Search

The commentator wrote that Krzysztof Rutkowski, when asked about a return to politics, stated that it is difficult to assess today whether it would mean a return to the past, and reminded that in politics, supposedly, nothing is excluded. The author assessed that Rutkowski would fit well on Donald Tusk's lists, alongside Kołodziejczak and Zembaczyński. https://t.co/U8JGNj0dAd #polityka #Rutkowski #Tusk (translated)

NeoJudgeTuleya wrote that in recent hours, information about a possible attack on the prime minister and deputy prime minister was conveyed through special services, and urgent meetings were held at the Anti-Terrorist Center. The author suggested that the threat had been communicated via email and its publicity was an operation intended to divert attention from government problems. As a background, he pointed to the collapse of public finances and record state debt, knife attacks in schools, and scandals at the ministerial level, including the affair of Deputy Minister Kołodziejczak. He wrote that the authorities intentionally directed media attention to the topic of the attack in order to limit the debate on taxes, the budget deficit, and government actions. The author accused the ruling camp of fueling polarization, shifting the blame for mistakes onto political opponents, and appointing individuals who are loyal but, as he assessed, lacking competence. He also claimed that the alert about the attack was intended to provide the government with political benefits, justify state operating costs, and silence the opposition. He mentioned the creation of enemies, including the opposition and President Nawrocki. #polityka #manipulacja #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The author of the post wrote that the matter started "innocently," and he claimed that it was revealed that the father-in-law of Deputy Minister of Justice Myrcha, who is also the father of MP Gajewska, had covered up the case of burying a man alive in the past. #Polska #polityka #sprawiedliwość #PL (translated)

Between Poland and Ukraine, there are no clear relations, as both countries, acting in accordance with their interests, defend their own historical narratives, which is confirmed by the organized congress of historians and discussions on difficult issues of the past, while also taking steps towards dialogue and cooperation. #Polska #Ukraina #historia (translated)

Zbigniew Bogucki accused Prime Minister Donald Tusk of politically exploiting human tragedy to attack the President of Poland. He urged him to withdraw from this stance and used an offensive comparison to describe the Prime Minister's actions. Bogucki appealed to Tusk to focus on the safety of Poles, including safety in schools, instead of concentrating on polls. He wrote that parents expect the Prime Minister to take action on this matter, and that he himself would be judged by history and citizens. He also accused him of lies, insinuations, and attacks on the President. He called on the Prime Minister to cooperate with the President on security matters, emphasizing that he considers it the responsibility of the head of government. He also called for the adoption of a good law, which — as he wrote — the President would sign, as well as for collective actions to ensure the safety of children. #Polska #Bezpieczeństwo #Polityka (translated)

The prosecutor has requested assistance from Ukraine in the investigation concerning the attack at the abbey in Jarosław, in which a priest was killed and four other people were seriously injured, asking for a check on the psychiatric history of the suspect and for his mother to be interrogated. #prokuratura #Ukraina #atak (translated)

NASA plans to investigate the mysterious fast Marius Hills Pit on the Moon, which may lead to a huge cave, and the results of the GIMLI mission could provide valuable information about the volcanic past of our satellite and potential shelters for astronauts. #NASA #Księżyc #misjaGIMLI (translated)

The author of the entry accused Bogucki of attacking the government, the prime minister, and ministers after declaring the need to end the political war, and then criticized the sitting Marshal of the Sejm. As he wrote, Bogucki referred to him as a "blemish on Polish democracy," undermined his right to hold this office, and accused him of disrespect. The author also reminded that Bogucki presented himself, Nawrocki, and the Presidential Chancellery as democrats and statesmen. He considered the way Nawrocki exercised his office as the main blemish on democracy. He assessed that the president constantly participated in the political dispute, publicly attacked those in power, and exacerbated conflicts between state bodies while simultaneously calling on others to end the dispute. He noted that this was his private opinion and wrote that he did not take sides in the party conflict but evaluated the matter from the perspective of the state and its institutions. He announced that he would remind Bogucki and Nawrocki of their subsequent statements about responsibility and calming the dispute. In the end, he asked to send regards to Przydacz. #PolskaDemokracja #WojnaPolityczna #Polityka (translated)

