Search

We have just filed a criminal review action in favor of President Jair Bolsonaro in the Supreme Federal Court, in light of the occurrence and confirmation of new facts, capable of overturning the absurd conviction, which was decided by a majority of votes, in the 1st Chamber. The main grounds supporting the request stem from: (i) the presentation of new evidence that benefits the requester, embodied in a Technical Opinion that identifies several breaks in the chain of custody of digital evidence (related to seized electronic devices); (ii) the contrariness to the norms that ensure the accusatory structure and the effective exercise of defense, appropriately pointed out during AP 2668 and now examined in light of the statements of the Rapporteur himself in the session of September 15, 2026, regarding PET 16.662/DF. It is important to note that, beyond the expected failures in the chain of custody of electronic media, the positions declared by Minister Alexandre de Moraes during the unusual judgment session of PET 1662/DF ("Master case"), held on the 15th, showed an absolute relationship of contrariety with what was decided in the criminal action that convicted President Bolsonaro. In few words: identical situations with totally different positions. The relationship of contrariety was evident in the issues concerning the possibility of the judge acting in the investigations during the inquiry phase, which the aforementioned Minister publicly and recurrently did, and, a few months later, now claims to be illegal in the "Master case." The same state of affairs is observed in relation to the granting of a reasonable time to analyze the collection of seized evidence, which was also repeatedly denied to us (even in the face of 70 terabytes presented serodiariamente), and, conversely, has now been alleged by the same Minister regarding the media of the former banker’s cell phone. Due process and legal certainty are (or should be) conjoined twins, so that it is not acceptable to have different decisions in the face of identical situations and arguments, under penalty of encountering the odious jurisprudence of the moment. (translated)

This decision by Minister André Mendonça, as presented, carries a serious and concerning dimension of prior censorship. When not only the removal of a specific publication is determined, but also the preemptive blocking of future content, supposedly "equivalent," it opens the door to preemptively preventing the circulation of criticisms, denunciations, comments, and political debates. In a democracy, especially during an election period, we cannot accept that platforms receive a sort of license to silence, in advance, anything that may displease a candidacy or a political group. Even more serious is that many of the facts treated as "disinformation" are part of the public debate and are notorious, documented, widely discussed by the press, and known by society. One cannot label as fake news that which is a public fact, political criticism, collective memory, or a legitimate question about the statements, alliances, positions, and conduct of public agents. The Electoral Justice must combat deliberate lies, but it cannot become an instrument of political shielding, erasure of facts, or intimidation of those exercising the constitutional right to inform, criticize, and express themselves. It is a scandal that, once again, in the final stretch of the electoral process, attempts are made to restrict public debate through broad and potentially silencing decisions. Freedom of expression does not only exist for comfortable or favorable speeches to the powerful: it exists, above all, to protect criticism, divergence, and the circulation of information of collective interest. We are already mobilized and preparing representations in defense of people who are being targeted by this type of measure. (translated)

CONGRATULATIONS Those who follow me know how critical I have been of various sports decisions at Vasco during Pedrinho's management. Still, I have never been disloyal and attacked him personally. Always for the work in football. Besides that, Pedrinho is positioning himself to be in the Top 3 of the presidents in Vasco's history! (translated)

🚨 NEW FACTS ABOUT ALCOLUMBRE AND VORCARO. I have already filed a complaint against Davi Alcolumbre with the Ethics Council and have already defended his removal from the Presidency of the Senate. The complaint, PCE 17/2026, is formally in process. Now, in light of the new messages attributed to Alcolumbre and Daniel Vorcaro revealed by Veja, I will request a complete survey of ALL decisions of the Presidency of the Senate related to Banco Master. CPIs and CPMIs. Requests for information. Visitor records. Official letters. Dispatches. Denials. Decisions. I WANT THE ENTIRE TIMELINE. Date by date. Act by act. Foundation by foundation. The new messages need to be confronted with each institutional decision made about Banco Master. EXPLANATION IS NOT ENOUGH. NOW I WANT DOCUMENTS. (translated)

