Search

RafałDlaPolski5 wrote that attorney Magda Prządka, the defender of the injured man, spoke about hindering contact with the detainee during today's police intervention and violating the right to defense. The author described this as standards under Donald Tusk's government and indicated the Republic as the source. https://t.co/pyexC8BDNh #Prawo #Obrona #Polska (translated)

Sławek Jastrzębowski wrote that the lawyer removed the material regarding the events from the previous day today and deemed this decision justified. He added that Tusk and the police could present the lawyer as an attacker with a knife. https://t.co/UY2dWCCSLu #Polska #Tusk #policja (translated)

Author r00t🇪🇺 accused Bogucki of omitting the Constitution, the hierarchy of legal sources, and circumstances in his interpretation that—according to the author—did not fit his thesis. He reminded that according to Article 194(1) of the Constitution, judges of the Constitutional Tribunal are elected by the Sejm, and the president has no right to approve this election or politically verify it. According to the author, Article 4(1) of the Act on the Status of Judges of the CT concerned the taking of an oath but did not grant the president the right of veto. The author cited the judgment of the CT K 34/15 from December 3, 2015, stating that the Tribunal recognized that the lack of a statutory deadline for taking an oath means an obligation to act without delay, with the possibility of considering exceptional, objective circumstances. He questioned Bogucki's argument about the change of law and urged him to specify a particular normative change that would justify departing from this interpretation. He added that the fundamental structure of the oath before the president remained unchanged, as did Article 194(1) of the Constitution. Discussing the judgment K 3/26 from May 12, 2026, the author pointed out that Justyn Piskorski sat in the adjudicating panel, whose status—he wrote—was linked to the flawed composition of the CT considered by the ECtHR in the case of Xero Flor v. Poland. He also accused Bogucki of failing to mention the publication of the judgment in the Journal of Laws, required—according to the author—by Article 190(2) of the Constitution. The author also recalled the dissenting opinions of Rafał Wojciechowski and Jarosław Wyrembak. According to his account, Wojciechowski accused the majority of going beyond the limits of the request and creating a norm contrary to Article 194(1) of the Constitution, while Wyrembak questioned the sentence and pointed to the obligation to take the oath as a consequence of the obligation to submit it. The author also noted that the justification of K 3/26 referred to extraordinary, objective, and justified circumstances, not to the unlimited political freedom of the president. Questioning Article 5 of the Act on the Status of Judges of the CT, the author stated that adopting Bogucki’s interpretation could mean granting the president an actual ability to block the effects of the election made by the Sejm. He urged him to indicate a provision of the Constitution establishing such a competence. He added that Article 126 does not constitute a blanket authorization for extending the president's powers, and its paragraph 3 specifies that the president performs tasks on the principles laid down in the Constitution and laws. Finally, the author accused Bogucki of selective use of provisions and case law. He wrote that the lack of a statutory deadline does not grant the president the right to indefinitely block the constitutional competences of the Sejm. #Konstytucja #Prawo #Polska (translated)

Ewa wrote that attorney Roman Giertych asked Nawrocki several questions. He asked if he is the governor of the MAGA movement in Poland and who and for what reason had been holding him back so much that he hadn’t spoken for three days, even though he had previously been heard shouting loudly. Giertych also asked if Nawrocki was dependent on Donald Trump and his people. Ewa added that she compares this to an addiction to white pouches placed by the gums. #Polska #MAGA #polityka (translated)

Jarosław Królewski wrote that non-compliance with licensing requirements has been confirmed. He pointed out that organizing a high-risk match, including the protection and securing the presence of visiting fans, costs significantly more than 250,000 zł. He also indicated that not allowing opposing fans could bring additional revenue to the organizer if the change in event status allows for the sale of alcohol. In his opinion, in such a scenario, not accepting guests could be beneficial both commercially and sportively. He added that the penalty should effectively discourage rule-breaking, rather than being a cost considered upfront. #sport #licencjonowanie #kibice (translated)

The President of the Republic, António José Seguro, called for the social responsibility of private individuals in supporting culture during the ceremony for the donation of the collection of architect Eduardo Souto de Moura to the Casa da Arquitetura, emphasizing the need for new patrons for its maintenance. #Arquitetura #Cultura #Mecenas (translated)

The newspaper P – Paukner Media claimed that the Kolín company Draslovka continued to operate in the Russian market despite a statement from March 2022 about halting supplies to Russia. It identified Jan Dobrovský as a co-owner, describing him as a significant supporter of the STAN movement and other politicians. The author stated that according to a study by the Russian institute Агентство Плодородия, Draslovka's exports to Russia increased from 300 tons of pesticides worth $500,000 in 2021 to 1,000 tons for $1.9 million in 2022. Records from the customs database Volza reportedly also captured shipments of the product Retacel 750 in 2022, including three shipments of 21,396 units, valued at $49,817.25, $49,414.29, and $49,168.93. The post further claimed that Draslovka made additional supplies in 2023 and obtained an extension of its license to sell pesticides in Russia until 2034 in 2024. According to the author, the company collaborated with Russian authorities during the licensing process, and its products were sold to both farmers and retail in Russia. The newspaper P – Paukner Media also stated that the owners of Draslovka and Dobrovský supported political entities and personalities that, according to him, acted against Russia. It attributed a donation of over 300,000 crowns to Dobrovský for Petr Pavel and noted that the group BPD Partners was the largest patron of STAN. In 2025, Dobrovský was reported to contribute 1.7 million crowns to the movement from his own funds. The author also mentioned support for the coalition SPOLU, Danuše Nerudová, and Jan Farský. The post criticized the contradiction between the declared termination of operations in Russia and the described supplies and licensing process. It noted that neither the group BPD Partners nor Draslovka responded to its inquiries about business in Russia. It also asked whether STAN or the coalition SPOLU would take a stance on their supporter’s business activities. #RuskáFederace #Politika #STAN (translated)

