Aggregated public profile · Not an official account.

Otto Juote wrote that Finland should time its economic crisis to coincide with that of France. According to him, the collapse of France would force the ECB and the eurozone into exceptional rescue operations, allowing Finland to integrate its crisis into a broader solution and shift part of its costs onto the eurozone. Juote assessed that Finland would be at the mercy of others if it faced a crisis alone, but could benefit from France's negotiating power. He argued that it would be better for Finland to be part of the rescue operation than to be left to be saved alone later, and emphasized that this strategy is essential, in his view. #talouskriisi #Ranska #Euroalue (translated)

Otto Juote wrote that it would be important to clarify and publish the names of those members of the National Coalition Party who, according to him, pressured and threatened Otto Meri to remove the public name list he had shared. Juote claimed that after Meri brought the scandal to public attention, some of his party colleagues decided to make an example out of him. #politiikka #skandaali #demokratia (translated)

Otto Juote wrote that in the future, milk sold in Finland should be mixed with about 8-22 percent oat milk or ethylene glycol. According to him, this would be scientifically the most sensible to implement by amending the dairy obligation. Juote responded to a question about the reasoning with profanity and linked his view to the National Coalition Party. #maito #kauramaito #Suomi (translated)

Otto Juote wrote that the citizenship test assesses whether an applicant for citizenship other than Finnish has sufficient knowledge and skills to obtain citizenship if other conditions are met. He suggested that anyone could perhaps become a Kurd, but Finns are a people, and a passport or language skills alone do not make a person Finnish. #kansalaisuus #Suomi #monikulttuurisuus (translated)

Otto Juote wrote that according to the National Coalition Party, it is time for the next government to publish Tiitinen's list. He said that Orpo had criticized the future prime minister and demanded an end to the delays and excuses, as well as the publication of the list. #TiitisenLista #Kokoomus #Politiikka (translated)

Otto Juote asked whether it was true that the abolition of inheritance tax failed in the government because the National Coalition Party and the Swedish People's Party did not agree to the conditions set by the Finns Party regarding cuts to development aid and tightening immigration policies. #perintövero #politiikka #Suomi (translated)

Otto Juote wrote that, in his opinion, the YEL reform would not improve the situation for entrepreneurs during the current government term. He justified his view by saying that the law would not come into effect until 2028 and that it would not apply to any entrepreneur before the parliamentary elections in spring 2027. Juote argued that the timeline was politically intentional: according to him, the National Coalition Party could present itself as the initiator of the reform before the elections while avoiding responsibility for the consequences, which would only begin in the next term. He suspected that a blue-red government formed after the elections could annul or postpone the reform and anticipated that the SDP would demand its cancellation. Juote noted that no invoices based on the new model had yet been sent, nor had implementation decisions been made. According to him, the new parliament could repeal the law or postpone its entry into force with a simple legislative amendment, allowing the practices of the 2023 model to continue. He also questioned the information systems as an official basis for a delay extending to 2028 and assessed that the postponement would give the National Coalition Party the opportunity to leave the implementation of the reform to the next government. Juote claimed that the National Coalition Party did not want to reform YEL during any government term. #YEL #politiikka #uudistus (translated)

Otto Juote criticized the National Coalition Party for allegedly abandoning its values and becoming an assistant to the right-wing government. He wrote that disappointed voters were shifting to support the Left Alliance and the Social Democratic Party and questioned where the previously promised projects, such as Garden Helsinki, senior spa vouchers, and the sale of natural monopolies to international investors, had gone. Juote ironically described the National Coalition Party as a leftist social-liberal party, which in his view had previously supported, among other things, state-owned projects, service vouchers, increased immigration from developing countries, climate actions, and support packages. He claimed that the party had also held onto acquired benefits while it spoke of cuts and reducing debt. Additionally, Juote asked why discussions about entrepreneurship, economic growth, and warnings about right-wing policies seemed to have disappeared from the party. He wrote that Orpo's National Coalition Party no longer reflected the pragmatic interest group and system party that he had previously supported. Juote estimated that he would likely vote for a red tie-wearing socialist in the upcoming elections instead of a blue tie-wearing one for the first time. #Kokoomus #Vasemmistoliitto #Politiikka (translated)

