Aggregated public profile · Not an official account.

Konrad Krasuski wrote that during the prosecution's conference, there was a request not to incite hatred, which is why the names of the experts were not disclosed. He accused Dioz of publishing the data and image of the person who warned the zoo before the action and adding false information to their story. He asked how long the organization would be able to harass people with impunity. #hejting #bezpieczeństwo #prawaosób (translated)

Konrad Krasuski announced the publication of the next material in Official Zero regarding ZOO Łączna the next day. It was supposed to present the perspectives of both sides, take into account the new prosecutor's conference, and summarize the new developments from the past few days. #ZOOŁączna #konferencja #prokuratura (translated)

Konrad Krasuski wrote that social media was the main, and practically the only channel allowing DIOZ to operate on such a large scale. He accused the organization of using it for a witch hunt, disclosing personal data, manipulating recipients, and promoting fundraising and pet food, whose labeling—he claimed—did not meet legal requirements. He added that DIOZ had concealed its connection with the company producing this pet food and published false materials, including photos from the USA portrayed as situations from Poland, on which the organization profited from fundraising. Krasuski noted that court cases and actions by the authorities in Poland take a long time, but users can report posts that violate platform regulations. He wondered what could happen if there were a lot of such reports. #dezinformacja #manipulacja (translated)

Konrad Krasuski wrote that there were 73 open DIOZ collections on the page at the specified address at that time. He accused the service of refusing to answer even basic questions regarding the verification of the collections. According to him, other fundraising sites had already stopped allowing DIOZ to conduct collections and answered all his questions. He added that instead of an answer, he received information about the publication of a report regarding the funding of animal homelessness in Poland. He asked why the service does not respond to his questions and wrote that he does not know the reason, although he has his suspicions. #DIOZ #zbiórki #bezdomnośćZwierząt (translated)

Konrad Krasuski published a summary of his materials regarding DIOZ and encouraged sharing them with people who have just learned about the organization's activities. He wrote that his publications addressed issues including finances and fundraising, allegations of harassment and manipulation, testimonies from affected individuals, experts, and former employees, as well as leaks of recordings from the president of DIOZ, controversial veterinary procedures, and the export of animals abroad. Among the mentioned materials, he also pointed out his response to DIOZ's explanations, his confrontation with the organization's president during a protest, the issue of money from poultry farms and techno parties at the animal center, for which — as he wrote — DIOZ was fundraising. He also mentioned a case related to ZOO Łączna. #DIOZ #afera #zwierzęta (translated)

Konrad Krasuski wrote that he was pleased to see that the commenters on DIOZ's publications began, in his opinion, to notice the problem after watching many videos about the organization. He wondered why comments were not being deleted and speculated that DIOZ might not be keeping up with moderating them. He added that while commenting on earlier publications, he received a shadow ban. https://t.co/tQ6JLLNFDU #DIOZ #komentarze #otwartość (translated)

Konrad Krasuski asked about the role of DIOZ in the Zoo Łączna case. He wrote that in suspicious situations related to animal care, the involvement of this organization often arose, and in this case, DIOZ was supposed to file reports, publish photos without specific context, and describe cruel situations in the zoo on social media without showing evidence. According to Krasuski, after the zoo owner was released from custody, he himself brought up the topic of the organization. The author also pointed to a wave of critical comments on DIOZ's posts, including from individuals who had previously supported the organization, and asked whether its supporters would recognize the scale of the abuses that, as he wrote, he had spoken about multiple times. In the end, he invited viewers to watch the material. #DIOZ #opiekazwierząt #zoo (translated)

