The author mentioned that more good and important news had arrived during the night. He described it as a great relief and proof that people can resist authoritarian right-wing forces and stop their progression through the democratic process and elections. https://t.co/P26Ghkeh4e #demokratia #uutiset #oikeudet #FI (translated)
In the title "Ask Angela" - the expert warns that such requests for help do not solve public harassment in nightlife, as the threat of violence or harassment is usually a long-term phenomenon that does not require the use of secret codes. #turvallisuus (translated)
The author believed that pensions to be paid or earned should not be cut. He warned that freezing the index would leave pensions permanently behind the rise in prices and said that pensions should not be subjected to political whim. According to him, pensioners should be able to trust the state and the protection of property. https://t.co/g1vhIUZKfw #eläke #oikeudet #sosiaaliturva #FI (translated)
The author considered the statement an important response to the Trump administration's attacks on institutions of international law and hoped it would also prompt action from the commission. According to him, the EU should urgently use the blocking regulation to compel companies operating in Europe not to enforce sanctions. #EU #Oikeudet #Politiikka #EU (translated)
Eija Pohjansaari from PS Vantaa wrote that she was not willing to give up any of her rights to please people, whom she referred to in a derogatory manner. She considered this to be genuine feminism and said that current feminists did not think the same way. #feminismi #oikeudet #naistenvoima (translated)
The author described the actions as a shocking violent terrorism of society and said that it had nothing to do with a conventional expression of opinion. #väkivalta #terrorismi #oikeudet #FI (translated)
A basic boomer wrote that everyone had the right to a home, but according to him, the social democrat had the right to three Hitas apartments. He claimed that they were acquired at the expense of others. https://t.co/fsjP5rdIHY #koti #oikeudet #Hitas (translated)
Joakim Vigelius wrote that the Greens proposed in their recent program more services and support for the undocumented, as well as legalization for those who applied for asylum between 2015 and 2018 and are still residing illegally in Finland. He argued that those without papers or who are residing illegally in Finland should return to their home country. https://t.co/tK1GVaAkoR #maahanmuutto #turvapaikanhakijat #oikeudet (translated)
The Day's Bureaucrat questioned Western legislation, which he wrote allows immigrant groups to incite violence against the native population but restricts the native population's ability to speak negatively about immigrants. #maahanmuutto #oikeudet #yhteiskunta (translated)
The author stated that he had been out of the country for two days and claimed that in the meantime, the government partner Kokoomus had proposed a social media ban for children as a means to stop the rapes committed by immigrants. He asked what would be next. #FI (translated)
Otto Juote wrote that in Finland everyone had freedom of opinion and a wide right to express viewpoints allowed within its framework. #mielipidevapaus #Suomi #oikeudet (translated)
Jari Mäkäräinen criticized Sanna Ukkola's writing about the Prime Minister's meeting with Imam Sharmarke Said Aw-Mussen. According to Mäkäräinen, Ukkola regarded the meeting as ordinary work and believed that the imam, who was born in Turku, was being asked impossible questions regarding Sharia. Mäkäräinen argued that asking the imam was not a misunderstanding: in his view, the imam left open whether Sharia would be applied in Finland in family or criminal law matters. Mäkäräinen wrote that, according to him, freedom of religion did not justify the establishment of a parallel legal system alongside Finnish laws. He claimed that in Muslim-majority countries, freedom of religion, women's equality, and individual rights were not realized in liberal democracies due to Islamic doctrine and Sharia. He cited Lebanon as an example, where he believed the growth of the Muslim population and political organization undermined previous balance and led to civil war. In France, Sweden, Belgium, and Britain, he mentioned the visibility of parallel societies, honor-based violence, segregation of areas and schools, and pressure to accept practices related to Sharia. In Finland in the 2000s, Mäkäräinen claimed that groups with a Muslim background who had immigrated were connected to the overrepresentation of sexual offenses, unemployment, use of social security, and demands for their own rules. He believed that distinguishing criticism of Islam from calls for deportation did not make questions about Sharia suspect. According to Mäkäräinen, the primacy of the Finnish Constitution and criminal law should be clear in all matters, and Finland did not need to repeat the experiences of countries where the application of Sharia had been tried. https://t.co/bGpZ7VaTux #uskonnonvapaus #integratio #muslimit (translated)
