Search

Sture Fjäder wrote that Finland should move to a stricter social security system for immigrants and limit social security only to Finnish citizens. According to him, benefits should also be tightened for citizens. Fjäder estimated that the removal or tightening of social security for immigrants would at least end immigration based on social security and dealings with Kela for the purpose he described. #maahanmuutto https://t.co/uEElXGJt1e #maahanmuutto #sosiaaliturva #Suomi (translated)

Miko Bergbom wrote that the Green youth hoped for "free money" for immigrants and reminded that, according to him, this was taxpayer money. He stated that Finland could not afford the current situation and demanded a swift transition to a citizenship-based social security system. According to Bergbom, the welfare state was at risk if this was not done, as the money, in his view, was running out. Bergbom claimed that the share of immigrants in certain social benefits clearly exceeded their share of the population. He said that in the capital region, their share of the total amount of social assistance was already about 50 percent. He stated that this situation should raise concerns, but he opposed new unconditional benefits for immigrants proposed by the left. #maahanmuutto #sosiaaliturva #verotus (translated)

According to the author, the livelihood of labor migrants without social security can currently be ensured only by sufficiently high income thresholds. He considered citizenship-based social security to be the best way to address this issue as well. #maahanmuutto #sosiaaliturva #työmarkkinat (translated)

A-J Hirsimäki wrote that the publication has gathered 28,000 views and 39 likes, describing the comment section as being filled with diamonds. According to him, Minister of Social Affairs Partanen, Prime Minister Orpo, and Representative Kauma were the best contributions of the National Coalition Party to the Finns Party's election campaign. Hirsimäki hoped that the same energy would last until spring. #politiikka #vaalit #Kokoomus (translated)

The parliamentary group claimed that Finland's social security system attracts people from various parts of the world to move to Finland for social security rather than for work. The group stated that the long-term goal of the Finns Party is to change social security to be based on citizenship. https://t.co/qjgBJDFOvd #sosiaaliturva #kansalaisuus #perussuomalaiset (translated)

Jari Mäkäräinen criticized Sanna Ukkola's writing about the Prime Minister's meeting with Imam Sharmarke Said Aw-Mussen. According to Mäkäräinen, Ukkola regarded the meeting as ordinary work and believed that the imam, who was born in Turku, was being asked impossible questions regarding Sharia. Mäkäräinen argued that asking the imam was not a misunderstanding: in his view, the imam left open whether Sharia would be applied in Finland in family or criminal law matters. Mäkäräinen wrote that, according to him, freedom of religion did not justify the establishment of a parallel legal system alongside Finnish laws. He claimed that in Muslim-majority countries, freedom of religion, women's equality, and individual rights were not realized in liberal democracies due to Islamic doctrine and Sharia. He cited Lebanon as an example, where he believed the growth of the Muslim population and political organization undermined previous balance and led to civil war. In France, Sweden, Belgium, and Britain, he mentioned the visibility of parallel societies, honor-based violence, segregation of areas and schools, and pressure to accept practices related to Sharia. In Finland in the 2000s, Mäkäräinen claimed that groups with a Muslim background who had immigrated were connected to the overrepresentation of sexual offenses, unemployment, use of social security, and demands for their own rules. He believed that distinguishing criticism of Islam from calls for deportation did not make questions about Sharia suspect. According to Mäkäräinen, the primacy of the Finnish Constitution and criminal law should be clear in all matters, and Finland did not need to repeat the experiences of countries where the application of Sharia had been tried. https://t.co/bGpZ7VaTux #uskonnonvapaus #integratio #muslimit (translated)

Jari Mäkäräinen criticized an article in Helsingin Sanomat and said he had made corrections to it. According to him, the nonfiction writer Ari Haasio and Mattila had suggested that Finnish identity was ambiguous, compared the mistrust faced by evacuees from Karelia to current fears directed at Muslims, and stated that everyone was a descendant of immigrants. Mäkäräinen wrote that migration was an old phenomenon, but migrations from different times could not be equated. He noted that the first people arrived in what is now Finland about 11,000 years ago and believed that this did not provide a basis for equating the current migration from Afghanistan or Somalia with the arrivals of earlier traders, craftsmen, or industrial founders. He described Finlayson as an actor that built factories in capital-poor Finland, brought technology, and created jobs. Mäkäräinen compared him to a Mohammed coming from Somalia, who he described as illiterate and dependent on Kela support. He believed these examples illustrated different types of migration and claimed that there were differences in education, employment, cultural distance, and criminality. He also claimed that those coming from Afghanistan were overrepresented in rape statistics. Regarding the evacuees from Karelia, Mäkäräinen wrote that they had come from within Finland, spoke Finnish, and shared key features of Finnish culture. He said they had faced mistrust and derogatory name-calling, but believed they differed from current arrivals from Afghanistan, for example, in terms of adaptation, work ethic, and use of social security. Mäkäräinen also denied the comparison made by Haasio and Mattila between 19th-century antisemitism and the Somali discussions of the 1990s. According to him, the groups were not similar, and Jews had mostly integrated well. He argued that current migrations should be evaluated based on their impacts on employment, crime, and social security. Finally, he wrote that the continuity of society required, in his opinion, the adaptation of newcomers. #maahanmuutto #suomalaisuus #kulttuuri (translated)

