Wolność__Słowa

Freedom of Speech wrote that the police officer should state the reason before demanding documents and identification. In his opinion, the recording lacked such an explanation, and the policewoman should undergo retraining. The author also believed that the visible physical contact from the police in the video was unnecessary. He added that when the man started attacking the officers and fleeing, it was hard to blame the police for the pursuit and taking him down. However, he emphasized that the recording does not resolve media allegations regarding the knife or the policewoman's head hitting the door glass: according to him, there is no visible or audible impact, and the knife is not present at all. He accused PAP, TVP, and politicians from the ruling coalition of using this information for disinformation. The author assessed that the publication of the recording by the police was beneficial, as it allowed for a better understanding of the officers' behavior and expressing one's own opinion. https://t.co/m33wH9PD5u #policja #bezpieczeństwo #media (translated)

Freedom of Speech reached out to the Metropolitan Police Headquarters with a question of whether it indeed published the indicated information. He wrote that, according to him, the right to meet with a lawyer did not depend on providing one's personal data, and he characterized the described actions as methods straight out of the Polish People's Republic. #prawo #adwokat #Polska (translated)

Freedom__Words wrote that PAP and TVP spoke about a knife attack, while Adrian Witczak described the crowd as being armed with knives. He added that despite this, accounts for disinformation would be removed from them, and praised Sośnierz. https://t.co/6NZ2LaFgsf #dezinformacja #Polska #media (translated)

Freedom of Speech, addressing Donald Tusk and Karol Nawrocki, wrote about a man with a knife in his pocket and stated that the increase in aggression was attributed to Nawrocki. He accused Tusk of intentionally increasing aggression with his posts and claimed that he was aware of it. #agresja #polityka #dyskusja (translated)

Freedom__of Speech wrote that foundations took away the most valuable animals, ironically suggesting that their owners were the ones who had abused them the most. He claimed that the prosecutor's office, police, and governor saw no obstacles for the business to continue operating and questioned what the purpose of the actions taken was. https://t.co/lmXrGo31Vr #zwierzęta #ochronazwierząt #sprawiedliwość (translated)

Freedom__Of Speech wrote that the action was not a one-day event and was supposed to be prepared in collaboration with the prosecutor's office and the Ministry of Hennig-Kloski. He added that the authors of the action appealed to zoo directors for help, and some foundations left the area due to hate. He also informed that they would try to check the animals transported to Belgium and the Netherlands. In the end, he ironically described the action as professionally and carefully prepared. https://t.co/fXNuJPBpg8 #Zwierzęta #Akcja #Pomoc (translated)

Freedom of Speech reassured that the action was directed by an animal advocacy foundation that — as he wrote — had already organized similar activities and knew what it was doing. He added that the police would not assist individuals who were not in control of the situation. #prozwierzęca #akcja #fundacja (translated)

Freedom of Speech wrote that the deficit was supposed to amount to 270 billion this year and 280 billion next year, and yet "something has to be promised." He stated that Ćwik and Kloska did not calculate this, but he considered the strategy itself to be correct: in his opinion, it consisted of promising unfulfilled things to stay in power thanks to gullible voters. https://t.co/dgjxZZA0T9 #deficyt #polityka #obietnice (translated)

Freedom of Speech wrote that if the matter concerned a politician's child, it would have been handled appropriately. He also asked the interlocutor if he realizes that he is behaving like a cruel populist and pointed out that a similar case had occurred recently. https://t.co/DffvsKwHuL #polityka #populizm #społeczeństwo (translated)

It was written on the Wolność__Słowa account that the school could require a student to return an item, and in case of refusal, call the parents and ask them to take the child away. If the parents did not answer the phone or caused problems, the author pointed out the possibility of calling the police. He also criticized the recipient of the post for instigating a political dispute instead of supporting schools and teachers and ensuring that another school employee does not lose their life at the hands of a student. #szkoła #edukacja #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Freedom of Speech wrote that the recipient of the post previously criticized the president for vetoing a law prohibiting the confiscation of dangerous items from students. The author argued that schools can establish their own statutes and procedures, including rules for punishment for inappropriate behavior and posing a threat, as well as calling parents or the police. He asked why the recipient is initiating another political confrontation instead of calming public opinion. #polityka #edukacja #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Freedom of Speech wrote that the recording was not generated by AI and featured Krzysztof Gawkowski, who spoke about the immediate removal of content and accounts reported to the Polish police starting Thursday, as well as the need for the president's signature on a law enabling such actions. https://t.co/P6ArbPBdi7 #polityka #internet #prawo (translated)

Wolność__Słowa wrote that the matter was not about censorship, but about the welfare of children. He recommended a conversation between Piotr Uściński from Rozwój Plus and Ewa Schaedler from Polska 2050, which was conducted by editor W. Dąbrowski. As he pointed out, the nearly 7-minute conversation showed how much freedom of speech was threatened. https://t.co/1yqvUZguq3 #WolnośćSłowa #Dzieci #Cenzura (translated)

Freedom of Speech wrote that among KO politicians, jokes began to surface suggesting that Kołodziejczak was the first victim of the Mercosur agreement. He also cited a comment from Ewa Zajączkowska, who ironically stated that trade with Colombia had blossomed too much. https://t.co/or2U5Be7yY #Polityka #Handel #Mercosur (translated)

Freedom of Speech wrote that the case described by him was shocking, but the politicians of the Civic Coalition and pro-government media did not write about it. He also stated that it was the end of a several-day struggle for women's rights. https://t.co/a9uWdvcnx3 #prawakobiet #polityka #media (translated)

Freedom__of_Speech wrote that the journalistic environment during the election campaign contributed, in his opinion, to associating the current president with the term "pimp." He also accused some journalists, including Justyna Dobrosz-Oracz, of political involvement under the pretense of doing their jobs. The author pointed out that he critically assessed the behavior of Konrad Berkowicz, who — as he wrote — insulted female journalists by using sexually charged language towards them. He added that the MP could have ignored the question instead of responding in that manner, and that his party colleagues would have to explain his behavior. He also claimed that Berkowicz's accounts were managed by others, and the content published there supported this narrative, exposing other politicians of the Confederation to consequences. Freedom__of_Speech critically referred to parties that — as he put it — benefited from having their own "Zembaczyński," that is, a politician confronting critics. He wrote that he assessed such behaviors similarly regardless of political affiliation, and he considered both sides of the dispute around Dobrosz-Oracz and Berkowicz equally unworthy of attention. He added that the matter diverted attention from other issues and was beneficial to the ruling party. #polityka #dziennikarstwo #Społeczeństwo (translated)