Monika Jadwiga Piątkowska announced that she won a case in the electoral procedure against Łukasz Gibala in the first instance. As she wrote, the District Court in Krakow agreed with her position regarding Gibala's comments about the councilors of the Civic Coalition. According to Piątkowska, the court ordered him to publish a correction on RMF FM and social media. She noted that the decision was not final. Piątkowska assessed that moving the campaign to court indicated a lack of ideas from her opponent's campaign team for substantive competition. She accused Gibala of avoiding debates with the media and residents and predicted that by the end of the campaign he would attempt to win the presidency of Krakow in court. She announced that in the coming days she wants to talk to residents about the city's finances, transport, housing, safety, and investments. She advocated for a campaign based on facts and expressed hope that the court's decision would help Krakow emerge from the period of disputes and "dirty campaigning." #Kraków #wybory #polityka (translated)

A lawyer who for years represented people formally on different sides of the Zondacrypto scandal and having different interests. Bitbay and Zondacrypto sponsored his entries in car rallies. He himself is suspected of assisting in money laundering from drug trafficking and obstructing proceedings. He also arranged a meeting in Monaco between the president of Zondacrypto and former spokesperson of PIS Adam Hofman to ensure "protection" from press publications. Who is attorney Błażej Gazda? https://t.co/mt9AV6djyJ #Zondacrypto #Bitbay #prawo (translated)

Na posiedzeniu pojednawczym stawili się dziś Oskarżony - p. Jakub Wiech wraz Obrońcą - p. adw. Zofią Goetz. I to właściwie wszystko, co mogę napisać, gdyż z mocy prawa rozprawy toczą się za zamkniętymi drzwiami, chyba że... pokrzywdzony złoży wniosek o jawne rozpoznanie sprawy. Pokrzywdzonym w tej sprawie jestem ja i z uwagi na jej precedensowy charakter (w końcu to pierwsza sprawa "w drugą stronę") i znaczenie społeczne z takim wnioskiem wystąpię. Zależy mi na tym, byście Państwo wiedzieli wszystko. Zresztą gdy postępowanie będzie prowadzone przy otwartych drzwiach serdecznie Państwa zaproszę, chętnie na sali zobaczę również media. Sprawę tę uczynię jawną i publiczną, podobnie jak jawne i publiczne są obrony prac doktorskich. Transparentność ponad wszystko. Nieustannie i gorąco pozdrawiam panią Mecenas, gdyż wniosła sporo kolorytu w posiedzenie, które zapowiadało się na wyjątkowo nudne, a takim nie było! #sprawiedliwość #transparentność #prawo

Odklejka Romana Giertycha: - Karol Nawrocki ZŁAMAŁ KONSTYTUCJĘ, nie wspominając o Ukrainie w swoim wystąpieniu na forum ONZ I właśnie takich mamy w Polsce mecenasów XDDDDDD https://t.co/U0YiKhWNI0 #Polska #ONZ #Konstytucja

"Cuando unos levantan el brazo, otros tenemos que levantar la voz. Tenemos la obligación democrática de defender banderas que son conquistas sociales". @Ruiz_Noticias Entrevista ya disponible para mecenas premium y este sábado en abierto en https://t.co/CGCni9tUmb https://t.co/uEc9xxaHkK #DefensaDemocrática #ConquistasSociales #LevantaLaVoz #Nocountrycodesarementionedinthetweet.