Konrad Krasuski described the chaos surrounding the zoo in Łączna, where — as he wrote — there were clashes with the police, and officers with shields pushed back residents defending the facility. He presented both sides of the dispute. According to Krasuski's account, the prosecution alleged that hundreds of animals were being abused and malnourished, and some were suffering or had died. Five people were arrested and charged; none admitted guilt. The prosecution also requested the temporary arrest of the zoo director. The owners, on the other hand, described the confiscation of the animals as an unprecedented action. Krasuski wrote that residents were coming to the zoo to block transports, and accusations of animal theft were appearing online. He also mentioned revealed screenshots of conversations from the foundation about the division of the animals, a recording warning about the action, and concerns regarding the safety of the transport, conditions in the new places, and the reliability of the experts. Krasuski stated that he was on-site and spoke with people involved in the case, including anonymously with an employee of the Veterinary Inspection. He also attended a press conference held by the prosecution and spoke with a lawyer for the owners. He announced that he would look into what initiated the case and how events escalated the previous night. #ZooŁączna #protest #ochronazwierząt (translated)

Konrad Krasuski wrote that he received information from several interlocutors that raised his doubts about the course of the inspections and the selection of experts in the case of the zoo in Łączna. The lawyer he referred to reportedly claimed that Mondo Cane regularly requests the same expert, who then co-creates a protocol in line with the expectations of the organization. Krasuski asked why a veterinarian expert was not appointed. According to the author, an employee of the Veterinary Inspection critically assessed the expert's competencies, using offensive language. Another interlocutor reportedly indicated that similar situations occurred in the palm house in Legnica and the shelter in Rybow. Krasuski added that in such cases, the expert is often not a veterinarian. The author announced that he would ask the prosecutor's office who and at whose request the expert was appointed, what her competencies were, who prepared and approved the protocols, what remuneration she would receive, and whether the organizations participating in the intervention had an influence on the selection of the expert. Krasuski also raised the issue of the future of the animals. He reminded that the dogs from Sobolewa were sent, among others, to Kuflew and DIOZ, and asked where the animals from Łączna would be transported and whether anyone would monitor this. He wrote that the conversations that leaked from the chats did not indicate the existence of such monitoring. #sprawiedliwość #weterynaria #biegli (translated)

Konrad Krasuski wrote that he spoke with an anonymous employee of the Veterinary Inspection about the situation around the zoo in Łączna. According to the informant, on October 2, during the Animal Rights Congress in the Senate, the Chief Veterinary Officer and representatives of the General Directorate for Environmental Protection were present, and discussions were already underway in the corridors about a future intervention at the zoo. The employee emphasized that identifying irregularities during an inspection does not automatically mean that animals must be taken away. As Krasuski reported, the informant distinguished between deficiencies that could be ordered to be corrected — such as an insufficient enclosure for a tiger — and situations where the animal's welfare is threatened enough to warrant immediate removal. He also assessed that there was no reason not to trust the District Veterinary Officer in Wałbrzych. According to the employee, the veterinarian had held this position since around 2015, had extensive knowledge, and difficult cases were consulted with him; in his opinion, animal removal was not necessary. The informant alleged that the authority of the Veterinary Inspection was being publicly undermined, and the responsibility for systemic problems fell on individual veterinarians. He claimed that after subsequent media scandals, district veterinarians were being changed, but this did not lead to real reforms. He also pointed out the lack of uniform procedures, support, specialized training related to zoo inspections, and a joint protocol for such inspections. He critically assessed the advisory teams at the Chief Veterinary Officer. As Krasuski conveyed, the employee believed that individuals associated with animal protection and social sciences had a significant impact on the discussion, while the knowledge and experience of veterinarians and field inspectors were being marginalized. He also noted that actions concerning the removal of animals from the zoo in Łączna were to be undertaken about six months after the notification, while the investigation by the same prosecutor's office concerning DIOZ lasted much longer. The employee stressed that the transport of wild and exotic animals, when necessary, requires prior preparations: acclimatizing the animal to the transport crate and ensuring the presence of a familiar caretaker. According to him, severe stress can lead some species to refuse food, panic, or self-harm. The informant also indicated that veterinarians were asked very short notice about the possibility of sedating animals before transport and assessed that such an operation should not be organized ad hoc. As Krasuski reported, the employee believed that transport could be justified in direct threat to life or health, but in other circumstances, the transport itself and the associated stress could also pose significant risks to the animals. #OchronaZwierząt #ZOO #Weterynaria (translated)

