Search

The author called for reconsidering the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder, writing that for more than four decades people whose distress centred on relationships had been labelled as having a disordered personality. They argued that the evidence no longer supported that framing.

Have you heard about the legendary experiment where people made to cross a wobbly suspension bridge misattributed their physiological arousal as romantic or sexual attraction? The principle successfully replicates in a modern setting. The idea that physiological #BridgeExperiment #Psychology #Attraction #Nospecificcountriesarementionedinthetweet.Therefore #thereturnis: Nocountrycodes.

Interesting question: Could ADHD have evolved as an evolutionary advantage? People who screened positive for ADHD switched to exploration more quickly and, in this specific task, achieved greater reward-harvesting efficiency. They also abandoned less rewarding resource patches https://t.co/uRJVU5067p #ADHD #evolution #psychology #Nospecificcountriesarementionedinthetweet.

The Erosion of Truth in Feminized Institutions Human beings developed the scientific process to observe reality and uncover fundamental truths about the universe. However, the increasing feminization of academia has, in some cases, shifted its priorities, with social equity taking precedence over truth. A study titled *“Taboos and Self-Censorship Among U.S. Psychology Professors”* asked professors whether they prioritized scientific truth or social equity when the two appeared to conflict. According to the study, 66.4% of male professors chose truth, compared with 43% of female professors—a 23.4-point gap. This suggests that some individuals are willing to set aside truth in favor of ideology. The study also found that professors feared social sanctions for expressing their empirical beliefs, while younger, more left-leaning, and female faculty members were more likely to oppose controversial scholarship. Psychology faculty are reportedly 56% women and 44% men. Based on the study’s figures, approximately 53.3% of professors would rank truth first. Women account for roughly 71–75% of newly awarded psychology doctorates. If the field reaches 73% women, only about 49.3% of psychologists would rank truth first. The broader implications are significant. As academic institutions increasingly prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion, research and data may be ignored when they conflict with political goals. Science influences education, medicine, human resources, therapy, the media, and nearly every other field concerned with human behavior. These studies shape legislation, psychological diagnoses, corporate policies, pharmaceutical prescriptions, and popular advice. Truth is not necessarily losing to lies. Rather, as institutions become increasingly feminized, they may gradually stop valuing truth itself.

“Socialism Was Good in Theory” That assumes socialism’s theory was never seriously challenged. It was—long before the Soviet Union, Lenin, or any national-scale experiment. Five thinkers attacked its foundations from different directions. Tocqueville: Equality Can Become Servitude In 1848, Alexis de Tocqueville distinguished democracy from socialism. Both pursued equality, but democracy sought it while preserving individual freedom. Socialism risked achieving equality by expanding state power. Equality, he warned, is not automatically liberty. Bastiat: Redistribution Can Become Plunder In 1850, Frédéric Bastiat examined what happens when the state takes from some to give to others in the name of justice. He called this “legal plunder.” His concern was that politics could become a permanent struggle to control redistribution. Nietzsche: Equality Can Become Resentment Nietzsche attacked socialism psychologically. He saw egalitarianism as potentially rooted in resentment toward exceptional individuals, ambition, strength, and hierarchy. The danger was a culture that treated excellence as morally suspect—not lifting people upward, but bringing the exceptional downward. Böhm-Bawerk: Challenge the Economics In 1896, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk attacked Marx’s economic theory, arguing that Marx’s labor theory of value could not adequately explain the relationship between labor values and actual prices. He challenged socialism’s claim to a scientific economic foundation. Mises: The Calculation Problem In 1920, Ludwig von Mises asked a devastating question: even if socialism is morally desirable, how would planners know what to produce? The sequence is clear: Tocqueville challenged the political premise. Bastiat challenged redistribution. Nietzsche challenged egalitarian psychology. Böhm-Bawerk challenged Marxian economics. Mises challenged central planning. All of them preceded the Soviet experiment. So “socialism was good in theory, but bad in practice” is not an argument. It is a historical claim that requires explaining why these objections were wrong.

The Value of Truth in Science Humanity developed the scientific process to observe the universe and uncover its fundamental truths. However, the increasing feminization of academia has, in some fields, shifted emphasis from truth toward social equity. As a result, certain areas of science appear less focused on understanding how the world works and more focused on reshaping it according to political ideals. A study titled *“Taboos and Self-Censorship Among U.S. Psychology Professors”* asked professors whether they prioritized scientific truth or social-equity goals when the two appeared to conflict. According to the study, 66.4% of male professors chose truth, compared with 43% of female professors—a 23-point gap. This suggests that some academics would knowingly place ideology above truth. The study also found that nearly all professors feared social sanctions for expressing their empirical beliefs. Researchers observed that younger, more left-leaning, and female faculty members were more likely to oppose controversial scholarship. Psychology faculty are currently approximately 56% women and 44% men. Based on the study’s figures, an estimated 53.3% of professors rank truth first. Women also receive roughly 71–75% of newly awarded psychology doctorates. If women eventually comprise 73% of the field, only about 49.3% of psychologists would rank truth first. The broader implications are significant. As women’s representation in scientific and academic institutions increases through both natural trends and affirmative-action policies such as DEI, research and data may be disregarded when they conflict with political goals. Psychology influences education, medicine, human resources, therapy, media, and other institutions concerned with human behavior. These fields shape legislation, psychological diagnoses, corporate policies, pharmaceutical prescriptions, and popular advice. Truth is not necessarily losing to lies. Rather, as institutions become increasingly feminized, they may gradually stop valuing truth itself.

The Erosion of Truth in Feminized Institutions Human beings developed the scientific process to observe reality and uncover fundamental truths about the universe. However, the increasing feminization of academia has, in some cases, shifted its priorities, with social equity taking precedence over truth. A study titled *“Taboos and Self-Censorship Among U.S. Psychology Professors”* asked professors whether they prioritized scientific truth or social equity when the two appeared to conflict. According to the study, 66.4% of male professors chose truth, compared with 43% of female professors—a 23.4-point gap. This suggests that some individuals are willing to set aside truth in favor of ideology. The study also found that professors feared social sanctions for expressing their empirical beliefs, while younger, more left-leaning, and female faculty members were more likely to oppose controversial scholarship. Psychology faculty are reportedly 56% women and 44% men. Based on the study’s figures, approximately 53.3% of professors would rank truth first. Women account for roughly 71–75% of newly awarded psychology doctorates. If the field reaches 73% women, only about 49.3% of psychologists would rank truth first. The broader implications are significant. As academic institutions increasingly prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion, research and data may be ignored when they conflict with political goals. Science influences education, medicine, human resources, therapy, the media, and nearly every other field concerned with human behavior. These studies shape legislation, psychological diagnoses, corporate policies, pharmaceutical prescriptions, and popular advice. Truth is not necessarily losing to lies. Rather, as institutions become increasingly feminized, they may gradually stop valuing truth itself.

THE “TEATRO EDICOLA” BY ARTISTIC DIRECTOR GRAVINO AND FOYER’97 FEATURED IN THE PSYCHOLOGIST OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY SOURCE: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/teatro-edicola-artistic-director-gravino-foyer97-sardella-ph-d--btibf/ Source: https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/worlds-smallest-theatre-and-psychologists-next-act We are genuinely proud to see the Teatro Edicola gaining international reach, now featured in the pages of The Psychologist, the publication of the prestigious British Psychological Society—the second most influential psychological association in the world, surpassed only by the American Psychological Association. In the article, I offer an in‑depth reflection on “the smallest theatre in the world” and its scientific potential. This recognition marks an important step in bringing new international visibility to the theatre company Foyer’97 and to the visionary project conceived by Francesco Gravino, which is increasingly becoming part of a wider global academic conversation. The Teatro Edicola is not merely an artistic experiment; it is also Performance Psychology and Theatre Neuroscience.Indeed, it has all the characteristics to become a fully fledged academic case study, one that neuroscientists and psychologists are beginning to examine closely in order to understand how extreme proximity between actor and spectator reshapes aesthetic experience and emotional dynamics. San Severo is thus beginning to enter the international map of cultural and psychological research. A small space that is generating a large conversation: we will see together how it continues to evolve, to the benefit of the entire artistic—and wider—community of San Severo.

