Search

The author criticized Dubyna's post, accusing him of misrepresenting the division of powers, the competences of the Council of Ministers, the rulings of the Constitutional Tribunal, and the concept of a coup d'état. He wrote that the appointed team analyzing the systemic effects of the court and tribunal rulings did not seize judicial power and had no authority to overturn judgments, change decision-making panels, or issue orders to judges. The author stated that Dubyna referred to Article 190 of the Constitution while omitting the difference between the finality of Constitutional Tribunal rulings and the analysis of their legal effects. He also accused him of failing to take into account the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Xero Flor v. Poland and the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-448/23, which — as he wrote — concerned fundamental irregularities in the functioning of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal. The author considered the designation of the appointment of the government analytical team as a coup d'état to be a manifestation of a misunderstanding of the principles of state functioning. He also criticized the comparison of the situation to a totalitarian system, stating that it was historically unfounded and offensive to those repressed by the communist state. He added that the use of capital letters and exclamation marks did not lend any legal or intellectual value to the statements. #prawo #konstytucja #Polska (translated)

Konrad Hryszkiewicz wrote that the Venice Commission and the CJEU will accept even the worst atrocities, and the symmetry proponents will argue that it was worse under the rule of PiS. He also pointed out that in the recording, the police riot units dispersed people opposing the removal of animals from the Łączna Zoo. https://t.co/Ydj5u31Dz3 #Polska #Wolność #Zwierzęta (translated)

The author of the post wrote that producers and trade representatives warned about the rise in prices of some non-alcoholic beers and wines, as well as energy drinks, due to the planned VAT increase. He mentioned that the Polish Breweries Association announced it would challenge the regulations in the Court of Justice of the European Union. #Ceny #VAT #BrowaryPolskie #PL (translated)

The author of the entry referred to the comparison made by Professor Grabowska, who likened the selection of a Constitutional Tribunal judge to the admission of a person without a high school diploma to university. He asked why similar procedural requirements are not applied to the election of President Karol Nawrocki. He recalled that Article 129(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland indicates the Supreme Court as the body determining the validity of the presidential election. However, he noted that the resolution in this matter was adopted by the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs, the status of which as a court established by law — as he wrote — has been questioned in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. He added that the National Electoral Commission pointed out irregularities requiring judicial assessment and the need for the case to be heard by a panel whose independence would not be in doubt. The author emphasized that he does not prejudge the invalidity of Nawrocki's election. He also reminded that taking the oath provided for in Article 130 of the Constitution does not by itself remove any potential defects in the earlier electoral procedure. He asked whether constitutional requirements are applied selectively, depending on the political support for a given person. #KonstytucjaRP #SądNajwyższy #Polityka (translated)

The article by Krzysztof Koźmiński discusses the consequences of the CJEU ruling in case C-510/25 Adazik, which addresses the issue of the number of proceedings required to settle one null credit agreement, emphasizing the organizational costs and the accessibility of justice for citizens. #kredyty #prawo #TSUE (translated)

The author reported that his conversation today with Roberta Metsola, the President of the European Parliament, dealt with the protection of the rule of law in Europe. He added that as the rapporteur for the Rule of Law Report, he also addressed the key role of the CJEU in ensuring effective judicial protection for all citizens of the Union. https://t.co/DEJWA7UnO3 #Praworządność #UniaEuropejska #TSUE #EU (translated)

Mikołaj Wróbelek wrote that according to information reaching KO politicians, the palace considered appealing to Donald Trump regarding the Constitutional Tribunal as a "nuclear option" through Nawrocki. The author claimed that Nawrocki would not refer the matter to the CJEU but would turn to Trump, which Wróbelek compared to the actions of a leader dependent on the United States. #Polska #polityka #Trump (translated)

Max Hübner ironically described the past week as another in which Donald Tusk was "winning." He wrote that Tusk lost the elections in Krakow, did not take control of the Constitutional Tribunal by the end of September, and — as Hübner claimed, which Tomasz Siemoniak supposedly admitted — lied about the "CIA report." Hübner added that Tusk had to confront a result of 5.19, which Karol Nawrocki reminded him of, and also — as the author assessed — he most likely knew about the court's approval for a "iron list" for Marcin Romanowski. He also wrote that the CJEU rejected Tusk's "request" to suspend the application of the EU-Mercosur agreement. He further stated that it became known that Tusk opposed the construction of an American military base in Poland, but Nawrocki was supposed to correct him. Hübner ended his post with wishes for a nice weekend. #Tusk #Polityka #Wybory (translated)

