The author of the post criticized Nawrocki, assessing that his statements increasingly resembled those of Donald Trump. He accused him of inconsistency: earlier, he had publicly belittled the Speaker of the Sejm, presenting him as a substitute for Donald Tusk, and later spoke about dialogue above divisions and the good of the Fatherland. The author inferred from Nawrocki's statements that he was counting on a real dialogue with the government only after the elections in 2027. He suggested that the problem might not have been so much the agreement, but rather that the current government did not meet his political expectations. He also recalled that — in his view — Nawrocki was not elected to wait for a convenient parliamentary majority, and the Constitution did not provide for the suspension of cooperation between state bodies until the next elections. Nawrocki's declaration that dialogue was his only idea was described by the author as bizarre. He stated that the way political opponents were treated gave the impression that it was a conversation solely on Nawrocki's terms. He added that the good of the Republic should not depend on the elections in 2027 or on whether the Poles would choose a government that suited Nawrocki, calling such an approach absurd. #Polityka #Wybory2027 #Dialog (translated)




