Search

WolnośćTV cited a statement by Dobromir Sośnierz, who argued that merely possessing a knife does not make a person a knife-wielder if they have not used it, and that they had the right to carry it. Sośnierz compared this to men possessing a tool that could be used for rape, noting that possessing it does not in itself make them rapists. He described this argumentation as an example of "PRL propaganda." The post also referred to the Confederation. #Wolność #Prawo #Propaganda (translated)

Jacek Karnowski encouraged listening to and sharing a portion of the conversation with attorney Magdalena Leszczyńska on the television channel wPolsce24. He wrote that Piotr's defender compared the brutal treatment by the police of the Constitutional Tribunal defender with the lenient treatment of murderers and pointed out that portraying Piotr as a "knife-wielder" was manipulation. Karnowski assessed that the conversation revealed the power's manipulations. #prawaCzłowieka #sprawiedliwość #manipulacja (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk questioned the way the police presented the controversial intervention. He wrote that the detained man lost consciousness, and according to witnesses, he was being choked and was taken to the ambulance in handcuffs. He added that there were no recordings from the officers' body cameras, but the available recordings contained screams and the officer's profanity. Kusznieruk pointed out that reports included information about a folding knife that was allegedly hidden under the man's clothing. He asked whether the man threatened with it or took it out, and emphasized that no evidence of the knife's use was presented. In his opinion, simply possessing a knife would not justify choking or the disproportionate use of force. The author suggested that highlighting information about the knife while ignoring the circumstances of losing consciousness and the lack of recordings could serve to build a convenient narrative. He called for the release of recordings, documentation of the intervention, and the basis for the use of specific coercive measures. He added that deliberately distorting facts to justify the officers' actions would be a more serious problem than the controversial intervention itself. #policja #interwencja #manipulacja (translated)

Magda Trzaskowska addressed Donald Tusk and Karol Nawrocki, asking whether the information that someone had a knife in their pocket meant that it had not been used. She called such a presentation of the matter a tacky manipulation, underpinned by political "sempticism," and described it as disgusting. She added that they had gotten used to it. #polityka #manipulacja #Tusk (translated)

Bartosz Lewandowski asked Waldemar Żurek if he had evidence that the entire property came from an unlawful act, or if, as he assessed, it was a matter of manipulation. He pointed out that harm in criminal law is not equivalent to profit, and the individuals he wrote about could have accumulated their wealth legally over many years. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #kryminalistyka (translated)

Mateusz Morawiecki described "Tuskla" as the latest technology of lies and manipulation. He wrote that while Tesla jumps over obstacles, "Tuskla" was supposed to jump over its own promises to avoid fulfilling 100 specifics. https://t.co/BpAVnHWZ4J #technologia #manipulacja #wiedza (translated)

Ziemowit Miłosz Malecha wrote that presenting the capacity of 1.2 GW of offshore wind energy as sufficient to power 1.5 million households may mislead consumers. According to him, this number comes from the expected average annual energy production, not supply guarantees. Malecha pointed out that production depends on wind strength: it decreases with weak winds, and with strong winds, it can exceed current demand, which may require exporting surpluses or limiting production. He added that such slogans overlook the issue of energy availability at the time it is needed. #Energia #Statystyka #OdnawialneŹródłaEnergii (translated)

Dear President wrote that the O. platform and its associated media have, in his opinion, developed a loyal electorate of 30 percent made up of obedient supporters. He claimed that the support of this group would not change regardless of the platform's actions, and described it as an example of effective social engineering and mass manipulation. #socjotechnika #manipulacja #media (translated)

Chrzanik criticized TVP Info for the material about Karol Nawrocki, accusing the station of a manipulative representation of his statements. According to the author, the material suggested that Nawrocki considered the loss of shelter by the residents of Kharkiv to be insignificant, and he described the assessments regarding the increased threat from Russia as "the distribution of fear." Chrzanik wrote that in the interview, Nawrocki repeatedly spoke about the threat from Russia, and quoted his words: "Russia has always been and is a threat." #TVP #manipulacja #Nawrocki (translated)

Oskar Kida criticized the minister's interpretation regarding the opinion of the Venice Commission on the oath-taking of judges of the Constitutional Tribunal before the president. He wrote that according to the principle, the president should promptly accept the oath from individuals legally elected by the Sejm. In his opinion, however, if there are doubts about the legality of the election, the president may withhold acceptance of the oath until these doubts are resolved by the appropriate authority. If the doubts are confirmed, the president — as Kida argued — cannot accept the oath. Kida assessed that the position of the Venice Commission is contrary to the case law of the Constitutional Tribunal or overly simplifies the matter. He claimed that the president can examine the circumstances of the candidates' selection, including their compliance with formal requirements, but cannot resolve doubts against them on his own. The decision should be made by the appropriate authority. Kida also accused the minister of manipulating the presentation of the Commission's position: according to him, the opinion allows for the oath to be taken without the president's physical presence only when he unlawfully delays acceptance or refuses it. The author emphasized that the Venice Commission is an advisory body and does not issue binding resolutions. He concluded that its opinion is inconsistent in many places with Polish law, the Constitution, and the case law of the Constitutional Tribunal. According to Kida, the opinion does not preclude that the oaths taken on April 9, 2026, by four individuals were effective, nor that these individuals are serving judges of the Constitutional Tribunal. He argued that such an effect could occur if the Tribunal found that the president unjustifiably delayed the acceptance of the oath; otherwise, these individuals could not become judges. Kida wrote that in his opinion, without a change in the law, one cannot take an oath before the president without his presence. #Prawo #Konstytucja #Sędziowie (translated)

