Search

Piotr Kusznieruk informed that the court refused to temporarily arrest Piotr W., and after more than 50 hours of detention, the man was supposed to return home. He described that Piotr W. was standing at a red light at a pedestrian crossing, after which the police were said to have chased him, subdued him, and pinned him to the floor. According to the account referenced by Kusznieruk, the man lost consciousness and was taken to the hospital in handcuffs. The author noted that — as he wrote — the specific basis for the initiation of the identification has not been publicly clarified to this day. He added that the prosecution requested a temporary arrest, and the court did not agree to this request. Kusznieruk assessed that arrest should be a last resort and called for an investigation into the basis for the intervention, the use of force by the officers, and the circumstances surrounding Piotr W.'s loss of consciousness. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #Polska (translated)

Bartosz Lewandowski wrote to Krzysztof Stanowski that this is how Poland looked since around 1990. He added that the escalation of the struggle should not surprise him, because — as he stated — it intensified as the current holders of influence lost their power. #Polska #historia #polityka (translated)

Bartosz Malewski wrote that the detention protocol and charges were presented to Piotr 30 hours after his arrest. He assessed that this was the first properly conducted action in the proceedings and added that during this time Piotr was removed from handcuffs for the first time. According to Malewski, Piotr was charged with forcing police officers to refrain from taking action and violating the bodily integrity of the police officers. In the case of one of the officers, the charge was said to include actions threatening loss of life or serious bodily harm. Malewski cited the provisions: Article 224 § 2 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 222 § 1a of the Penal Code in relation to Article 57a § 1 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 11 & 2 of the Penal Code, as well as Article 224 § 2 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 222 § 1 of the Penal Code in relation to Article 57a § 1 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 11 & 2 of the Penal Code. He stated that Piotr did not admit to the alleged acts and refused to provide explanations, but he submitted an extensive statement about the course of events from his own perspective and about the period of detention so far. Malewski also informed that a request had been submitted, among other things, for an examination of Piotr's health status. #policja #prawo #sprawiedliwość (translated)

The author of the post called for the release of Piotr and wrote that the volunteer from the Town under the Constitutional Tribunal was choked until he lost consciousness and then arrested. He described these actions as brutality and lawlessness of the "Tusk regime" and emphasized that his community would not abandon its own. https://t.co/C4VlnEz1Cz #Wolność #Protest #PrawaCzłowieka #PL (translated)

"Tusk, you're lying again! Your henchman used the police to provocatively invade the organizers' office of the protests in front of the Constitutional Tribunal. You caused a volunteer to lose consciousness by unjustly ordering the police to use violence against him. Then it turned out that he had a small knife with him, which he used the day before to cut strings for posters at the protest. The assaulted man did not threaten anyone with it nor reached for it. But as is typical of UB methods, you insisted that the knife found post factum justified the conducted provocation," Ziobro stated. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #DonaldTusk #polityka (translated)

Zbigniew Ziobro accused Donald Tusk of responsibility for the provocation at the Constitutional Tribunal, which led to police intervention and the loss of consciousness of a demonstrator, emphasizing that Tusk is trying to intimidate society ahead of the upcoming protests. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #DonaldTusk #polityka (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk questioned the way the police presented the controversial intervention. He wrote that the detained man lost consciousness, and according to witnesses, he was being choked and was taken to the ambulance in handcuffs. He added that there were no recordings from the officers' body cameras, but the available recordings contained screams and the officer's profanity. Kusznieruk pointed out that reports included information about a folding knife that was allegedly hidden under the man's clothing. He asked whether the man threatened with it or took it out, and emphasized that no evidence of the knife's use was presented. In his opinion, simply possessing a knife would not justify choking or the disproportionate use of force. The author suggested that highlighting information about the knife while ignoring the circumstances of losing consciousness and the lack of recordings could serve to build a convenient narrative. He called for the release of recordings, documentation of the intervention, and the basis for the use of specific coercive measures. He added that deliberately distorting facts to justify the officers' actions would be a more serious problem than the controversial intervention itself. #policja #interwencja #manipulacja (translated)

Max Hübner wrote that the policewoman he held responsible for Mr. Piotr's loss of consciousness was, by her behavior, signaling the need for psychiatric help. According to his account, she crudely ordered the man lying down to lie down, even though he was being held by three policemen, and threatened bystanders. Hübner assessed that three years of Tusk's rule were enough for the Soviet mentality to return to the police. https://t.co/sD63dKXnyb #Polska #Policja #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The article analyzes the problem of excessive RCB alerts in Poland, comparing them to earlier pandemic restrictions on access to forests, pointing out the risk of losing citizens' trust in the state, and drawing attention to the chaos and panic that such messages can provoke. #alertyRCB #pandemia #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The author of the entry addressed to Marcin Kierwiński accused the recipients of using the police for actions against the organizers of peaceful demonstrations and hiding behind police uniforms. He also claimed that they were afraid of losing power and accountability for numerous violations of the law. #Polska #Protest #Władza #PL (translated)

Robert Gwiazdowski recalls the beginnings of the political struggle for the Constitutional Tribunal in Poland, pointing to the introduction of controversial legislative changes by the ruling party in 2015 in the face of the threat of losing power. #TrybunałKonstrukcyjny #Polityka #Prawo (translated)

Three years after the elections, Donald Tusk, like Jarosław Kaczyński in 2023, may gain support in the polls, but at the same time faces the risk of losing the ability to form a government after the upcoming parliamentary elections. #DonaldTusk #KoalicjaObywatelska #PolskaPolityka (translated)

The number of legal questions directed to the Supreme Court in Poland has dropped by nearly 57 percent over the last decade, which is a result of the loss of authority of this institution and the conflict over the status of neojudges. #SądNajwyższy #prawo #neosiędziowie (translated)

The article analyzes the upcoming midterm elections in the USA and predicts that a democratic blue wave may lead to the Republicans losing control of the House of Representatives and possibly the Senate, which is a result of President Trump's low popularity. #Wybory2026 #NiebieskaFala #DonaldTrump (translated)