Search

Jack Strong assessed that the judge had no evidential basis to agree to the arrest, and therefore her decision was not an act of heroism. He regarded the very request of the prosecution as absurd, which—he claimed—was a result of telephone pressure from Waldemar Żurek. He added that political pressure can compel a signature or the submission of a request, but it cannot create the missing evidence. According to Strong, the operation, which was supposed to demonstrate Żurek's strength, ended in his disgrace. He also claimed that the prosecutors had mocked him, and Korneluk had previously warned about such a turn of events. He marked the National Prosecutor's Office. #polityka #sprawiedliwość #prokuratura (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk accused Wielowieyska of accepting the police's version as an established fact and assessing the detained individual before the court's decision. He questioned the legal basis for identifying the man who — as he wrote — was calmly standing at the crosswalk, as well as the attempt to take him aside. He asked whether the refusal to provide personal information justified intervention. Kusznieruk noted that pushing away the officers and fleeing did not exempt the assessment of the legality and proportionality of the force used. He also pointed out the choking of the subdued individual, the vulgarities and threats that — as he wrote — were audible on the recording, and questioned whether such behavior was within the standards of human rights. He added that the court had refused to detain the man, and according to the defense, it concluded that the prosecutor had not even demonstrated a high probability of the alleged act being committed. He characterized this as more than just a routine refusal of detention. He deemed the attribution of a crisis to the detainee based on his behavior as public stigmatization. He also believed that publicly presenting him as an aggressor before the court's decision could be seen as incitement, and that journalists should monitor power, rather than act as its spokesperson. #prawaCzłowieka #Polska #policja (translated)

Marcin Edo wrote that Piotr W. was called a "knife man" by Donald Tusk and government media. He added that the prosecutor's office lost in court a case regarding a detention request that Judge Anna Kuzaj did not consider. Edo also used offensive terms towards Tusk and the government. #Polska #sąd #prawo (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk described the court's decision to deny the arrest of Piotr after the protest as a disgrace for the prosecution. He stated that, in his opinion, the lack of high probability of committing a crime meant that the prosecution had not demonstrated the basic premise for applying the arrest. He claimed that Piotr had spent over 50 hours deprived of freedom, and the police conducted a brutal intervention and a request for arrest was submitted without convincing evidence. He noted that the denial of arrest does not mean acquittal, but he considered it a serious signal for the prosecution. He called for the accountability of the police officers and their superiors. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #prokuratura (translated)

Piotr Kusznieruk informed that the court refused to temporarily arrest Piotr W., and after more than 50 hours of detention, the man was supposed to return home. He described that Piotr W. was standing at a red light at a pedestrian crossing, after which the police were said to have chased him, subdued him, and pinned him to the floor. According to the account referenced by Kusznieruk, the man lost consciousness and was taken to the hospital in handcuffs. The author noted that — as he wrote — the specific basis for the initiation of the identification has not been publicly clarified to this day. He added that the prosecution requested a temporary arrest, and the court did not agree to this request. Kusznieruk assessed that arrest should be a last resort and called for an investigation into the basis for the intervention, the use of force by the officers, and the circumstances surrounding Piotr W.'s loss of consciousness. #prawo #sprawiedliwość #Polska (translated)

Magdalena Prządka-Leszczyńska informed that the court did not grant the prosecutor's motion for the temporary detention of Piotr W. and agreed with the defense's position. She wrote that the man returned home after more than 50 hours. The author described that on Friday morning on Marszałkowska Street in Warsaw, Piotr W. was waiting for a green light at the pedestrian crossing, after which he was subdued by police officers. According to her account, he lost consciousness and was transported by ambulance on a stretcher, always in handcuffs, even during transport and while at the emergency room. Prządka-Leszczyńska wrote that the prosecutor demanded the application of temporary detention, and she, Magda Majkowska, and Bartosz Malewski from Ordo Iuris argued in court that there were no grounds for depriving Piotr W. of his freedom before the verdict. She added that the court agreed with them. She thanked the MPs who — as she wrote — supported Piotr W. from the very first hours, as well as journalists for showing the full recording. Among the people and editorial offices mentioned were Dorota Arciszewska, Marek Jakubiak, Telewizja Republika, wPolsce.pl, and Polsat News. #sprawiedliwość #Polska #prawo (translated)