Sebastian Staszewski wrote that Jerzy Brzęczek made many mistakes in the past as a coach, but achieved 8 wins, a draw, and a loss, as well as a direct qualification for Euro 2020. He added that now his record is 9 wins and a loss, and the team qualified directly for the U-21 Euro. Staszewski assessed that these achievements should be met with respect. #JerzyBrzęczek #Euro2020 #U21 (translated)

Jakub Balcerzak cited an interview in which Yuri Romano, a spiker for PGE Projekt Warszawa, spoke to the Tauronliga portal. Romano said he was happy to be playing in a strong Polish league and appreciated the interest of fans in volleyball. He added that performing in Poland had been his dream, and he had a positive view of Warsaw and his family's living situation. Romano described Poland as a country that is still developing. He pointed to new roads and clean, well-maintained cities, and also mentioned that he wanted to visit as many places in the country as possible. Coach Roberto Piazza was, according to Romano, a great coach, and the team was satisfied with his work. The spiker added that he had previously worked with him in Milan, and they talked in the summer about starting a job in Warsaw. #TAURONLiga #siatkówka #Polska #Warszawa (translated)

The author wrote that a monument commemorating the victims of the ghetto in Sosnowiec was destroyed. He considered that the return of demons from the past was the result of Grzegorz Braun, whom he described as an anti-Semite, entering the Polish political scene. #antysemityzm #pamięć #Polska #PL (translated)

Cristian Ghinea, a senator from the Save Romania Union (USR), and a former two-time minister of European funds, stated that within six months, the Romanian national airline TAROM will declare bankruptcy. "I advise everyone not to buy tickets for flights." https://t.co/uu6HbjWONE #TAROM #rumunia #transportlotniczy #RO (translated)

Mr. Grzegorz, I read the entire justification. And I agree with one thing – legal analysis cannot be replaced with the label of a "neo-judge," because that is not an argument 🤷‍♂️ However, the justification itself, although extensive and internally organized, in my opinion leaves two very serious legal problems. The first concerns Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The provision states that in preparatory proceedings, a "blanket warrant" can be issued at the request of the prosecutor or in the absence of their objection. Here, the prosecutor filed an objection. The court does not challenge the wording of the provision. It consciously deviates from it, considering that the binding objection of the prosecutor would violate the court's jurisdictional independence. It references Article 8 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 178 paragraph 1 of the Constitution, Article 6 of the ECHR, Article 47 of the KPP, and part of the case law of appellate courts. This is a legal argument. But there is also an opposing line of case law, based precisely on the linguistic interpretation of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which the court itself notes in the justification. I wrote about this yesterday. So it is not the case that there is no problem. There is a very serious dispute about the limits of interpretation contra legem and whether the court can practically deprive the premise, which the legislator explicitly included in the provision. The second problem I have is with the prognostic assessment. The court acknowledges that Romanowski left Poland, did not appear for the hearing concerning the temporary arrest, was outside the reach of Polish authorities, and even informed in his own application that he has a passport issued under a different identity 🤷‍♂️ The court considers these circumstances to be burdensome but then assumes that they cannot determine the assessment because one should look at it primarily prospectively. 🤔 And this is where I have the greatest doubt. The prediction of a suspect's future behavior does not occur in a vacuum. Its foundational material is, after all, their past behavior. 🤷‍♂️ If a person involved in the proceedings previously did not comply with procedural mechanisms, left the country, and remained outside the reach of the authorities, then their later declaration that from this moment they will comply with the conditions of the "blanket warrant" must be subjected to particularly rigorous assessment. The court may conclude that despite this, the risk has currently diminished. But it should convincingly demonstrate why specific past behaviors have lost their prognostic significance. Because if we are to predict a person’s future behavior while disregarding their past behavior, then a rather fundamental question arises - on what basis are we actually building this prediction? 🤷‍♂️ Therefore, I would not dismiss this ruling with the label of a neo-judge, but I would also not say that the problem ends with the justification sounding rational. A rationally constructed justification can still lead to a legally debatable result. In my opinion, this is exactly the kind of case we are dealing with here. The argumentation of the court is clear and can be recounted, but both the way of breaking the literal wording of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the prognostic assessment of the suspect's behavior leave significant legal doubts. If I were to rule on this matter, I would not grant the application. Firstly – due to the prosecutor's objection and the content of Article 281 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Secondly – even accepting a different interpretation of this provision, I would not find sufficient grounds for a positive prognostic assessment. This is not about punishing Romanowski for the past. It is about assessing whether his past behavior allows rationally to assume that from this moment he will respect the obligations arising from the "blanket warrant." In my opinion – it does not allow 🤷‍♂️ And that is precisely why there is an appellate review. #prawo #justycja #analizaprawna (translated)

