Once again – a meeting that has not been reported raises questions Yesterday, I wrote about Nooshi Dadgostar's participation in the Stockholm mosque's 25th anniversary. Now similar questions arise regarding her participation in the Somali National Federation's annual meeting last year. Neither the Left Party nor the Somali National Federation has publicly reported on the meeting or the issues discussed there. What were the discussions about? Were issues such as equality, child marriage, female genital mutilation, and niqab discussed? Or was the meeting about political representation, candidates, and party lists? I also want to know how the Left Party views the risk that patriarchal or clan-based power structures gain political influence under concepts such as multiculturalism, representation, and cooperation. The question is particularly relevant as I already warned in Fokus on January 12, 2026, eight months before the election, about clan- and network-based mobilization and how such collective mobilization can affect personal votes and the parties' internal processes. The article was titled “Change the electoral system – clan votes undermine democracy.” The election result now raises questions that the Left Party should answer openly: How does the party work to prevent family, clan, or other collective power structures from influencing nominations, personal votes, and political representation? Why has so little public information been provided about these meetings with organizations that claim to represent larger groups? Have there been other similar meetings with organizations that have not been reported in the party's own channels? Democracy is built on transparency, the individual's free choice, and individual rights – not on collectives controlling the individual's political choices or on closed meetings without public reporting. I look forward to Nooshi Dadgostar's response. Sameh Egyptson Member of Parliament (KD) (translated)
