Marek accused TVP Info of disseminating false information. He wrote that Joanna Mąkosa reported on the confrontation with an attacker armed with a knife and the injury of a policewoman, but — according to him — the recordings from the police and witnesses did not confirm the attack, and the knife was found only after the arrest. https://t.co/se501h4eAO #FakeNews #Media #Prawda (translated)
Waldemar wrote about Piotr Wichert, whom he described as an activist and delegate of PiS, as well as an acquaintance from Arciszewska's district. He described the right-wing narrative, according to which Wichert was severely beaten by the police. As he pointed out, he was allegedly fleeing from being identified, pushed away an officer, who hit her head against a glass door, and had a knife with him. Waldemar added that recordings from body cameras were presented as a manipulation by Donald Tusk's government. The author wrote that Jarosław Kaczyński intervened at the police station, media in the Republic declared Wichert a victim, and representatives of PiS considered the matter persecution. He also criticized what he described as the leniency of the justice system towards politicians from that party. The post ended with the signature of Jacek Fogiel. #Polska #PiS #Sprawiedliwość (translated)
Piotr Kusznieruk wrote that the revealed recordings raised questions about the reason for the police check on the man who was, as he suggested, connected to the protest. According to his reconstruction, the officers followed the man for several dozen meters, demanded his personal information without providing a specific reason for the check, and then incapacitated him inside the building. Kusznieruk noted that the man pushed the officers away and fled inside, but he believed that this did not explain the earlier decision to conduct a check. The author claimed that the man lost consciousness during the intervention, and the knife found with him was not presented as having been used. He also questioned the proportionality of the force used and whether the man deliberately attacked the policewoman when the window broke. Furthermore, he described that several hours later, the detained man was informed that he could meet with lawyer Magdalena Leszczyńska if he provided his details. According to Kusznieruk, the man did not know the lawyer and did not want to see her, while the police considered this a refusal to contact a defense attorney. Kusznieruk also criticized the statement by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who — as he wrote — linked the matter to President Nawrocki. He asked whether the police acted on the orders of superiors, collected data on demonstration participants, and previously observed the man. He directed questions to the Polish Police and the Ministry of Interior and Administration regarding who ordered the identification of Piotr and on what basis. He warned that if the identification of protesters occurred without legal grounds, it could mean using the state apparatus to control citizens. #Polska #Policja #protesty (translated)
The author of the post claimed that the police violated procedures by detaining Piotr without grounds and without giving him a reason. He added that the recordings had been hidden for a long time so that the public would not see the officers' neglect or how severely they beat Piotr. #OddajciePiotra https://t.co/pvIWXutYMS #Polska #Policja #Sprawiedliwość #PL (translated)
Max Hübner accused PAP of previously portraying Piotr as an attacker with a knife and the policewoman who beat him as injured. He claimed that the recordings showed that the policewoman was not harmed and that the accounts were inconsistent. He added that PAP relied on a post by Donald Tusk. https://t.co/VuLL9VenLT #polityka #media #społeczeństwo (translated)
Sebastian Kaleta called the publication of the recording another disgrace and wondered why it was released only after more than a day. He claimed that the material undermines previous reports of an alleged attack on the officer and shows an unjustified attempt to identify a citizen. According to Kaleta, the officer did not provide a reason for taking action, which allegedly violated internal procedures. Citing established case law from the Supreme Court, he called for an investigation into the suspicion of exceeding authority — if the identification occurred without reason or for the unlawful purpose of establishing a list of assembly participants. Kaleta wrote that the man was alone and had no witnesses. He also claimed that the protesters outside the Constitutional Tribunal felt besieged by the police and feared the creation of a list of participants, for which, as he emphasized, the police had no right. He admitted that the man quickly moved to the office so that further actions took place in the presence of witnesses. He assessed that the police directed at the Constitutional Tribunal did not have the trust of the protesters. #Polska #protesty #policja (translated)
Jacek Ozdoba stated that the recordings published by the police revealed, in his opinion, numerous irregularities during Piotr's arrest. He questioned why the officers did not provide a specific reason for requesting documents and emphasized the knife issue, although — according to the account presented — Piotr did not use it. Ozdoba demanded clarification on whether the policewoman sustained injuries and what evidence exists for that. He assessed that the recordings undermined information regarding her health status. He also pointed to allegations concerning actions taken after the arrest, which — as he wrote — could indicate the possibility of a crime being committed. He also questioned the conditioning of contact with a lawyer on providing personal data, reminding about the arrested person's right to contact a defender as stipulated in Article 245 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He asked whether he was allowed to notify a close person, whether the measures applied were necessary and proportional, and whether he was provided with adequate medical assistance. According to a statement by Piotr W., which Ozdoba referred to, comprehensive medical examinations were not conducted. Ozdoba also raised concerns regarding the legal grounds for the arrest and pointed to the possibility of judicial review based on Article 246 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In his opinion, the actions of the officers should also be assessed in light of Article 231 of the Penal Code. He wrote that a uniform does not exempt one from responsibility, and an arrest does not strip a person of their rights. He added that the course of actions and communication by the police, which he assessed presented many facts in a way inconsistent with reality, raised justified concerns of provocation. #Polska #Policja #Prawo (translated)
The author of the post claimed that the officers needed a day to prepare and edit the recordings, which — in his opinion — provided evidence of violations of procedures and civil rights. He added that the recordings ultimately undermined the government propaganda about the alleged knife attack. #prawaobywatelskie #propaganda #media #PL (translated)
