Search

🚨De l'Angleterre au Québec : les programmes qui sauvent des enfants, et que la France n'a pas encore copiés 📒 Stratégie multimodale de prévention des accidents de la vie courante des enfants de moins de 5 ans ✍️ Haut Conseil de la santé publique (HCSP), rapport rédigé par un groupe de travail piloté par le Pr Isabelle Claudet-Walker (Commission spécialisée « Santé des enfants et des jeunes — Approche populationnelle » Juin 2026 Capsules Audio/Vidéo de Pratiques en Santé 🎙️🎥 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMhvlKutYMA 🔍💡 Prévention des accidents domestiques chez les moins de 5 ans : la France n'a ni stratégie nationale, ni système de surveillance fiable — pendant que le Royaume-Uni et le Canada démontrent depuis 15 ans l'efficacité de leurs programmes. Analyse de Pratiques en Santé et lien vers la source ℹ️➕ https://www.pratiquesensante.com/blog/pratiques-15/strategie-multimodale-de-prevention-des-accidents-de-la-vie-courante-des-enfants-de-moins-de-5-ans-6185 📌 Ce rapport comble un vide documentaire rare : il ne se contente pas de décrire les risques d'accidents domestiques chez les tout-petits, il dresse l'état des lieux implacable d'une politique de prévention française exsangue — instances dissoutes, sites fermés, absence de coordination — et le met en regard de programmes étrangers dont l'efficacité a été mesurée. Pour un acteur de terrain, c'est une ressource à double usage : un argumentaire chiffré pour justifier une action de prévention auprès d'une tutelle, et une boîte à outils directement transposable (check-lists, principe ALTER, fiches par âge) pour ses propres actions auprès des familles. On y trouve aussi de quoi nuancer les messages trop culpabilisants envers les parents, au profit d'une approche d'appropriation plutôt que d'injonction. #️⃣ #pratiquesensante #PréventionAcVC #SantéEnfant #AccidentsDomestiques #PetiteEnfance #LittératieSanté #PréventionBaséeSurPreuves #PMI

🚨 Addictions en France : un système bien conçu, mais à bout de souffle — le rapport qui le prouve 📒 Addictions : améliorer les parcours de prise en charge ✍️ Inspection générale des affaires sociales (IGAS) — rapport N°2025-079R. - Nathalie Rabier-Thoreau et Stéphanie Seydoux (membres de l'IGAS), avec la participation du Pôle DATA (Juliette Berthe, Raphaël Capranico) et du Pôle numérique (Philippe Romenteau). juin 2026 (mise en ligne sur igas.gouv.fr le 2 septembre 2026). Capsules Audio/Vidéo de Pratiques en Santé 🎙️🎥 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dt2U8wjouQ0 🔍💡 Parcours addictions : un dispositif solide mais sous tension. L'IGAS chiffre les délais (≈ 2 mois), pointe un repérage trop tardif et propose 20 leviers concrets pour le premier recours et la coordination territoriale Analyse de Pratiques en Santé et lien vers la source ℹ️➕ https://www.pratiquesensante.com/blog/pratiques-15/addictions-ameliorer-les-parcours-de-prise-en-charge-6183 📌 Ce rapport dresse le premier état des lieux d'ensemble du dispositif français d'addictologie depuis la réforme de 2007-2008, toutes addictions et tous publics confondus. Il nomme précisément ce que le terrain vit déjà : files actives saturées, délais d'accès de près de deux mois, repérage trop dépendant de l'initiative des usagers, coordination floue entre ville, hôpital et médico-social. Il donne des repères chiffrés utiles pour argumenter un besoin auprès d'une ARS ou d'un partenaire, identifie des bonnes pratiques transférables (aller-vers, microstructures, coordinations territoriales) et éclaire l'accompagnement des publics les moins bien captés : jeunes, femmes hors périnatalité, personnes précaires, comorbidités psychiatriques. 🇬🇧: Addictions: improving care pathways - https://www.pratiquesensante.com/en/blog/practices-15/addictions-ameliorer-les-parcours-de-prise-en-charge-6183 #️⃣ #Addictologie #PréventionSanté #RéductionDesRisques #ParcoursDeSoins #PremierRecours #SantéPublique #RPIB #pratiquesensant