SciLight Global South Sustainable Development (GSSD) – Street Art as Participatory Infrastructure and Community Mental Health SOURCE: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/scilight-global-south-sustainable-development-gssd-sardella-ph-d--ojtlf/ It is with considerable satisfaction that I have the honour of announcing the publication of our scholarly contribution, produced in collaboration with Professor Matteo Mantuano (Unitré, Università degli Studi di Milano), with the generous support of the Stramurales International Street Art Festival, Stornara Life APS, under the direction of Lino Lombardi, and the Banda dei Fischietti of Stornara, Puglia, Italy: "Street Art as Participatory Infrastructure and Community Mental Health: The Case of the Stramurales Festival of Stornara Life APS" Global South & Sustainable Development, 2026, 1(1), 6 🔗 https://www.sciltp.com/journals/gssd/articles/2602003135 Published by Casa Editrice SciLight, with its headquarters at Suite 4002, Level 4, 447 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia. What Does this Research Concern itself with? The present study examines the Stramurales International Street Art Festival of Stornara (Puglia) as an innovative instrument of participatory public health intervention, analysed through the theoretical lenses of environmental psychology, resilience theory, and the emerging framework of "EnvironMental Health." Stornara constitutes a paradigmatic instance of the structural violence that afflicts rural Southern Italy: youthful emigration, infrastructural deterioration, and collective despondency together form a constellation of deeply interconnected public health crises. The Stramurales model—founded by Maestro Lino Lombardi under the auspices of the association Stornara Life APS—addresses these considerable challenges by means of three cardinal democratic mechanisms: the voluntary participation of property owners, the democratic selection of mural content through annual community assemblies, and a system of transparent governance expressly designed to forestall appropriation by local political élites. Principal Findings ISTAT data document a reduction in the annual rate of youth emigration from approximately 175 per 1,000 young adults during the period 2014–2017 to approximately 118 per 1,000 between 2018 and 2022: a diminution of some 33 per cent, notably coincident with the festival's inception. Whilst one must naturally refrain from attributing this variation causally and exclusively to the intervention in question, the quantitative evidence integrates compellingly with a rich body of qualitative testimony: participants who now describe their community no longer as "a place from which one flees", but rather as "a place actively engaged in becoming something". The psychological mechanisms thus documented — affective regulation, social cohesion, narrative reconstruction, and collective self-efficacy — are produced not by the murals as such, but by the democratic process through which they are brought into being. It is participatory governance, one must insist, that constitutes the genuine therapeutic agent. Why Does This Matter at the Global Level? Through comparative analysis with experiences drawn from the Global South—among them Casa Kolacho in Medellín, post-apartheid initiatives in South Africa, and festival projects within the Brazilian favelas—the study demonstrates the transferability of this model to contexts of structural marginalisation of markedly different character and provenance. The implications for public policy are unambiguous: democratic governance of urban space is not a procedural nicety but a fully-fledged therapeutic intervention, at once economically sustainable and eminently replicable. This work forms part of a broader research programme initiated with the publication of Street Art as Public Health Infrastructure in the Harvard Health and Human Rights Journal, and aspires to contribute, both theoretically and empirically, to the consolidation of an integrated discipline at the intersection of cultural policy, urban design, and public health. I remain profoundly grateful to all those in Stornara who possessed the singular courage to paint their own future.

