Search

The author of the post wrote that the whole world should envy the Poles a man who turned back a plane, went to the Constitutional Tribunal and — despite being pushed and having attempts to trip him — entered the building. According to the author, the man wanted to fight for Poland and the honor of all Poles, and no one else would undertake such an action. https://t.co/wPzty8tNQW #Polska #honor #walka #PL (translated)

The author of the post praised the man, claiming that the whole world should envy Poland for having such a person. He wrote that the man turned the plane around, went to the Constitutional Tribunal, and despite being pushed and having attempts made to trip him, entered the building. According to the author, he acted in defense of Poland and the honor of Poles, and no one else would have dared to do so. https://t.co/kGQVQC7jfx #Polska #Honor #Walka #PL (translated)

The author of the post claimed that the government wants to directly regulate the scope of economic freedom and freedom of speech. He wrote that the draft law on restrictive measures, print number 3003, provided for penalties for actions described as "interference in the information space" — up to 20 million PLN and 12 years in prison. https://t.co/2eGmSgLeKU #wolność #prawo #gospodarka #PL (translated)

The author of the post wrote that Bitcoin holders were concerned after, according to him, $90 million had disappeared from hardware wallets. He added that these devices were supposed to be safer than cryptocurrency exchanges, but fraudsters managed to gain access to them. (translated)

The post author wrote that Chinese producers offered meat for even 1000 dollars cheaper per ton than competitors from Brazil and Thailand. According to him, overproduction in China was increasing poultry exports, and European producers were beginning to worry about new competition. #mięso #konkurencja #rolnictwo #CN #BR #TH (translated)

The District Court for Warsaw-Śródmieście refused the temporary arrest of Piotr W., stating that although the evidence suggests his involvement, there are no grounds for applying the most severe preventive measure, among other reasons due to his previous clean record. #Prawo #TymczasowyAreszt #Warszawa (translated)

Max Hübner wrote that those associated with Giertych's environment, who mocked his post from yesterday, should feel embarrassed today after the court's decision. The court did not impose any preventive measures against Piotr, which—according to Hübner—most likely meant that there was no physical attack on the police officers. #Polska #sąd #polityka (translated)

Magdalena Prządka-Leszczyńska informed that the court did not grant the prosecutor's motion for the temporary detention of Piotr W. and agreed with the defense's position. She wrote that the man returned home after more than 50 hours. The author described that on Friday morning on Marszałkowska Street in Warsaw, Piotr W. was waiting for a green light at the pedestrian crossing, after which he was subdued by police officers. According to her account, he lost consciousness and was transported by ambulance on a stretcher, always in handcuffs, even during transport and while at the emergency room. Prządka-Leszczyńska wrote that the prosecutor demanded the application of temporary detention, and she, Magda Majkowska, and Bartosz Malewski from Ordo Iuris argued in court that there were no grounds for depriving Piotr W. of his freedom before the verdict. She added that the court agreed with them. She thanked the MPs who — as she wrote — supported Piotr W. from the very first hours, as well as journalists for showing the full recording. Among the people and editorial offices mentioned were Dorota Arciszewska, Marek Jakubiak, Telewizja Republika, wPolsce.pl, and Polsat News. #sprawiedliwość #Polska #prawo (translated)

Magdalena Majkowska informed that the District Court for Warsaw-Śródmieście in Warsaw did not grant the prosecutor's request for the temporary arrest of Piotr. As she wrote, together with lawyer Magda Prządką and lawyer Bartosz Malewski from Ordo Iuris, she pointed out from the beginning that the prosecutor did not demonstrate a high probability of the alleged act being committed nor any risk of flight, hiding, or tampering. Majkowska added that according to the court, there was no need to apply any preventive measures against him. According to Majkowska, Piotr had not been previously convicted, had a stable life situation, was a member of the volunteer fire brigade, and was a former professional soldier. She also wrote that he participated in demonstrations in defense of the Constitutional Tribunal, and at home, his wife and children were waiting for him. #Polska #Wolność #Prawo (translated)

Bartosz Malewski informed that the court did not grant the prosecution's request for a month of temporary detention for Piotr. According to Malewski, the prosecutor justified the request with concerns that Piotr might hide and an assessment that there is a high probability of him committing further crimes. Malewski wrote that together with lawyers Magda Prządka and Magda Majkowska, he convinced the court that there were no grounds for imposing detention. He claimed that it was not sufficiently substantiated that Piotr had committed the alleged acts and that Friday's events should be treated as an incident requiring thorough explanation. According to Malewski, Piotr has a permanent place of residence, is socially engaged, and is a firefighter in the volunteer fire department, so there is no real risk that he would hide. He added that after the defenders reached him, Piotr, feeling safer, started limited cooperation with the authorities. Malewski also emphasized that the lack of cooperation is Piotr's right and should not be a basis for preventive measures. Malewski also assessed that the forecast for further criminal activity had no rational basis. He wrote that Piotr had not been convicted and that his behavior on Friday was not aimed at committing the alleged acts, which, in Malewski's view, undermined the legal qualification adopted by the prosecution. He informed that the court did not apply other preventive measures, such as police supervision, and that Piotr would respond to the charges at liberty. He added that assistance was provided as part of a procedural intervention by Ordo Iuris. #wolność #sprawiedliwość #prawo (translated)

