Search

Michał Fiszer wrote that his income came from military pension, lectures, articles, and occasional assignments such as translations. He added that readers could also support him by buying him coffee. In response to questions about who pays him, he suggested that similar questions should be directed to those praising Russia, among other things, about how they exchange rubles or whether they receive payments in cryptocurrencies. Fiszer estimated that a significant portion of society is susceptible to manipulation. He wrote that about one third, and possibly more, believe in the theory of the Smolensk crash, and 10 percent believe in the existence of a Jewish world government with a secret bunker under Sworne Gacie. He also mentioned people who believe in the harmfulness of vaccines, a flat Earth, or chemtrails, as well as confusing agencies that arose in the Third Republic with institutions from the times of the People's Republic of Poland. He stated that as a lecturer, he is subject to lustration, and his declaration of not cooperating with the services of the People's Republic of Poland has never been questioned. He also wrote that the only party he belonged to was the UPR. Fiszer reiterated the call to rely on information from the president and his office, the prime minister and his office, the Ministry of National Defense, the National Security Bureau, the military, the General Staff, the commands of the armed forces, the police, border guards, and the fire service, as well as the Military Counterintelligence Service, the Internal Security Agency, and the Intelligence Agency in matters related to state security incidents. He also encouraged reliance on science, scientists from reputable universities, and scientific journals. He announced that he expects an attack from internet trolls, and then intends to write about the anti-aircraft guns ZU-23-2 used in Poland and their derivatives, including the Pilica system. In a note, he corrected that in his previous post he referred to a powered paraglider, not an unpowered paraglider. #Bezpieczeństwo #Dezinformacja #Nauka (translated)

Wojciech Machulski wrote that it is worth taking a close look at the recordings from France, which he described as terrible. He stated that Poland should avoid what they depict and learn from the mistakes of others. https://t.co/jLEm2EVh6L #Francja #bezpieczeństwo #nauka (translated)

The American biotechnology company Colossal Biosciences announced progress in research on bringing the extinct dodo bird back to life, using artificial intelligence to analyze its DNA and planning to introduce the necessary genetic changes in its closest relative, the nicobar pigeon. #dodo #sztucznainteligencja #nauka (translated)

The author of the post harshly criticized AI-generated images and wrote that people presented them as real. He pointed out that a giant taro clone was visible in the background, which—he noted—does not naturally occur in Poland. https://t.co/XtTJP0swo7 #AI #sztucznainteligencja #nauka (translated)

The author stated that 16,511 schools received 735,000 computers, and additionally, 12,000 artificial intelligence labs and 1,458 STEM labs were created, intended for learning through experiences and experiments. #PolskaGórą https://t.co/YnFrOdDcnT #Edukacja #Technologia #Innowacje #PL (translated)

Venek wrote that the French Academy of Sciences announced the death of Pierre Joliot-Curie, a biochemist and the grandson of the two-time Nobel Prize laureate Marie Curie. According to his post, the scientist died at the age of 94. https://t.co/sxlqBkev8Q #nauka #biochemia #Nobel (translated)

