Search

The primary reason for the ambiguity and confusion surrounding the nature of COVID is that it cannot be understood or resolved through specialized knowledge alone; rather, it requires fundamental scientific thinking, as it is a matter of the utmost complexity. From this perspective: 1. A global pandemic is impossible, given the diverse conditions worldwide and the specific biological characteristics of different human populations. 2. Excessive fear of infections and diseases, coupled with catastrophic expectations regarding the environment, constitutes a form of paranoid psychopathy. 3. Vaccination is not a viable approach for respiratory illnesses, as there are thousands of potential pathogens—unlike the single agents targeted by other types of vaccines. For this fabricated, non-existent "COVID pandemic," only 2–3% of the global population was vaccinated—specifically, those who paid for it. For the rest, the production and free distribution of the vaccine were withheld. How could one possibly envision the entire human race falling ill and subsequently being vaccinated? This is a financial scam. 4. The prevailing theory regarding the immune system is flawed. What is termed an "immune response" is merely a reaction occurring in sick or weakened organisms, yielding only a temporary and indeterminate effect. Robust organisms do not fall ill at all, as they effectively prevent the proliferation of pathogenic microorganisms—of which there are thousands, many being lethally dangerous. The body’s primary defense lies in maintaining a standard alkalinity of pH 7.32, a state that depends on respiration and the levels of oxygen within the body. If it drops by even 0.02, acidosis sets in; this is the primary cause of the illness, not the infection. The microflora also serves as a defense, preventing the intrusion of external microbes. 5. The notion of mass infections and widespread illness is a form of psychopathy. The human organism possesses a unique, innate resistance—evidenced by its immense capacity for production—even though, as the most complex entity in the Universe, it is inherently prone to instability. For weak organisms, no defense offers a guarantee, as they produce low-quality, ineffective blood—characterized by a lower count of white and red blood cells and reduced alkalinity. 85–90% of the population is healthy. The remaining percentage—those with weak organisms—fall ill and die as part of the normal, natural mortality rate, which is being framed as "Covid." Healthy individuals do not constitute a medical problem; only the sick do. A further question arises: to what extent does medicine help, and to what extent does it cause harm? It is frequently exploited to generate massive profits—a practice that is both corrupt and immoral. Attempting to treat weak organisms is an unscientific fiction; it is simply impossible. Conventional medical methods cannot cure weak organisms, while strong organisms have no need for medical treatment. The focus should not be on treatment, but on prevention—cultivating and maintaining strong organisms—yet this approach is free of charge and completely ignored. The sole source of a healthy organism is oxygen. Prevention is achieved through breathing exercises. Anything else is pointless and useless. The authorities impose conventional medicine as absolute truth, while dismissing all other concepts of health as unscientific fraud. This transforms conventional medicine into a form of "medical fascism," based on deceptive and ignorant notions of health. Propaganda is being waged against oxygen, utilizing a fabricated and entirely false theory regarding antioxidants and the supposedly toxic effects of oxygen. Without oxygen, the human body is merely dead matter; death occurs within five minutes. Ultimately, all death is a form of suffocation. Sufficient oxygen levels lead to perfect health and peak vitality. If what I say is true, then the entire COVID saga is a manifestation of staggering idiocy and ignorance. This is characteristic of how those in power view life, not just here, but across the globe. Power is not an expression of human intelligence, but rather of the savage, bestial nature of humanity. Formal education is anti-intellectual, anti-scientific, and antithetical to the kind of exploratory, scientific thinking needed to solve life’s problems. It constitutes an act of aggressive coercion—a sadistic perversion directed against natural, healthy thought. It forces the memorization of vast amounts of information, which effectively stifles any capacity for exploratory thinking. This material is uninteresting and tedious; consequently, it cannot be retained and is promptly forgotten. It is part of the authorities' twisted claim to an absolute monopoly over everything—a monopoly on truth itself. Monstrous absurdities and lies are instilled in the mind. This "pseudo-education"—profoundly anti-intellectual in nature—serves to enforce a caste-like division within society: those who possess a higher education degree versus those who do not. Many brilliant discoverers—truly intellectual and educated individuals—either lacked a higher education degree or graduated with very poor academic records. Examples include Edison, Einstein, and Steve Jobs. The formal education system imposed by the powers that be is alien to genius; it hinders, and indeed actively suppresses, its manifestation. In the past, higher education did not exist at all. It is a vile, perverted invention of the ruling establishment—intellectual garbage, mere trash, devoid of any real value. These people scream as if their lives depend on it, hurling false accusations and denouncing the Internet—simply because the Internet has given a platform to "know-it-alls" and stripped the establishment of its monopoly on truth. The Internet is not the source of disinformation, nor is it responsible for a bacchanalia of ignorance and vulgarity. Truth, lies, and stupidity pose no problem for intelligent people, who cannot be deceived; they recognize them in an instant. The Internet serves as a source of endless, truthful, reliable, and vital information, while providing a platform for brilliant minds to communicate with one another and publish their profound thoughts and discoveries—free from the terror of those in power, who are the primary creators and purveyors of lies, ignorance, and stupidity. "Official" science is no more scientific than theology; both serve the same function: the dissemination of lies and ignorance—all while being presented as the sole, indisputable truth. For this reason, the Internet stands as the most brilliant invention in human history—the one that has most profoundly transformed life and offered the greatest opportunities for human development and success.

