Search

Max Hübner described the government's narrative as "full of holes" and accused it of exploiting tragedy to push through a censorship law. He pointed to Gawkowski's statements: first, he was supposed to inform about the immediate blocking of accounts, and a minute later say that a law is needed to block such content and that the government expects it to be signed by the president. https://t.co/SW6JsB20HI #Cenzura #Polityka #WolnośćSłowa (translated)

Jarek Olechowski wrote that those supporting Donald Tusk had created a fake graphic bar resembling materials from Republic TV and were using it to attack the station and demand that the National Broadcasting Council revoke its license. He claimed that the graphic was marked as generated by artificial intelligence, yet it was still disseminated by politicians from the Civic Coalition and journalists supporting the government. He described Republic as the largest news television in Poland and the only major station completely independent of the authorities, and compared the actions described to the Russian machine aimed at freedom of speech and Polish democracy. #WolnośćSłowa #Demokracja #Media (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that after information from the services about possible attacks on the prime minister and the head of the Ministry of National Defense appeared, a wave of comments emerged under the article of one of the largest portals. As he noted, some of them contained mockery, while others openly expressed satisfaction. He asked whether such reactions still fall within the limits of freedom of speech. https://t.co/SFOFj0cbTO #WolnośćSłowa #Polityka #Komentarze #PL (translated)

Chrzanik recalled Donald Tusk's morning statement, in which he announced the intention to once again present the bill to the president and stated that freedom of speech does not include spreading aggression and should have limits. Tusk also warned against the debate on access to weapons. Chrzanik imagined that if Karol Nawrocki were to veto the bill again, voices would arise blaming him for every subsequent attack. #WolnośćSłowa #DebataPubliczna #Polska (translated)

Jan Molski wrote that according to the MP from Poznań, fascism means "verbal attack." He insultingly assessed the MP and stated that even President Jaśkowiak could not tolerate her. He also claimed that the actions related to the DSA were intended to silence the opposition on the internet and called for resistance. https://t.co/NnrP2Hse1J #wolnośćsłowa #opozycja #DSA (translated)

Filip Zator wrote that the KO MP Kierzek-Koperska described a verbal attack on another person as fascism. He added that, in his opinion, the authorities want to combat this understood fascism through the DSA law, which — he claimed — the MP herself admitted. He called on the president to veto the law and warned that otherwise reality would resemble "Orwell IRL." #faszyzm #wolnośćsłowa #DSA (translated)

The author of the entry wrote that in his speech he presented a concerning picture of the media situation in Poland and warned about the threats to freedom of speech. He mentioned actions against Telewizja Republika, pressure on advertisers, and plans referenced in the attached link. https://t.co/0zSGzhR9j9 #WolnośćSłowa #Media #Cenzura #PL (translated)

The author of the post wrote that the police boasted about arresting 59 people for online jokes referring to recent school attacks. They questioned the connection between the jokers and the individuals attacking with knives and assessed the police's actions as an absurd spectacle. #Polska #Bezpieczeństwo #WolnośćSłowa #PL (translated)

Ewa wrote that Nawrocki vetoed the law that, according to her, was supposed to protect Polish children from threats on the internet. She accused him of defending freedom of speech and suggested that the absence of censorship helped him gain votes. She added that this information was conveyed by the wife of the man she referred to as a pimp. https://t.co/AtPgpXVaCf #polityka #wolnośćsłowa #dzieci (translated)

The author of the post suggested that someone would soon lose their position. He claimed that the prime minister instructed to find a challenge and accused him of exploiting the tragedy to push for internet censorship. https://t.co/0y46SJotKr #Cenzura #Polityka #WolnośćSłowa #PL (translated)

Adam Czarnecki recommended the entry of Niebezpiecznik criticizing the draft act implementing the DSA, which — as he wrote — is bad. According to Czarnecki, the draft stipulated that the President of the Office of Electronic Communications could issue orders to remove or block content. Until now, it was an independent civil court that decided whether a statement violated the law or someone's rights, in proceedings where both parties could defend themselves. Czarnecki claimed that according to the draft, an official could independently assess the legality of content, the proceedings would primarily rely on evidence provided by the complainant, the author of the entry would not have the guarantee of being heard before the block, and the order would be subject to immediate execution. He assessed that an appeal to the administrative court would not solve the problem, as the court would only verify the formal correctness of the office's actions, and the content could disappear from the internet for many months before the case is considered. According to Czarnecki, the draft also included the protection of personal rights. He warned that a councilor, mayor, minister, or company that deemed a critical article or comment offensive could use a fast track to file a request to the office instead of seeking redress in court. He also pointed out that this procedure did not cover the leaks of personal data of ordinary citizens. Czarnecki accused Donald Tusk of exploiting the current attacks in schools to introduce regulations. He referred to Krzysztof Bosak's term, who called it "disgusting exploitation of tragedy." He appealed for improvements to the law instead of its quick enactment. He added that the ABW can already block content of a terrorist nature under EU regulation 2021/784 and a law signed by President Andrzej Duda in 2024. #DSA #Ustawa #WolnośćSłowa (translated)

Sławek Jastrzębowski wrote that the president never said the words attributed to him anywhere and called the quote a disgusting lie. He used an insulting term of a Bolshevik nature against Gawkowski and accused him of lying without restraint. He added that Bolsheviks always feared freedom of speech the most and would do everything to take it away, after which he declared his opposition. #WolnośćSłowa #Polityka #Kłamstwo (translated)

The author wrote that violence and hatred, including on the internet, did not represent freedom of speech for him, but rather a violation of rights and civil liberties that requires a decisive response from the state. He added that the law adopted that day is intended to enable the blocking of dangerous content online, and expressed hope that this time the president would not veto it. #WolnośćSłowa #Bezpieczeństwo #Prawo #PL (translated)

Krzysztof Sałek from KO in Stalowa Wola wrote that in light of the latest reports about atypical groups and "challenges" on TikTok, the state should monitor and supervise the content and quickly remove harmful ones. He emphasized that in his opinion, this is not a political action nor aimed at anyone, and it does not constitute an attack on freedom of speech. https://t.co/o5cnUlT4bN #TikTok #bezpieczeństwo #wolnośćsłowa (translated)

The author of the post opposed the censorship that, as he wrote, was being pushed by the EU and the government. He stated that the arbitrariness of social media platforms should be restricted instead of limiting the freedom of speech of Poles. https://t.co/dCJEmJE28W #WolnośćSłowa #Cenzura #Polska #PL (translated)

The author of the post opposed censorship, which he attributed to the actions of the EU and the government. He wrote that instead of limiting the freedom of speech of Poles, the arbitrary power of social media platforms should be limited. https://t.co/bbzXWju2EX #WolnośćSłowa #Cenzura #Polska #PL (translated)

Konrad Berkowicz wrote that the Speaker of the Sejm, whom he described as the second person in the state, spoke from the stage in a vulgar manner about defecating and invited people to use drugs and engage in casual sex with him and members of his party. He added that the deputies had been chanting vulgar slogans, and some described the President of the Republic of Poland with offensive words suggesting pimping and criminality. Berkowicz noted that the same individuals were outraged by the term "courtesan" and stated that the truth upset them the most. #Polityka #Sejm #WolnośćSłowa (translated)