Twenty-five years after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, this article revisits in images the tragic events that marked the history of the United States and the world, highlighting the coordination and the devastating impact of the attacks orchestrated by al-Qaeda. (translated)

€800 Billion of Central Planning Europe’s defence problem illustrates a lesson politicians repeatedly refuse to learn: You cannot spend your way out of a supply problem. Ursula von der Leyen’s Commission has announced an €800 billion rearmament programme with the confidence of a central planner who has discovered that shortages can be eliminated by increasing the budget. The European Court of Auditors appears considerably less impressed. Its warning is devastating: insufficient coordination, fragmented funding, bottlenecks in materials and critical components, shortages of skilled personnel and serious difficulties in achieving readiness by 2030. Notice what is missing from the solution: more bureaucracy. The fundamental error is confusing financial resources with real resources. Governments can create euros with a stroke of a pen. They cannot create factories, engineers, semiconductors, explosives, machine tools, rare materials or production capacity by decree. Worse, the EU is attempting to coordinate what politicians cannot possibly know well enough to coordinate from Brussels: which technologies should be developed, which weapons should be produced, where capacity should be expanded, and how scarce resources should be allocated. That is precisely the information problem identified by Friedrich Hayek. Knowledge is dispersed throughout millions of individual decisions. Prices communicate that knowledge. Central planners replace those signals with political priorities, committees and funding programmes. The result is predictable: fragmentation, duplication, lobbying, distorted incentives and expensive procurement. Europe does need to rearm. But that does not prove that Europe needs an €800 billion bureaucratic spending programme. In fact, the opposite may be true. If defence is genuinely urgent, Europe should remove the obstacles preventing private capital, competition and production from responding to demand. Let companies compete. Let governments buy what actually works. Let prices reveal scarcity. Let inefficient producers fail. The question is not whether Europe can spend €800 billion. Of course it can. The question is whether Brussels can transform €800 billion of political spending into €800 billion of actual military capability. The Court of Auditors has just reminded us that money is not knowledge, bureaucracy is not coordination, and spending is not production. And history has never been kind to economies that confuse the three.

Today, I participated in a virtual meeting of the 🇺🇦 Ukraine Defence Contact Group under German & UK leadership. The coordination of our collective effort in support of Ukraine & the translation of financial commitments into delivery of equipment are vital for Ukraine’s success! https://t.co/GkKbMHydPE #Ukraine #Defence #SupportUkraine #UA #DE #GB

Poland, the Baltic states, Romania, and now Germany. Russia is escalating tension across the whole region. We’ll not be intimidated and our response will be our continued support for Ukraine and full coordination of NATO states against the aggressor. Russia will not win this war. #StandWithUkraine #NATO #StopRussianAggression #PL #LT #LV #EE #RO #DE #RU #UA #NATO

DISMANTLE THE SCO NOW. The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation is becoming the central platform for authoritarian and anti-Western coordination across Eurasia. My warning is clear: China, Russia, India, Iran, Belarus and Pakistan are now on my failing & dismantling list because of https://t.co/fuCllgdqPx #DismantleTheSCO #Authoritarianism #Eurasia #CN #RU #IN #IR #BY #PK

Pourquoi ces exos en veille de match ? Toujours la même vision et orientation du travail physique du côté du Barça Objectif : garder la même ligne de conduite Ces exercices activent le système nerveux central sans fatigue métabolique ni dommage musculaire Changement de direction court / coordination / vitesse courte les efforts courts et maximaux augmentent la fréquence de décharge motoneuronale, ce qui “réveille” le système nerveux pour le lendemain, sans le fatiguer. foot = accélérations, décélérations excentriques, changements d’appui, pas de course linéaire longue. On réactive donc exactement les patterns moteurs du match. Très peu de volume (quelques répétitions max), donc quasi aucun impact sur la charge externe cumulée ni sur la fraîcheur du joueur. on stimule le système nerveux et les patterns spécifiques du match sans fatigue https://t.co/LGzmX0PJwX #FCBarcelona #PréparationPhysique #Entraînement