At 25 years old, Gildas Bouger, a student at the Nantes Atlantic Design School, is a finalist in the 2026 James Dyson Awards with his revolutionary sensory mask for blind football, which transforms obstacles into vibrations to help visually impaired players train independently. #JamesDysonAwards #Invention #Cécifoot (translated)

THE “BATTLE OF CERIGNOLA (1503)” ON “POPULAR ARCHAEOLOGY USA” (by LUCIANO MAGALDI SARDELLA) SOURCE 1: https://popular-archaeology.com/author/sardella/ SOURCE 2: https://popular-archaeology.com/article/the-2026-battlefield-archaeology-of-the-battle-of-cerignola-1503/ __________________________________________________________________ CERIGNOLA (FG) — On 28 April 1503, at sunset, a shallow trench cut through the vineyards outside Cerignola rendered heavy cavalry obsolete. For five centuries its exact position has been merely conjectured, its archaeology ignored, its most important sources never translated into English. We are on the Puglian Tablelanda, a corridor of battles for two thousand years: from Cannae in 216 BC to Frederick II’s falconry from Torre Alemanna. Cerignola, at that time, was not a town but a rural hamlet of 350 families at 120 metres above sea level, guardian of the Mena of the Dogana delle Pecore, the great customs system of transhumance that financed the Kingdom of Naples. It was for its possession that the battle was fought. Opposed, two worlds. Louis d’Armagnac, Duke of Nemours, Viceroy of Naples for Louis XII, thirty years old, splendidly armed, certain of victory. On the other side, Gonzalo Fernández de Córdoba, the Great Captain, who on 27–28 April marches from Barletta with some 9,000 exhausted men and decides to entrench himself upon a low ridge. In front of it he has deepened what was already there: not an invention, but an agrarian ditch. The French gendarmes, the last heirs of the mediaeval knight, lower their lances and never reach the line. From behind an embankment reinforced with vine stakes, more than 1,000 Spanish arquebusiers open fire. Nemours falls, almost certainly the first European army commander to die by a portable firearm. With him dies the cavalry charge as a dominant tactic. And here lies the scandal denounced by the article: no cartographer of the seventeenth or eighteenth century ever mapped the field. No memorial stone recalls it. It is not protected as a cultural landscape under the Code of Cultural Heritage. Every deep ploughing of the Tavoliere, standard practice since the Bourbon reforms, destroys an archaeology never recorded. Yet the perimeter is reconstructable. By cross-referencing sixteenth-century descriptions of “slopes covered with vineyards fifteen miles north of the Ofanto” with the Via Traiana, the engagement zone is a rectangle of 3–4 sq km to the north-east of the present settlement. With ISPRA’s 1m DTM LiDAR, anomalous linear depressions could be revealed, and the lower fill of a 2–3 metre ditch, beneath the ploughed layer, is still legible by magnetometry and ground-penetrating radar. Why have we arrived so late? Not for lack of sources, but for lack of translation. The Comune di Cerignola and the Centro Studi e Ricerche Torre Alemanna of Prof. Matteo Stuppiello, who in 1978 obtained the first monumental protection for Torre Alemanna, have digitised a corpus that has never entered Anglophone historiography. Here are the 3 pillars: 1. The letter that still smells of powder. The “Letter of Consalvo da Cordova to the Sovereigns of Spain of 29 April 1503,” edited by Stuppiello in 2003 and updated in 2025 on comune.cerignola.fg.it/biblioteche-digitali. A manuscript page written at Cerignola the day after the battle, “rich in flashes, twilight gleams, and gunfire.” Not a polished chronicle à la Giovio, but a field dispatch: the exhaustion of the night march, the decision to entrench upon arrival, the recovery and honourable burial of Nemours, the intact capture of the French artillery. 