From the article: "Minister André Mendonça (STF) revealed that federal police responsible for the investigation into Fábio Luís Lula da Silva, Lulinha, fear that the leadership of the Federal Police (PF) will end the operation that investigates the scandal of improper discounts on retirements and pensions from INSS. In a document sent to the president of the Court, Edson Fachin, the magistrate reported internal tensions within the corporation following a change in the command of the investigations. According to Mendonça, the friction began after the Federal Police's Director-General, Andrei Rodrigues, transferred the investigation on Lulinha to the General Coordination Core for the Suppression of Corruption. In the document, the minister cited reports from four investigators who stated they face frequent questioning about decisions made within the inquiry. Among the points mentioned are the selection of targets for precautionary measures and the definition of actions to be requested from the judiciary. Mendonça highlighted that the tensions occurred within the Federal Police itself and were not provoked by him, who is the rapporteur for the investigations into the INSS scandal in the Supreme Court. Andrei Rodrigues was head of Lula's security and assumed the position of General Director of the Federal Police in 2023, after the election of the leftist to the Presidency of the Republic. He denies any wrongdoing." (translated)

In my opinion, after this news, the signs of a possible "OPERATION TAPETÃO" become increasingly concerning. My fear is that, in the event of a possible victory for Flávio, judicial decisions may arise that could interfere with the result or even his inauguration. The scenario, for me, deserves maximum attention. Are they preparing a coup? And there's an important point: any decision made by the "Brazilian authorities" will also be subject to scrutiny and international repercussions, including in the United States. (translated)

When God is our security There are moments when all we want is a guarantee. Someone by our side. An open door. Enough money. A ready answer. Something that makes us feel that nothing can go wrong. Ezra could have sought that security too. He could have asked for soldiers, horses, and protection for the journey. But there was something greater within him: the certainty that God did not need an army to guard those who trusted Him. This does not mean that we should reject help, resources, or people. God often uses all of this to take care of us. The danger begins when the resource takes the place of our trust. When our peace depends on who promised to help, the money we have, the answer we are waiting for, or the door that needs to open. God sometimes allows some securities to disappear just to remind us where our true security always came from. Maybe today you are facing a road that you cannot see fully. Maybe there are decisions, worries, or situations that you would like to control. And perhaps God is silently telling you: “You do not need to know everything that will happen. You just need to know who is going with you.” God’s hand continues to rest on those who seek Him. When answers are lacking, He remains God. When someone says no, He continues to open paths. When your resources seem small, His resources remain infinite. And when you see no protection around you, it does not mean you are alone. There are battles in which God gives us people to help. There are others in which He lets us realize that only His arm sustained us. In both situations, the glory still belongs to Him. So, before you desperately run after someone, run to God. Before you give your heart to fear, give your worries to Him. Do what is within your reach, wisely use the resources that God puts in your hands, but do not place your hope in them. Perhaps the greatest peace you can feel today comes from this truth: You may not have all the guarantees you would like, but you have the presence of God. And those who walk under the good hand of God never walk alone. Lord, teach me to use what you have placed in my hands without turning resources into idols. When I feel afraid of tomorrow, remind me that Your hand is still upon me. May my trust not be in people, money, or circumstances, but in You. Guard my paths and give me courage to follow, even when I cannot see everything ahead. In the name of Jesus, Amen. I am Júlio Schneider. If this prayer has blessed your heart, share it with someone you love. Perhaps it will be exactly the word that person needed to hear today. Think about it... while God blesses you! 🙏 Want to pray this prayer with me? I will soon share the link to the Prayer on YouTube, stay tuned. (translated)

The press reports as if it’s nothing the FACT that they CHOSE Dino and Gilmar Mendes to make decisions contrary to @FlavioBolsonaro's campaign and to reinforce Lula. They still exert pressure to remove Mendonça from the TSE. When will they understand that this is the real coup? (translated)

