Clarion de Laffalot assessed that the initiative had a less-than-expected start and attributed part of the result to what he called obstacles, particularly the judiciary's decision to prevent the organic circulation of content on social media. According to him, this harmed a party that depended almost exclusively on these platforms and had neither money nor TV time. The author also stated that the boycott of debates made the election even more polarized and indicated that, in his assessment, Brazilians were not interested in projects and proposals. Despite this, he described the result as the beginning of a long-term project and said that the cultural arm still had a lot of work to do. He added that the initiative continued to be the best available option, although Brazil, as he wrote, had a long tradition of choosing the worst. #política #eleições2023 #Brasil (translated)