The author announced a conversation about Donald Tusk, whom he referred to as a dictator. He asked what is happening behind the scenes of the state and stated that the services, the Constitutional Tribunal, the NBP, the prosecutor's office, the courts, and other institutions are becoming elements of an increasingly fierce political war. The conversation is scheduled for today at 14:00. #DonaldTusk #polityka #Polska #PL (translated)

The Black List Pro wrote that the dog was found at the "I Have an Idea" Foundation, which manages the shelter in Świdnica. The author claimed that the animal was neither exotic nor endangered or neglected, and that its owner was the mother of the zoo owner. He asked how and why the dog ended up at the foundation and whose decision it was, addressing this matter to the prosecutor's office. #Świdnica #FundacjaMamPomysł #SprawaPieska (translated)

WolnośćTV referenced statements by Krzysztof Bosak, who said that the previous day there was an attack on a Polish diplomatic convoy in Palestine and the breaking of windows in vehicles belonging to the Polish state. He attributed responsibility to Israeli terrorists. Bosak also accused the authorities in Warsaw of persecuting entrepreneurs and imposing fines amounting to tens or hundreds of thousands for what he claimed were fabricated offenses. He also spoke about the actions of the prosecutor's office, police, and private organizations that were allegedly smuggling animals abroad. He questioned the focus of the conversation on what someone was supposed to have heard in the forest. He stated that a discussion could occur if someone had seen and recorded something. #Polska #konwójdyplomatyczny #prokuratura (translated)

The Ordo Iuris Institute wrote that the refusal to provide an explanation by the suspect should not be a basis for temporary detention. Attorney Magda Majkowska from Ordo Iuris, Piotr's defender, said that this is his right and that the prosecution cannot justify detention based on it. She added that she has never encountered a case where the mere refusal led to detention. In her opinion, this could mean using detention to force the suspect to provide an explanation in order to regain his freedom. The Institute defined the right to remain silent as a fundamental procedural guarantee and stated that exercising it should not be associated with negative consequences. #Prawo #Sprawiedliwość #Obrona (translated)

Lawyers for Poland stated that Piotr W. did not admit to the charges and refused to provide explanations. According to them, the prosecutor requested a one-month detention, highlighting the need to secure forensic psychiatric evaluations. They added that the prosecutor's spokesperson confirmed the suspect's fainting and his transport to the hospital. The authors emphasized that detention is not a punishment before conviction, and the refusal to provide explanations is the suspect's right and does not prove his guilt. #Prokuratura #Areszt #Prawo (translated)

The District Prosecutor's Office in Siedlce submitted a motion to dismiss the proceedings against Krzysztof A., who is suspected of attempting to murder the mayor of the municipality of Stara Kornica, and is requesting the implementation of therapy in a long-term treatment center due to his mental state. #ataknożem #wojt #chorobapsychiczna (translated)

Magdalena Prządka-Leszczyńska wrote that the citizen weakened at the prosecutor's office and was taken to the hospital, and his lawyer had to fight with the police for access to the suspect. She added that the suspect submitted a written request for the lawyer's participation in these activities. She described the situation ironically as a return to normalcy. #prawo #prokuratura #obrońca (translated)

Uszi wrote that the animals were taken from the Łączna Zoo, and the results of the prosecutor's examination were supposed to be known before the services entered the area. He cited disclosed chats of the activists, from which — he claimed — it followed that they had divided the animals among themselves a few days before the operation. According to Uszi, both activists and the Dutch pointed to the key role of the Ministry of Climate and Environment, and Minister Paulina Hennig-Kloska accused others of lying in their statements. The author also wrote that the taken tiger would not return to Poland. He claimed that Stichting Leeuw sends the seized predators to a private reserve in Africa, where luxurious safaris can be booked through Booking.com. #Zoo #Wydarzenia #OchronaZwierząt (translated)