The Psychologist – The British Psychological Society – Quando i Muri Diventano Benessere SOURCE: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/psychologist-british-psychological-society-when-sardella-ph-d--jl9df/ Dr Luciano Magaldi Sardella e il Professor Matteo Mantuano parlano di come lo "Stramurales International Street Art Festival" e l'arte di strada partecipativa transforma la salute mentale urbana. Link: https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/when-walls-become-wellness The Psychologist, The British Psychological Society by esteemed Dr. Joe Sutton, Head of Science Communication at BPS. Contenuto dell’articolo In un torrido pomeriggio del giugno 2018, ci trovavamo nella piazza centrale di Stornara, una piccola città agricola della Puglia, nel Sud Italia, ad assistere a qualcosa di straordinario. L'artista locale Lino Lombardi stava facilitando un acceso dibattito tra i residenti su quali progetti murali avrebbero dovuto ornare i muri fatiscenti della loro città. Ciò che ci colpì non fu l'arte in sé, bensì la trasformazione che vedemmo negli occhi di persone che, solo pochi mesi prima, avevano descritto la loro città natale come un luogo da cui fuggire. Erano individui che reclamavano la propria narrazione, votavano sul proprio futuro, dipingendo letteralmente sopra decenni di declino. Siamo psicologi ambientali e di comunità che hanno trascorso oltre un decennio a studiare come gli ambienti costruiti plasmino i risultati in termini di salute mentale. La ricerca del Dottor Luciano Magaldi Sardella si concentra sugli interventi artistici partecipativi nelle comunità rurali in declino, mentre il Professor Matteo Mantuano è specializzato nei meccanismi psicologici dell'empowerment comunitario e dell'agentività collettiva. Quando venimmo a conoscenza del festival Stramurales all'inizio del 2018, riconoscemmo in esso una rara opportunità di osservare l'arte urbana partecipativa come potenziale strumento per affrontare la crisi della salute mentale che affligge le città in via di spopolamento del Sud Italia. Nel corso degli ultimi sette anni abbiamo condotto un'ampia ricerca sul campo a Stornara — intervistando i residenti, documentando l'evoluzione del festival e analizzando i suoi impatti psicologici e sociali. Ciò che abbiamo trovato a Stornara era qualcosa di ben più significativo di un'innovativa iniziativa artistica guidata dalla comunità. Era la psicologia ambientale in azione — che ridefiniva la nostra comprensione del rapporto tra ambienti costruiti, arti partecipative e salute mentale. La Crisi Nascosta alla Vista di Tutti Ricerche recenti rivelano un'allarmante convergenza di crisi ambientali e della salute mentale che rimane curiosamente poco esaminata nel discorso psicologico. La ricerca sulla salute mentale riceve appena il 2,3 per cento dei finanziamenti complessivi del National Institute of Health. Non possiamo sapere quanta parte di questi riguardi i nostri ambienti — sia naturali che costruiti — che plasmano in modo fondamentale il nostro benessere psicologico. Il campo di recente proposta denominato "EnvironMental Health" sottolinea che il deterioramento degli ambienti costruiti correla significativamente con stress elevato, isolamento sociale e peggioramento dei risultati in termini di salute mentale. Le comunità rurali del Sud Italia incarnano questa crisi. Tra il 2002 e il 2017, la regione del Sud Italia ha perso circa due milioni di residenti a causa della migrazione, prevalentemente giovani adulti tra i 15 e i 34 anni. Questo esodo ha creato ciò che Johan Galtung ha descritto come "violenza strutturale" — assetti sistematici che impediscono alle comunità di realizzare il proprio potenziale. Il tributo in termini di salute mentale si manifesta non solo in diagnosi individuali, ma nella disperazione collettiva, nell'erosione del capitale sociale e in comunità che guardano il proprio futuro emigrare letteralmente. Stornara esemplificava questa traiettoria. Nel 2017, questo comune di 6.000 abitanti affrontava la familiare spirale: la contrazione economica che precipitava l'emigrazione giovanile, accelerando il deterioramento delle infrastrutture e alimentando un ulteriore declino. I muri crollavano. Le attività commerciali chiudevano. La speranza evaporava. Poi qualcosa cambiò. La Rivoluzione Stramurales: Democrazia attraverso l'Arte Ciò che è emerso a Stornara trascende il convenzionale turismo culturale. Il Festival Internazionale di Street Art Stramurales opera attraverso tre meccanismi democratici fondamentali che lo distinguono dai superficiali progetti di abbellimento urbano. Organizzato attraverso Stornara Life APS — un'associazione a iscrizione aperta fondata dal Maestro Lino Lombardi — il festival previene la cattura elitaria attraverso la partecipazione volontaria dei proprietari degli immobili, garantendo l'assenza di coercizione; la selezione democratica dei contenuti attraverso la votazione annuale della comunità sui temi del festival e sulle proposte di murales; e una governance trasparente e inclusiva che dà a tutti i residenti voce in capitolo nella direzione del festival. Questa architettura partecipativa facilita ciò che l'Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità descrive come "empowerment comunitario" — processi che consentono alle comunità di aumentare il controllo sui fattori determinanti che influenzano la loro salute. Recenti studi sul campo a Vienna dimostrano che gli interventi di arte urbana riducono stress e ansia migliorando al contempo gli stati d'umore, ma Stramurales va oltre, incorporando la creazione artistica all'interno di strutture decisionali democratiche. Quando i residenti offrono volontariamente i propri muri e votano sui contenuti, compiono atti di investimento materiale e psicologico. Questo ripristino dell'agentività collettiva — la convinzione che i residenti possano plasmare il futuro della propria città natale anziché limitarsi ad assistere al suo declino — affronta direttamente la violenza strutturale che erode la salute mentale. Tra il 2020 e il 2025, Stornara ha registrato un notevole incremento delle entrate turistiche nonostante le perturbazioni causate dalla pandemia. Nuove attività commerciali hanno aperto i battenti. Un emigrato originario di Stornara, tornato a malincuore nel 2017 per assistere i genitori anziani, lavora ora come guida turistica e descrive Stornara come "la città più bella d'Italia". Non si tratta semplicemente di indicatori economici. Sono risultati in termini di salute mentale. La Scienza alla Base della Trasformazione La ricerca contemporanea in molteplici discipline valida ciò che i residenti di Stornara sperimentano visceralmente. Una revisione sistematica del 2024, che ha esaminato 79 articoli sottoposti a revisione paritaria, ha identificato come i luoghi dell'arte — dai musei permanenti alle installazioni pubbliche temporanee — stimolino il coinvolgimento della comunità, rafforzino l'identità culturale e favoriscano la coesione sociale. I progetti murali guidati dalla comunità rafforzano specificamente l'identità e l'orgoglio locali, creando nuove routine che incoraggiano le persone a interagire e costruire relazioni. Una recente ricerca sperimentale condotta a Berlino ha rilevato che le mostre d'arte a livello del marciapiede hanno alterato significativamente il legame dei visitatori con il proprio quartiere e la loro soddisfazione nei suoi confronti, migliorando il benessere complessivo. Ciò si allinea con le teorie emergenti sull'impatto della fruizione artistica sulla salute mentale, che individua cinque meccanismi chiave: processi affettivi che regolano le emozioni e lo stress; processi cognitivi che forniscono stimolazione sensoriale e apprendimento; processi sociali che creano esperienze condivise; auto-trasformazione attraverso la riflessione; e costruzione della resilienza per affrontare le sfide. La ricerca in psicologia ambientale dimostra che gli ambienti costruiti operano come interventi terapeutici. Studi sulle strutture di degenza psichiatrica rivelano che gli elementi progettuali che influenzano privacy, controllo, accesso alla luce naturale e, in particolare, l'inclusione di opere d'arte hanno un impatto significativo sui risultati dei pazienti. Se i muri degli ospedali hanno importanza terapeutica, quanto più lo avranno i muri che incontriamo quotidianamente nelle nostre comunità? Il modello Stramurales sfrutta questi meccanismi attraverso il recente concetto di "visual health activism". Diversi murales affrontano esplicitamente temi legati alla salute e ai diritti umani: "Refuge for All Migrants" di Alaniz Niz rappresenta i lavoratori agricoli africani sfruttati; "Turning Our Backs on Migration" di Sabotaje al Montaje sfida le politiche escludenti; "African Child at Sunset" di Devil Art Design ritrae giovani migranti in cerca di un futuro dignitoso. Queste opere affrontano i determinanti sociali della salute attraverso la difesa dei diritti umani. Le politiche migratorie che negano i diritti fondamentali creano vulnerabilità sanitarie — tra cui accesso limitato all'assistenza sanitaria, condizioni di lavoro pericolose e trauma psicologico derivante dalla discriminazione. I murales svolgono una duplice funzione di salute pubblica: affrontano la salute mentale dei residenti, advocando al contempo per le popolazioni i cui diritti alla salute sono sistematicamente violati. Attaccamento alla Terra e Resilienza Comunitaria Il rapporto tra percezione ambientale, identità culturale e resilienza comunitaria ha ricevuto notevole attenzione accademica nel 2024-2025. Ricerche condotte nelle aree rurali della Cina dimostrano che la percezione ambientale degli spazi pubblici influenza la resilienza comunitaria attraverso gli effetti di mediazione concatenati dell'identità culturale e dell'attaccamento ai luoghi. Quando le comunità trasformano i propri ambienti fisici attraverso processi partecipativi, rafforzano simultaneamente i legami psicologici che costituiscono il fondamento della resilienza. Questo spiega perché Stramurales riesce laddove i tradizionali approcci allo sviluppo economico falliscono. Il festival non si limita a creare valore economico — sebbene oltre 150 murales di artisti internazionali attirino ormai migliaia di visitatori ogni anno. Ridefinisce fondamentalmente il rapporto dei residenti con il proprio ambiente, trasformando le narrative del declino in prove di vitalità. Ogni murale democraticamente selezionato diventa ciò che i ricercatori sulla resilienza chiamano un "ancora di speranza" — una prova tangibile che contraddice la disperazione. La teoria contemporanea della resilienza sottolinea che la forza risiede non soltanto nelle infrastrutture fisiche, ma nella coesione sociale. Una recente analisi del design urbano resiliente nei quartieri emarginati americani ha rilevato che il messaggio dei residenti — "Ci piacciono i nostri vicini, ci piace il carattere del luogo in cui viviamo" — rivelava che la resilienza riguarda fondamentalmente le persone e la comunità. Gli interventi progettuali hanno successo quando preservano e rafforzano questi legami sociali, anziché imporre visioni esterne. Stramurales incarna questo principio. I meccanismi di votazione democratica assicurano che l'arte rifletta i valori autentici della comunità, piuttosto che le preferenze degli artisti o dei curatori. Questo previene lo spostamento culturale che spesso accompagna la rigenerazione urbana, in cui i miglioramenti avvantaggiano i nuovi arrivati alienando al contempo i residenti preesistenti. Centrando l'agentività dei residenti, Stramurales costruisce quella che i ricercatori descrivono come "resilienza critica" — una capacità che affronta le disuguaglianze sottostanti anziché limitarsi ad adattarsi ad esse. Il Divario della Partecipazione e l'Accesso Universale Questi risultati risuonano profondamente con le preoccupazioni di lunga data riguardanti l'accessibilità alle arti. La Commissione Warwick del 2015 ha documentato che l'8 per cento più ricco e più istruito della popolazione britannica rappresentava il 44 per cento delle presenze ai concerti di musica dal vivo e il 28 per cento delle visite alle mostre di arte visiva. Questo divario nella partecipazione colpisce in modo particolare le comunità che trarrebbero il massimo beneficio dall'impegno artistico per la salute e il benessere. Ma Stramurales sfida questa narrativa. La street art come infrastruttura di salute pubblica non richiede biglietti d'ingresso, prenotazioni anticipate né capitale culturale per essere apprezzata. Esiste nei luoghi in cui le persone vivono, trasformando i tragitti quotidiani in incontri con la bellezza e il significato. Il processo di selezione democratica garantisce che l'accessibilità si estenda oltre la fruizione alla co-creazione — i residenti non si limitano a guardare l'arte, ma determinano ciò che appare sui propri muri. Ricerche recenti sulle arti partecipative e sulla coesione sociale sottolineano che gli interventi di successo condividono caratteristiche comuni: