Search

Piotr Kusznieruk asked how to understand the document: as a commendation of unlawful actions against citizens or a politically commissioned attempt to gather data on participants of a legal demonstration. He wrote that the slogan "Murem za mundurem" should not mean unconditional support for every police officer. He pointed out a female officer who, as he noted, was accused of beating, insults, and chewing gum during an intervention. He addressed the commander, demanding an explanation of abuses and accountability instead of appeals for solidarity. #polska #prawaobywatelskie #protest (translated)

Jarosław Kaczyński wrote that he opposed lawlessness and called for monitoring the actions of the authorities. He stated that thanks to the interventions of his environment, lies, violence, and violations of rules during the detention of Mr. Piotr last Friday were revealed. According to Kaczyński, the court did not consider the prosecutor Żurek's request for temporary arrest, and the detainee was treated criminally by Donald Tusk's people and was the main victim in this case. He added that every significant victory begins with the first step. #Polska #sprawiedliwość #wolność (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that the crowds of Poles gathered that day in Warsaw demanded the stopping, as he put it, of Tusk's lawlessness. He declared that the participants did not intend to retreat and pointed out that they were defending the Constitutional Tribunal, the rule of law, and the sovereignty of Poland. He added that everyone had to take a stand on the side of Poland, and that joint action was meant to lead to victory. https://t.co/HzXEiSMmhP #Polska #praworządność #demokracja #PL (translated)

The author of the post called for the release of Piotr and wrote that the volunteer from the Town under the Constitutional Tribunal was choked until he lost consciousness and then arrested. He described these actions as brutality and lawlessness of the "Tusk regime" and emphasized that his community would not abandon its own. https://t.co/C4VlnEz1Cz #Wolność #Protest #PrawaCzłowieka #PL (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that Professor Maciej Taborowski's term as a judge of the Constitutional Tribunal has been ongoing since March of this year, and Święczkowski unlawfully and forcibly prevented him from adjudicating. He described this situation as lawlessness and anticipated that it would soon come to an end. (translated)

The author wrote that the use of brutal force against people who have served their homeland their whole lives was an injustice and an attempt to intimidate the nation. He called for the signing of an appeal to the President in defense of the Constitutional Tribunal. https://t.co/RGCkmXzWt0 #bezprawie #obrona #Wolność #PL (translated)

Michal Rachoń wrote that the officers responsible for what he called today's lawlessness should face personal criminal responsibility. He pointed to those commanding the action at the Association of Free Speech, three officers who — he claimed — were choking Piotr, and an officer who was supposed to direct insults at him. He added that responsibility should also include those obstructing access to representatives appointed by Piotr's wife. He urged politicians seeking the votes of viewers to take effective action to ensure justice is served. #sprawiedliwość #prawaosób #bezprawie (translated)

Zbigniew Bogucki criticized the way Prime Minister Donald Tusk, Berek, and Kierwiński treated the protesters in front of the Constitutional Tribunal. He accused the rulers of contempt and arrogance, and compared Tusk's words, in terms of language, to messages from a distant past. Bogucki thanked the demonstrators who — as he wrote — had been peacefully protesting in front of the Tribunal around the clock for many days, seven days a week. He described them as a counterbalance to the lawlessness he attributed to Tusk and Berek, and accused the Prime Minister of using unpleasant terms toward them. He also referred to a statement from Kierwiński, who reportedly called the protesters an offensive term associated with PiS. Bogucki wrote that politicians elected by the citizens should not speak this way about people they disagree with. He emphasized that the sovereign is the citizens of the Republic, not the members of the government. #Protest #Suwerenność #Polska (translated)

Adam Mazguła wrote that Karol Nawrocki vetoed another three laws regarding — in his opinion — voting rights, human rights, and political advertising. He stated that these were laws from September 4, 2026: on amending the Election Code (sejm print no. 2670), on competent authorities and proceedings regarding political advertising and responsibility for violations of obligations in these matters (print no. 2769), and on the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (print no. 2271). Mazguła assessed that about 200 more vetoes are needed for Nawrocki’s term to end. He accused him of consciously acting against Poland and wrote that the greater the chaos in the country, the more satisfaction he has. He also attributed to him a desire for chaos and lawlessness, as well as a political slogan directed against democracy and Donald Tusk. #Polska #PrawaCzłowieka #Demokracja (translated)