2. The graffito, a monument within the monument. In the fourteenth-century church of Santa Maria delle Grazie, known as the Incoronatella, on the Via Trinitapoli Vecchia, where tradition holds the body of Nemours was taken. On the triumphal arch, a graffito of 1503 gives in quasi-notarial form the date, sixth indiction, Friday at the twenty-third to twenty-fourth hour. It truly was a Friday, as confirmed by Cappelli’s perpetual calendar. Deciphered in 1995 by Prof. Francesco Magistrale, Latin palaeographer at the University of Bari, in La Battaglia di Cerignola (1993) and in the municipal monograph S.M. delle Grazie (1999). It is now fading through damp and neglect. 3. The cadastre that explains the ditch. The Apprezzo of 1672 preserved in the Archivio di Stato di Napoli, fondo Pignatelli Aragona Cortes, Scanzia 63, fasc.1: “At the time of the battle, dense vineyards covered the hill reaching down to the plain, and were clearly separated from the rest of the countryside by a not very deep ditch”. Córdoba did not improvise; he adapted. This is confirmed by the Giustiniani cadastres: 277 hearths in 1532, 699 in 1595. The landscape of 1503 was one of intensive horticulture, not the deep-ploughed cereal monoculture of today. To these are added the first monograph by Vincenzo Buonassisi, La Battaglia di Cerignola (1908, died at Via Fanfulla 10 on 27 June 1928), and the first modern military analysis by Piero Pieri, “Consalvo di Cordova e la battaglia di Cerignola”, Archivio Storico Pugliese 1952, which 30 years before the Anglophone rediscovery of “pike-and-shot” defined Cerignola as an engineered killing ground. While Cerignola forgot, others remembered. The “Regimiento de Infantería Cerinola n.42”, later “Fuerteventura n.56”, bore the name of Cerignola until the twentieth century. Its coat of arms, described in Heráldica e Historiales del Ejército, Tomo V (Madrid, 1981): argent field, a dying white swan entangled in a hedge, a gold mural crown, with scroll “Cerignola”. Dossier officially transmitted on 30 April 1986, prot. 4565/509, by the Servicio Histórico Militar in Madrid to the Centro Torre Alemanna through Col. Alessio Antonutti and Gen. José Cifuentes. And in Amsterdam, in the Rijksmuseum, the anonymous commemorative bronze medal: Hercules with lion-skin and club and Janus with keys beside an eagled coat of arms, legend “Consalvus Agidarius… Janum clausit”, on the reverse a battle scene “Consalvi Agidari Victoria de Gallis ad Cannas” — an error by the artist who confuses Cerignola with Cannae. It belonged to Mrs J.M. van Gelder-Nijhoff, donated in 1885. The author’s conclusion is unequivocal: Gonzalo’s ditch is the most consequential earthwork in European military history. It inaugurates the infantryman armed with a firearm and conditions the Mediterranean for 160 years. It may still be there, infilled, ploughed over, invisible to the naked eye but accessible to a magnetometer. It is not a question of mediaeval archaeology but of the will to protect.

