Search

The Moose Enchanter wrote that Zając Ossowska is still active but cannot return Kulka to her owner. He referred to a post by ZOO Łączna on Facebook, according to which Kulka, the private dog of Mrs. Gosia, mother of Marcin, was taken to an animal shelter in Świdnica during prosecutorial actions. The author of the ZOO Łączna post stated that after obtaining information about the dog's whereabouts, they went to pick it up and thanked the shelter staff for their care. He added that Kulka is already with them, but by the prosecutor's decision cannot return to Mrs. Gosia, and a family member will take care of her. #Psy #Zwierzęta #Schronisko (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk informed that the court refused to temporarily arrest Piotr W., and after more than 50 hours of detention, the man was supposed to return home. He described that Piotr W. was standing at a red light at a pedestrian crossing, after which the police were said to have chased him, subdued him, and pinned him to the floor. According to the account referenced by Kusznieruk, the man lost consciousness and was taken to the hospital in handcuffs. The author noted that — as he wrote — the specific basis for the initiation of the identification has not been publicly clarified to this day. He added that the prosecution requested a temporary arrest, and the court did not agree to this request. Kusznieruk assessed that arrest should be a last resort and called for an investigation into the basis for the intervention, the use of force by the officers, and the circumstances surrounding Piotr W.'s loss of consciousness. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #Polska (translated)

Magdalena Prządka-Leszczyńska informed that the court did not grant the prosecutor's motion for the temporary detention of Piotr W. and agreed with the defense's position. She wrote that the man returned home after more than 50 hours. The author described that on Friday morning on Marszałkowska Street in Warsaw, Piotr W. was waiting for a green light at the pedestrian crossing, after which he was subdued by police officers. According to her account, he lost consciousness and was transported by ambulance on a stretcher, always in handcuffs, even during transport and while at the emergency room. Prządka-Leszczyńska wrote that the prosecutor demanded the application of temporary detention, and she, Magda Majkowska, and Bartosz Malewski from Ordo Iuris argued in court that there were no grounds for depriving Piotr W. of his freedom before the verdict. She added that the court agreed with them. She thanked the MPs who — as she wrote — supported Piotr W. from the very first hours, as well as journalists for showing the full recording. Among the people and editorial offices mentioned were Dorota Arciszewska, Marek Jakubiak, Telewizja Republika, wPolsce.pl, and Polsat News. #sprawiedliwość #Polska #prawo (translated)

Magdalena Majkowska informed that the District Court for Warsaw-Śródmieście in Warsaw did not grant the prosecutor's request for the temporary arrest of Piotr. As she wrote, together with lawyer Magda Prządką and lawyer Bartosz Malewski from Ordo Iuris, she pointed out from the beginning that the prosecutor did not demonstrate a high probability of the alleged act being committed nor any risk of flight, hiding, or tampering. Majkowska added that according to the court, there was no need to apply any preventive measures against him. According to Majkowska, Piotr had not been previously convicted, had a stable life situation, was a member of the volunteer fire brigade, and was a former professional soldier. She also wrote that he participated in demonstrations in defense of the Constitutional Tribunal, and at home, his wife and children were waiting for him. #Polska #Wolność #Prawo (translated)

Bartosz Malewski informed that the court did not grant the prosecution's request for a month of temporary detention for Piotr. According to Malewski, the prosecutor justified the request with concerns that Piotr might hide and an assessment that there is a high probability of him committing further crimes. Malewski wrote that together with lawyers Magda Prządka and Magda Majkowska, he convinced the court that there were no grounds for imposing detention. He claimed that it was not sufficiently substantiated that Piotr had committed the alleged acts and that Friday's events should be treated as an incident requiring thorough explanation. According to Malewski, Piotr has a permanent place of residence, is socially engaged, and is a firefighter in the volunteer fire department, so there is no real risk that he would hide. He added that after the defenders reached him, Piotr, feeling safer, started limited cooperation with the authorities. Malewski also emphasized that the lack of cooperation is Piotr's right and should not be a basis for preventive measures. Malewski also assessed that the forecast for further criminal activity had no rational basis. He wrote that Piotr had not been convicted and that his behavior on Friday was not aimed at committing the alleged acts, which, in Malewski's view, undermined the legal qualification adopted by the prosecution. He informed that the court did not apply other preventive measures, such as police supervision, and that Piotr would respond to the charges at liberty. He added that assistance was provided as part of a procedural intervention by Ordo Iuris. #wolność #sprawiedliwość #prawo (translated)

