Search

The author stated that when arguments are lacking, personal attacks on women occur. She described the statements of MP Ševčík as a distraction from the substantive topic and added that women encounter such behavior far too often. She also wrote that she is proud not to let herself be drawn into such debates. #feminismus #rovnost #ženskápráva #CZ (translated)

The Brno Regional Court annulled the decision of the municipality of Březina, which changed the zoning plan and converted the building plots of former minister Blažek and other owners into fields, stating that the municipality did not justify the traffic issues and other arguments were too general. #Březina #územníplán #soudnírozhodnutí (translated)

Greg wrote that Krzysztof Stanowski published another article about football. He criticized the argument that journalists should not comment on club management since they have never managed them themselves and ironically noted that according to such an approach, Stanowski could only criticize Donald Tusk if he had been prime minister for 10 years. The author pointed out that journalists wrote about the owner of Raków, while — as he stated — one could write harshly about Dariusz Mioduski without similar reservations. He considered the sudden increase in criticism of Michał Świerczewski to be pathetic but suspected that Raków was simply going through a weaker period, similar to those experienced by Legia, Lech, and Wisła. At the same time, he assessed Stanowski's arguments as very stupid and accused him of never writing anything wise about football. #piłka #dziennikarstwo #krytyka (translated)

The author of the contribution accused the government of abusing patriotism to defend its own power. He recalled Samuel Johnson's statement from 1775 about patriotism as the "last refuge of a scoundrel" and stated that Johnson did not criticize love of country, but warned against those who, in his view, hide behind national symbols when they run out of arguments. https://t.co/WaMKqUSVIm #vlastenectví #politika #společnost #CZ (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk accused Professor Sadurski of condemning the journalist's vulgar comment more strongly than the convicted politician he defends received a five-year prison sentence for crimes involving corruption. He pointed out that the sentence is not legally binding, but in his view, that does not justify disregarding the findings of the first-instance court. Kusznieruk wrote that Sadurski has the right to criticize uncivil language, but he should also address the seriousness of the actions determined by the court. He added that Sadurski's membership in the Venice Commission remains significant when assessing his public statements, although he does not speak on behalf of that institution. He also criticized the closure of discussions under the pretext of fighting trolls, arguing that it is difficult to reconcile that with openness to arguments. #Polska #korupcja #debata (translated)

Pivana wrote that she had defended Chorase since his arrival at Slavia, even though she did not approve of everything he did. She was bothered when people judged others without knowing them. As a former elite athlete, she said she knew how people could behave under stress or euphoria, and their behavior on the field, in her opinion, does not necessarily reflect who they are outside of it. Due to her defense of Chorase, she found herself in conflicts with people she considered her own, and gradually, according to her, she became a symbol of what they found troubling about him. She now felt that his behavior had once again challenged the arguments she used to defend him, and she did not know what to say in his defense. She wished to know whether his actions troubled him and whether he realized their impact on Slavia and on the people who stood up for him. She mentioned that he had not yet responded to the supportive message she sent him on Instagram in July 2024. At the same time, she wrote that she still believed people deserve understanding and a chance, but they must want to seize it. She concluded her post with a question addressed to Tomáš, asking whether he was at all sorry about it. #sport #slavia #pochopení (translated)

Mickpl wrote that during the Senate's work on the bill regulating Airbnb rentals, there was lobbying from three foundations. According to him, these organizations demanded a change in the definition of hotel services, which would allow funds that had announced plans to build hotels but ultimately built rental apartments to avoid paying a 23% VAT. The author noted that the argument raised was the possible negative effects on students. In his opinion, this referred to individuals renting rooms in private dormitories for 3,000 PLN. He added that signing lease agreements could provide tenants with protection, and the status of students was not to be verified. Mickpl indicated that comments could be submitted regarding print number 863, as well as concerning the cooperatives he had written about earlier. #airbnb #ustawa #wynajem (translated)

Jarek Gasewicz wrote that the recording from September 3, 2026, lasted 88 seconds and consisted of two excerpts. According to him, Nawrocki claimed six times that he appoints Constitutional Tribunal judges, stated twice that he nominates them, and undermined their legal knowledge four times. Gasewicz added that once Nawrocki claimed the right to decide who can be a Constitutional Tribunal judge. He ended his entry with the question of whether it is possible to discuss with arguments against people to whom he used an offensive term. https://t.co/ml9xZnDF5F #prawo #sędziowie #TK (translated)

The Chairwoman wrote that Szymon Stachowiak, Nawrocki's advisor, raised his voice during his appearance with Agnieszka Gozdyra yesterday, and his message boiled down to the accusation that Tusk was shifting the responsibility onto the president. She added that Grzegorz Napieralski reacted, and Stachowiak's shouted arguments lost their strength in the studio. https://t.co/Z7m2WLUH07 #polityka #debata #Tusk (translated)

Bogdan Klich, head of the Polish embassy in Washington, criticized Tucker Carlson for his interpretation of the German invasion of Poland in 1939, pointing to the distortion of history and comparing his arguments to those used by Vladimir Putin to legitimize aggression against Ukraine. #TuckerCarlson #historia #Putin (translated)

The author of the article published a satirical text styled as minutes from an extraordinary meeting of the crisis staff. In it, he described President Pavel's return from Morocco, his participation in the elections, acknowledgment of a mistake, and apology as a situation that thwarted the prepared criticism. He attributed to imaginary critics a plan to focus on the cost of the flight, the president's clothing, the car from the airport, his greeting to the electoral commission, and his expression. According to the text, they were to question both the apology and its timing, and to criticize the president regardless of whether he had left or returned. The author concluded by stating that the text is a fictional satire. #politika #satira #prezident (translated)

The author of the post objected to public insults directed at him. He wrote that he does not know the author of those insults, has not engaged in a discussion with him, and does not recall ever addressing him in a similar manner. He pointed out that he accepts criticism of his assessments and arguments, but he deemed personal attacks as a departure from the debate. He called on the interlocutor to stop insulting him and added that he does not intend to participate in such exchanges, but will not tolerate them. #debatypubliczne #szacunek #kultura_dialogu (translated)

Monika Jadwiga Piątkowska announced that she won a case in the electoral procedure against Łukasz Gibala in the first instance. As she wrote, the District Court in Krakow agreed with her position regarding Gibala's comments about the councilors of the Civic Coalition. According to Piątkowska, the court ordered him to publish a correction on RMF FM and social media. She noted that the decision was not final. Piątkowska assessed that moving the campaign to court indicated a lack of ideas from her opponent's campaign team for substantive competition. She accused Gibala of avoiding debates with the media and residents and predicted that by the end of the campaign he would attempt to win the presidency of Krakow in court. She announced that in the coming days she wants to talk to residents about the city's finances, transport, housing, safety, and investments. She advocated for a campaign based on facts and expressed hope that the court's decision would help Krakow emerge from the period of disputes and "dirty campaigning." #Kraków #wybory #polityka (translated)

I understand the race for arguments, but your train has already left the platform with the passport. The state has a legal obligation to issue documents to a citizen unless there is a court decision. Please leave the regulations from the People's Republic of Poland in the People's Republic of Poland. #prawo #obywatel #paszport (translated)