Konrad Krasuski wrote that he spoke with an anonymous employee of the Veterinary Inspection about the situation around the zoo in Łączna. According to the informant, on October 2, during the Animal Rights Congress in the Senate, the Chief Veterinary Officer and representatives of the General Directorate for Environmental Protection were present, and discussions were already underway in the corridors about a future intervention at the zoo. The employee emphasized that identifying irregularities during an inspection does not automatically mean that animals must be taken away. As Krasuski reported, the informant distinguished between deficiencies that could be ordered to be corrected — such as an insufficient enclosure for a tiger — and situations where the animal's welfare is threatened enough to warrant immediate removal. He also assessed that there was no reason not to trust the District Veterinary Officer in Wałbrzych. According to the employee, the veterinarian had held this position since around 2015, had extensive knowledge, and difficult cases were consulted with him; in his opinion, animal removal was not necessary. The informant alleged that the authority of the Veterinary Inspection was being publicly undermined, and the responsibility for systemic problems fell on individual veterinarians. He claimed that after subsequent media scandals, district veterinarians were being changed, but this did not lead to real reforms. He also pointed out the lack of uniform procedures, support, specialized training related to zoo inspections, and a joint protocol for such inspections. He critically assessed the advisory teams at the Chief Veterinary Officer. As Krasuski conveyed, the employee believed that individuals associated with animal protection and social sciences had a significant impact on the discussion, while the knowledge and experience of veterinarians and field inspectors were being marginalized. He also noted that actions concerning the removal of animals from the zoo in Łączna were to be undertaken about six months after the notification, while the investigation by the same prosecutor's office concerning DIOZ lasted much longer. The employee stressed that the transport of wild and exotic animals, when necessary, requires prior preparations: acclimatizing the animal to the transport crate and ensuring the presence of a familiar caretaker. According to him, severe stress can lead some species to refuse food, panic, or self-harm. The informant also indicated that veterinarians were asked very short notice about the possibility of sedating animals before transport and assessed that such an operation should not be organized ad hoc. As Krasuski reported, the employee believed that transport could be justified in direct threat to life or health, but in other circumstances, the transport itself and the associated stress could also pose significant risks to the animals. #OchronaZwierząt #ZOO #Weterynaria (translated)

Magda wrote that sending Prof. Dr. Hab. Wojciech Sadurski, a professor of legal sciences and a constitutional lawyer from the University of Sydney and the University of Warsaw, to the Venice Commission was a mistake. She sarcastically stated that Nawrocki would agree if instead, a boxer or Bąkiewicz had been sent and they had been politely asked. #komentarz #polityka #nauka (translated)

Jakub Kosikowski wrote that after the tragedy, everything must be done to ensure that a similar situation does not happen again, and he emphasized that this was not the first such case in Poland. In his opinion, the team of experts should determine what went wrong in the hospital, and the facility should implement the recommendations from the report. The family should receive compensation from the hospital's or doctor's policy without a lengthy court process. Kosikowski also pointed out that the experts should assess whether there was gross negligence that would justify a criminal case, and their tasks should be carried out by the prosecutor's office, the patient rights advocate, and the medical chambers. He wrote that he had no illusions that anyone could receive a judgment and compensation after 5–10 years, but without changes in event analysis and the implementation of recommendations, this would not protect other children from tragedies. He assessed that in Poland, conclusions are poorly drawn from such events. #bezpieczeństwozdrowotne #prawepacjenta #systemochronyzdrowia (translated)

Piotr Witczak commented on the proposal by the president of the Enel-Med medical center to raise the health insurance contribution for unvaccinated individuals. He asked whether the president had credible scientific evidence that vaccinated individuals were generally healthier and had a lower mortality rate from any cause. Witczak claimed that he was aware of evidence indicating the opposite correlation. He cited data showing that after ten years of observation, at least one chronic condition was found in 57% of vaccinated individuals and 17% of unvaccinated individuals. He also referred to several studies that suggested better health status among unvaccinated individuals. https://t.co/CwSuhy5Io8 https://t.co/KrhHGVeqSY #szczepienia #zdrowie #nauka (translated)

Marcin Borzęcki believed that Marcel Reguła should not reject the role that Borussia Dortmund saw for him. As he wrote, the club had only two nominal wing players, and Niko Kovač adapted Maxi Beier, who was previously positioned as a hanging striker, to play on the wing. Borzęcki predicted that Reguła could play both as a wing player, relieving Svensson or Ryerson, and in one of the two number ten positions. He added that regular minutes in such a club would be of great value, and learning to play defensively and developing tactical responsibility could help the player. According to Borzęcki, Borussia's interest in Reguła seemed serious, so it would be worth trying. He added that even if the transfer did not materialize, having such a club listed on his CV could help the player find a place in a team from the lower half of the table. #BorussiaDortmund #Ekstraklasa #PiłkaNożna (translated)

Dariusz Dziektarz wrote that his experiment made it to the media. He stated that he now expects at least an award from the Minister of Science and Higher Education or another minister for his contribution to Polish science, otherwise he will release "it". https://t.co/jl9I9ksuwQ #nauka #badania #ministerstwo (translated)