BETA nonprofit public democratic european moderated

Search

#garlasco

Garofano: "I liked the performance of lawyer De Rensis" De Rensis: "Thank you, but this is nothing compared to what is to come. There will be much worse, I guarantee you." (translated)

#Bocellari: this is a matter of unprecedented seriousness because they had no right to choose and decide whether, what, how, when to deliver the analyses! (translated)

The captain of the Carabinieri RIS is the military who testified to the importance of the 33, which, according to him, was immediately evident to be a wet palm. He also revealed that the 2 negative DNA counter-tests were not sent to prosecutor Muscio. #Garlasco Collaborate for the truth (translated)

Am I bad if I start to think that the fugitive with the 33 has disappeared because the DNA was not Stasi’s? (translated)

And the creeping fear about how many investigations in the history of Italy have been conducted cannot be silenced. #garlasco was a terrible mistake or was there more? And in other cases? The Italian excellence of the #ris must be freed from all suspicion. (translated)

Talking today with Luca Tartaglia was exciting. Especially for the news that started to come out just before going on stage. And it was inevitable to say, as was said on Saturday in Montecatini, that I, along with Tartaglia, De Giuseppe and a very few others, everything we have done in these years, before the public recognition, we did with the CERTAINTY of being in the right. With the CERTAINTY that in 2017 this story was not over. Now, personally I would not have imagined what emerged today. And I want to be cautious. Because if what is claimed by the Pavia Prosecutor's Office were true - I emphasize the IF - we should look critically not only at Garlasco. I add a postscript: I have nothing to celebrate. Absolutely nothing. I only feel so much bitterness for the lives shattered in these years. (translated)

I dream of a piece of news where #Garlasco is not the opening of a news program. Not that it isn't talked about. That it isn't the opening of a news program. (translated)

Lyuba 3h

According to Tg1, the RIS Marino during the sit would have confirmed having conducted two negative analyses and informed superiors of the results. (translated)

Listening to the service of @Tg1Rai, we know that Marino, questioned on Friday, would have confirmed the double negative result of September 20, 2007, and would have communicated it to his superiors. This is. This is the outrage committed to the detriment of Stasi. (translated)

There was no DNA of Alberto Stasi on Chiara's nails. There was no child pornography on his computer. The pedals of his bike had not been switched. And there was neither blood nor DNA of Chiara on those pedals. How many more things, that led to the conviction and contributed to the creation of the monster, have never existed? #garlasco (translated)

Garlasco investigation: the Public Prosecutor's Office of Pavia reveals that the Parma forensic team hid in 2007 the evidence that exonerated Stasi. A guilty theory was constructed at the expense of a man while ignoring science and reality. I ask: who will compensate Stasi for a life destroyed by miscarriage of justice? (translated)

Pino Rinaldi: “As always, Sempio's defense is strongly supported by the Poggi. What emerged today should have prompted reflection, yet Tizzoni and Compagna claim that there is no new evidence regarding Stasi...” (translated)

Oh God TG1: Marino discredits Garofano, he told the prosecutors that he reported to his superiors about the double negative DNA tests of Chiara Poggi on the pedals. 💣 (translated)

Why do people keep saying "if it's true" or "if it will be verified?" But for heaven's sake, the test was negative but this negative result was NOT communicated and therefore did not enter the procedural history! It's a fact! Damn! (translated)

#Garlasco: does anyone remember another case with a DNA test conducted by the RIS of Parma in the early 2000s that later led to a conviction? I have it on the tip of my tongue… (translated)

The appropriate and comprehensive "Press Release" signed by the Prosecutor of the Republic of Pavia, Dr. Fabio Napoleone, anticipates the evident intention to proceed with criminal action against Mr. Sempio with the formal Request for Referral to judgment that will be filed within the legal deadlines. Of particular interest are the new pieces of evidence regarding the now-famous "prints on the pedals." The existence of repetitions with results different from those that led to the conviction of the current defendant will certainly be useful in a potential request for revision, as they are pieces of documentary evidence that have never been examined before. Also of undeniable interest are the further acquisitions in relation to the timing of the murderous action, which, as now proposed by the consultants of the Prosecutor's Office of Pavia, makes the presence of Alberto Stasi at the crime scene and at the time of Chiara Poggi's death irreconcilable. Always maintaining respect for the presumption of innocence to which the current suspect is fully entitled, we can nevertheless assert that the conviction of Alberto Stasi appears to present emergencies that are now absolutely irreconcilable with the compliance of the rule provided for by Article 533 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which justifies the conviction of a defendant only if their guilt has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. (translated)

Anne 4h

They do a test on the bicycle, it turns out that there is DNA of Chiara Poggi, the next day they do a confirmatory test and what comes out? Galassi: "that it is negative, but this negative data, as it results from these new communications from the prosecutor's office, was not communicated and therefore did not enter the procedural history, this is a devastating fact.‼️ Stasi finds himself in front of a magnificent opportunity to see his position reviewed”📍 (translated)

Today I learn, with great surprise, that according to some users, anthropometry is not a science. Now, on @ignotox_, for lawyer Cataliotti, professor Cattaneo cannot measure a footprint. I wanted to humbly say that, as an anthropologist, yes, she can do it. And she has done it. (translated)

Cataliotti: “What is this Christ laughing at?” Galassi: “It’s unacceptable. How can he judge Cattaneo as inadequate? It’s unbearable. He should contain himself. And if you don’t mind, I am a professor, don’t call me ‘this here’. Best wishes for the defense” (translated)

Here is who did the analyses on the teaspoon and pedals. (translated)