Jack Strong wrote that according to his source in the prosecutor's office, the collected evidence did not justify the arrest of Piotr and the man was to be released. He claimed that pressure was being exerted from above to file a motion for arrest, and he called on Minister Żurek to disclose who called the prosecutor. He added that messengers would not help in this matter, and he tagged the National Prosecutor's Office. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #Polska (translated)

Jacek Zarzecki wrote that the Provincial Veterinary Inspectorate issued health certificates for 21 animals taken from the Łączna Zoo to the Netherlands, including a tiger. According to him, the certificates were not issued by the county veterinarian supervising the zoo, who publicly stated that he saw no grounds for taking the animals, and was subsequently removed from the proceedings. Zarzecki pointed out that the police were supposed to designate a final destination for the animals, namely a private zoo. He asked on what legal basis the inspectorate took over the duties of the county veterinarian and from which account the certificates were issued. He also expressed doubts about whether each animal was examined before loading and whether its medical documentation, which — he wrote — was taken over by the prosecutor, was checked, and whether the tiger had a valid rabies vaccination. Zarzecki emphasized that the health certificate is an official document on which the credibility of Polish exports of animals and meat is based. He stated that any possible bending of procedures in this matter could undermine trust in the documents and procedures, and if EU institutions got involved, Poland would have to explain itself. #Zwierzęta #Weterynaria #Prawo (translated)

Bartosz Malewski wrote that prosecutor Anna Osypiuk wanted Piotr to be placed in detention for a month, justifying it with — as the author assessed — a completely irrational fear of his escape and hiding. According to Malewski, when the prosecutor announced she would submit a motion for temporary detention to the court, Piotr fainted and fell. An ambulance was called, and Piotr was to be taken to the hospital. #sprawiedliwość #prokuratura #polska (translated)

Magdalena Prządka-Leszczyńska reported that proceedings in the prosecutor's office regarding Piotr were still ongoing. The prosecutor decided to submit a request for his temporary arrest for a month to the District Court for Warsaw-Center; according to the author, the court could consider the request the next day. She added that Piotr fainted and an ambulance was called to the prosecutor's office. #prawo #Warszawa #prokuratura (translated)

Bartosz Malewski wrote that prosecutor Anna Osypiuk wanted to apply a one-month detention against Piotr, justifying this — in his opinion — with an unfounded fear that the man would escape and go into hiding. He added that when the prosecutor announced the issuance of the decision, Piotr fainted and fell. An ambulance was called, and the man was to be transported to the hospital. #prawo #prokuratura #sprawiedliwość (translated)

The services in action described an incident in which witnesses suspected that the driver of a Porsche was drunk and tried to stop him. According to the author, the driver assaulted several people, including an elderly woman, whom he hit several times, and with one of the blows — an elbow to the head — he knocked her onto the hood of the car. Another witness was said to have been hit while the driver was fleeing the scene. The author cited a statement from the spokesperson for the Warsaw II District Police Headquarters, who reported that the case is being pursued upon a private accusation, and the police had not received a notification. The services in action claimed that in this situation, a notification from the victim is not required, and the police and prosecutors should initiate proceedings. They referred to Article 217a § 1 of the Penal Code and appealed to the police and prosecutors to take action. #Bezpieczeństwo #Prawo #Policja (translated)

The services in action asked Waldemar Żurek whether the prosecutors under his authority did not want to initiate proceedings ex officio regarding the man with the Porsche, who — according to the author — beat up an elderly couple after they pointed out his driving. The author described that in the recording, the older woman was struck in the face, attacked with an elbow, and kicked, while the older man was beaten and hit by a vehicle. He also asked where the important public interest was in this case and criticized the response of the services and the statement of the police spokesman. https://t.co/ojuMHHLSwU #bezpieczeństwo #sprawiedliwość #prawo (translated)

The author of the entry demanded the resignation of Żurek and Kloska, the prosecution of the prosecutor before a disciplinary court, and the referral of anti-breeding foundations to court. He also called for changes in the law and wrote that the parties responsible for this matter should end up in the "garbage can of history." #Żurek #Dymisja #Prokurator #PL (translated)

Sławek Jastrzębowski wrote that the police officers did not provide the legal basis for identification. He referred to the ruling of the Supreme Court from December 17, 2025, in case file No. II KK 473/25, brought in cassation by the Ombudsman. He pointed out that the court held that a citizen can refuse to provide data if the request has no legal basis, and the refusal does not constitute an offense. Jastrzębowski added that identification interferes with personal freedom and is subject to legal scrutiny, after which he demanded the immediate release of the policewoman and referred the case to the prosecutor. #prawo #policja #wolność (translated)