erogazione nelle comunità locali, approcci non stigmatizzanti, flessibilità, promozione del coinvolgimento sociale, coinvolgimento di mostre ed erogazione entro specifici archi temporali. Stramurales incorpora tutti questi elementi aggiungendo al contempo una genuine governance democratica. Questo è urgentemente rilevante. Le condizioni di salute mentale tra i giovani a livello mondiale sono in aumento, e i servizi tradizionali di salute mentale rimangono cronicamente sottofinanziati. Se non riusciamo a scalare gli interventi clinici per soddisfare la domanda, dobbiamo investire in approcci preventivi di salute pubblica che mirino ai determinanti sociali. Da Stornara al Mondo: Implicazioni per la Pratica Il modello Stramurales offre un modello replicabile che richiede un modesto investimento finanziario ma una sostanziale partecipazione comunitaria. Gli elementi essenziali includono: coinvolgimento volontario, processo decisionale democratico, uso strategico dei social media per il marketing e integrazione delle narrative locali con le pratiche artistiche globali. Diverse città hanno implementato varianti con risultati promettenti. La ricerca sugli interventi artistici negli spazi urbani in Europa e in Asia dimostra che i progetti d'arte partecipativa possono fungere da "social prescribing", migliorando la resilienza psicologica e potenziando il coinvolgimento pubblico. Gli approcci di "tactical urbanism" — interventi su piccola scala e a basso costo per migliorare gli spazi pubblici — incorporano sempre più l'arte come elemento centrale piuttosto che supplementare. Le implicazioni si estendono oltre le singole comunità. I quadri internazionali, tra cui il Patto Internazionale sui Diritti Economici, Sociali e Culturali, sanciscono i diritti alla salute e alla partecipazione culturale. Gli obblighi degli Stati di conservare, sviluppare e diffondere la cultura dovrebbero sostenere le iniziative culturali guidate dalla comunità che hanno un impatto dimostrabile sui risultati in termini di salute. Come sottolineano le analisi della governance pandemica, le future riforme della politica sanitaria devono affrontare non solo la preparazione biomedica, ma anche le vulnerabilità sottostanti nella resilienza comunitaria e nella coesione sociale. La street art che opera attraverso strutture partecipative rafforza direttamente queste dimensioni. Cosa gli Psicologi Possono Fare Abbiamo un ruolo da svolgere a molteplici livelli. In primo luogo, dobbiamo condurre ricerche che documentino gli impatti sulla salute mentale degli interventi artistici partecipativi. Sebbene esistano prove promettenti, studi metodologicamente rigorosi con campioni adeguati e follow-up a lungo termine rimangono scarsi. Abbiamo bisogno di disegni sperimentali, non solo di studi osservazionali, che esaminino i meccanismi attraverso i quali le trasformazioni ambientali influenzano i risultati psicologici. In secondo luogo, dovremmo sostenere politiche che riconoscano il coinvolgimento artistico come intervento sanitario. Ciò significa supportare il finanziamento della salute pubblica per le iniziative artistiche comunitarie, in particolare nelle aree economicamente depresse dove i tradizionali approcci allo sviluppo hanno fallito. Dovremmo collaborare con urbanisti, architetti e artisti per integrare le arti partecipative nella rigenerazione dei quartieri fin dall'inizio, non come ripensamenti successivi. In terzo luogo, dobbiamo garantire che gli interventi incarnino una partecipazione genuina piuttosto che una consultazione di facciata. Il modello Stramurales ha successo perché i residenti detengono un potere reale. Senza questo, gli interventi artistici rischiano di replicare le strutture di potere esistenti e di accelerare potenzialmente la gentrificazione che allontana le comunità che si propongono di servire. In quarto luogo, dovremmo adottare metodi di ricerca basati sulle arti che mettano al centro le voci della comunità. Approcci collaborativi come il teatro partecipativo, il photovoice e la poetica collaborativa permettono alle comunità di articolare le proprie esperienze e aspirazioni in modi che le tradizionali valutazioni psicologiche non riescono a cogliere. Questi metodi riconoscono che le comunità possiedono una competenza propria riguardo ai propri bisogni e alle potenziali soluzioni. Infine, dobbiamo collocare gli interventi artistici all'interno di quadri più ampi che affrontino la giustizia sociale. L'arte non dovrebbe funzionare come un "cerotto" che maschera le disuguaglianze sottostanti. Dovremmo invece sfruttare il potenziale dirompente delle arti per promuovere quella che i ricercatori definiscono "resilienza critica" — una capacità che sfida le ingiustizie sistemiche anziché limitarsi ad aiutare le persone ad adattarsi ad esse. Ciò significa affrontare non solo i sintomi (il disagio mentale) ma le cause (la violenza strutturale, l'abbandono economico, i fallimenti politici). Ripensare le Infrastrutture Sanitarie Pubbliche Il caso Stramurales impone una riconsiderazione fondamentale di cosa costituisca un'infrastruttura sanitaria. Immaginiamo tipicamente cliniche, ospedali, farmacie — istituzioni biomediche che erogano trattamenti per condizioni diagnosticate. Ma cosa succederebbe se l'intervento di salute mentale più efficace per una comunità in declino non fosse una nuova struttura psichiatrica, bensì processi democratici che consentano ai residenti di trasformare il proprio ambiente visivo? I muri ricoperti di arte selezionata democraticamente, creata attraverso una genuina partecipazione comunitaria, migliorano in modo dimostrabile la salute mentale della comunità operando al contempo i diritti culturali sanciti dal diritto internazionale. Il modesto investimento finanziario richiesto impallidisce di fronte ai costi dei servizi clinici che trattano il disagio prevenibile. Per le comunità che vivono il declino in cui i tradizionali approcci allo sviluppo economico hanno fallito, la street art partecipativa può offrire l'intervento di salute mentale più conveniente, accessibile e sostenibile disponibile. Non si tratta di romanticizzare l'arte o di sminuire le gravi malattie mentali che richiedono cure cliniche. Si tratta di riconoscere che la salute mentale della popolazione richiede di affrontare i determinanti sociali — e che le arti partecipative che prendono di mira gli ambienti costruiti, il capitale sociale e l'agentività collettiva affrontano direttamente questi determinanti. La domanda che la psicologia deve porsi non è se l'arte possa funzionare come intervento sanitario — Stramurales e le prove crescenti dimostrano che può farlo. Piuttosto, la domanda è se possediamo l'immaginazione per ripensare le infrastrutture sanitarie, riconoscendo che una promozione efficace della salute mentale può richiedere tanto il processo decisionale democratico e la partecipazione comunitaria quanto la competenza clinica. Mentre guardavamo i residenti di Stornara votare sui murales in quel pomeriggio di giugno, assistevamo a persone che esercitavano una capacità umana fondamentale troppo spesso negata nel nostro campo: il potere di plasmare il proprio ambiente e, attraverso quella creazione, di guarire. Forse questa è la lezione più vitale che Stramurales offre alla psicologia — che a volte l'intervento più terapeutico non è somministrato da professionisti, ma creato da comunità che reclamano la propria agentività… un muro selezionato democraticamente alla volta. Dr Luciano Magaldi Sardella holds a PhD in Cognitive Leadership at Aspire Institute, Harvard Business School. Professor Matteo Mantuano is Professor of Social Sciences and Psychoeducational Health, Unitré University of Milan, Italy. Photo: 'Kid trapped in a box' mural by Leticia Mandragora References: All-Party Parliamentary Group on Arts, Health and Wellbeing (2017). Creative Health: The Arts for Health and Wellbeing (2nd ed.). Belfiore, E. & Bennett, O. (2024). The social impact of the arts: An intellectual history. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Bone, J.K., Bu, F., Fluharty, M.E., Paul, E., Sonke, J.K. & Fancourt, D. (2024). Who engages in the arts in the United States? A comparison of several types of engagement using data from The General Social Survey. PLOS ONE, 19(1), e0296743. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0296743 Chatterjee, H.J. & Noble, G. (2024). Museums, health and well-being: A preliminary report for Phase I. UCL Museums & Public Health Research Group. Cohen, G.D., Perlstein, S., Chapline, J., Kelly, J., Firth, K.M. & Simmens, S. (2006). The impact of professionally conducted cultural programs on the physical health, mental health, and social functioning of older adults. The Gerontologist, 46(6), 726–734. Daykin, N., Mansfield, L., Meads, C., Julier, G., Tomlinson, A., Payne, A., Grigsby Duffy, L., Lane, J., D'Innocenzo, G., Burnett, A., Kay, T., Dolan, P., Testoni, S. & Victor, C. (2024). What works for wellbeing? A systematic review of wellbeing outcomes for music and singing in adults. Perspectives in Public Health, 138(1), 39–46. doi:10.1177/1757913917740391 Fancourt, D. & Finn, S. (2019). What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being? A scoping review. World Health Organization, Health Evidence Network Synthesis Report 67. Flores González, L.M. & Rodríguez Sánchez, I. (2024). The transformative power of art in marginalized communities: Case studies from Latin America. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 7(2), 145–167. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191. Hart, A., Gagnon, E., Eryigit-Madzwamuse, S., Cameron, J., Aranda, K., Rathbone, A. & Heaver, B. (2016). Uniting resilience research and practice with an inequalities approach. Sage Open, 6(4), 1–13. Johnson, H., Carson-Apstein, E., Banderob, S. & Macualay-Rettino, X. (2017). 'You kind of have to listen to me': Researching discrimination through poetry. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Social Research, 18(2). doi:10.17169/fqs-18.3.2864 Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. Kim, J. (2017). Effects of community-based group music therapy for children exposed to ongoing child maltreatment and poverty in South Korea: A block randomized controlled trial. Arts Psychotherapy, 54, 69–77. doi:10.1016/j.aip.2017.01.001 Li, Y., Zhang, H. & Chen, T. (2024). Environmental perception, cultural identity and community resilience: Chain mediating effects of place attachment in rural China. Journal of Rural Studies, 98, 103– 115. Marmot, M., Atkinson, T., Bell, J., Black, C., Broadfoot, P., Cumberlege, J., Diamond, I., Gilmore, I., Ham, C., Meacher, M. & Mulgan, G. (2010). Fair society, healthy lives: The Marmot Review. Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post-2010. Mulligan, M., Scanlon, C. & Welch, N. (2008). Renegotiating community life: Arts, agency, inclusion and wellbeing. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 1, 99–115. doi:10.5130/ijcre.v1i0.591 Neelands, J., Belfiore, E., Firth, C., Hart, N., Perrin, L., Brock, S., Holdaway, D. & Woddis, J. (2015). Enriching Britain: Culture, creativity and growth. The 2015 Report by the Warwick Commission for the Future of Cultural Value. Packer, J. & Ballantyne, R. (2024). The role of museums and art galleries in promoting wellbeing: Insights from the United Kingdom and Australia. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 30(3), 234–251. Papies, E.K., Best, M., Gelibter, E. & Stroebe, W. (2024). The role of mental simulation in desire and motivation: A systematic review. Motivation Science, 10(1), 1–18. Pykett, A.A., Osborne, T., Resch, B., Nielek, R., Krukar, J. & Malleson, N. (2024). From smart to sustainable cities: The role of environmental psychology in urban transformation. Cities, 144, 104644. Roe, J. & Aspinall, P. (2024). The restorative benefits of walking in urban and rural settings in adults with good and poor mental health. Health & Place, 71, 102654. Stuckey, H.L. & Nobel, J. (2010). The connection between art, healing, and public health: A review of current literature. American Journal of Public Health, 100(2), 254–263. Theorell, T. (2024). Psychological health effects of musical experiences: Theories, studies and reflections in music health science. Stockholm: Springer Nature. Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.F., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A. & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. Van den Berg, A.E., Wesselius, J.E., Maas, J. & Tanja-Dijkstra, K. (2024). Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health: A longitudinal analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 310, 115270. WHO (2019). WHO housing and health guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization. Zarobe, L. & Bungay, H. (2024). The role of arts activities in developing resilience and mental wellbeing in children and young people: A rapid review of the literature. Perspectives in Public Health, 137(6), 337–347. doi:10.1177/1757913917712283.

