Konrad Krasuski wrote that he received information from several interlocutors that raised his doubts about the course of the inspections and the selection of experts in the case of the zoo in Łączna. The lawyer he referred to reportedly claimed that Mondo Cane regularly requests the same expert, who then co-creates a protocol in line with the expectations of the organization. Krasuski asked why a veterinarian expert was not appointed. According to the author, an employee of the Veterinary Inspection critically assessed the expert's competencies, using offensive language. Another interlocutor reportedly indicated that similar situations occurred in the palm house in Legnica and the shelter in Rybow. Krasuski added that in such cases, the expert is often not a veterinarian. The author announced that he would ask the prosecutor's office who and at whose request the expert was appointed, what her competencies were, who prepared and approved the protocols, what remuneration she would receive, and whether the organizations participating in the intervention had an influence on the selection of the expert. Krasuski also raised the issue of the future of the animals. He reminded that the dogs from Sobolewa were sent, among others, to Kuflew and DIOZ, and asked where the animals from Łączna would be transported and whether anyone would monitor this. He wrote that the conversations that leaked from the chats did not indicate the existence of such monitoring. #sprawiedliwość #weterynaria #biegli (translated)