Rakušan požírá partnery a dere se až na vrchol Oslovil mne Marek Stoniš. Ten Marek Stoniš, kterého jsem 5 až 6 let nazpět nemohl vystát ve své důvěře v liberální společnost. Ten Marek Stoniš, který byl euroskeptický dříve než já a který mne na úvodníku Reflexu strašil i ve snech. Dnes to vidím jinak a Marka Stoniše si začínám vážit stále více. Když vedl Reflex, vyrostlo pod ním mnoho úspěšných lidí, kteří mu dnes nemohou přijít na jméno. Bohumil Pečinka, Petros Michopulos, Čestmír Strakatý, Martin Bartkovský - ti všichni pod Stonišem působili a dostali prostor, díky němuž dnes mají vlastní publika, ať už s nimi souhlasíme, či nikoliv. Jednu věc Marku Stonišovi nikdo nemůže vzít. Jako manažer vždy nechal lidi růst a to často i ty, jejichž názory se s tím jeho přímo vylučovaly. Jen těžko si lze něco podobného představit u Michopulose či Bartkovského. Z úcty, která se dnes ze světa pomalu vytrácí, jsem tedy pro Stonišem vedený měsíčník TO napsal text a dal jsem si na něm nebývale záležet. Je o původu, vzniku a historii hnutí STAN se zaměřením na Víta Rakušana. Nejprve STAN "udělali" Polčák s Gazdíkem a Michalikem, ale ve skrytu, za bílými koni Besserem, Peckovou a právě Rakušanem. Gangsteři v pozadí, hodnoty v popředí. Touto formou se "Stanaři" maskují i dnes jako pomyslné ANO pro liberály. Pak přišel Dozimetr a vše se změnilo. Vít Rakušan přežil, zbavil se nepohodlných partnerů, Gazdík s Polčákem skončili v propadlišti dějin a gangsteři byli obměněni za přední miliardáře, liberální sponzory i hodnotové mecenáše. Pomalu, ale jistě, okusovalo hnutí STAN i ODS Petra Fialy, aby partaj v dnešní době požíralo se stále větší kadencí. Důvod současné úspěšné transformace bílého koně ve všehoschopného lídra opozice je jediný. Nové aliance Víta Rakušana zahrnují vlastníky mediálních domů, jejichž ochrana je pro hnutí STAN naprosto klíčová. Ti samí lidé podporují i Petra Pavla, čímž se Rakušan dostal k nejlepším marketérům na trhu - těm, kteří "udělali" i současnou hlavu státu. Aby toho nebylo málo, uzavřel Vít Rakušan ještě jednu zásadní alianci - tu s Ursulou von der Leyen. Hnutí STAN zůstává jedinou partají ve frakci Leyenové (EPP), která má na tuzemské scéně sílu. Aby Leyenová přežila, potřebuje ve volbách roku 2029 uspět a český garant tohoto úspěchu není nikdo jiný, než Vít Rakušan. Stále zoufalejší lídryně Evropské komise pro své koně udělá vše možné i nemožné. Mediální promo? Není problém. Využijí se i systémy RRS, DSA a další "ochranné valy demokracie" v Rakušanův prospěch? Uvidíme. Z bílého koně gangsterů a gaunerů typu Redla, Polčáka, Gazdíka a Michalika se Rakušan posunul na samý vrchol. Je lídrem opozice a stojí za ním Pražský hrad i nejmocnější žena Evropy. Další opoziční partaje si neuvědomují, že o jejich osudu bylo již dávno rozhodnuto. Nejsou členy té správné evropské frakce a navíc nemají Rakušanovy konexe. Předseda hnutí STAN je tak postupně jednoho po druhém pozře a po jejich zádech vystoupá až na samý vrchol. Povede se to? Stane se Rakušan českým Péterem Magyarem, jak má v plánu? I na to odpovídám v hlavním článku nového vydání měsíčníku TO. https://t.co/AGOspa5PsQ Číslo jsem viděl a kromě množství zajímavých textů musím poukázat na krásné dílo o 30 nepříliš známých hrdinech teroristického útoku ze 7. října v Izraeli. Poznám, když si dá s textem někdo práci a tento počin je doslova dokonalý, nebývale smutný, ale vybízí i k zamyšlení nad tím, zda bychom my sami v krizi našli odvahu, nebo nikoliv. Příběh 85 letého Shloma Rona, který ukryl svou rodinu, naaranžoval dům tak, aby se zdálo, že v něm bydlí sám a nechal se kvůli záchraně blízkých dobrovolně zastřelit, zamává i s těmi nejsilnějšími povahami. Tak šup do trafik, stojí to (TO) za to (TO) :) Šalom. #politika #Rakušan #STAN

Za chwilę miną 2 miesiące od momentu gdy premier powiedział na konferencji prasowej, że „jeśli się okaże, że mecenas Giertych złamał prawo, np. poprzez nielegalne wyniesienie nagrań z przesłuchania prezesa PiS Jarosława Kaczyńskiego w sprawie <dwóch wież>, to poniesie konsekwencje”. Coś wiadomo w tej sprawie, czy zamieciona przez usłużnych dziennikarzy pod dywan? #Polska #polityka #prawo

Mecenas Dupła wyprodukował fejkowe oświadczenie sugerujące, że Jędrzejewski wycofał się z oskarżeń wobec Kacprzyka, a mniej lub bardziej propeowskie konta na tym protalu, niby tak przejęte aferą, od razu z wielką ulgą tego fejka powieliły. Zaraz Kacprzyka na sztandary wezmą 🙃 #fejk #afera #media

Dziś mija 98 dni od wybuchu afery w Warszawskim Szpitalu Południowym, a jak komentuje sprawę główny jej bohater? JA MAM TO W DUPIE. Obrzydliwe, ale z drugiej strony, jak ciebie broni mecenas KO Bibuła, to faktycznie możesz sobie na takie teksty pozwolić… #Warszawa #afera #zdrowie