Search

Susanne wrote that NU.nl proposed Laura Faber as an ordinary citizen in an article about people taking in status holders, without mentioning her work in the reception and integration of newcomers, according to her. Susanne called Faber the director of Bureau de Werkvloer, a teacher at PONT | Zorg & Sociaal, project leader for the Development of Municipal Reception at the municipality of Hengelo, and founder of the integration school and language school Iedereen aan Boord in Deventer. According to Susanne, Faber's income came 100% from projects and assignments that were directly related to refugee reception and the integration of newcomers and status holders. Susanne called the portrayal misleading and wrote that she had submitted a community note. According to her, it was ready for review and would only become visible to everyone after enough reviews. She thanked Hilda Spruit for her response under the article and provided two sources. https://t.co/htqtVhSm1c https://t.co/4GI1TXQwZR #journalistiek #vluchtelingen #integratie (translated)

Hilda Spruit also asked NU.nl to pay attention to citizens outside the asylum and integration chain who had taken in a status holder. She pointed out that Laura Faber worked in that chain and wrote that according to NU.nl there were more citizens who had provided shelter to a status holder. https://t.co/tUHaNJitSs #asiel #integratie #statushouders (translated)

WNL reported today that the influence of status holders on social housing was much greater than previously stated, according to the organization. Geert Wilders was said to be laughed at because of this, while behind the scenes, more politicians would know the figure. https://t.co/PKQD1FsGju #WNL #socialehuisvesting #statushouders #politiek (translated)

Dr. Jan van de Beek wrote that he addressed what he called a persistent myth in a video: that asylum migration hardly contributes to population growth. He described the claim that hardly any social rental homes go to status holders as a related lie and called for support in his fight against migration misinformation. https://t.co/2tDHwYX14O #asielmigratie #bevolkingsgroei #migratiedesinformatie (translated)

Dr. Jan van de Beek stated that additional housing units that are not existing social rental homes, according to him, should not go to status holders, but to young and/or urgent housing seekers who are already living in the Netherlands. He criticized people in higher positions for not suggesting to build extra homes for these housing seekers themselves. https://t.co/fN3r9XE6vi #Wonen #SocialeHuisvesting #JongeIngezetenen (translated)

WNL Today reported that the pressure from status holders on social housing turned out to be much greater than previously thought. Electoral geographer Josse de Voogd, according to the report, criticized what he saw as a deliberate misinterpretation of the figures by politicians. He referred to this as "almost disinformation from the system" and said that politicians did not sufficiently realize how many people were living in a difficult position and that the allocation was seen as a priority. #WNL #StandvanNederland #socialehuisvesting #politiek #statushouders (translated)

The Jetten cabinet wants to address the housing shortage with thousands of temporary homes, including flexible houses for refugees with residency permits, thereby reducing the pressure on asylum reception and social rental properties. #wooncrisis #flexwoningen #woningtekort (translated)

Henk Vermeer wondered why houses were being built for Syrian status holders in the Netherlands and now also in Syria, while he believed there was no guarantee that return would be possible. He wrote that he could not explain this. https://t.co/Gs6ldPPFdl #Syrië #vluchtelingen #huisvesting (translated)

Mona Keijzer wondered how a Minister of Housing could claim that starters could live with their parents. She asked who, in her opinion, received priority: young people who had been looking for a home for years or status holders. Keijzer referred to parliamentary questions. https://t.co/xHu2dSrr7E #wooncrisis #jongeren #volkshuisvesting (translated)

Sywert van Lienden wrote that status holders in the Netherlands officially received a home within 14 weeks: after 2 weeks of matching, there was a municipal allocation period of 10 weeks. According to him, a homeless person had to go through a process of 12 months to have a chance at a home, after which it could still take 3 to 6 months. He called that legal inequality. #huisvesting #rechtvaardigheid #statushouders (translated)

Sywert van Lienden wrote that starters, according to him, should move to an attic room at their parents' house, if available, while status holders were given priority for new build homes in the Netherlands. He said he was furious about that. https://t.co/RUUzlMXb4f #woede #starters #nieuwbouw (translated)

Simone Juffermans wrote that the situation would no longer improve. She compared the advice that HuGO gave in 2023 — "Have you thought of a wealthy friend?" — with a statement from 2026 by Mrs. Douchemunt, who according to Juffermans said that starters could live with their parents. She also wrote that Paternotte first wanted a good alternative so that status holders would not all end up on the street. #sociaal #woningnood #ouderen (translated)

Monique X-Fluencer wrote that she believed the Minister of Housing was no longer fit for her position. She called the Jetten cabinet incompetent and said that the Prime Minister should be ashamed because, in her opinion, status holders were being favored over the Dutch. #woonminister #Jetten #statushouders (translated)

Strijder124 wrote that Minister Boekholt-O’Sullivan (D66) only wanted to abolish the priority for status holders when there was a real solution. According to Strijder124, the minister said that many starters could continue living with their parents, but she also saw distressing situations. According to her, municipalities and provinces had urged for extra housing for people in trouble. The minister, according to Strijder124, asked for a few days to wait for her plan, which should give people access to housing. After that, it could be seen what the priority position would look like. Strijder124 concluded that nothing would change. #woningnood #huisvesting #statushouders (translated)

Femke Marije wrote that housing for status holders seemed to weigh more heavily for the minister than the lack of housing for young people, whose lives, according to her, also came to a standstill. She stated that the votes of that day showed the other priorities of the coalition and reported that she had submitted parliamentary questions. https://t.co/2C17KYZ4mG #huisvesting #jongeren #politiek (translated)

Dr. Jan van de Beek wrote that he had repeatedly calculated over the past years on X that about a third of the starters were status holders. According to him, this outcome has since been confirmed by the EIB. https://t.co/WRAUf1KihN https://t.co/RMtTCa9rEJ #statushouders #starters #EIB (translated)

Widtvoet wrote that Minister Boekholt advised young Dutch people, who according to the author could not find housing because houses were being massively allocated to status holders, to comfortably stay living with their parents. https://t.co/SIsH6hAThj #asielzoekers #Boekholt #asielzoekers https://t.co/aWMqQ80s7y #asielzoekers #woningnood #jongeren (translated)

Jan-Luuk wrote that he heard Minister Boekholt (D66) say that 350,000 homes would be built for status holders. He wondered what that meant for starters who still lived with their parents and argued that status holders were thus given priority. According to Jan-Luuk, starters also contributed to that. #woningnood #statushouders #starters (translated)