The parliamentary group believed that social security should be based on citizenship. The group justified its position by stating that Finland should not be responsible for the social security of the entire world. https://t.co/GRgauMCmco #sosiaaliturva #kansalaisuus #Suomi (translated)

OsakeKeisari wrote that Jari Sarasvuo assessed that Finland needed more successful companies and entrepreneurs. According to Sarasvuo, there would be no need for discussion about the funding of social security if there were enough resources for it. He believed that 10 billion euros could be cut from the public finances, among other things, from administration. https://t.co/XLNdb83OTV #eläke #yrittäjyys #sosiaaliturva (translated)

The Finns Party wrote that the party's long-term goal was to tie social security to citizenship. It stated that Finland could not act as a "global social office." #ps #perussuomalaiset #sosiaaliturva https://t.co/0yVkNnYbk4 #perussuomalaiset #sosiaaliturva #politiikka (translated)

Thunder wrote that the pension system is, in his opinion, a scam that Alex Gunsberg and Roni had already discussed. He estimated that the system would collapse sooner or later and claimed that there were no jobs for those over 50. Additionally, he claimed that brain surgeons were being brought into the country on social security, who would receive pensions without paying pension contributions. https://t.co/WtGLmYfN19 #eläke #sosiaaliturva #työmarkkinat (translated)

Jari Sarasvuo wrote that wealthier nations received, according to him, income transfers for their pensions and home renovations. He estimated that this did not affect his own standard of living, but he felt a bit sorry for the young, less fortunate, and the elderly. #tuloerot #sosiaaliturva #hyvinvointi (translated)

The Finns Party wrote that Marin's government had opened the opportunity for students from third countries and their family members to come to Finland and benefit from Finnish education and social security at the taxpayers' expense. The party stated that it had started to limit the program and said the work would continue in the next election term. According to them, the Finns Party was the only party that could continue this work. #siksiPS #perussuomalaiset #opiskelijat #maahanmuutto #opiskelijat #maahanmuutto #perussuomalaiset (translated)

Heikki Pursiainen criticized Finnish economic discussion as limited based on two recently published columns in Helsingin Sanomat. According to him, Korkman described what should not be cut and believed that adjustments were necessary but did not propose any cuts. Pursiainen claimed that Korkman also criticized the government’s policies without offering alternatives. Pursiainen wrote that he found Teittinen’s reflections good in themselves but believed they underestimated Finns' ability to impact matters. He argued that Teittinen suggested that adjustments would probably be politically impossible and that Finland's fate depended on economic conditions and Russia. Pursiainen assessed that there could be many actions: he mentioned more encouraging social security, cutting business subsidies, tuition fees, and abandoning incentives for staying home as a parent. He added that for conservatives, a smaller public sector was a goal and not a reason for lamenting, and in his view, adjustments did not threaten the foundations of the welfare state. Pursiainen indicated that economists should also present their own solutions for discussion and negotiation. #Suomi #Taloustiede #Politiikka (translated)

Sture Fjäder wrote to Jenny Kasongo that, according to him, the government had not taken anyone's own income or money, but had paid somewhat less in Kela benefits, housing support, and social assistance. He noted that the benefits are financed by taxpayers and mentioned that he had attached a picture of who receives and who pays. #kela https://t.co/Nie3wnLItV #Kela #verot #sosiaaliturva (translated)

According to the diaconal barometer, church diaconal workers report that the number of people in need of help has increased significantly due to cuts in social security, which causes financial concern and increases people's isolation. #diakoniatyö #sosiaaliturva #köyhyys (translated)

Development aid does not become more effective by simply changing the words. Developing countries do not improve by changing the words. Even in our own country, someone decided to start calling immigrants from developing countries relying on the social security system as top talents. But no, that didn't work either. Empirically verifiable facts cannot be changed by beautifying the language – although a significant part of the left's energy seems to be spent on that nowadays, playing with words. #kehitysapu #maahanmuuttajat #sosiaalisetasiat (translated)

Now think about it, people: an immigrant gets a guaranteed pension after living here for three years. Similarly, the rights of an immigrant to social security are the same as those who have lived and worked here all their lives. Finnish decision-makers are, in their ignorance, a class of their own on the whole planet. #maahanmuutto #sosiaaliturva #Suomi (translated)