The Austrian Critique of Marx followed a line from value theory to economic coordination. 1) **Menger:** Value is **subjective**. People value goods because they think they satisfy wants; water in a desert can be far more valuable than water at home, with production labor unchanged. 2) **Böhm-Bawerk:** Marx’s surplus value is flawed. **Time and capital** matter: wages and costs are advanced before revenue arrives, so interest/profit reflect time preference, risk, and production structure—not unpaid labor. 3) **Transformation problem:** Marx’s labor-values should imply different surplus values by industry, but competition pushes toward equal profit rates. Marx tried to convert values into **prices of production**, yet the inconsistency with his earlier theory remains debated. 4) **Mises:** The key issue is whether socialism can **calculate**. Rational planning needs prices for **capital goods**, which only markets under **private ownership** can generate. 5) **Hayek:** Knowledge is **dispersed** and local. **Prices** transmit that information so coordination can occur without everyone knowing the full cause. 6) **Rothbard:** Profit isn’t necessarily exploitation. Capitalists bear uncertainty, organize production, and pay wages upfront; workers get an agreed wage, while profit is what remains if the venture succeeds. So the deepest split is not only about profit source, but about coordination: Marx asks who appropriates value; Austrians increasingly ask how millions coordinate exchange, knowledge, and expectations at all.

🚨 La fin des établissements ? Ce que change vraiment la logique de plateforme 📒 Transformation de l'offre : Handicap / RéinVenter l’offre médico-sociale ✍️ Agence Nationale d’Appui à la Performance des établissements de santé et médico-sociaux Céline Castro, Caroline Martinaud et Anne Raucaz (ANAP — Agence Nationale d’Appui à la Performance des établissements de santé et médico-sociaux), avec la collaboration de Jessica Chamba et Chrystelle Campas (EY). Conception éditoriale : Bénédicte Haquin. Illustration : Franck Teillard. Traduction FALC réalisée par des travailleurs d’ESAT (3Sources). Capsules Audio de Pratiques en Santé 🎙️🎥 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=206t7ylaseU 🔍💡 Logique de plateforme : passer d’une place en établissement à une palette de services calée sur le projet de vie de la personne. Retour d’expérience de 12 structures + méthode en 5 chantiers. Analyse de Pratiques en Santé et lien vers la source ℹ️➕ https://www.pratiquesensante.com/blog/pratiques-15/transformation-de-l-offre-handicap-reinventer-l-offre-medico-sociale-6151 📌 Le document fournit une grammaire commune pour faire passer une structure figée d’une logique de « place en établissement » à une palette de services modulable, construite autour du projet de vie de la personne. Il outille concrètement : cinq chantiers séquencés, des postures d’accompagnement graduées, des fiches de fonction, des exemples de coopérations territoriales et de systèmes d’information partagés. Il sert à objectiver un projet de conversion, à argumenter auprès d’une tutelle et à repérer les points de blocage réglementaires. À lire en gardant en tête qu’il date de 2020 : le cadre national a depuis nettement évolué. 🇬🇧: Transformation of the offer: Disability / Reinventing the medico-social offer - https://www.pratiquesensante.com/en/blog/practices-15/transformation-de-l-offre-handicap-reinventer-l-offre-medico-sociale-6151 #️⃣ #TransformationOffre #PlateformeDeServices #Autodétermination #InclusionHandicap #MédicoSocial #CoordinationDeParcours #SerafinPH #pratiquesensante

During a round table in Paris, Justice Minister Gérald Darmanin expressed the need to improve measures against international parental child abductions, acknowledging that these complex situations endanger the best interests of the child and require better coordination and mediation. (translated)

