Superjan asked why anyone would choose a sperm donor if neither party involved was infertile. He argued that if the person providing the egg, the person carrying the child, and the person providing the sperm were not seen as mother or father, it was unclear why the child would be considered theirs. He advocated for adoption, called the choice a political statement, and wrote that children would then belong to everyone and be made available for others' enjoyment. #zaaddonor #gezinsvorming #adoptie (translated)
