Search

The author of the post called the material compromising for the police and pointed it out as evidence in the trial against the officers. He also criticized the man for further sharing the material, derogatorily assessing his intelligence. https://t.co/qeTNGdK8ys #policja #justycja #prawo #PL (translated)

Judge Konrad Mielcarek from the Warsaw district court submitted a request to the National Judiciary Council regarding a personal attack by the Minister of Justice Waldemar Żurek on his decision to issue a letter of iron for Marcin Romanowski, which caused public tensions and a reaction from the KRS. #sąd #Polska #justycja (translated)

The author wrote that Onet reported the information about Pereira winning in court against prosecutor Ewa Wrzosek, but did not mention his victory over Wirtualna Polska. He added that the case was important not only for him and referred to Ewa Wrzosek's profile on X for details about her case. #justycja #media #Polska #PL (translated)

Mr. Grzegorz, I read the entire justification. And I agree with one thing – legal analysis cannot be replaced with the label of a "neo-judge," because that is not an argument 🤷‍♂️ However, the justification itself, although extensive and internally organized, in my opinion leaves two very serious legal problems. The first concerns Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The provision states that in preparatory proceedings, a "blanket warrant" can be issued at the request of the prosecutor or in the absence of their objection. Here, the prosecutor filed an objection. The court does not challenge the wording of the provision. It consciously deviates from it, considering that the binding objection of the prosecutor would violate the court's jurisdictional independence. It references Article 8 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 178 paragraph 1 of the Constitution, Article 6 of the ECHR, Article 47 of the KPP, and part of the case law of appellate courts. This is a legal argument. But there is also an opposing line of case law, based precisely on the linguistic interpretation of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which the court itself notes in the justification. I wrote about this yesterday. So it is not the case that there is no problem. There is a very serious dispute about the limits of interpretation contra legem and whether the court can practically deprive the premise, which the legislator explicitly included in the provision. The second problem I have is with the prognostic assessment. The court acknowledges that Romanowski left Poland, did not appear for the hearing concerning the temporary arrest, was outside the reach of Polish authorities, and even informed in his own application that he has a passport issued under a different identity 🤷‍♂️ The court considers these circumstances to be burdensome but then assumes that they cannot determine the assessment because one should look at it primarily prospectively. 🤔 And this is where I have the greatest doubt. The prediction of a suspect's future behavior does not occur in a vacuum. Its foundational material is, after all, their past behavior. 🤷‍♂️ If a person involved in the proceedings previously did not comply with procedural mechanisms, left the country, and remained outside the reach of the authorities, then their later declaration that from this moment they will comply with the conditions of the "blanket warrant" must be subjected to particularly rigorous assessment. The court may conclude that despite this, the risk has currently diminished. But it should convincingly demonstrate why specific past behaviors have lost their prognostic significance. Because if we are to predict a person’s future behavior while disregarding their past behavior, then a rather fundamental question arises - on what basis are we actually building this prediction? 🤷‍♂️ Therefore, I would not dismiss this ruling with the label of a neo-judge, but I would also not say that the problem ends with the justification sounding rational. A rationally constructed justification can still lead to a legally debatable result. In my opinion, this is exactly the kind of case we are dealing with here. The argumentation of the court is clear and can be recounted, but both the way of breaking the literal wording of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the prognostic assessment of the suspect's behavior leave significant legal doubts. If I were to rule on this matter, I would not grant the application. Firstly – due to the prosecutor's objection and the content of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Secondly – even accepting a different interpretation of this provision, I would not find sufficient grounds for a positive prognostic assessment. This is not about punishing Romanowski for the past. It is about assessing whether his past behavior allows rationally to assume that from this moment he will respect the obligations arising from the "blanket warrant." In my opinion – it does not allow 🤷‍♂️ And that is precisely why there is an appellate review. #prawo #justycja #analizaprawna (translated)

Z niecierpliwością czekam na wiadomość o aresztowaniu Artura Chodzińskiego vel Emilia Kamińska i kilka innych trollowskich kont. Jaki on czuł tu się bezpieczny.. Skończyło się rumakowanie kreaturo . Będziesz siedział!!!! Dzień dobry ☕⛴️ #justycja #trollowanie #aresztowanie

HFPC skierowała do Prokuratora Generalnego zawiadomienie o uzasadnionym podejrzeniu popełnienia przestępstwa przez Prezes TK Julię Przyłębską. Sprawa dotyczy manipulowania składami orzekającymi Trybunału Konstytucyjnego. https://t.co/LmxlfUBLLd #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Prawo #Justycja

Linia obrony adwokata Lewandowskiego zdechła. I Lewandowski dalej kłamie. Kral nie był adwokatem wpisanym na listęp adwokatów w momencie ich spotkania wizyty w Budapeszcie. Kral musiał zrezygnować z praktyki adwokackiej na żądanie nadzoru finansowego z Estonii, który kontrolował firmę kontrolującą Zondacrypto. Lewandowski musiał o tym wiedzieć. #Lewandowski #prawo #justycja

Kolejny Polak jest podejrzewany o odurzanie swej partnerki, gwałcenie jej, nagrywania z tego filmów i udostępniania ich w zamkniętej międzynarodowej grupie w internecie. Postępowanie przeciwko niemu prowadzi prokuratura w Tychach — ustalił nieoficjalnie Onet. To już czwarty Polak #przemoc #gwałt #justycja #PL

79-letni Jacques Leveugle został oskarżony o gwałty i agresję seksualną wobec nieletnich, jednak z 89 zidentyfikowanych potencjalnych ofiar, tylko dwie skargi nie uległy przedawnieniu, a mężczyzna nie stanie przed sądem także w związku z zabójstwami swojej matki i ciotki, których dokonał w kontekście ich ciężkiego stanu zdrowia. #JustycjaDlaOfiar #AgresjaSeksualna #Przedawnienie

Groźby karalne w formie e-mail? Pistolet gazowy znaleziony zapewne podczas przeszukania i sąd zgodził się na tymczasowe aresztowanie na 3 miesiące. Ręce opadają. Redaktor Krasowski publikował materiały dotyczące afery Polnord. Krytykował nie tylko działania obecnych władz prokuratury, ale i poprzedników. Pierwszych za nieudolność i błędy, następców za tuszowanie. Sądy powinny stać na straży wolności obywatelskich. #prawo #wolność #justycja

Amerykański Departament Sprawiedliwości oficjalnie postawił w stan oskarżenia faktycznego przywódcę Kuby, Raúla Castro. Polityk, który niedawno przeszedł na emeryturę i zrezygnował z kierowania Komunistyczną Partią Kuby, został oskarżony o morderstwo. Brat legendarnego Fidela #RaúlCastro #Kuba #Justycja #US #CW