Another EU citizen, Lithuanian suspect Rasa Zilevič, is being extradited to Cyprus to face criminal charges over the usurpation of Greek Cypriot properties in the occupied areas. The case highlights CY-EU coordination against illegal property transactions in the occupied areas. https://t.co/LStQNVE23m #EU #Cyprus #PropertyRights #LT #CY #GR

🚨 45 000 enfants sans toit en France : ce que votre ville peut vraiment faire 📒 Enfants sans toit, mais pas sans droits — Le pouvoir d'agir des Villes face à l'exclusion des enfants liée au logement ✍️ UNICEF France. Directrice de la publication : Adeline Hazan. Coordination éditoriale : Jodie Soret et Julie Zerlauth. Rédaction : Juliette Droux et Julie Lignon - Septembre 2025 Capsules Audio de Pratiques en Santé 🎙️🎥 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S81xDU_8wJQ 🏠👧 Exclusion liée au logement : un guide qui transforme le rôle des communes en leviers concrets pour repérer, accueillir et protéger les enfants sans-domicile. 🔍 Cartographie des compétences, pistes d'action par champ de droit, grille d'auto-diagnostic pour les villes. Analyse de Pratiques en Santé et lien vers la source ℹ️➕ https://www.pratiquesensante.com/blog/pratiques-15/enfants-sans-toit-mais-pas-sans-droits-le-pouvoir-d-agir-des-villes-face-a-l-exclusion-des-enfants-liee-au-logement-6138 📌 Ce guide traduit un problème de droits (plus de 45 000 enfants privés de domicile, p.3) en leviers d'action municipaux concrets et documentés. Il cartographie précisément qui fait quoi entre l'État, le département et la commune (p.6-7), puis décline pour chaque champ — repérage, habitat, hébergement, logement, petite enfance, école, santé, alimentation — des pistes opérationnelles illustrées par des dispositifs réels et transférables. Sa valeur d'usage : outiller un acteur local pour repérer les enfants invisibles, adapter l'accueil et l'orientation, et sécuriser l'accès aux droits fondamentaux malgré des compétences communales limitées. La grille d'auto-évaluation finale (p.108-111) en fait un support de diagnostic directement mobilisable en collectivité. 🇬🇧: Roofless children, but not without rights — The power of cities to act against child housing exclusion - https://www.pratiquesensante.com/en/blog/practices-15/enfants-sans-toit-mais-pas-sans-droits-le-pouvoir-d-agir-des-villes-face-a-l-exclusion-des-enfants-liee-au-logement-6138 #️⃣ #pratiquesensante #DroitsDeLenfant #SansDomicilisme #MalLogement #VilleAmieDesEnfants #PrécaritéInfantile #AccèsAuxSoins #InégalitésSociales

Two years after the tragic death of Hind Rajab, a five-year-old girl killed in Gaza, the Israeli army announces the opening of a criminal investigation to examine the circumstances of this incident, following revelations about alleged shortcomings in coordination with the Palestinian Red Crescent. (translated)

**Load Is Not the Enemy. Unstructured Load Is.** Europe does not need to make industry consume less electricity simply for the sake of consuming less. It needs to make electricity demand more intelligent in time. Industrial flexibility means shifting, shaping and coordinating loads around electricity prices, grid conditions and production needs — without compromising the output the customer actually wants. That can mean demand response. It can mean BESS. It can mean thermal storage, EV charging, process scheduling or combining several flexible assets behind the meter. The value does not come from any single technology. It comes from **coordination**. As electricity markets become more dynamic, flexibility turns consumption from a passive cost into an actively managed energy profile. The next efficiency frontier is therefore not only about using fewer kilowatt-hours. It is about deciding **which kilowatt-hours, when, and for what purpose.** #Energy #Flexibility #Electricity

