Search

Patryk Słowik wrote that the reactions of many people could have been different if, after incorrectly calling someone a knife-wielder, the agency had immediately apologized instead of just removing the material which he believed was evidence of the employee's incompetence. He emphasized that the hate was indefensible, but it should not overshadow the incompetence or the hours-long avoidance of consequences for the serious blunder of the largest Polish news agency, whose reliability and credibility — as he wrote — are defined by law. #media #komunikacja #odpowiedzialność (translated)

The Independent Medium stated that André do Prado, described by the outlet as an elected senator and an influential figure of the PL, was mediating the appointment of Paulo Kogos (PL) as a state deputy since the beginning of the legislature. According to the publication, Tarcísio’s administration should appoint one or two deputies from the party to positions in the government, in an agreement that would benefit Kogos, whom the outlet described as libertarian. #POLÍTICA #KOGOS #ALESP (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that getting to know others can reduce the perception of them as a threat, and ignorance destroys the world. He presented the book, to which he attached a link, as an attempt to save its small part. https://t.co/hh1BAt7yka #znajomość #ignorancja #książki #PL (translated)

Piotr Klimek wrote that for Jaga to have a chance at anything in the Europa League, it must win against such opponents, and that's exactly what it is doing. He noted that next week it will face Anderlecht, and defeating the Belgians could help push them out of the top 24. He described this match as a "mini play-off" and added that there would be more opportunities. #LigaEuropy #Jagiellonia #Anderlecht (translated)

Dariusz Mazur wrote that the president vetoed the act on executing judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. He assessed that the president is not aligned with human rights or with Europe, and asked if he sees Poland's place in the East. He added that the president is trying to paralyze the execution of the interim measure of the ECtHR regarding the judges of the Constitutional Tribunal selected in March. According to Mazur, the president does not have the right to veto in this matter, and the measure will be executed. #prawaczłowieka #Polska #ETPCz (translated)

Marcin Matczak considered the president's attempt to control whether the judges of the Constitutional Tribunal elected by the Sejm met the requirements as usurpation. He argued that according to the principle of legality, the president would need a clear legal basis for such control, and — as he wrote — there was no such provision. Matczak criticized the hypothetical examples presented by Marcin Przydacz and Zbigniew Bogucki regarding the election of a horse, a monkey, or a person without Polish citizenship to the Tribunal. He described them as science fiction scenarios. He added that if the Sejm chose animals, it could invalidate their appointment with another resolution, just as — according to him — PiS did in 2015 to introduce substitutes into the Tribunal. He noted that in that case, people who had Polish citizenship were elected. In response to the arguments of Przydacz and Bogucki, Matczak presented his own ironic examples of possible presidential control: a test of knowledge about society and the Constitution, a physical fitness test, and a certificate from a parish priest about the candidate's impeccable character. He asked why the president should control one requirement and not the others. Matczak wrote that he considered the whole situation absurd. He assessed that caricatural legal arguments were being constructed so that the president — a potential defendant of the Tribunal — could decide who would judge him. He attributed such a position to Karol Nawrocki and his associates. #prawo #Polska #sędziowie (translated)

Liliana Wiadrowska wrote that people were massively publishing photos from their visits to the Łączna ZOO on the internet and suggested tagging Agnieszka Gozdyra in each one. She stated that Gozdyra almost always sided with the wrong side of the dispute and added that it did not surprise her that journalists were referred to as "political prostitution." #ZOO #dziennikarstwo #polityka (translated)

The author wrote that after 46 hours in the emergency room, a death occurred. He noted that a lower priority should allow for the earlier admission of the most urgent cases, rather than leaving someone without treatment for several days. He described the situation as "sick." (translated)

The commentator referred to an exchange of words in which Zbigniew Bogucki responded to Mazurek's questions about Maciej Berek. Bogucki stated that Berek is not a judge and is not currently sitting in the Tribunal, so he cannot be removed from there. Mazurek suggested that Berek would go to the Tribunal for a year and then be dismissed. The commentator assessed that Berek had completely ruined his career. #sędzia #Trybunał #polityka (translated)

Krzysztof Sałek from KO Stalowa Wola wrote that the absence of these individuals may have stemmed from a desire to avoid escalating the situation and to prevent harm or misfortune. He added that they might have believed that the police would handle those who — as he put it — claim that Nawrocki is not bound by the Constitution. https://t.co/OCrtOo03tv #Polska #Prawo #Wydarzenia (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that for the first time he agreed with Zajączkowska. He stated that her distinction between the president and a person who considers themselves the president accurately captured the constitutional doubts regarding the procedure for validating the election of Karol Nawrocki. He recalled Article 129, paragraph 1 of the Constitution and the status of the Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber of the Supreme Court, which confirmed the validity of his election. He also warned against categorical formulations, arguing that they may become inconvenient when applied to political allies. #polityka #konstytucja #wybory (translated)