The Psychologist – The British Psychological Society – When Walls Become Wellness SOURCE: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/psychologist-british-psychological-society-when-walls-sardella-ph-d--pu8sf/ Dr Luciano Magaldi Sardella and Professor Matteo Mantuano on how ‘Stramurales Participatory Street Art’ transforms urban mental health. Link: https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/when-walls-become-wellness The Psychologist, The British Psychological Society by esteemed Dr. Joe Sutton, Head of Science Communication at BPS Contenuto dell’articolo On a sweltering afternoon in June 2018, we stood in the central square of Stornara, a small agricultural town in Puglia, Southern Italy, watching something extraordinary unfold. Local artist Lino Lombardi was facilitating a heated discussion among residents about which mural designs should adorn their town's crumbling walls. What struck us wasn't the art itself, but the transformation we witnessed in the eyes of people who, just months before, had described their hometown as a place to escape. These were individuals reclaiming their narrative, voting on their future, literally painting over decades of decline. We are environmental and community psychologists who have spent over a decade studying how built environments shape mental health outcomes. Dr Luciano Magaldi Sardella's research focuses on participatory arts interventions in declining rural communities, while Professor Matteo Mantuano specialises in the psychological mechanisms of community empowerment and collective agency. When we first learned about the Stramurales festival in early 2018, we recognised it as a rare opportunity to observe participatory urban art as a potential tool for addressing the mental health crisis plaguing Southern Italy's depopulating towns. Over the past seven years, we have conducted extensive fieldwork in Stornara – interviewing residents, documenting the festival's evolution, and analysing its psychological and social impacts. What we found in Stornara was something far more significant than an innovative community-led arts initiative. It was environmental psychology in action – reshaping how we understand the relationship between built environments, participatory arts, and mental health. The Crisis Hiding in Plain Sight Recent research reveals an alarming convergence of environmental and mental health crises that remains curiously underexamined in psychological discourse. Mental health research receives a mere 2.3 per cent of overall National Institute of Health funding. We cannot know how much of that concerns our environments – both natural and built – which fundamentally shape our psychological wellbeing. The newly proposed field of 'EnvironMental Health' emphasises that deteriorating built environments correlate significantly with elevated stress, social isolation, and worsening mental health outcomes. Southern Italy's rural communities embody this crisis. Between 2002 and 2017, South Italy region lost approximately two million residents to migration, predominantly young adults aged 15-34. This exodus created what Johan Galtung described as 'structural violence' – systematic arrangements preventing communities from realising their potential. The mental health toll manifests not just in individual diagnoses, but in collective despair, eroded social capital, and communities watching their futures literally emigrate. Stornara exemplified this trajectory. By 2017, this municipality of 6,000 residents faced the familiar spiral: economic contraction precipitating youth emigration, accelerating infrastructure deterioration, driving further decline. Walls crumbled. Businesses shuttered. Hope evaporated. Then something changed. The Stramurales Revolution: Democracy through Design What emerged in Stornara transcends conventional cultural tourism. The Stramurales International Street Art Festivalworks through three foundational democratic mechanisms that distinguish it from superficial beautification projects. Organised through Stornara Life APS – an open-membership association founded by Maestro Lino Lombardi – the festival prevents elite capture through voluntary property owner participation ensuring no coercion; democratic content selection through annual community voting on festival themes and mural proposals; and transparent, inclusive governance that gives all residents a voice in the festival's direction. This participatory architecture facilitates what the World Health Organization describes as 'community empowerment' – processes enabling communities to increase control over determinants affecting their health. Recent field studies in Vienna demonstrate that urban art interventions reduce stress and anxiety while improving mood states, but Stramuralesgoes further by embedding art creation within democratic decision-making structures. When residents voluntarily offer walls and vote on content, they perform acts of material and psychological investment. This restoration of collective agency – the belief that residents can shape their hometown's future rather than merely witnessing decline – directly addresses the structural violence that erodes mental health. Between 2020 and 2025, Stornara experienced a huge increase in tourism revenue despite pandemic disruption. New businesses opened. A Stornara-born emigrant who returned reluctantly in 2017 to provide parental care, now works as a tour guide and describes Stornara as 'the coolest town in Italy'. These aren't just economic indicators. They're mental health outcomes. The Science behind the Transformation Contemporary research across multiple disciplines validates what Stornara residents experience viscerally. A 2024 systematic review examining 79 peer-reviewed articles identified how arts places – from permanent museums to temporary public installations – stimulate community engagement, enhance cultural identity, and foster social cohesion. Community-driven mural projects specifically strengthen local identity and pride, creating new routines for individuals to interact and build relationships. Recent experimental research in Berlin found that sidewalk-level art exhibitions significantly altered visitors' connection to and satisfaction with their neighbourhoods, improving overall wellbeing. This aligns with emerging theories on art viewing's impact on mental health, which identifies five key mechanisms: affective processes regulating emotions and stress; cognitive processes providing sensory stimulation and learning; social processes creating shared experiences; self-transformation through reflection; and resilience building for coping with challenges. Environmental psychology research demonstrates that built environments operate as therapeutic interventions. Studies on mental health inpatient facilities reveal that design elements affecting privacy, control, daylight access, and particularly the inclusion of artwork significantly impact patient outcomes. If hospital walls matter therapeutically, how much more do the walls we encounter daily in our communities? The Stramurales model harnesses these mechanisms through the recent concept of 'visual health activism'. Several murals explicitly engage health and human rights themes: Alaniz Niz's 'Refuge for All Migrants' represents exploited African agricultural workers; Sabotaje al Montaje's 'Turning Our Backs on Migration' challenges exclusionary policies; Devil Art Design's 'African Child at Sunset' portrays migrant youth seeking dignified futures. These works address social determinants of health through human rights advocacy. Migration policies denying basic rights create health vulnerabilities – including restricted healthcare access, hazardous working conditions, and psychological trauma from discrimination. The murals perform dual public health functions, in addressing residents' mental health while advocating for populations whose health rights face systematic violation. Place Attachment and Community Resilience The relationship between environmental perception, cultural identity, and community resilience has received substantial scholarly attention in 2024-2025. Research in rural China demonstrates that environmental perception of public spaces influences community resilience through chain mediating effects of cultural identity and place attachment. When communities transform their physical environments through participatory processes, they simultaneously strengthen the psychological bonds that underpin resilience. This explains why Stramurales succeeds where traditional economic development approaches falter. The festival doesn't just create economic value – though over 150 murals by international artists now attract thousands of visitors annually. It fundamentally reshapes residents' relationship with their environment, transforming narratives of decline into evidence of vitality. Each democratically selected mural becomes what resilience researchers call an 'anchor of hope' – tangible proof contradicting despair. Contemporary resilience theory emphasises that strength resides not merely in physical infrastructure but in social cohesion. A recent analysis of resilient urban design in marginalised American neighbourhoods found that residents' message – 'We like our neighbours, we like the character of where we live' – revealed that resilience is fundamentally about people and community. Design interventions succeed when they preserve and strengthen these social bonds, rather than imposing external visions. Stramurales embodies this principle. The democratic voting mechanisms ensure art reflects genuine community values rather than artist or curator preferences. This prevents the cultural displacement often accompanying urban regeneration, where improvements benefit newcomers while alienating existing residents. By centering resident agency, Stramuralesbuilds what researchers describe as 'critical resilience' – capacity addressing underlying inequalities rather than merely adapting to them. The Participation Gap and Universal Access These findings resonate profoundly with longstanding concerns about arts accessibility. The 2015 Warwick Commission documented that the wealthiest, most educated 8 per cent of the UK population accounted for 44 per cent of live music attendance and 28 per cent of visual art visits. This participation gap particularly affects communities that would benefit most from arts engagement for health and wellbeing. But Stramurales challenges this narrative. Street art as public health infrastructure requires no admission fees, no advance booking, no cultural capital to appreciate. It exists where people live, transforming daily commutes into encounters with beauty and meaning. The democratic selection process ensures accessibility extends beyond consumption to co-creation – residents don't just view art, they determine what appears on their walls. Recent research on participatory arts and social cohesion emphasises that successful interventions share common features: delivery in local communities, non-stigmatising approaches, flexibility, promoting social engagement, involvement of exhibitions, and delivery within specific timeframes. Stramurales incorporates all these elements while adding genuine democratic governance. This matters urgently. Mental health conditions among young people globally are rising, and traditional mental health services remain chronically underfunded. If we cannot scale clinical interventions to meet demand, we must invest in preventive public health approaches targeting social determinants. From Stornara to the World: Implications for Practice The Stramurales model offers a replicable template requiring modest financial investment but substantial community participation. Essential elements include voluntary engagement, democratic decision-making, strategic social media use for marketing, and integration of local narratives with global artistic practices. Several cities have implemented variations with promising results. Research on artistic interventions in urban spaces across Europe and Asia demonstrates that participatory art projects can serve as 'social prescribing', improving psychological resilience and enhancing public engagement. Tactical urbanism approaches – small-scale, low-cost interventions improving public spaces – increasingly incorporate art as core rather than supplementary elements. The implications extend beyond individual communities. International frameworks including the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights enshrine rights to health and cultural participation. State obligations to conserve, develop and diffuse culture should support community-driven cultural initiatives demonstrably impacting health outcomes. As pandemic governance analyses emphasise, future health policy reforms must address not only biomedical preparedness but underlying vulnerabilities in community resilience and social cohesion. Street art operating through participatory structures directly strengthens these dimensions. What Psychologists Can Do We have roles to play at multiple levels. First, we must conduct research documenting the mental health impacts of participatory arts interventions. While promising evidence exists, methodologically rigorous studies with adequate sample sizes and long-term follow-up remain scarce. We need experimental designs, not just observational studies, examining mechanisms through which environmental transformations affect psychological outcomes. Second, we should advocate for policy recognising arts engagement as health intervention. This means supporting public health funding for community arts initiatives, particularly in economically deprived areas where traditional development approaches have failed. We should work with urban planners, architects, and artists to integrate participatory arts into neighbourhood regeneration from inception, not as afterthoughts. Third, we must ensure interventions embody genuine participation rather than tokenistic consultation. The Stramuralesmodel succeeds because residents hold real power. Without this, arts interventions risk replicating existing power structures and potentially accelerating gentrification that displaces the communities they ostensibly serve. Fourth, we should employ arts-based research methods that centre community voices. Collaborative approaches like participatory theatre, photovoice, and collaborative poetics enable communities to articulate their experiences and aspirations in ways traditional psychological assessments cannot capture. These methods acknowledge that communities possess expertise about their own needs and potential solutions. Finally, we must situate arts interventions within broader frameworks addressing social justice. Art should not function as a 'sticking plaster' masking underlying inequalities. Instead, we should harness arts' disruptive potential to promote what researchers term 'critical resilience' – capacity challenging systemic injustices rather than merely helping people adapt to them. This means addressing not just symptoms (mental distress) but causes (structural violence, economic abandonment, policy failures). Reimagining Health Infrastructure The Stramurales case compels fundamental reconsideration of what constitutes health infrastructure. We typically envision clinics, hospitals, pharmacies – biomedical institutions delivering treatments for diagnosed conditions. But what if the most effective mental health intervention for a declining community isn't a new psychiatric facility, but democratic processes enabling residents to transform their visual environment? Walls covered with democratically selected art, created through genuine community participation, demonstrably improve community mental health while operationalising cultural rights described in international law. The modest financial investment required pales beside costs of clinical services treating preventable distress. For communities experiencing decline where traditional economic development has failed, participatory street art may offer the most cost-effective, accessible, and sustainable mental health intervention available. This isn't about romanticising art or dismissing serious mental illness requiring clinical care. It's about acknowledging that population mental health requires addressing social determinants – and that participatory arts targeting built environments, social capital, and collective agency directly address these determinants. The question facing psychology isn't whether art can function as health intervention – Stramurales and growing evidence demonstrate it can. Rather, the question is whether we possess imagination to rethink health infrastructure, recognising that effective mental health promotion may require democratic decision-making and community participation as much as clinical expertise. As we watched Stornara residents voting on murals that June afternoon, we witnessed people exercising a fundamental human capacity too often denied in our field: the power to shape their own environments and, through that shaping, to heal. Perhaps that's the most vital lesson Stramurales offers psychology – that sometimes the most therapeutic intervention isn't administered by professionals, but created by communities reclaiming their agency… one democratically selected wall at a time. Dr Luciano Magaldi Sardella holds a PhD in Cognitive Leadership at Aspire Institute, Harvard Business School. Professor Matteo Mantuano is Professor of Social Sciences and Psychoeducational Health, Unitré University of Milan, Italy. Photo: 'Kid trapped in a box' mural by Leticia Mandragora References: All-Party Parliamentary Group on Arts, Health and Wellbeing (2017). Creative Health: The Arts for Health and Wellbeing (2nd ed.). Belfiore, E. & Bennett, O. (2024). The social impact of the arts: An intellectual history. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Bone, J.K., Bu, F., Fluharty, M.E., Paul, E., Sonke, J.K. & Fancourt, D. (2024). Who engages in the arts in the United States? A comparison of several types of engagement using data from The General Social Survey. PLOS ONE, 19(1), e0296743. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0296743 Chatterjee, H.J. & Noble, G. (2024). Museums, health and well-being: A preliminary report for Phase I. UCL Museums & Public Health Research Group. Cohen, G.D., Perlstein, S., Chapline, J., Kelly, J., Firth, K.M. & Simmens, S. (2006). The impact of professionally conducted cultural programs on the physical health, mental health, and social functioning of older adults. The Gerontologist, 46(6), 726–734. Daykin, N., Mansfield, L., Meads, C., Julier, G., Tomlinson, A., Payne, A., Grigsby Duffy, L., Lane, J., D'Innocenzo, G., Burnett, A., Kay, T., Dolan, P., Testoni, S. & Victor, C. (2024). What works for wellbeing? A systematic review of wellbeing outcomes for music and singing in adults. Perspectives in Public Health, 138(1), 39–46. doi:10.1177/1757913917740391 Fancourt, D. & Finn, S. (2019). What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being? A scoping review. World Health Organization, Health Evidence Network Synthesis Report 67. Flores González, L.M. & Rodríguez Sánchez, I. (2024). The transformative power of art in marginalized communities: Case studies from Latin America. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 7(2), 145–167. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191. Hart, A., Gagnon, E., Eryigit-Madzwamuse, S., Cameron, J., Aranda, K., Rathbone, A. & Heaver, B. (2016). Uniting resilience research and practice with an inequalities approach. Sage Open, 6(4), 1–13. Johnson, H., Carson-Apstein, E., Banderob, S. & Macualay-Rettino, X. (2017). 'You kind of have to listen to me': Researching discrimination through poetry. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Social Research, 18(2). doi:10.17169/fqs-18.3.2864 Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. Kim, J. (2017). Effects of community-based group music therapy for children exposed to ongoing child maltreatment and poverty in South Korea: A block randomized controlled trial. Arts Psychotherapy, 54, 69–77. doi:10.1016/j.aip.2017.01.001 Li, Y., Zhang, H. & Chen, T. (2024). Environmental perception, cultural identity and community resilience: Chain mediating effects of place attachment in rural China. Journal of Rural Studies, 98, 103– 115. Marmot, M., Atkinson, T., Bell, J., Black, C., Broadfoot, P., Cumberlege, J., Diamond, I., Gilmore, I., Ham, C., Meacher, M. & Mulgan, G. (2010). Fair society, healthy lives: The Marmot Review. Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post-2010. Mulligan, M., Scanlon, C. & Welch, N. (2008). Renegotiating community life: Arts, agency, inclusion and wellbeing. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 1, 99–115. doi:10.5130/ijcre.v1i0.591 Neelands, J., Belfiore, E., Firth, C., Hart, N., Perrin, L., Brock, S., Holdaway, D. & Woddis, J. (2015). Enriching Britain: Culture, creativity and growth. The 2015 Report by the Warwick Commission for the Future of Cultural Value. Packer, J. & Ballantyne, R. (2024). The role of museums and art galleries in promoting wellbeing: Insights from the United Kingdom and Australia. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 30(3), 234–251. Papies, E.K., Best, M., Gelibter, E. & Stroebe, W. (2024). The role of mental simulation in desire and motivation: A systematic review. Motivation Science, 10(1), 1–18. Pykett, A.A., Osborne, T., Resch, B., Nielek, R., Krukar, J. & Malleson, N. (2024). From smart to sustainable cities: The role of environmental psychology in urban transformation. Cities, 144, 104644. Roe, J. & Aspinall, P. (2024). The restorative benefits of walking in urban and rural settings in adults with good and poor mental health. Health & Place, 71, 102654. Stuckey, H.L. & Nobel, J. (2010). The connection between art, healing, and public health: A review of current literature. American Journal of Public Health, 100(2), 254–263. Theorell, T. (2024). Psychological health effects of musical experiences: Theories, studies and reflections in music health science. Stockholm: Springer Nature. Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.F., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A. & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. Van den Berg, A.E., Wesselius, J.E., Maas, J. & Tanja-Dijkstra, K. (2024). Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health: A longitudinal analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 310, 115270. WHO (2019). WHO housing and health guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization. Zarobe, L. & Bungay, H. (2024). The role of arts activities in developing resilience and mental wellbeing in children and young people: A rapid review of the literature. Perspectives in Public Health, 137(6), 337–347. doi:10.1177/1757913917712283.

