Search

The proposed project for a new core curriculum for safety education in secondary schools involves introducing practical activities using specialized equipment, such as weapons and drones, but faces concerns about teacher preparation and funding for its implementation. #EdukacjaBezpieczeństwa #ZmianyWProgramie #PraktyczneZajęcia (translated)

The article examines the funding sources of the Rozwój Plus association led by Mateusz Morawiecki, pointing to membership fees and doubts regarding the actual costs of organizing events and media productions related to Morawiecki's policies. #RozwójPlus #MateuszMorawiecki #PolitykaPolska (translated)

In a lengthy interview, Zdzisław Litewka, the father of Łukasz, reveals his doubts about the investigation into his son's death, emphasizing that he is not sure whether everything was done to uncover the truth and pointing out the lack of proper diligence on the part of the law enforcement agencies. #ŚmierćŁukaszaLitewki #FundacjaTeamLitewka #Śledztwo (translated)

The District Court in Warsaw, chaired by Judge Marcin Waszkiewicz, lifted the preventive measures against Michał Woś, citing doubts regarding the evidence gathered by the prosecution in relation to the charges associated with the Justice Fund. #MichałWoś #sprawiedliwość #korupcja (translated)

According to the latest survey, 54% of Americans believe that Donald Trump committed crimes justifying impeachment, indicating increasing support for the impeachment procedure among voters, despite doubts about its actual impact on the president. #impeachment #DonaldTrump #wybory (translated)

Zbigniew Bogucki accused Donald Tusk of returning to the topic of abortion to distract from the government’s incompetence, ongoing scandals, and issues with public finances. He stated that the prime minister was motivated by political considerations rather than the common good or women's health. Bogucki reminded that he had been in power for three years and lost the vote on abortion in July of the first year of his government. He wrote that since then, nothing had happened, and the public had only just learned that the committee dealing with this issue had not been working, even though the lawmakers sitting on it were receiving pay. He added that before the announced women’s strike, Tusk faced problems “on every front” and once again raised the issue of abortion, which, according to Bogucki, shifted the focus away from the problems affecting millions of Poles. #DonaldTusk #Polska #aborcja (translated)

Leszek Kieliszewski discusses the operation of the Enhanced Recidivism Risk Assessment System (PSORR), which supports judges in making decisions about the conditional release of convicts, raising concerns about the opacity of the algorithm assessing recidivism risk. #recydywa #prawo #sądownictwo (translated)

Gutab wrote that the development of the port in Świnoujście can be halted by limiting its funding. He claimed that the government reduced the budget for the port expansion for 2027 from 1.3 billion PLN to just under 300 million PLN. He accused the government of acting in favor of Germany and questioned whose side the prime minister was on. #Świnoujście #port #ekologia (translated)

Adaś contrasted the current narrative of the "imperfect family" and its nuances with the way it was portrayed a month earlier as normal. He criticized the narrative surrounding the issue, referring to two unopened beers, the insult and attack on people expressing doubts, and the sentimental interviews with the family, which he claimed had three Blue Cards. He ironized that such an approach was "healthy." https://t.co/ibdWyinU9m #rodzina #życie #społeczeństwo (translated)

Rzep wrote that Channel Zero was supposed to provoke significant controversy around selected topics, utilizing Stanowski's reach, and then publish more programs while ignoring or ridiculing critical voices. According to the author, when doubts arose regarding the version of events presented by the channel, the topic lost interest, and Stanowski focused on the next one. Rzep also recalled Stanowski's words that he would not achieve the expected reach without sparking outrage. #KanałZero #kontrowersje #media (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk accused the interlocutor of citing Article 4 of the law on the status of Constitutional Tribunal judges while ignoring Article 5, according to which — as he pointed out — the employment relationship of a tribunal judge was established after taking an oath. He emphasized that being elected to the position was not the same as assuming office and starting duties, and the oath had to be taken before the President of the Republic of Poland. Kusznieruk noted that the argument about the possibility of resigning from the position did not prove that taking the oath was unnecessary. He added that the refusal of the president to receive it did not justify unilaterally replacing the statutory procedure, and merely pronouncing the oath in his absence did not settle the legal dispute. He also recalled Article 7 of the Constitution, indicating that public authorities acted on the basis of and within the limits of the law. He asked the interlocutor for the specific legal basis for recognizing the oath taken on October 14 in the Sejm without the participation of the president as valid, in the sense of Articles 4 and 5 of the law. He assessed that the presented argumentation was more political acrobatics than a convincing interpretation of the law and added that signing as a constitutional tribunal judge would be premature at this stage. #Prawo #Konstytucja #Sędziowie (translated)