Jachcy, citing constitutional expert Genowefa Grabowska, wrote that according to her, the opinion of the Venice Commission indicated the president's obligation to take an oath from the properly chosen candidate for judge. She added that if there was an error during the election, the president does not have such an obligation, and not everyone wants to quote this fragment of the opinion. The author of the entry argued that the procedure for selecting such an important position should not be burdened with an error. He compared it to admission to university, where — as he wrote — the condition is the presentation of a high school diploma. He also pointed out that in this case, the condition is a 10-year work experience in the position of legal adviser. #Konstytucja #Prawo #KomisjaWenecka (translated)

Sławomir Cenckiewicz wrote that a few days earlier, one of the important people on his side informed him that Commander Boroń had assured the President of the Republic of Poland — through another person — that the police would not intervene at the Constitutional Tribunal. According to Cenckiewicz, it was also assured that Berek would not enter the Tribunal using the police. He added that another person from his environment ridiculed those protesting at the Tribunal, considering the protest to be Sakiewicz's and the Republic's action, as there were no plans to enter the Tribunal. Cenckiewicz wrote that at times he thinks some people on his side do not know what reality they live in, and this — as he pointed out — is a positive interpretation. He also stated that Berek and Patyra won. #protest #Polska #policja (translated)

Jacek Fogiel wrote that MP Gosek waved his parliamentary ID during actions at the Constitutional Tribunal and threatened police officers with criminal responsibility. He believed that immunities should be abolished so that MPs do not use them to hinder the work of officials or exert pressure on them. He emphasized that it is not about "hunting" a PiS politician, but about ending situations in which, in his opinion, MPs behave as if the law does not apply to them. Fogiel described Gosek's behavior not as a defense of the Tribunal, but as arrogance of a representative of the former power. #immunitet #polityka #bezkarność (translated)

Stanisław Żerko believed that the President of Poland should not take an oath from a person who does not meet the requirements. He argued that his opinion was as important as the position of the committee, and in the matter, as he wrote, was stirred up by the columnist Wojtek Sadurski, whom he described as a staunch opponent of PiS and accused of undermining his own credibility multiple times due to his zeal. #Polska #polityka #opinie (translated)

Jarosław Królewski called on Łukasz and his side to take the dispute to court, arguing that evidence and witness testimonies should resolve the differences of opinion. He declared his willingness for a transparent proceeding, within the limits of the law, and announced that after assessing the facts, the sides could apologize. Królewski proposed to clarify in court, among other things, decisions regarding the coat of arms displayed on the giant screen and other issues. He pointed out that he noticed inconsistencies in the statements of the other side and emphasized that he himself had not written about reading out compositions. He also wanted the circumstances of the beating, which he claimed occurred at the other side's stadium, to be investigated. He wrote that he had materials and accounts from witnesses, if the family agreed to their use. He also suggested clarifying the conversations held during VAR, comments about boring play, which the other side had considered a provocation, and the decision not to let in away fans. Królewski wrote that he was tired of the events of the past weeks and did not want to continue the dispute on social media or through mutual statements. He emphasized that he was concerned with establishing the facts and accountability for specific decisions, and his post was meant to be the last statement on this matter. #AI #sprawiedliwość #transparencja (translated)

The services in action wrote that Gałecka and Minister Marcin Kierwiński accused the Movement for Border Defense of impersonating border services. He added that the prosecution was conducting proceedings in this matter and submitted an indictment to the court. The author noted that a celebrity entered the Sejm in the company of a person who — as he wrote — had a badge identical to the police one and a strikingly similar armband, and yet no entry on this topic appeared. He asked why. #polityka #sprawiedliwość #media (translated)

WolnośćTV published an exchange in which they asked Ewa Zajączkowska whether Konrad Berkowicz's statement about Justyna Dobrosz-Oracz was scandalous. Zajączkowska replied that Berkowicz used an offensive term against the journalist suggesting corruption in media work and considered her a disgrace to the journalism environment. When asked if such words crossed any boundaries, Zajączkowska pointed to the insults directed at the president and herself. She stated that she had been insulted with terms regarding her intelligence and the fatherhood of her child. She also referenced a statement by a TVP editor in "Kwiatki Polskie," who allegedly called her the right hand of Mentzen and suggested a sexual subtext related to that hand. #dziennikarstwo #media #polityka (translated)

God's whip Jaro Camaro wrote that there was no agreement between Kyiv and Moscow regarding not attacking fuel infrastructure. He accused an unspecified person of having invented such an agreement a day earlier and then accused Ukraine of a lack of goodwill. He also expressed extreme outrage towards that person, using offensive language. #Ukraina #Rosja #konflikt (translated)