While 'psychology' is often the best level of description of current AIs I don't necessarily mean 1:1 human psychology. It seems fairly likely AIs have emotion-like states which do not straightforwardly correspond to humans and both us and AIs lack vocabulary to talk about. #AI #Psychology #Emotions #Nospecificcountriesarementionedinthetweet.

“Socialism Was Good in Theory” That sentence assumes the theory was never seriously challenged. It was. Long before the Soviet Union existed, before Lenin seized power, and before socialism had been tested on a national scale, major thinkers were already attacking its foundations—from very different directions. Five of them stand out. Tocqueville: Equality Can Become Servitude In 1848, Alexis de Tocqueville drew a sharp distinction between democracy and socialism. Both spoke about equality. But Tocqueville believed they pursued it in fundamentally different ways. Democracy, in his view, sought equality while preserving individual freedom. Socialism risked achieving equality by expanding the power of the state over the individual. His warning was essentially this: equality is not automatically liberty. A society can pursue equality so aggressively that it begins sacrificing the independence that makes political freedom meaningful. Bastiat: Follow Where Redistribution Leads Two years later, Frédéric Bastiat attacked socialism from a different direction. His question was deceptively simple: What happens when the state acquires the authority to take from some people and give to others in the name of justice? Bastiat called this “legal plunder.” His concern was not merely that redistribution might be expensive. It was that once government becomes the instrument through which competing groups obtain benefits from one another, politics can turn into a permanent struggle over who controls the machinery of redistribution. The problem, therefore, wasn’t simply how much the state redistributed. It was the principle that made redistribution legitimate in the first place. (bastiat.org⁠) Nietzsche: Equality Can Become Resentment Nietzsche approached socialism neither as an economist nor as a constitutional theorist. He attacked its psychology. He saw modern egalitarian movements as part of a much older moral impulse: resentment toward exceptional individuals and suspicion of strength, ambition and hierarchy. For Nietzsche, the danger was not simply that everyone might become economically equal. It was that a culture could begin treating excellence itself as something morally suspect. The goal would cease to be lifting people upward. It would become bringing the exceptional downward. Böhm-Bawerk: Challenge the Economics Then came Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk. In 1896, he turned his attention specifically toward Marx’s economic system. His criticism was not primarily moral or political. It was technical. Böhm-Bawerk argued that Marx’s theory of value did not adequately explain how the labor values developed in Capital could be reconciled with the actual prices Marx subsequently needed to explain. In other words, he attacked socialism where it claimed to possess a scientific economic foundation. The argument became one of the central criticisms of Marxian economics and helped launch a debate that would continue for generations. Mises: The Calculation Problem Then, in 1920, Ludwig von Mises attacked an even more fundamental question: Even if socialism is morally desirable, how would a socialist economy actually know what to produce? A functioning economy has millions of competing uses for scarce resources. Build a bridge or a hospital? Use steel here or there? Produce more machinery or more consumer goods? Under private ownership and markets, prices for capital goods provide information about relative scarcity and opportunity costs. Mises argued that abolishing private ownership of the means of production also removes the genuine market prices necessary for rational economic calculation. The problem wasn’t simply that socialist planners might make bad decisions. It was that the system deprived them of the very economic signals required to systematically compare those decisions. (Mises Institute⁠) And that was the sequence. Tocqueville challenged the political premise. Bastiat challenged the moral and legal mechanism of redistribution. Nietzsche challenged the psychology behind egalitarianism. Böhm-Bawerk challenged Marx’s economic theory. Mises challenged the possibility of rational central economic calculation. Five different thinkers. Five different objections. And all of them came before the Soviet Union had demonstrated what large-scale socialist government would actually look like. So “socialism was good in theory, but bad in practice” is not an argument. It is a historical claim that requires you to explain why these theoretical objections were wrong. The interesting question isn’t whether socialism had critics. It did. The interesting question is whether socialism ever adequately answered them” - ChatGPT

Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “CGAS (Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale) and related gender ideological-belief measures were strongly associated with left-wing authoritarianism” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “CGAS (Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale) was not simply standing in for being politically left-wing” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Support for coercion, punishment, and violence appears to be tied less to liberalism generally than to an authoritarian disposition organized around left-wing ideological content” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Gender ideology may function as an ideological accelerant” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Gender ideology may supply authoritarian psychology with a structured map of perceived outgroups, threat sources, and oppressor classes” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Dissent becomes not a legitimate position but a failure of professional duty or an act of harm” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “The same psychological machinery operates on the extreme left”- Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Violence can come to seem permissible or necessary” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Three findings pull in the same direction. People who strongly endorse gender ideology positions score dramatically higher on left-wing authoritarianism than their political identity alone would predict. Furthermore, both LWA (Left-Wing Authoritarianism) and CGAS (Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale) predicted support for political violence” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Together, these findings support the paper's core claim: gender ideology may function as an ideological accelerant, telling left-wing authoritarian psychology who the enemy is, why the situation is urgent, and—in those already disposed toward force—that violence is legitimate” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “One mechanism by which clinical content may translate into violence permission deserves note. Trans-Genocide Belief—the perceived likelihood that a genocide of individuals that identify as transgender is currently underway in the United States—is predicted to more strongly relate to CGAS (Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale) and LWA (Left-Wing Authoritarianism) than to political identity and to be associated with elevated justification for political violence” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “This prediction is consistent with broader research showing that perceived threat, existential threat, and collective victimhood can increase support for hardline, punitive, or exclusionary action against outgroups, particularly when paired with authoritarian dispositions or strong moral conviction (Armaly & Enders, 2022; Carriere et al., 2022; Hirschberger et al., 2016; Kljajić et al., 2025; Schori-Eyal et al., 2014; Skitka, 2010)” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Related work on moralization and violent intergroup conflict further suggests that when a political conflict is framed as a moral emergency involving dangerous or demonized outgroups, violence can come to seem permissible or necessary (Mooijman et al., 2018; Saguy & Reifen-Tagar, 2022)” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “The practical stakes are straightforward. Research frameworks for understanding authoritarianism have historically focused overwhelmingly on the political right, while analogous left-wing pathways have received far less attention. Yet federal agencies and public safety officials are concerned not only with ideology in the abstract, but with radicalization pathways: the content that tells people who to fear, why the situation is urgent, and when force becomes acceptable” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology “This study suggests that the same psychological machinery operates on the extreme left, and that it may be running through institutional channels—clinical guidelines, professional standards, credentialed expertise—that current threat-detection frameworks are not well designed to recognize” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Violence connected to gender ideology remains largely undocumented in the academic literature. This study provides a first systematic empirical look at the psychological infrastructure that makes such violence conceivable” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Both LWA (Left-Wing Authoritarianism) and CGAS (Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale) were significantly positively correlated with justification for political violence across all six targets” - Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? “Our main findings for youth starting treatment with blockers include: At baseline, about one-quarter of these youth had clinically concerning scores for depression and anxiety. About one-quarter reported having thought about suicide, and 8% reported having attempted suicide in the past. These numbers are on par with the population of middle school youth at large” - The Trans Youth Care - United States “Our main findings for youth starting treatment with GAH include: At baseline, about half of these youth had clinically concerning scores for depression and anxiety. About two-thirds reported having thought about suicide, and one-quarter reported having attempted. By two years after starting GAH, these youth showed increased scores for life satisfaction, appearance congruence (having the physical appearance of one's body match one's gender identity), positive emotions, and psychological well-being and decreased scores for depression and anxiety” - The Trans Youth Care - United States

