The author stated that Daniela Lima had first-hand released a UN report questioning Meta for interference in the Brazilian election. According to him, experts from the Human Rights Council demanded that the company protect political expression and take effective measures during the electoral period after receiving reports of restrictions on the platforms. He said that the issue involved freedom of expression, association, and equality among political positions, and claimed that Meta limited the reach of one side while amplifying the other. He also asserted that the company was not neutral and that the UN had already demanded explanations. The author listed among the topics circulating “#WhoIsMarianaFlavio,” “#7MillionLulaSoldiers,” “JUSTICE FOR ANA CLARA,” Quaest, “CENSORSHIP NEVER AGAIN,” “FLAVIO AND RED COMMAND,” “#FlavioOwnerOfBet,” “#CensorshipNo,” Felipe Nunes, “4 days left,” “FLAVIO IS COLLOR,” “WAKE UP JANONES,” “45% and Lula,” Kassio and Mendonça and rejection. At the end, he asked readers to share the publication and claimed they would try to silence the matter. #LiberdadeDeExpressao #CensuraNuncaMais #Eleições2024 (translated)