Cold Beer and Hot Showers - Not Kilowatt-Hours All That Consumers Want The energy sector spends an extraordinary amount of time talking about generation, transmission, storage, flexibility, markets, tariffs, balancing, ancillary services, carbon emissions, batteries, hydrogen, demand response, electrification pathways, system costs, capacity mechanisms, investment signals, market design and regulation. All of these things matter. Some of them matter enormously. But there is a simple question that often disappears somewhere between the conference room, the policy paper and the technical model: What does the customer actually want? The answer is surprisingly simple. Most people do not wake up in the morning thinking about kilowatt-hours. They do not dream about capacity markets. They do not worry about frequency stability. They do not spend their evenings comparing balancing mechanisms. They want cold beer and hot showers. They want a warm home in winter and a cool home in summer. They want the lights to turn on when they press the switch. They want their phone charged, their food refrigerated and their car ready when they need it. In other words, they do not want energy. They want what energy allows them to do. That distinction may sound trivial, but it changes almost everything. For more than a century, the energy industry has been organized around the production, transportation and sale of energy itself. Electricity became measured in kilowatt-hours. Gas became measured in cubic meters. Fuel became measured in litres or tonnes. Markets, regulations and business models were built around those units. The customer, however, never experienced life in kilowatt-hours. The customer experienced comfort. Convenience. Mobility. Reliability. Security. The units used by the industry and the outcomes desired by the customer were never the same thing. For a long time, this mismatch was not particularly important. Energy was relatively scarce, flexibility was limited, and the dominant challenge was supplying enough fuel to satisfy demand. The system could afford to focus on production because production was the central problem. Today the situation is changing. Electrification is transforming energy systems around the world. Renewable generation is increasing rapidly. Batteries are appearing in homes, businesses and vehicles. Buildings are becoming smarter. Heat pumps are replacing boilers. Electric vehicles are becoming mobile storage assets. Customers are increasingly able not only to consume energy but also to store it, shift it, manage it and sometimes even sell it. As this happens, the most valuable question is no longer simply how much energy is produced. The more important question becomes: How well is energy aligned with what people actually need? A family does not care whether its water heater operates at noon or at two in the afternoon if hot water is available when someone steps into the shower. A homeowner does not care whether a battery charges at 1 p.m. or 3 p.m. if electricity costs less and reliability improves. An electric vehicle owner does not care when charging occurs as long as the vehicle is ready when needed. The objective is not the kilowatt-hour. The objective is the service. This is why many of the most important developments in modern energy systems are not really about producing more energy. They are about matching energy to the service required, at the right time, in the right place and in the right form. The technical term for this is often hidden behind complicated language. Experts discuss flexibility, demand management, dynamic pricing, distributed energy resources and system optimization. Consumers experience something much simpler. They experience agency. They experience the ability to save money without sacrificing comfort. They experience the ability to make choices. They experience the ability to benefit from technologies that work for them rather than asking them to work for the technology. This is where many debates become confused. Consumers do not want to be coordinated. They want agency. Good energy systems do not force people to behave differently. They make beneficial behaviour easier, more natural and more rewarding. The best systems do not rely on control. They rely on alignment. When the customer’s interest aligns with the system’s interest, remarkable things become possible. Demand shifts naturally. Storage becomes useful. Flexibility appears. Costs decline. Reliability improves. The customer does not need to understand the complexity underneath. Just as nobody needs to understand how the internet routes packets around the globe in order to send a message, nobody should need to understand wholesale electricity markets in order to enjoy affordable energy services. Success is not measured by how much complexity consumers are asked to absorb. Success is measured by how much complexity the system absorbs on their behalf. The future energy system will undoubtedly involve more digital technology, more electrification, more storage, more automation and more coordination. But none of those are the destination. They are merely tools. The destination remains exactly what it has always been. Cold beer. Hot showers. Comfortable homes. Reliable mobility. Affordable bills. Everything else is infrastructure. And perhaps that is the simplest way to understand the energy transition. People do not want kilowatt-hours. They want the life that kilowatt-hours make possible.

A major fire in the Hautes Fagnes nature reserve in Belgium required effective coordination between emergency services and volunteers, highlighting both the professionalism and some improvised aspects of the response to one of the country's worst fire disasters, exacerbated by a historically hot summer. (translated)