Magdalena Prządka-Leszczyńska contacted TVP Info with a request to indicate which day the gathering referred to in the recording took place, or to deny that it was recorded on October 14. She wrote that in her opinion, the material was from the day when an ambulance was called for Adam Borowski, and not from the day of Piotr's detention. She stated that she and Magda Majkowska are defenders, not politicians, and that they have been acting in Piotr's case since October 16, 2026, at 3 PM. She added that their statements concerned only the events of October 16 and the period of the man's detention. Prządka-Leszczyńska emphasized that everyone has the right to defense, the assistance of a defender, and a fair trial, and that the role of a lawyer is to defend a person subject to preparatory proceedings. She also pointed out that merely committing an act does not determine whether a crime has been committed or whether it was the crime attributed to the given person. She requested that her statements not be used for political manipulation or media insinuations. https://t.co/4IM4bWegy6 #prawo #obrona #sprawiedliwość (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk questioned whether the Sejm documented the verification of Maciej Berek's qualifications for selection to the Constitutional Tribunal. He wrote that Andrzej Filipowicz requested documents from the Chancellery of the Sejm and the Justice and Human Rights Committee, but the received response — according to Filipowicz’s account — did not mention documents from the bar association confirming Berek's qualifications and experience. Kusznieruk pointed out a discrepancy between Sejm print number 3006 from August 14, 2026, which stated that Berek had been practicing as a legal advisor since 2001 and actively for 25 years, and a certificate from OIRP in Warsaw dated September 3, 2026. According to the data he cited, Berek was entered on the list on June 26, 2002, and obtained his qualifications after taking the oath on September 25, 2002. The certificate listed the periods of registered legal practice from January 1, 2006, to July 31, 2009, and from August 1, 2012, to the date of issuance but did not include a list of civil law contracts. The author quoted responses from the Senate Chancellery and the Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights, according to which Berek did not hold the position of legal advisor there nor provided legal assistance in that role. The Supreme Audit Office informed, however, that he was a legal advisor and performed duties aligned with the tasks of advisors, although the appointment of a controller as a legal advisor was not possible. Kusznieruk emphasized that the legal qualification of this work and the declared civil law contracts remained in dispute. According to Filipowicz's summary, if the two periods of Berek's work as a legal advisor in NIK are counted, his tenure was 1,345 days, or about 3 years and 8 months; without those periods, it was 387 days related to running a law office. Kusznieruk noted that this was an analysis of available materials and not a binding decision regarding the failure to meet the requirements. He called for determining who in the Sejm was responsible for verification and what documents were examined, indicating that any potential criminal liability under Article 231 § 1 or § 3 of the Penal Code would require demonstrating statutory prerequisites. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Prawo #InformacjaPubliczna (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk called on the minister to familiarize himself with the full justification of the Constitutional Tribunal's judgment in case K 34/15 before accusing him of manipulation. He wrote that the Tribunal confirmed the obligation to promptly take the oath, but allowed for exceptional postponement when strictly defined, objective obstacles arise — for the time needed to clarify doubts. He pointed out that this does not mean granting the president any discretionary veto power; however, in his opinion, it undermines the assertion that the president has no decisive voice. Kusznieruk reminded that the judges of the Constitutional Tribunal are elected by the Sejm, but according to Article 4 of the law, they take an oath before the president, and Article 5 connects the taking of the oath with the establishment of an employment relationship. He added that the election itself does not therefore end the procedure, and the difference between appointment and election does not nullify the legal significance of the oath. In his opinion, the rule of law requires considering the entire wording of the provisions, even when it complicates the political message. #praworządność #sędziowie #wyrok (translated)

Sebastian Lach wrote that Lithuania claimed that a Ukrainian drone FP-1 with a payload entered its airspace from the direction of Poland. According to his post, Lithuanian radars detected the object while it was still over Poland, and Prime Minister Sinkevičius had no doubts about its origin. The Polish Ministry of National Defense was said to have responded that its systems did not confirm this, while Ukraine apologized and pointed to Russian signal jamming during the attack in the Petersburg area. Lach reported that the drone crashed in northern Lithuania, damaged a car, but did not injure anyone, and NATO scrambled fighter jets. The author compared the reaction to the incident with a hypothetical situation in which the drone would have fallen in Poland. He wrote that then maps and accusations of a Russian provocation would have emerged, while in this case, he described the reaction as silence and a reference to the lack of confirmation and Ukraine's apologies. Lach assessed that some people want an end to the war, while others may prefer its prolongation to play on fear and avoid accountability before 2027. He added that reports about the incident reinforced his conspiracy theory that Russia was not behind the events of April 10, 2010. #Polska #wojna #bezpieczeństwo (translated)

The author wrote that there was no doubt in the EU that easing sanctions against Putin would not end the war. He pointed out that this was to be one of the main topics of the meeting in Strasbourg starting that day. He also mentioned the tightening of cooperation between the EU and Canada, as well as matters related to the budget for the years 2028–2034. https://t.co/6cHhC6Ocqq #UE #Putin #sankcje #EU #CA (translated)