Piotr Kusznieruk reached out to Prime Minister Donald Tusk, Minister Marcin Kierwiński, and the Chief Police Commander with a question about the responsibility for the treatment of the detained Piotr W. He referred to a statement from the detainee, in which he described a lack of contact with his wife and designated defenders, the non-receipt of a copy of the detention protocol, as well as head injuries, dizziness, pain, and bruised wrists. He also accused the authorities of failing to provide appropriate medical diagnostics. Kusznieruk inquired about recordings from body cameras and the complete medical documentation, as well as why the detainee was cut off from his family and defenders. He called for an explanation of the allegations, and in case even part of them is confirmed, for immediate oversight actions and consequences for those responsible. He indicated that Tusk bears political responsibility for the government's actions, Kierwiński for supervising the Police, and the Chief Commander for the functioning of the subordinate formation. He emphasized that the Police should adhere to the law, and the responsibility for overseeing the services should not be limited to press conferences. #PrawaCzłowieka #Polska #Policja (translated)
Max Hübner turned to the Capital Police Headquarters with questions about where the policewoman was injured, why the officers wanted to check the man's identity, why they did not provide the entire recording, and why they were chasing him. He also asked about the reason for the intervention, which he described as extremely unjustified, and assessed that the police had very much compromised themselves. #policja #interwencja #zdrowie (translated)
Magdalena Prządka-Leszczyńska criticized the recording published by the Capital City Police Headquarters. She wrote that the officer did not inform the detainee that his wife had also appointed Bartosz Malewski and Jerzy Kwaśniewski as defenders. According to her, the detainee said he was unaware of these defenders or that he could trust them. The author added that the day before, the officer visible in the recording assured her that he had no direct contact with the detainee and was only relaying information from his superiors. He was also said to have stated that he could not provide the recording. Prządka-Leszczyńska noted that this statement was recorded by Republic TV. #Policja #Prawo #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)
Joanna Pinkwart questioned the descriptions of yesterday's incident involving a policewoman and a detained man. She wrote that publicly available recordings did not confirm the information about an attack on the officer, who was said to have fallen and broken a window. According to Pinkwart, the man had a pocket knife, not a knife, but the recordings did not show him taking it out or threatening with it. She claimed that the window was broken by a kick when several police officers were pinning the man to the ground, and the paramedics were examining the detainee, not the policewoman. She added that in the recording, the officer mentioned the arrest for insulting an officer. Pinkwart emphasized that the recordings did not show the beginning of the event, so it was unclear whether the man had acted aggressively earlier, attacked the police, or pulled out the pocket knife. She demanded the release of footage from police cameras that would confirm at least part of the official version. Until then, she referred to it as "Radio Erevan." #Polska #Policja #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)
Max Hübner wrote that Donald Tusk, his allies, whom he referred to derogatorily, and media associated with the Third Republic were supposed to portray Piotr, who was beaten by the police according to the author, as a criminal, a knife-wielder, and an attacker, while the policewoman with no injuries was presented as injured. He added that they did not publish the recording of the policewoman before the intervention. https://t.co/f6U04jkh8w #prawda #Polska #policja (translated)
Mariusz Kozłowski wrote that files of operational cases are disappearing from an important department of the Police. He wondered what would happen to the recordings from the body cameras of the officers who — he claimed — had unlawfully detained Piotr since the previous day. He considered this situation a reflection of the condition of the Police. https://t.co/oz7mQlqrKR #Polska #Policja #sprawiedliwość (translated)
Tomasz wrote that in his opinion the recipients of the post lied, even though — as he claimed — there were witnesses and video recordings. He compared them to ZOMO and accused them of complete loss of dignity. #prawda #godność #świadkowie (translated)
Paweł Sokala wrote that he did not know exactly what happened before the recording started. However, he claimed that the glass only broke after the man was pinned to the ground, contrary to the entry of a person he defined as a pro-government patostreamer. He added that there was no other broken glass visible in the recording. https://t.co/KWpyMr0oaZ #patostreamerzy #Polska #media (translated)
Wiktor wrote that he had not been following the case closely and asked whether the recordings from the police body cameras had been published yet. He referred to materials that, as he pointed out, showed a beaten man who appeared to be hitting and choking himself. He noted that few people had demanded the release of the recordings, although in his opinion they would be the most important document regarding the incident. #Polska #sprawiedliwość #bezpieczeństwo (translated)
Tomasz Lipiński described the state of knowledge at 8:00 AM as "verified facts." He wrote that a man was calmly walking away from the officers who were monitoring him due to suspicious behavior. According to Lipiński, 300 meters from the TK, the man entered the premises of his association and attacked a female officer. He had a closed knife in his pocket. Lipiński also wrote that the man, lying on the ground and losing consciousness, hit the female officer's head against the glass door, which broke, and then lost consciousness himself. The officers were supposed to put handcuffs on him, and after he regained consciousness, transport him to the police station. There, he was said to have refused to meet with a lawyer and probably ate the recordings from the officers' cameras. The author also claimed that the man convinced the duty officer to turn off the lights and pretended that the police station was closed. An update was promised. #Fakty #Wydarzenia #Bezpieczeństwo (translated)
Tomasz Lipiński wrote to Dominika Wielowieyska that the recordings from the police cameras were supposed to confirm the described events, and then asked if that was indeed the case. He added that it would be "shameful" if it turned out that Kacprzyk treated her at the Southern Hospital. #polska #policja #sprawiedliwość (translated)