There were always hallucinations. Antonio Auffinger, a mathematics professor at Northwestern University (United States), recalled to AFP that a year ago, "there were always hallucinations," meaning inventions or gross errors in the reasoning of even the most advanced models. #IntelligenceArtificielle #Mathématiques #CriseExistencielle (translated)

Wikipedia: From 2005 to 2012, the contributor Jagged_85 vandalized thousands of pages to attribute as many inventions as possible to Muslims and the Islamic Golden Age. Even today, many misled academics repeat his fabrications. https://t.co/wnu5fBPIda https://t.co/QYPnLZb761 #Wikipédia #Histoire #Vandalisme (translated)

C'est grave : Sébastien Lecornu a menti pour criminaliser les lycéens. J'ai enquêté et discuté avec des personnels du lycée Paul Eluard hier. Ils m'ont confirmé, preuve à l'appui, que le récit sur un jet « d'acide chlorydrique » par des « agresseurs » était une invention totale du gouvernement et de l'extrême-droite. Avec une telle accusation, le gouvernement essaye de convoquer un imaginaire raciste pour criminaliser les lycéens et justifier leur répression. Il faut que cette fake news soit dénoncée très largement, solidarité avec les lyceéns ! #Solidarité #FakeNews #Lycéens

Le problème posé par l'IA, c'est le débordement de l'invention. Cette invention contient la capacité de se déclencher d'elle-même et d'être, comme on dit, non alignée, c'est-à-dire pas alignée sur les consignes qu'on lui donne. Il faut donc une gouvernance commune mondiale https://t.co/LgIi2qWqFl #IA #Gouvernance #Innovation #Il #FR

De toute façon ab initio les mecs sont disqualifiés "moi je n'utilise pas l'IA, je me rends pas compte". Ok. Ben gars ça veut juste dire que ta position sociale est littéralement en sursis dans ce monde. Tu passes à côté du plus important progrès technique depuis l'invention de la machine à vapeur, tu n'as même pas la curiosité de l'utiliser pour voir comment c'est mais tu prétends continuer à donner ton avis/arbitrer des débats sur l'état du monde. Zéro crédibilité, zéro légitimité. A ce niveau c'est comme inviter des analphabètes. Fermez directement le service public : la Grande Librairie, C ce soir, etc. Foutez-moi tout ça dehors, on n'a aucune leçon à recevoir de gens qui n'ont pas fait l'effort minimum d'aller jouer quelques heures avec l'IA depuis trois ans. #IA #Technologie #Innovation

Le couscous royal est littéralement une invention française pied-noire parce qu’avant ça personne n’avait expliqué à vos rats morts d’ancêtres qu’on pouvait éventuellement garnir un peu plus le plat au lieu d’y mettre seulement deux navets avec un bout de mouton. Restez humbles, ce que vous croyez être « votre » couscous est LITTÉRALEMENT le couscous colonial. #couscous #gastronomie #colonialisme

Would you inhabit a 3D-printed house erected in eight days? An affordable / mould-resistant / fire-resistant / seismic-resistant / climate-disaster-resilient house. SOURCE: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1420242892872158 A 3D-printed house that genuinely resolves the global housing crisis!!! What you are viewing in the video is no mere exhibition prototype. It is House Zero — the first luxury 3D-printed residence realised in Austin, Texas, by the American firm ICON in collaboration with the practice Lake|Flato Architects. Two hundred square metres, three bedrooms, a drawing room with exposed beams, a designer kitchen, and an independent casita in the garden. Its iconic undulating walls were extruded in a mere eight to ten days. A project so revolutionary as to have been included in TIME's list of the Best Inventions of 2022. But what does it truly signify to dwell in a 3D-printed house? WHAT A 3D-PRINTED HOUSE IS: No bricks or formwork are employed. An enormous robotic arm — ICON's Vulcan system — deposits, layer upon layer, a proprietary special concrete, Lavacrete, a material engineered to be eminently resistant, insulating, and printable. The entire process is governed by software that adjusts the formula every fifteen minutes according to weather conditions. Plaster and structure become one and the same. WHY IT IS THE FUTURE OF CONSTRUCTION: ALL THE ADVANTAGES 1. Record times: The walls of House Zero were completed in eight days, as opposed to the months required by a traditional building site. The site operates twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, and never ceases for lack of labour. 2. Less waste and greater sustainability: Additive printing uses only the material that is necessary. Site waste and emissions from material transport are reduced to nigh on zero. Moreover, Lavacrete is designed for superior energy efficiency. 3. Lower costs (potentially): Fewer workmen on site, fewer deaths and injuries at work, less time, fewer errors. According to ICON, the system can substantially curtail construction costs and render housing more accessible. 4. Total architectural liberty: The curves, the fluted walls, the integrated niches you see in the video would be exorbitantly expensive or impossible by traditional methods. With 3D printing, form truly follows function. 5. Resilience and insulation: The walls in printed reinforced concrete are more resistant to fire, water, mould, and extreme atmospheric agents, typical of Texas. The thermal inertia of the material guarantees superior insulation. 6. A solution to the housing crisis: It is the technology that ICON is already employing to build entire neighbourhoods of one hundred houses in Texas and for social housing projects in Mexico. The question now is this: having seen it within, would you live in it?

