreover, earlier materials from KPRP talked about an ESTIMATE of 1.70–2.60 PLN 🤦♂️ In the address, the estimate has already turned into a guaranteed effect 🤦♂️ Next, you say that the project is "good for the budget"... Meanwhile, your own justification predicts a loss of up to 600 million PLN just from the retail sales tax and further, unestimated costs of any potential excise tax reduction. I ask again - did you read your own project? Because you probably didn’t write it manually... Even more interesting. In the address: "The government bears full responsibility for fuel prices." In the justification of your project: market disruptions have an "objective character and are independent of entrepreneurs and the government".... So please decide. Full responsibility of the government or factors independent of the government? Because both versions cannot be true at the same time 🤦♂️ "The Marshal of the Sejm freezes the project." The project was submitted on September 18. On the same day, it was directed to the Legislative Office and BEOS. Then for opinions and consultations. Moreover, KPRP talked about the possibility of "freezing" as early as September 17 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️ THE DAY BEFORE THE PROJECT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE SEJM! So first, a narrative about freezing was created, and only later did the Marshal receive the bill 🤦♂️🤦♂️ Are you communicating with the rest of the "experts" in your office?? Next, we hear that the government deliberately keeps prices high because it wants to profit from VAT and dividends from Orlen. Proof? None was provided! A higher price may mean higher nominal VAT revenues. Orlen can pay dividends to shareholders. But one does not imply the other: this is NOT proof that the government deliberately keeps fuel prices high. This is attributing a motive without providing evidence 🤦♂️ Then you sign the law and say: "Every zloty obtained from this law must be spent on reducing fuel prices." A moment earlier, you conceded that the law DOES NOT CONTAIN a mechanism for passing that money on to reduce prices 🤦♂️🤦♂️ Exactly. So it "mustn't." This is your political demand, not the legal effect of the signed law 🤷♂️ Moody’s? Yes. Here, the fact is a fact: Poland's rating was lowered from A2 to A3. But why was there no information that at the same time, the outlook was changed from negative to STABLE? Why does the rating decision then create a vision that "tomorrow there may not be enough for pensions and armaments"? (translated)
Ukraine has used a self-developed tactical ballistic missile of the FP-7 type for the first time in the war against Russia, while President Zelensky announces the expansion of missile production. (translated)
"With his back against the wall, President Nawrocki signed the law on excess profits of fuel companies. Consistency and determination always bring results; that's how it has to be with Karol Nawrocki," stated Tomasz Trela from the Left. (translated)