In the face of the rising number of frauds related to illness, the Małopolska police and the National Health Fund warn against scammers impersonating family members or medical personnel who manipulate the emotions of victims to extort money for fictitious treatment. #oszustwa #nawnuczka #manipulacja (translated)

NeoJudgeTuleya wrote that in recent hours, information about a possible attack on the prime minister and deputy prime minister was conveyed through special services, and urgent meetings were held at the Anti-Terrorist Center. The author suggested that the threat had been communicated via email and its publicity was an operation intended to divert attention from government problems. As a background, he pointed to the collapse of public finances and record state debt, knife attacks in schools, and scandals at the ministerial level, including the affair of Deputy Minister Kołodziejczak. He wrote that the authorities intentionally directed media attention to the topic of the attack in order to limit the debate on taxes, the budget deficit, and government actions. The author accused the ruling camp of fueling polarization, shifting the blame for mistakes onto political opponents, and appointing individuals who are loyal but, as he assessed, lacking competence. He also claimed that the alert about the attack was intended to provide the government with political benefits, justify state operating costs, and silence the opposition. He mentioned the creation of enemies, including the opposition and President Nawrocki. #polityka #manipulacja #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Mateusz Morawiecki criticized the morning briefing convened by Prime Minister Tusk, which involved ministers, heads of services, and representatives of state institutions. He wrote that less information was shared after the meeting with the public than before and called for concrete actions for the safety of children. Morawiecki expressed concern regarding the tragic events and extended condolences to the families of the victims and those affected. He also thanked teachers, rescuers, and officials. He claimed that for three years he has been warning about the harmful influence of smartphones, algorithms, and social media on children, highlighting access to hate, violence, manipulation, and dangerous content. He described the ban on phones in schools as insufficient, as children still use devices after classes. He informed that Rozwój Plus proposed a ban on social media usage for individuals under 15 years of age, to be enforced by platforms, as well as severe financial penalties and legal liability for digital companies regarding harmful content and deceptive advertisements. He also advocated for support for parents, teachers, and educators. Morawiecki emphasized that protecting children should not lead to the restriction of adults' freedom of speech, and he opposed solutions that would allow for preventive censorship. He demanded from the Prime Minister specific draft laws, deadlines for their implementation, and identification of those responsible for their execution. He assessed that the safety of children would not be ensured by further briefings, but by decisions and responsibility. #BezpieczeństwoDzieci #Polska #Rodzice (translated)

John Bingham described the ruling team as cynical and claimed that it based its maintenance of power on manipulation and political PR. He expected the media to ask about the issue of the "assassination attempt on the prime minister": whether the threat signal was confirmed before the announcement was published, who decided to make it public, and what effect it was supposed to have on security. He also asked whether the decision was consulted with the ABW (Internal Security Agency) and SOP (Government Protective Bureau), whether an update was to be provided after assessing the credibility of the threat, and what operational or protective benefit announcing the possibility of an assassination on the highest representatives of the authorities gave before presenting the verification results. #polityka #media #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The Institute of Truth wrote that in December 2014, Daniel Obajtek testified as a witness in the trial of Roman and Józef Lis, who were accused of fraudulently obtaining around 200 thousand złoty in EU subsidies. According to the institute, Obajtek denied at that time that he was a silent partner of TT Plast and stated that he owned shares briefly, many years before assuming the office of the mayor of Pcim. He was also said to have testified that as mayor he did not hold any positions in the company nor managed it, and did not collaborate with an employee named Szymon. The institute reminded that in February 2021, "Gazeta Wyborcza" published recordings of conversations from 2009 in which Obajtek allegedly discussed clients, taking over contracts from Elektroplast, and matters concerning TT Plast. The newspaper reported that employees of the company referred to Obajtek as a silent partner. In 2016, Roman Lis filed a report of suspected false testimony and attached recordings. The prosecutor's office refused to initiate an investigation after about a month, finding that there were no signs of a prohibited act. According to the Institute of Truth, Obajtek denied breaking the law, admitted that he had once been a shareholder and knew the owners, but maintained that as mayor he did not work for TT Plast or any other company, and the recordings did not prove a crime. Orlen's office described the publication as a manipulation based on recordings of undetermined integrity. The institute assessed that the testimonies about the lack of professional relations with the company and not managing it did not withstand confrontation with the recordings. #InstytutPrawdy #Obajtek #prawo #korupcja (translated)