We have the ability to overinterpret. The Tu-95MS disaster caused a lot of speculation. Meanwhile, there is no point in speculating. We shouldn't attribute any intentions to people suggesting things, as legends then circulate. Operational commander, Maj. Gen. pilot Ireneusz Nowak, sarcastically wrote that "Perhaps this particular one was the carrier of the Ch-101, which ended its flight near Tarnawa!" Just that, and that is enough. I am lucky to personally know General Nowak; he is from the old guard of the F-16, people trained in the USA, pilots often retrained by veterans of American military actions, mentally shaped as "tactical minded." Among this group were the first base commanders, division generals Darek Malinowski and Czarek Wiśniewski, along with Jacek Pszczoła, also a division general, a laid-back person who cannot be ruffled, and at the door of his office in Łask, there was at one time a sticker with a large wasp. They are exceptionally competent people, calm but capable of making quick decisions and unafraid of the responsibility for them. Another characteristic feature is truly outstanding intelligence. Why am I writing about this? Because people at this intellectual level often fall into the trap that what is clear and obvious to them is incomprehensible to others, and their minds drift into fascinating directions, to places that make one’s hair stand on end, wondering how it is even possible. That was the case this time as well. The flood of comments is overwhelming; personally, I was stunned. Scholars of the holy scripture wrote that the general suggests it was Polish saboteurs from Kedyw-bis. What can drop on a person's head, drops (in my case, my jaw, both hands, and the other leg). Maj. Gen. Ireneusz Nowak DOES NOT SUGGEST ANYTHING LIKE THAT. This is a gross overinterpretation. He only wrote that it may have been this Tu-95MS that fired the Ch-101 missile, which landed in Poland, as established as a result of deliberate action, not a mistake (such an impact point was in the navigational system’s memory, the only chance for a mistake being incorrect input of coordinates, which is very unlikely). Additionally, the missile did perform a classic "bump" with a vertical attack, driving into the ground almost at a right angle to it, executing the attack at the programmed location. Since the Tu-95MS belonging to the 22nd Guards Donbas Heavy Bomber Division from Engels (now Olenia) and to the 326th Tarnopol Heavy Bomber Division from Ukraine rotate to Engels or, less frequently, to Akhtubinsk to fire the Ch-101 at Ukraine for several hours, it is theoretically possible that this aircraft launched that missile (about 1 in 40 odds, as there are that many of them). What Maj. Gen. Ireneusz Nowak REALLY suggested, Mark Rutte, the Secretary General of NATO, somewhat more directly stated. The experienced politician knows that you have to lay it on the line for the simpletons because they will twist everything. They will make things up, add remarks, and generally go off in the wrong direction. Mark Rutte said several really important things: "Vladimir Putin knows he can never win against NATO; NATO is so strong that Russia has no chance of overcoming it." What does this mean? That NATO MUST BE UNITARY. WE MUST NOT ALLOW OURSELVES TO BE DIVIDED. He added: "NATO will defend every square kilometer of its territory. There is no doubt about it, and Putin knows this (...) If anything happens, we are ready to respond." “Well, first, about the word 'hybrid' – I have said this many times already. It sounds a bit too mild, almost cozy. In reality, we are talking about aggressive tactics in the gray zone. What we are dealing with is hostile drones, acts of diversion, sabotage, and even massive cyberattacks." "But I want to make it clear: we have all the response options we need. You will not always see them publicly. They will not always be symmetrical. It will not always operate on a 'tit for tat' basis, but I assure you that we have the tools for effective response, and the Russians know this perfectly well." THIS IS KEY. NATO IS NOT PASSIVE. NATO has many different tools for hybrid responses to Russia's hybrid attacks. And if Maj. Gen. Nowak suggested