The Attorney General of the State of Santa Catarina enters the dispute over the Maracanã! Phelipe Monteiro Mastra Fontoura, attorney, acting on his own behalf and as a citizen, filed a representation to the Public Prosecutor's Office of the State of Rio de Janeiro dated September 19, 2026. The representation is directed against the Clube de Regatas do Flamengo, Fluminense Football Club, the State of Rio de Janeiro — through the State Civil House — and Fla-Flu Serviços S.A., the concessionaire of the Maracanã Complex. The author also requests that Vasco da Gama SAF and Club de Regatas Vasco da Gama be notified as interested parties in the proceedings. The central point is the allegation that the Maracanã, although a state public asset, is being managed in a way that favors Flamengo and Fluminense, despite the concession contract prohibiting exclusive use and discriminatory treatment or lack of technical criteria for other clubs. The representation argues that refusals to Vasco have primarily been justified by the need to preserve the pitch. The document cites incidents from 2022, 2023, and 2026. In three previous situations — Vasco x Sport, Vasco x Palmeiras, and Vasco x Atlético-MG — judicial decisions authorized the use of the stadium and questioned the justifications presented to prevent the matches. In August 2026, another refusal for Vasco x Vitória, for the Copa do Brasil, was issued this time referencing "technical windows" for pitch recovery and an NFL game. The representation also questions the consistency of the criteria related to the pitch. According to the arguments and documents cited by the author, Flamengo and Fluminense conducted intense sequences of matches at the stadium, even with reduced intervals. The text maintains that the calendar would be filled by the managers themselves and that, subsequently, the saturation of the pitch would be used to justify the impossibility of hosting third-party games. Another point is the Memorandum of Understanding signed between Flamengo, Fluminense, and Vasco, which provided for four annual home games for Vasco in 2025 and 2026, in addition to the classics, establishing that any refusal should be based on technical and operational criteria. The representation mentions a decision by the Court of Justice according to which the attempt to eliminate the effects of this understanding could constitute contradictory behavior contrary to good faith. The author also requests an investigation into possible conflicts of interest in the concession's oversight, citing professional ties described in the document between people linked to state oversight, the concessionaire, and Flamengo. It is important to highlight that the representation itself expressly states that it does not accuse these individuals of wrongdoing but requests that the circumstances be investigated. What is requested from the Public Prosecutor's Office? Phelipe Fontoura requests, among other measures, that the MP recommend the creation and publication of objective and uniform criteria for the use of the Maracanã, including a minimum interval between games, a monthly limit on matches, reports signed by identified professionals with ART, and written justifications for possible refusals. He also requests a sanctioning process regarding the refusals of 2026 and, if the situation persists, eventual civil action to prevent refusals without independent technical reports and written justifications. The Attorney General of the State of Santa Catarina also requests the opening of a civil inquiry, obtaining calendars, requests for the use of the stadium, reports, maintenance schedules, reports from the Independent Verifier, and documents related to the fine imposed on the concessionaire. He also requires an investigation into possible conflicts of interest and the involvement of Vasco to provide documents related to the refusals received since 2022. This document is not a lawsuit filed by Vasco. It is a representation made by citizen and attorney Phelipe Monteiro Mastra Fontoura to the Public Prosecutor's Office. (translated)

📝 President Lula's speech at the UN General Assembly This is the tenth occasion I am opening the General Debate of this Assembly. Since I first occupied this podium in 2003, this is the most critical moment for the United Nations. The feeling that moves me today is one of indignation. The UN is failing in one of its highest missions: to rid humanity of the scourge of war. Its credibility has never been so low. Its capacity to protect the most vulnerable - those who have no army or arsenals - has never been so small. We are all hostages to the paralysis of a Security Council that does not fulfill its role. In 1946, already in the first session of this Assembly, Brazil warned of the high price that the international community would pay for the veto power. This original vice of the UN Charter granted great powers the privilege of folly. To this original sin now adds a profound crisis of leadership. The year 2025 recorded the highest number of armed conflicts since World War II. Trillions of dollars finance a new arms race. Geopolitical tensions threaten to turn regional confrontations into a conflagration of global proportions. Those who hold the reins of crucial decisions must act with responsibility and a sense of urgency. Leaders of the countries that comprise the Security Council need to come together. I do not ignore the realities of power. But concessions to the law of the strongest have crossed the limits. This is not idealism. It is the purest realism. War is not the continuation of politics by other means. It is the total bankruptcy of politics. In an interdependent world, to lead is to reconcile the interests of the homeland with those of humanity. This is the realization of someone who represents a nation that loves peace and freedom. Someone who fought against a military dictatorship and defended their country against a coup d'état. It is the conviction of a worker elected three times president who took Brazil off the Hunger Map. This Assembly has recently corrected historical distortions. It recognized the trafficking of enslaved Africans as the gravest crime against humanity. It approved the most accurate representation of the world map. Now it must focus on key issues for the future of humanity. We are called to choose between multilateralism or unilateralism. Democracy or extremism. Sovereignty or subordination. These choices require courage, political will, and clarity of objectives. That is what is expected of a statesman. 📸 @ricardostuckert (translated)