Prem evaluated the recording from the body camera and pointed out nine violations that, in his opinion, were committed by the intervening individuals. He claimed that one of the police officers only provided their rank, without a name, and that the officers did not explain the actual reason for the identification. Referring to Article 15 of the Police Act was, as he wrote, insufficient to justify this action. According to Prem, there were also no legal or factual grounds for the identification, which he considered unlawful. The author also accused the police officers of violating the principle of least intrusive action as per Article 15(6) of the Police Act. He considered a mocking comment directed at the man and an approach within 45 cm to be a manifestation of psychological pressure and a violation of dignity. He also wrote that the order to move to another location had no legal basis. Prem asserted that the officers used physical force without prior calls to comply with the law and warnings required by Article 34 of the Act of May 24, 2013, on measures of direct coercion and firearms. He listed possible consequences: violation of personal inviolability under Article 217 of the Penal Code and potential abuse of power or failure to fulfill duties under Article 231 § 1 of the Penal Code, which carries a penalty of up to 3 years of imprisonment. He regarded the most significant issue to be the man's escape from the grip. According to Prem, if the grip was unlawful, the citizen would not, in principle, have committed an offense under Article 222 or Article 224 of the Penal Code, and self-defense against the unlawful action of a public officer would not be punishable. #policja #prawo #uczciwość (translated)

Intense protests against the government took place in Albania, during which the police used rubber bullets, and the demonstrators responded with stones and other means, leading to clashes and the arrest of over 1000 people in defense of a controversial investment linked to Donald Trump's son-in-law. #protesty #Albania #zamieszki (translated)

Łukasz Warzecha wrote that the hysterical behavior of the female officers, regardless of the reasons for the intervention, was meant to cover up deficiencies in training and physical preparation. He considered that such a situation was dangerous because an officer who was unable to perform a task using the means provided by the law on firearms and direct coercion under the given conditions could resort to harsher measures than the situation justified to compensate for their own weaknesses. He added that this could lead to disaster. #interwencja #bezpieczeństwo #policja (translated)

Dariusz Mazur wrote that the president vetoed the act on executing judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. He assessed that the president is not aligned with human rights or with Europe, and asked if he sees Poland's place in the East. He added that the president is trying to paralyze the execution of the interim measure of the ECtHR regarding the judges of the Constitutional Tribunal selected in March. According to Mazur, the president does not have the right to veto in this matter, and the measure will be executed. #prawaczłowieka #Polska #ETPCz (translated)

Jakub Pomezański described the recent events at the zoo in Łączna, which he called destroyed and robbed as well as the best in Poland. He claimed that individuals associated with suspicious foundations secured the most valuable animals and transported them to the Netherlands, and on site, bones of animals resembling goats were found, which, in his opinion, did not look like they had been lying in the ground for a long time. Pomezański wrote that the owner of the zoo was imprisoned based on charges he considered absurd. He also accused the foundations of lacking interest in the remaining animals, which were said to be roaming the area uncontrolled. According to him, some animals escaped through a fallen fence, which appeared to be damaged from the inside, undermining the theory that people gathered outside the zoo were defending the facility. He added that the police arrested a mother who came with children to the zoo to — as he wrote — defend it from destruction. Pomezański stated that the case raises his suspicions and expressed concern that since similar actions might affect a large company, individuals could also be at risk. He noted that the photos depicted the zoo in August 2025 and expressed outrage at those who would want to destroy it. #ZOO #Polska #sprawiedliwość (translated)

The author wrote that he would not disclose details to avoid causing harm, but he assessed the management of the services as dramatic. Citing signals from within, he stated that Polish capabilities and potential have been seriously weakened, and the effects of the current management may take years to undo. https://t.co/XklWovO4Ub #Polska #zarządzanie #służby #PL (translated)

The moose charmer claimed that the plan to loot the zoo had a well-thought-out structure: from stealing the most valuable animals to killing the least profitable ones. According to him, the outcome was supposed to be the seizure of the land and leading the family running the institution to poverty. The author wrote that the regulations and personal relationships of the managing individuals would hinder taking action and also alleged that the residents were beaten and tormented at night. He predicted that one of the most important pieces of information that day would be the court's rejection of the request for detention as a preventive measure, which, as he assessed, would strongly affect the public perception of the case. He added that the next few hours would show whether he was right. #zoo #przestępczość #polityka (translated)

This is a change in thinking about urban transport. Local governments no longer simply choose the "largest" means of transport, but "compose" an offer from several elements, each of which is meant to serve the part of the city it fits best – This is a change in thinking about urban transport. Local governments no longer simply choose the "largest" means of transport, but "compose" an offer from several elements, each of which is meant to serve the part of the city it fits best – summarizes Jan Machowski from the Krakow city hall. #TransportPubliczny #Metro #Samorząd (translated)