anything, IT WAS JUST THAT. You just need to understand it, know the context, listen to the statements of leading NATO politicians, and everything will become clear. And further Mark Rutte: “I do not claim that these malicious actions in the gray zone do not affect us. They do affect us, and sometimes it is very evident. However, our response can be multidimensional. Let’s look at the past. When, at the end of 2025, an underwater cable between Finland and Estonia was damaged, we launched Operation Baltic Sentry to protect our critical dilatory infrastructure. This was an example of a symmetrical response. But what happens next is asymmetric actions. More and more allies, such as Sweden, the United Kingdom, Belgium, or France, are taking coordinated steps to maximize the disruption of the Russian 'shadow fleet'. We are doing everything to make those rusted tankers stop generating the profits the Kremlin uses to fund its war machine." "Yesterday, the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe (SACEUR) stated plainly: 'Whenever you are able, when you are almost certain that the Russians stand behind an attack, publicly assign them the blame.' Just like Estonia did today. I fully support this and encourage it. Share all intelligence information with NATO and SHAPE structures. Russia continues its reckless campaign of hostile actions against NATO, trying to weaken our resolve and force us to stop supporting Kyiv. But it is failing. Our message to Moscow is clear: in response to any actions in the gray zone, we will do even more for Ukraine, not less. Because ultimately their only goal is to divide us so we lose focus and start arguing among ourselves." NATO is responding. NATO is providing Ukraine with a lot of ammunition. And Ukraine sends it further, to where it needs to land with a bang. NATO makes it harder for the shadow fleet to operate. It combats Russian spy networks; since the outbreak of the full-scale war in Ukraine in February 2022, NATO member states have expelled around 750 Russian diplomats: Bulgaria 83, Germany 80, Romania 52, Poland 45, France 40. How many "one-time saboteurs" are recruited in Russia for pennies remains a sweet mystery. But there, strangely enough, many different failures occur: trains derail, various things catch fire, blackouts appear, etc. Much of this is done by Ukrainians, but is it all? Who knows, who knows... Today, such saboteurs are rented online for pennies, massively, like cheap drones. They do it, and can we? And how do you know that there are no other intrigues? For example, discreet info in Kremlin circles that one is conspiring against another. Therefore, NATO has tools and can respond, which it is doing. Mainly in the field of cyberattacks that Russia is feeling. As for the Tu-95MS itself - if three engines go out at once, assuming it is true, in most cases it is due to fuel issues, either a break in fuel supply to the engines or fuel contamination, blocked filters, etc. Ukraine has seriously damaged the refineries producing aviation fuel. Often this production has been taken over by other refineries when technically possible. You can easily guess the quality of this fuel. So there could have been "not enough kerosene in the kerosene." Another issue is that the intensive use, these long hours of flights from Ukraine or Olenia to Engels, suspending missiles, and flying to launch over the Caspian Sea (if something goes wrong, the missile falls into the water), and then returning to the home base is about resources, resources, resources... Old bombers and their engines are wearing out at an accelerated pace. How do you think maintenance, spare parts, and technical servicing levels are? Well, exactly, the Russian bomber fleet is systematically degrading, and this can only be pleasing. Because we don't need those bombers for anything. In the picture, a "noisy cricket," the Tu-95MS, code-named "Bear" by NATO. Phot. Runet Dear friends, if you like it, and if I should dedicate my time to it, if you want to read something, I will ask for a coffee, it’s only 10 or 20 PLN. Best regards to everyone and a big thank you to those who buy coffees. https://t.co/pPHnCSlfpS #NATO #Rosja #UkraińskaWojna (translated)