Frag Out! Magazine described the K-03 Rys as a new camouflage pattern that it believed resembled the WS-31 or its variant and fit into the trend of patterns similar to Multicam. It tentatively named it "MultiPlama." It noted five colors with transitions, a large report limiting the repeatability of the pattern, and a selection of colors from the palette most commonly found in Poland. It compared the color scheme to the green version of ATACS, Endor Commando, which it evaluated as performing well in Poland. According to assurances cited by the magazine, the camouflage was supposed to conceal 30% more effectively than the wz.93, and it was also supposed to have a similar advantage over Multicam. Frag Out! disagreed with Jarosław Wolski, who had written that the pattern would distinguish soldiers on the battlefield and facilitate their identification. It argued that the K-03 Rys referenced the currently popular Multicam. The magazine emphasized that it assessed the uniform based on photos and recordings, so it wanted to see it in the field and test it. It noted the new cut, the men's and women's versions, and solutions that had been proposed 17 years earlier. According to the provided assurances, the fabric was to be 30% more durable, twice as breathable, and seven times more abrasion-resistant, as well as better at holding its color. It was supposed to consist of four components rather than, as is most common, two. Tops and trousers were to be selected separately, instead of creating a set. Frag Out! believed that it was still too early to form an opinion about the uniform, but it admitted that it looked at it with cautious optimism. It estimated that the exchange of uniforms and equipment would take 5-10 years. It also asked how companies would be able to sew equipment for the Green List if the pattern were to be patented, about which, as it wrote, Naval was being informed. In the end, it expressed hope that green bands would ultimately be found in the camouflage. #kamuflaż #mundur #armia (translated)
