Search

The author wrote that the faithful were waiting in St. Peter’s Square to see Pope Leo XIV wave from a window at the Apostolic Palace before leading the Angelus prayer. The author said that after being discharged from hospital following lung cancer surgery, the Pope thanked those who had helped him and those who had prayed for him, adding that they had also prayed for him. https://t.co/uwQO4IcY4l #Papa #Angelus #Fede #IT #VA

Konto Poland news War in Ukraine wrote that Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk announced that the country will not accept illegal migrants as part of the EU resettlement policy. According to the post, Tusk rejected repeating the mistakes of Western European migration policy. #Polska #migracja #UE (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk accused Wielowieyska of accepting the police's version as an established fact and assessing the detained individual before the court's decision. He questioned the legal basis for identifying the man who — as he wrote — was calmly standing at the crosswalk, as well as the attempt to take him aside. He asked whether the refusal to provide personal information justified intervention. Kusznieruk noted that pushing away the officers and fleeing did not exempt the assessment of the legality and proportionality of the force used. He also pointed out the choking of the subdued individual, the vulgarities and threats that — as he wrote — were audible on the recording, and questioned whether such behavior was within the standards of human rights. He added that the court had refused to detain the man, and according to the defense, it concluded that the prosecutor had not even demonstrated a high probability of the alleged act being committed. He characterized this as more than just a routine refusal of detention. He deemed the attribution of a crisis to the detainee based on his behavior as public stigmatization. He also believed that publicly presenting him as an aggressor before the court's decision could be seen as incitement, and that journalists should monitor power, rather than act as its spokesperson. #prawaCzłowieka #Polska #policja (translated)

NeoJudgeTuleye wrote that he watched the entire live conversation with Piotr and that he confirmed his earlier theses. The author assessed that the policewoman and her colleagues made a serious mistake. He claimed that without the experience and knowledge of a military gendarme, as well as without witnesses and media attention, the detainee could have been portrayed as a mentally ill knifeman who committed suicide in his cell. He also referenced the case of a detained farmer. According to NeoJudgeTuleye, the policewoman could have been considered injured in a confrontation with a right-wing criminal. The author urged people to know their rights, analyze cases, and draw their own conclusions, as — he wrote — MotherKurka says. #Polska #PrawaCzłowieka #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Professor Jarosław Flis from Jagiellonian University points out that in the coming months, the key issue will be the struggle between the main parties over which of them makes a bigger mistake, which could determine the outcome of the elections in 2027. #wybory2024 #Polska #politologia (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk described the court's decision to deny the arrest of Piotr after the protest as a disgrace for the prosecution. He stated that, in his opinion, the lack of high probability of committing a crime meant that the prosecution had not demonstrated the basic premise for applying the arrest. He claimed that Piotr had spent over 50 hours deprived of freedom, and the police conducted a brutal intervention and a request for arrest was submitted without convincing evidence. He noted that the denial of arrest does not mean acquittal, but he considered it a serious signal for the prosecution. He called for the accountability of the police officers and their superiors. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #prokuratura (translated)

Bartosz Lewandowski called the situation a disgrace for the National Prosecutor's Office. He wrote that the lack of a high probability of committing an offense meant that the court had already at this stage determined that the crime had not been demonstrated even to a degree justifying the application of preventive measures. #Polska #prawo #sprawiedliwość (translated)

Magdalena Majkowska informed that the District Court for Warsaw-Śródmieście in Warsaw did not grant the prosecutor's request for the temporary arrest of Piotr. As she wrote, together with lawyer Magda Prządką and lawyer Bartosz Malewski from Ordo Iuris, she pointed out from the beginning that the prosecutor did not demonstrate a high probability of the alleged act being committed nor any risk of flight, hiding, or tampering. Majkowska added that according to the court, there was no need to apply any preventive measures against him. According to Majkowska, Piotr had not been previously convicted, had a stable life situation, was a member of the volunteer fire brigade, and was a former professional soldier. She also wrote that he participated in demonstrations in defense of the Constitutional Tribunal, and at home, his wife and children were waiting for him. #Polska #Wolność #Prawo (translated)

Bartosz Malewski informed that the court did not grant the prosecution's request for a month of temporary detention for Piotr. According to Malewski, the prosecutor justified the request with concerns that Piotr might hide and an assessment that there is a high probability of him committing further crimes. Malewski wrote that together with lawyers Magda Prządka and Magda Majkowska, he convinced the court that there were no grounds for imposing detention. He claimed that it was not sufficiently substantiated that Piotr had committed the alleged acts and that Friday's events should be treated as an incident requiring thorough explanation. According to Malewski, Piotr has a permanent place of residence, is socially engaged, and is a firefighter in the volunteer fire department, so there is no real risk that he would hide. He added that after the defenders reached him, Piotr, feeling safer, started limited cooperation with the authorities. Malewski also emphasized that the lack of cooperation is Piotr's right and should not be a basis for preventive measures. Malewski also assessed that the forecast for further criminal activity had no rational basis. He wrote that Piotr had not been convicted and that his behavior on Friday was not aimed at committing the alleged acts, which, in Malewski's view, undermined the legal qualification adopted by the prosecution. He informed that the court did not apply other preventive measures, such as police supervision, and that Piotr would respond to the charges at liberty. He added that assistance was provided as part of a procedural intervention by Ordo Iuris. #wolność #sprawiedliwość #prawo (translated)