mes tweets un peu techniques sont pas super evidents à comprendre pour tout le monde alors je vais tenter de vulgariser au mieux pour expliquer toute la comedie qui se joue autour de l’IA en ce moment sachez déjà que nous assistons probablement à la + grande manipulation tech de notre epoque car quand je vois les dirigeants des plus grands labos de la silicon valley reclamer soudainement une pause et demander des exemptions aux lois antitrust au nom de la securitée globale je pense que nous devons regarder exactement la où ils veulent detourner notre attention mettez vous en tête que ce spectacle pseudo ethique masque une panique financière tres concrete face aux miliards engloutis dans des supercalculateurs dont les rendements sessoufflent combinee à la terreur dexposer ces pertes dans leurs prochaines formulaires d’IPO (entrée en bourse) puis je trouve que la methode brille par son cynisme sils estiment sincerement que leurs modeles non publies representent un danger ce duopole (Anthropic /openAI) possede deja toute la latitude pour freiner ses propres deploiements sans demander la permission a quiconque au lieu de cela ils nomment leurs propres organismes dévaluation soi disant independants comme METR en y placant leurs anciens employes et investisseurs & réclament une exemption antitrust officielle pour s’entendre sur le rythme de l’innovation en cherchent à substituer un tampon bureaucratique à leur responsabilite civile réelle comprenez que leur demarche vise avant tout a imposer leurs propres controleurs à des concurrents qui ne sont meme pas à la frontiere technologique… perso je pense que le calcul geopolitique qui se cache derriere ce recit s’avère tout aussi bancal car prétendre limiter le progrès aux seules nations alignées sous couvert de coordination entre democraties pour maintenir une avance artificielle relève de l’illusion pure dites vous que pendant que la silicon valley redige des chartes morales pour preserver ses rentes, verrouiller le marche americain et criminaliser la concurence exterieure, les laboratoires chinois optimisent leurs algorithmes tirent parti dune energie abordable et distribuent la puissance de calcul a une fraction du cout occidental, les batisseurs a lautre bout du monde avancent et construisent pendant que les geants americains debattent dun cartel sur mesure de même je pense que l’erreur fondamentale de ces acteurs reside dans la confusion entre la fin de leur monopole et la fin de la civilisation sachez que de l’invention de l’imprimerie au deploiement de la cryptographie moderne les pouvoirs centraux ont toujours qualifie la democratisation des outils de la pensée de menace pour lordre public le problème pour eux cnest que l’intelligence artificielle depasse la notion d’actif prive enfermé dans des coffres forts d’entreprise, elle simpose comme une propriete fondamentale de la matière et du calcul & vouloir rationner le code par decret administratif revient à tenter de breveter les lois de la physique je pense que l’avenir appartiendra inévitablement aux protocoles ouverts au calcul souverain et à l’inférence locale car la veritable resilience d’une societe emerge directement dun systeme immunitaire décentralisé ou des millions dutilisateurs inspectent, eprouvent et ameliorent la technologie en temps reel loin de la stérilité des laboratoires ultra centralisés les institutions qui tentent deriger des murs autour du savoir finissent par isoler leur propre fragilite pendant que le reste du monde batit le siecle sur des fondations libres #IA #Technologie #Innovation

L'article présente trois faits marquants sur Point de vue du Gras, la première photographie de l'Histoire réalisée par Nicéphore Niépce, dont l'exposition est prévue au musée de Chalon-sur-Saône en 2027 pour célébrer le bicentenaire de son invention. #Photographie #NicéphoreNiépce #Histoire