🚨 Now! Santos is advancing in talks with Cruzeiro to keep Gabigol until 2027, but the future still depends on the striker. Alexandre Mattos, the football director of Peixe, has made progress in recent hours in discussions with Pedrinho, the owner of SAF da Raposa. The alignment is for a new loan, with Santos paying a larger share of the salary. The main question is whether the number 9 really wants to stay in Vila Belmiro. The striker has given positive signals, but has not yet fully defined his plans for 2027. Gabi's staff understands that a lot can happen and that the main decisions will still be made. A move out of Brazil is not ruled out. There are inquiries from Europe and other markets. On loan from Cruzeiro until the end of 2026, Gabigol has 21 goals and 10 assists in 42 games this year. (translated)

Completely against this. We will continue to lose our great prospects at 18 years old, the Brasileirão will technically weaken (and as a product) and our real problem of failed player development will not be solved. Blaming this on foreigners is like putting a band-aid on a problem and closing our eyes to our work in grassroots development. Where is our number 9, our number 10, our midfielder who controls everything, and our wingers who are not just physical and make three hundred wrong decisions? Are we really developing these guys, and are we missing opportunities for them because of athletes from other countries? No way. Meanwhile, countries with foreigners in the league are winning the World Cup and developing grassroots talents. Regression. (translated)

🚨* Urgente: Deputados da União Europeia pedem análise de sanções contra autoridades brasileiras* Deputados da União Europeia enviaram hoje uma carta à Alta Representante da UE, @kajakallas, denunciando a crise do Estado de Direito no Brasil, a politização do Judiciário e as graves alegações de corrupção que envolvem o Supremo Tribunal Federal. Os signatários são @FidanzaCarlo, @AdamBielan e @Kaminski_M_. A carta aponta o ministro Alexandre de Moraes, os contatos com Daniel Vorcaro no escândalo do Banco Master, o contrato de R$ 130 milhões com o escritório da mulher do ministro e o papel central de Moraes na condenação de Jair Bolsonaro. Os eurodeputados mencionam expressamente as sanções americanas impostas pela Lei Magnitsky e pedem que a União Europeia estude medidas semelhantes. Não são só os Estados Unidos. O mundo civilizado está chocado com o grau de corrupção e de disfuncionalidade institucional do Brasil. Na carta, eles cobram três medidas concretas. Primeiro, uma avaliação urgente das acusações contra Alexandre de Moraes e da conduta do STF em processos politicamente sensíveis, inclusive possíveis violações da liberdade de expressão, do devido processo legal e do pluralismo político. Segundo, um exame sobre se a conduta documentada de Moraes, inclusive os fundamentos usados pelos Estados Unidos nas sanções Magnitsky, justifica sanções europeias contra os responsáveis. Terceiro, monitoramento independente e rigoroso de todo o processo eleitoral de 4 de outubro — não só da votação e da apuração, mas também da censura, do tratamento dos candidatos, das decisões judiciais e da imparcialidade das autoridades. #Brasil #UE #Corrupção