Adam Mazguła criticized Rafał Jankowski and the board of the NSZZ Policjantów after Jankowski stated that police officers "do not stand on the side of the government." He claimed that such a position undermines loyalty to constitutional organs of the state and could lead to anarchy. He accused Jankowski of having political ties to PiS and argued that his statement encourages police officers not to fulfill their duties. Mazguła referred to Article 27, point 1 of the Police Act of April 6, 1990, and cited the oath taken by police officers. He argued that police officers should serve Poland and its constitutional bodies, including the democratically elected government and the Minister of the Interior and Administration. He also accused the NSZZ board and Jankowski of focusing on pay and benefits. The author wrote that Jankowski did not respond to what he described as cases of death following police interventions, the use of violence against women and peaceful demonstrators, the detention of a female MP, the shooting of a “Solidarity” journalist, as well as repression and falsification of evidence against democratic opposition activists. These were Mazguła's accusations against Jankowski. Mazguła urged policewomen and policemen to serve Poland, not politics, and to use force against those breaking the law. He added that since Jankowski informed institutions of his position, he also conveyed his opinion to them. #PrawdąWOczy #WPoczuciuOdpowiedzialności #TarczaWolnościSłowa #BronimyKonstytucji #ŻołnierzGorszegoSortu #PrawaCzłowieka #WolnośćSłowa #ŚwieckośćPaństwa #PrawaKobiet #WojskoPolskie #Policja #Praworządność #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)

Mateusz Morawiecki wrote that RozwojPlus revealed that Berek does not meet the requirements to become a judge of the Constitutional Tribunal. He accused part of the right-wing that instead of holding Donald Tusk accountable, they attack those who he claimed expose his lawlessness. He added that his side focuses on action, while others limit themselves to shouting. #praworządność #sędziowie #polityka (translated)

The author of the post wrote that Judge Berek took an oath in the morning, and Poland still stood, while the Constitution was doing well. Addressing Czarnek, he stated that the announced end of the world did not happen, but the lawlessness that he attributed to his environment was coming to an end. #Polska #Konstytucja #sprawiedliwość #PL (translated)

Marcin Edo criticized Tusk's government and wrote that for three years, observing what he described as lawlessness and degradation had aroused in him a strong disgust. He asked how one could still support such actions, using an offensive term towards their supporters. https://t.co/KIaP4Z4GLM #polityka #bezprawie #Tusk (translated)

Przemysław Szubartowicz wrote that political forces, which he believes have been destroying this institution for a decade, are taking action to defend the Constitutional Tribunal against what he called alleged lawlessness. He regarded this as a manifestation of hypocrisy. He added that although the current authority has legal grounds, it will not ultimately rectify the situation. https://t.co/6cGLJulwuM #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #prawo #polityka (translated)

Mesuret wrote that after turning on Polish television, she had the impression that some state organs still did not accept the constitutional division of power, and some attributed to the president the powers of a Roman emperor. She also criticized PiS, accusing it of placing lawlessness on its banners, after which she turned off the television. #Polska #konstytucja #polityka (translated)

The author of the post questioned Duda about what specific actions and legal grounds justified his accusation of attempting to forcefully take control of the Constitutional Tribunal. He also asked whether the call for mobilization of members of the NSZZ "Solidarity" was meant to defend the competencies of the Sejm, the new judges, or the current personal arrangement in the Tribunal. He recalled that Article 1 of the law on trade unions defines the role of unions as representing and defending the rights and professional and social interests of employees. He emphasized that he did not question Duda's right to speak on constitutional matters or to organize peaceful demonstrations, but asked why he involved union structures in defending the current leadership of the Tribunal. Referring to the squabbles before the Tribunal, the author of the post asked whether Duda assessed the risk of escalation and anticipated security measures before the call for mobilization. He cited Article 57 of the Constitution and the obligations of organizers and leaders of assemblies arising from the law on assemblies. He asked whether Duda could guarantee that participants would not block entrances to institutions or hinder the legal actions of officials. The author stressed that merely declaring peaceful intentions, in his opinion, does not ensure safety, and asked whether Duda informed participants about the risk of confrontation. He also pointed out that "Solidarity" should not be, as he put it, the political backing of any party, and finally asked whether Duda would personally take responsibility for organizing the assembly and ensuring the safety of its participants. #TrybunałKonstytucyjny #Solidarność #PrawaCzłowieka (translated)