🚨 Entouré, mais seul : et si ce qui abîme le cerveau des aînés n'était pas ce que l'on croit ? 📒 « Ma solitude me tue-t-elle ? » — Solitude, isolement social et déclin cognitif chez les personnes âgées ✍️ Tomiko Yoneda (UC Davis) et un consortium international — Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (APA) Sur 175 000 personnes âgées suivies dans 18 pays, une distinction change tout : ce n'est pas le fait d'être seul qui pèse le plus sur le déclin cognitif et la mortalité, mais le sentiment de solitude. Autrement dit, une personne très entourée peut rester exposée. De quoi interroger nos pratiques de repérage — et une question simple qu'il faudrait peut-être poser bien plus souvent, à l'accueil comme à domicile. 👉 Mon analyse et le document source sont à retrouver ici : https://www.pratiquesensante.com/blog/pratiques-15/ma-solitude-me-tue-t-elle-solitude-isolement-social-et-declin-cognitif-chez-les-personnes-agees-6153 🎙️ À écouter également : la capsule audio de Pratiques en Santé. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTvkQqxhh-I #PratiquesEnSante #LienSocial #SolitudeDesAînés #BienVieillir #SantéCognitive #PréventionSanté

The Psychology Behind Political Violence Political life carries an appetite for violence beneath the surface. A shooter leaves a manifesto; supporters celebrate; online strangers justify killing over insults, misgendering, and fantasies of execution. We’re told these are separate phenomena—different ideologies, grievances, causes—but they’re deeply connected. The murderer, the celebrant, and the online fantasist share one conviction: blood will build a better world. We often assume ideology comes first, violence second—radicalization infecting an otherwise ordinary person. But corrupted people may seek ideologies that rationalize what they already want to believe. Feeling comes first; philosophy follows. Nietzsche called this *ressentiment*: not ordinary anger, but enduring resentment rooted in surrendered agency and perpetual victimhood. Ressentiment is creative: it turns grievance into virtue and revenge into justice. That’s why movements can sound humanitarian while obsessing over enemies. They promise liberation but focus on who must be eliminated; they call violence self-defense while celebrating destruction. Notice the imbalance: energy goes to identifying who deserves punishment, not to explaining how their better society would work. This is the difference between genuine grievance and pathological ressentiment. Genuine grievance seeks repair; ressentiment seeks subtraction. Its “solutions” are fantasies of punishment—heads cut off, privilege liquidated, wrong pronouns punished. These aren’t coherent doctrines of stability; they’re rationalizations for resentment. Ressentiment also despises self-improvement because it requires admitting agency. Its worldview depends on locating suffering outside oneself. The deepest enemy of these movements, then, is not any specific ideology. It is agency itself.

Orwell’s Five Warnings About the Psychology of Totalitarianism Orwell understood totalitarianism’s psychology: unlike dictators who seek wealth and status, totalitarians aim to reshape humanity. They often claim to act “for our own good,” with conscience on their side. After reading Orwell, five lessons stand out: 1. Political correctness can become mind control “If thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” Words frame reality and limit solutions. 2. Doublethink is the hallmark of propaganda “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.” When contradictions become acceptable, rational thought collapses. 3. Control the past and you control the future “Who controls the past controls the future.” Rewriting history turns gratitude into guilt and inheritance into theft. 4. You cannot fight for freedom with a shackled mind “Until they become conscious they will never rebel.” Team loyalties replace judgment; challenging the narrative grants permission to ask questions. 5. True power is the power to shape perception “Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes…” The goal isn’t mere obedience, but surrendering the ability to distinguish truth from what authority declares true. Orwell’s warning: don’t let it happen—resist arbitrary power by holding to truth, conscience, family, community, faith, and the people you love.