Segundo, pedimos um exame sobre se a conduta documentada atribuída ao ministro de Moraes, incluindo os fundamentos citados pelos Estados Unidos ao impor as sanções da Lei Magnitsky Global, deve justificar medidas restritivas no âmbito do respectivo regime europeu de sanções por violações de direitos humanos. Caso provas credíveis estabeleçam responsabilidade por violações ou abusos graves de direitos humanos abrangidos por esse regime, a União deve estar preparada para impor medidas seletivas contra os indivíduos responsáveis. Terceiro, tendo em vista o primeiro turno da eleição presidencial em 4 de outubro de 2026, pedimos um monitoramento particularmente rigoroso e independente de todo o processo eleitoral, a fim de garantir a sua integridade e salvaguardar a credibilidade das eleições. A União Europeia deve utilizar todos os instrumentos diplomáticos e de observação eleitoral adequados de que dispõe para verificar se as eleições são realizadas de forma livre, justa e transparente e se os resultados oficialmente anunciados refletem com precisão os votos depositados pelos cidadãos brasileiros. Esse escrutínio deve abranger não apenas a votação e a apuração, mas todo o ambiente eleitoral, incluindo o tratamento dos candidatos, o acesso aos meios de comunicação, restrições ao discurso político, censura ou remoção de conteúdo político, decisões judiciais que afetem candidatos e campanhas, o funcionamento dos sistemas de votação e de totalização, a publicação e a verificação dos resultados, e a existência de procedimentos efetivos para impugnar alegadas irregularidades. Dada a extraordinária influência política exercida pelo STF nos últimos anos, deve ser dada particular atenção à questão de saber se as autoridades judiciais e eleitorais atuam com imparcialidade e se abstêm de medidas que possam favorecer ou prejudicar indevidamente qualquer candidato presidencial. A União Europeia não pode defender de forma credível a democracia, os direitos humanos e o Estado de Direito no plano internacional enquanto permanecer em silêncio quando graves violações ocorrem numa das instituições judiciais mais poderosas de um país parceiro crucial. Por isso, instamos Vossa Excelência a assegurar que a União Europeia trate a situação no Brasil com a seriedade que ela exige, monitore de perto a condução da próxima eleição presidencial, avalie as alegações relativas ao ministro Alexandre de Moraes e ao STF, e esteja pronta a adotar medidas apropriadas quando provas credíveis estabelecerem violações graves de direitos fundamentais. Pedimos ainda que Vossa Excelência preste contas ao Parlamento Europeu e aos abaixo-assinados sobre essas questões, incluindo qualquer ação adotada ou prevista. Nesse sentido, apreciaríamos uma resposta descrevendo as medidas concretas que o SEAE pretende tomar antes da próxima eleição presidencial no Brasil. Atenciosamente, Adam Bielan, eurodeputado Carlo Fidanza, eurodeputado Mariusz Kamiński, eurodeputado Bruxelas, 21 de setembro de 2026 #DireitosHumanos #Eleições2026 #UniãoEuropeia

Como o Galo está sendo gerido para ser competitivo e sustentável? Nosso CEO, Pedro Daniel, foi ao CNN Esportes S/A, da @EsportesCNN, e explicou o Galo 2030, planejamento que guia as decisões do Clube. Alguns destaques: ⚙️ Mudanças no modelo de negócios ⚽ Mais investimento em infraestrutura e nas categorias de base 📈 Desenvolvimento individual dos atletas 🤝 Compromisso financeiro com os credores 🗣️ Como a escuta da Massa influencia as decisões do Clube 📺 Entrevista completa no canal da CNN Esportes no YouTube! #Galo2030 #Esporte #GestãoEsportiva

O Senado precisa ser independente e exercer todos os poderes e responsabilidades que a Constituição lhe dá. Quero representar Santa Catarina com firmeza, fiscalizar, cobrar e participar das decisões que vão impactar o futuro do nosso estado e do Brasil. Carlos Bolsonaro - Senador 222 #Senado #SantaCatarina #Brasil

Reparação histórica é oscambau‼️ O editorial é um ataque direto à tentativa do PT de reconstruir a memória pública dos grandes escândalos que marcaram o partido. O editor afirma que LuIa tenta transformar Dirceu em símbolo de “reparação histórica”, como se sua eventual eleição fosse uma correção moral de injustiças, quando, na verdade, Dirceu foi CONDENADO no Mensalão e na Lava Jato, com provas, delações e decisões confirmadas em várias instâncias. Ao recontar o passado, o PT tenta limpar sua biografia política e transformar derrotas jurídicas em vitórias simbólicas. O editor rejeita essa operação e afirma que o país não deve aceitar essa versão conveniente da história. #ReparaçãoHistórica #PT #HistóriaPolítica

Um dos anos mais difíceis na história da paiN no LoL se encerra de uma forma distante da nossa história dentro do CBLOL. Ao longo dos splits, passamos por diferentes mudanças e, apesar de momentos em que mostramos evolução, não conseguimos transformar isso em uma campanha consistente e chegar onde queríamos. Agora é hora de olhar para tudo que aconteceu, repensar no projeto levando as boas decisões com a gente e trabalhar ainda mais para 2027. Voltaremos com mais vontade, mais garra e a certeza de que essa história ainda tem muito para ser escrita. E, em cada passo dessa caminhada, contamos com vocês. #GOpaiN #CBLOL #LoL #paiN