I understand that you are not an economist, but after all, you have an entire army of "advisors" at your disposal... Because this is no longer information relayed by Moody. This is your RHETORIC. Just like with the debt. "In four years, the government increases debt by a trillion." The thing is, four years have not yet passed 🤷‍♂️ You are already linking the executed debt with a FUTURE FORECAST and then dividing that amount by the number of residents, announcing that a newborn has "26 thousand zł of debt." How do you come to such absurd conclusions?? I won't say it's not impressive... But public debt is not a personal obligation that is assigned to a child's account. And then there's the Constitutional Tribunal. You sign a law, still consider it unconstitutional, and send it to the Tribunal. The same Tribunal that the ECtHR has found to violate the right to a court set by law in the Xero Flor case, and the Grand Chamber of the CJEU in case C-448/23 stated that it does not meet the requirement of an independent and impartial court due to serious irregularities concerning its composition. And just minutes earlier, you said: "I'm not looking at legal loopholes." The Constitution and the legality of state organs are not "legal loopholes," Mr. Guardian of the Constitution 🤦‍♂️ And in the end, you say that you don't want "constant political war"... After a speech in which words fall: - blackmail, - the government’s ATM, - the government's financial catastrophe, - the prime minister's political plan and unsubstantiated claims that the government deliberately maintains high fuel prices to profit from them. I won't judge intentions. I assess the content. And the content of the official statement by the person holding the highest office in the state should withstand confrontation with documents 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Here - in many key areas - it does not withstand. I will no longer dwell on this speech, as I believe it is a waste of time. I'll just say this. I don't know who prepared this text for you. However, I do know that you read it, you delivered it, and you take responsibility for every word. And you repeated nonsense and manipulations that have long circulated in the statements of people from your Chancellery — which I have already corrected multiple times. The worst part is that many of them don't even take long to verify. You just need to open the documents from your own Chancellery. I really don't envy you. It only pains me your slogan: "First Poland, first Poles." Because Poland and Poles should truly come first - even before political interests, party narratives, and the need for another conflict. You cannot appeal to the good of citizens while simultaneously playing with their trust in the state, providing them from the highest office with half-truths, insinuations, and political assessments cloaked as facts. This is not about whether someone likes this government. It's about accountability for words. Especially from this office 🫣 #Polska #Polityka #Ekonomia (translated)

Jeżeli ktoś jest zdziwiony, dlaczego sprawa Mercosure przepadła w TSUE, to przypominam wypowiedź Donalda Tuska z 18.12.2025 o tym, że MERCOSURE jest ogólnie super i nikomu nie zaszkodzi. PO PROSTU TUSK SPRZEDAŁ ROLNIKÓW. I nawet nie walczył. Tyle. https://t.co/uvd0Z6yFSm #MERCOSURE #Tusk #rolnicy

TSUE odrzucił wniosek Polski ws. środka zabezpieczającego w postaci zawieszenia tymczasowego stosowania umowy handlowej z #Mercosur. Przypominam, że Komisja Europejska złamała procedury ratyfikacyjne, po pierwsze dzieląc umowę na dwie części, co miało przyspieszyć finalizację #TSUE #Polska #Mercosur #PL #EU #BR #AR #UY #PY

Dokładnie tak to wygląda. Straszenie nieustanne wojną i rozkład finansowy państwa ma jeden oczywisty cel, o którym już przebąkują niektórzy przedstawiciele tzw. elit liberalno-lewicowych. Otóż na słabość państwa jest jeden sposób - większe podporządkowanie 🇵🇱organom UE i centralizacja Unii, która ma szlachetnie przyjść z pomocą jak dobra „ciotka” z Niemiec. Orzecznictwo TSUE jasno ustanawiające pozatraktatowy prymat prawa unijnego nad Konstytucją RP, wypowiedzi @vonderleyen czy symboliczne wpinki z flagami unijnymi w klapie, to czytelne sygnały. #Polska #UniaEuropejska #Wojna