Konrad Krasuski asked whether the action was based on assumptions and whether it would only become apparent after it was carried out whether there were any irregularities. He compared the announcement of the animal protection with information about the export of some of them abroad. Referring to the conditions, he wrote that in a recorded conversation with a person from another organization, who knew its representatives, it was mentioned that they were not always supposed to be better. #aktualności #sprawyspołeczne #transportzwierząt (translated)

Konrad Krasuski wrote that the actions around the Łączna Zoo looked more and more absurd. He referred to leaked recordings, screenshots, and conversations that — he claimed — indicated that even before entering the zoo area, it was determined who would take specific animals, including monkeys, camels, and owls. He added that the conversations mentioned foundations applying for animals according to their own preferences. Krasuski also wrote that according to the same conversations, some foundations had worse conditions than the zoo and knew that they would take animals to such places. He mentioned statements regarding a lack of money and doctors. He believed that the matter required thorough clarification and described the actions as improvisation at the expense of the animals. He also asked on whose commission the operation was being conducted and whether it could be related to the need to take over the property or to remove the current tenants. #Zoo #Zwierzęta #Fundacje (translated)

Konrad Krasuski wrote that Gimper was accused of illegal gambling advertising after showing the logo of a company related to poker in his material. He pointed out that TVP aired a piece criticizing illegal gambling on the internet but showed logos of the same company, including one that took up the entire frame. He asked whether a case could also be initiated against TVP and wondered if the station is subject to different regulations. Krasuski deemed it absurd that, as he wrote, context does not matter and one can be prosecuted for displaying a logo. He added that he himself censores such content because he does not want to be sued. #hazard #media #prawo (translated)

Konrad Krasuski wrote that he did not believe in the good intentions of DIOZ during the protest and did not accept collaborating with the organization, even in matters of animal protection. He assessed that such presence legitimized DIOZ in the eyes of the audience and made it so that its previous actions were publicly forgiven again. #DIOZ #protest #zwierzęta (translated)

Zaproszenie do rozmowy na żywo z prezesem DIOZ ponowione. Od miesięcy pojawiają się kolejne wymówki. Przypomnę, że dogadaliśmy nawet warunki, na jakich taka rozmowa miałaby się odbyć. (U nich tworzą wizję, że to my nie chcemy gadać) Dlaczego prezes DIOZ nie chce skorzystać z okazji, żeby publicznie odnieść się do wszystkich zarzutów? Nie wiem, choć się domyślam. O wolontariacie, na który dostałem zaproszenie, już nie wspomnę. #DIOZ #rozmowa #wolontariat

DIOZ… znowu DIOZ… Podpalenie: Wokół samego podpalenia ich samochodu sporo wątków śmierdzi. Zbiórka odpalona na mniej niż godzinę po podpaleniu ze zdjęciami i opisami. Ludzie podsyłają że takie samochody kosztują między 100-200k, Dioz komunikuje że 500k, ale przecież taka okazja do grania na emocjach się pojawiła, że zbiórka odpalona na 1mln. Dioz jest diozem. Te same metody od lat. Aby lepiej się klikało usunęli z dokumentu, że auto jest w leasingu. Dioz oczywiście manipuluje też na temat sytuacji z zatrzymaniem. Jest oficjalna informacja z policji, że nie dotyczyło to protestu, dioz podaje swoją wersję, wygodniejszą dla nich, że zatrzymują ich bo protestują. (Filmu niestety nie nagram, a byłoby o czym, bo właśnie ruszam na urlop) edit: no i zapomniałem o porównywaniu przez prezesa Dioz sytuacji z podpaleniem do Wołynia. #DIOZ #manipulacja #podpalenie

Okazuje się, że ten dworek to może być niezły biznes. To ciekawe. Z jednej strony mówi się o ratowaniu zwierząt i miejscu ich odpoczynku. Z drugiej, na tej samej posiadłości konie pracują po 3–6 godzin dziennie, wożąc turystów. A w menu dla gości reklamowane jest mięso z kaczek hodowanych w majątku. Jedne zwierzęta ratujemy, inne w tym samym miejscu hodujemy, żeby trafiły na stół? Czy coś źle czytam? #ekologia #welfare #biznes