The author believed that this was not about individual silliness, but a long list indicated to him that racism had been toyed with throughout the entire term. He said that nothing real had been done about the issue. https://t.co/b2ouwo85hW #rasismi #oikeudet #politiikka #FI (translated)
Klaus said he had responded to a user named Sukkola, who he claimed had blocked him. He stated that his criticism was directed at Said Aw-Musse's position as a religious authority rather than at his personal actions. Klaus described classical Sunni Islam as a tradition in which sharia is seen as divinely ordained and as a legal system superior to human laws. According to him, it included legal, moral, and social rules regarding, among other things, testimony, inheritance, apostasy, and legislative authority. Klaus wrote that Aw-Musse had studied theology in Saudi Arabia and worked in a mosque where the teachings of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab had been used. He described this figure as an ultra-conservative thinker who demanded the return of Islam to its literal roots. According to Klaus, Aw-Musse's refusal to clarify his position on the primacy of Finnish law and the status of sharia justified suspicion. Merely following the law, in his opinion, did not indicate whether he considered the constitutional order of Finland to be just and final or a temporary imposition. Klaus expressed a desire to know what kind of Finland Aw-Musse envisioned in 50 or 100 years. Klaus believed that questions regarding women's rights, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and criminal law were not leading him into a trap but were inquiries into whether Aw-Musse accepted the principles of the Finnish rule of law. He deemed Aw-Musse's public stance significant for its societal relevance due to his religious role. According to Klaus, integration required not only adherence to the law but also acceptance of fundamental values. #uskonto #oikeudet #kulttuuri (translated)
Pjotr Debatt considered HS's writing a proper and fairly straightforward statement against face-covering cloaks. According to him, leftist parties often prioritized solidarity towards immigrants over women's rights, while moderate centrists and liberal circles remained silent to avoid allegations of capitulating. #naistenoikeudet #maahanmuutto #politiikka (translated)
Johannes Yrttiaho stated that he had submitted a dissenting opinion to the constitutional law committee's statement on the so-called criminal investigation legislation. According to him, the proposed intelligence powers for the police did not meet the requirements of the constitution. https://t.co/3N3M5bks4b #perustuslaki #rikostiedustelu #oikeudet (translated)
Rami Kurimo commented on the government's decision and wrote that in the future, people would have better opportunities to find out what the state, welfare areas, and municipalities purchased, from whom, and for what amount. He referred to Helsingin Sanomat as a source. https://t.co/8ALlDU3Vbc #hallitus #oikeudet #läpinäkyvyys (translated)
Alex Günsberg wrote that the Ministry of Finance had proposed raising the minimum retirement age to 70. He stated that people had been paying pension contributions throughout their working lives with the promise that retirement would begin at a certain age, but now the threshold had been moved without asking them. Günsberg estimated that the changes would continue until there was no clear limit to the retirement age. He claimed that pension funds were the property of the state and described people as becoming dependent on the support of a socialist central planner. #eläke #vanhuuseläke #oikeudet (translated)
Mika Merano wrote that he fundamentally believes it is wrong to think that the state owns children. According to him, the consequences of multiculturalism and inclusion particularly impact the children of families who cannot afford to choose. Merano said he understands the attractiveness of homeschooling if the alternative is a school that he described as having been proven excellent using Adlercreutz's observation method, but where instead of a peaceful learning environment and discipline there is language incompetence and restlessness. He compared the situation to those schools that students who experienced the peak years of PISA results remember. (translated)
Martti Paldanius claimed that one of the greatest threats to women in Finland was the prevalence of cultures where violence against women was accepted. According to him, Virta did not speak about this. Paldanius wrote that Finland should not accept violence against women. #kulttuuri (translated)