Misuna depicted the post as Babiš's order to meet on Sunday at 1 PM behind Agrofert by the warehouse. According to him, Nacher was supposed to bring matches, Aluna expensive gasoline, and Okamura a barrel; about Okamura, the author noted that he previously worked as a garbage man. https://t.co/DJzk0aIANr #Babiš #Agrofert #ČeskáPolitika (translated)

The connoisseur of the Soviet Union urged Poland not to repeat the mistakes of France in the 1960s and not to bring in migrants from culturally different countries as cheap labor. He suggested prioritizing Poles and filling staffing shortages with Ukrainians and Belarusians. He also called for not voting for Braun. https://t.co/XEmLLYljg1 #migracja #Polska #praca (translated)

Prem evaluated the recording from the body camera and pointed out nine violations that, in his opinion, were committed by the intervening individuals. He claimed that one of the police officers only provided their rank, without a name, and that the officers did not explain the actual reason for the identification. Referring to Article 15 of the Police Act was, as he wrote, insufficient to justify this action. According to Prem, there were also no legal or factual grounds for the identification, which he considered unlawful. The author also accused the police officers of violating the principle of least intrusive action as per Article 15(6) of the Police Act. He considered a mocking comment directed at the man and an approach within 45 cm to be a manifestation of psychological pressure and a violation of dignity. He also wrote that the order to move to another location had no legal basis. Prem asserted that the officers used physical force without prior calls to comply with the law and warnings required by Article 34 of the Act of May 24, 2013, on measures of direct coercion and firearms. He listed possible consequences: violation of personal inviolability under Article 217 of the Penal Code and potential abuse of power or failure to fulfill duties under Article 231 § 1 of the Penal Code, which carries a penalty of up to 3 years of imprisonment. He regarded the most significant issue to be the man's escape from the grip. According to Prem, if the grip was unlawful, the citizen would not, in principle, have committed an offense under Article 222 or Article 224 of the Penal Code, and self-defense against the unlawful action of a public officer would not be punishable. #policja #prawo #uczciwość (translated)

Qvosiu wrote that after yesterday's match, there was significant criticism of the refereeing from individuals he did not specify. In his opinion, De Burgos made only one key mistake: he allowed Abde's goal despite a clear foul on Fermin. The other situations, as he assessed, were resolved perfectly. #mecz #sędziowanie #piłka_nożna (translated)

BPM Chief Marcin Przydacz said in wPolsce.pl that the situation surrounding the Constitutional Tribunal resulted from legal errors of the parliamentary majority and the ruling camp, and above all from the desire to take control over this body. He added that in his opinion the ruling camp was simultaneously seeking this control and was unable to adhere to the law. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #prawo #Polska (translated)

He assessed that the France he knew might be coming to an end, and the scale of riots, looting, and arson had exceeded all limits. He criticized the media for portraying the protesters as students dissatisfied with reforms, describing this narrative as "sick." He claimed that it was known who was behind these events and why, and warned against repeating the same mistake. #Francja #protesty #zamieszki (translated)

Bartosz Malewski wrote that the detention protocol and charges were presented to Piotr 30 hours after his arrest. He assessed that this was the first properly conducted action in the proceedings and added that during this time Piotr was removed from handcuffs for the first time. According to Malewski, Piotr was charged with forcing police officers to refrain from taking action and violating the bodily integrity of the police officers. In the case of one of the officers, the charge was said to include actions threatening loss of life or serious bodily harm. Malewski cited the provisions: Article 224 § 2 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 222 § 1a of the Penal Code in relation to Article 57a § 1 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 11 & 2 of the Penal Code, as well as Article 224 § 2 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 222 § 1 of the Penal Code in relation to Article 57a § 1 of the Penal Code in conjunction with Article 11 & 2 of the Penal Code. He stated that Piotr did not admit to the alleged acts and refused to provide explanations, but he submitted an extensive statement about the course of events from his own perspective and about the period of detention so far. Malewski also informed that a request had been submitted, among other things, for an examination of Piotr's health status. #policja #prawo #sprawiedliwość (translated)

Patryk Słowik wrote that the reactions of many people could have been different if, after incorrectly calling someone a knife-wielder, the agency had immediately apologized instead of just removing the material which he believed was evidence of the employee's incompetence. He emphasized that the hate was indefensible, but it should not overshadow the incompetence or the hours-long avoidance of consequences for the serious blunder of the largest Polish news agency, whose reliability and credibility — as he wrote — are defined by law. #media #komunikacja #odpowiedzialność (translated)