You mentioned that @SuomenPoliisi prohibited you from discussing matters related to the investigation. Did the police explain what this prohibition is based on? According to Section 5 of Chapter 11 of the Preliminary Investigation Act, a prohibition must be given in writing and formally communicated. It must specify the subject of the prohibition, the duration of the prohibition, and the potential penalties. The prohibition can only relate to matters that have come to light in the investigation, which do not concern the prohibited person themselves and which they did not previously know. Moreover, their disclosure must additionally be able to complicate the investigation or cause harm or disadvantage to someone. What was such a matter in this case? The investigation concerns a message that has already been published. The suspect's own suspicion of a crime, their own message, and what the police have reported regarding their status concern the suspect themselves. The prohibition does not extend to them, nor does Paragraph 2 of Section 23 of the Publicity Act, which only pertains to confidential information regarding other individuals obtained as parties involved. The police must also clarify the content of the confidentiality obligation (ETL 11:6). Was that done? If the police prohibited the recording of the interrogation or the publication of its content, what is the legal basis for the restriction, and what information does it pertain to? If the suspect cannot record, will the police record it themselves? The interrogation must be recorded when the method of its conduct should be able to be verified later (ETL 9:3). In this matter, the basis is evident. The suspect has the right to remain silent. You can refuse to answer until the binding nature, basis, and scope of the prohibition have been clarified (and, of course, otherwise as well). You do not have to guess the limits of an ambiguous prohibition. The police do not need to allow the publication of all material in advance. But if an authority claims that revealing information is punishable, the basis and subject of the prohibition must be specified. If it was a request, it should not be presented as an obligation, and such a request can always be met with a mocking belly laugh. #Suomi #oikeus #poliisi (translated)

Why hasn't Nahom Hagos been deported? Those demanding deportation clearly don't grasp the kind of public sector employer we are dealing with. One person-year corresponds to about 1,600–1,700 working hours, and Hagos's entire bureaucratic path from the reception center to repeated criminal convictions and victim care has tied up an estimated 14–25 person-years of publicly funded work. Even entry, integration efforts, and the reception center phase consumed a couple of years of work, on top of which come the continuous handling of social assistance, substance abuse social work, and staff resources for shelters for the homeless. With the criminal history, the machinery was really set in motion: three extensive rape investigations, property and drug offenses, and escapes kept the police very busy. Prosecutors, several levels of the judiciary, public defenders, and interpreters in turn worked through about another person-year in the courtrooms. The largest share of the workload comes from incarceration. Daily monitoring, administration, and prison healthcare average about 0.6–0.8 person-years per inmate per year, which, together with long sentences and probation supervision, amounts to 4–6.5 person-years. However, Hagos's widest impact is through the victims: acute hospital care for fractures, forensic examinations, years of trauma therapy, victim support services, and assistance for elderly victims with diminished functionality demand as much as 3–5 person-years from public healthcare and social services. The authority chain caused by a single man thus corresponds at best to the annual total work contribution of a small agency or department. From the perspective of public sector demand, Hagos is a rapacious gold mine. Such a man cannot be deported! #karkottaminen #julkinensektori #rikollisuus (translated)

Asiaton ajattelu, kirjoittaminen tai puhuminen voi täyttää ajatusrikoksen tunnusmerkistön. Viranomaisiin kohdistettu, asialliseksikin tarkoitettu kritiikki tuomitaan toverituomioistuimissa usein joko instituutiosuojan rikkomuksena tai tuottamuksellisena maalitusrikoksena. #ajatteluvapaus #kritiikki #sanavapaus

Disinfokenttä värähtelee ja resonoi. Yhä useampi selvännäkijä, rajankävijä ja telepaatikko raportoi huolestuttavista muutoksista kentän pintakuviossa. Suuret Muinaiset osoittavat heräämisen merkkejä. Jotain suunnatonta liikkuu syvimmissä syvyyksissä. On vain ajan kysymys koska jotakin luiskahtaa todellisuutemme tälle puolen ja silloin on jokainen avoin mieli kuin linnoitus, jonka portit on jätetty auki ja vartioimatta. On siis toimittava nyt! Suomen on rakennettava järkkymätön psyykkinen Maginot-linja syöverin voimia, valtoja ja entiteettejä vastaan ennen kuin mielen riivaajat ovat täällä! Onneksi puolustukseen ryhmittymistä johtaa Suomen Kwisatz Haderach, librariaani ja reservin aseistakieltäytyjä Janne Riiheläinen🔥 Mielisota nyt!: https://t.co/41u9B0gFjx #mielisota #tietoisuus #muinaiset