Donald Trump ne participera pas aux commémorations du 11 septembre à New York, laissant le vice-président J.D. Vance représenter l’exécutif, tandis qu'il se rendra au Pentagone, malgré des déclarations contestées de Trump selon lesquelles cette version des faits serait une invention. #DonaldTrump #11Septembre #GroundZero

De George Baker Selection was een Nederlandse popgroep die in 1967 in de Zaanstreek werd opgericht met George Baker als frontman. Aanvankelijk heette de band Soul Invention; nadat succes uitbleef besloten ze hun naam amper een jaar later te veranderen in de George Baker Selection, vernoemd naar een personage uit een (onbekende) roman. Jaren 60 en 70 1 miljoen verkochte exemplaren van Little Green Bag (1970) De groep bestond aanvankelijk uit Hans Bouwens ("George Baker", gitaar en leadzang), George Thé (gitaar), Jan Hop (drums), Jacques Greuter (orgel), Henk Kramer (saxofoon) en Theo Vermast (basgitaar). Vanaf circa 1969 werd Vermast vervangen door Jan Visser, totdat in 1971 Vissers plaats werd ingenomen door Cor Veerman, die in 1974 weer werd opgevolgd door Martin Schoen. In hetzelfde jaar (1974) werd de groep ook uitgebreid met zangeres Lida Bond. Het nummer Little Green Bag (geschreven door Bouwens en Visser) was hun debuutsingle en tevens de eerste grote hit. Bouwens en Visser ontvingen daarvoor in 1970 van Conamus de Zilveren Harp. De groep kreeg er op 2 juli van datzelfde jaar een gouden plaat voor. https://hvdommelen.nl/g/GeorgeBS.html

🔴🇺🇸 RÉVÉLATIONS - ÉTATS-UNIS De nouveaux documents déclassifiés par la Maison-Blanche éclairent ce qui s’est passé autour des affaires Biden pendant l’élection de 2020. Pour comprendre simplement : à l’époque, le FBI disposait de plusieurs sources internes lui transmettant des informations potentiellement compromettantes sur les affaires de Joe Biden, Hunter Biden et leurs activités en Ukraine. Selon les documents désormais publiés, au moins 14 informateurs confidentiels avaient fait remonter ce type d’informations. Mais au lieu de traiter séparément chaque élément pour déterminer s’il était vrai ou faux, une opération secrète du FBI baptisée "Round River" a analysé une partie de ces renseignements sous l’angle de l’ingérence étrangère. Des informations défavorables aux Biden ont alors été étiquetées ou présentées comme relevant de la désinformation russe, ce qui a contribué à les discréditer ou à empêcher qu’elles soient pleinement exploitées. C’est là que l’affaire devient importante : "russe" ne voulait pas nécessairement dire "faux". Certaines informations concernant Hunter Biden étaient authentiques. L’exemple le plus connu est son ordinateur portable. En octobre 2020, en pleine campagne présidentielle, le New York Post publie des courriels provenant de cet ordinateur. L’histoire est rapidement associée publiquement à une possible opération russe ; 51 anciens responsables du renseignement signent une lettre estimant que l’affaire présentait les caractéristiques d’une opération d’influence russe, tout en précisant qu’ils n’avaient pas de preuve établissant que les documents étaient russes ou faux. Joe Biden utilisera cette lettre pendant la campagne pour rejeter l’affaire comme de la "désinformation russe". Or l’ordinateur n’était pas une invention russe : le FBI l’avait en sa possession depuis 2019, et son authenticité a ensuite été établie publiquement, notamment lorsqu’il a été utilisé comme pièce à conviction lors du procès fédéral de Hunter Biden en 2024. Autrement dit, les documents déclassifiés alimentent aujourd’hui une accusation particulièrement lourde : pendant l’élection de 2020, des informations réelles ou méritant enquête sur la famille Biden auraient été neutralisées en les faisant entrer dans la catégorie de la "désinformation russe", alors que le FBI disposait lui-même d’éléments permettant de savoir que certaines étaient authentiques. La Maison-Blanche présente désormais Round River comme l’exact inverse de l’enquête Trump-Russie : dans un cas, le FBI a poursuivi pendant des années des soupçons visant Trump ; dans l’autre, il aurait cherché à discréditer des renseignements compromettants visant les Biden. Source : Maison-Blanche, documents déclassifiés #Élections2020 #Biden #Désinformation